Men/Ladies - tatts or no tatts on women?
Options
Replies
-
I don't have any, and don't think I would get any of my own accord, but if I'm hanging out with someone and they say "hey let's go get tattoos" then I think I would get "hear no evil" in script behind my right ear (the deaf one), maybe in white ink.1
-
I dig em.
2 -
-
That's their choice. However, I remember when tattoos used to actually mean something to those who had them. Nowadays, it seems like many people just do it for attention or are trying too hard to be unique.0
-
Cutaway_Collar wrote: »
I'll pay you a monthly stipend if you don't get anyI don't have any, and don't think I would get any of my own accord, but if I'm hanging out with someone and they say "hey let's go get tattoos" then I think I would get "hear no evil" in script behind my right ear (the deaf one), maybe in white ink.
How much we talkin?
0 -
Cutaway_Collar wrote: »
I updated.Cutaway_Collar wrote: »
I'll pay you a monthly stipend if you don't get anyI don't have any, and don't think I would get any of my own accord, but if I'm hanging out with someone and they say "hey let's go get tattoos" then I think I would get "hear no evil" in script behind my right ear (the deaf one), maybe in white ink.
How much we talkin?
But I like my Ray Ban's! They fit my face so welllll! I'm afraid to try any others haha0 -
Cutaway_Collar wrote: »
You use it however you wish. No legal clauses in the agreement.Cutaway_Collar wrote: »
I updated.Cutaway_Collar wrote: »
I'll pay you a monthly stipend if you don't get anyI don't have any, and don't think I would get any of my own accord, but if I'm hanging out with someone and they say "hey let's go get tattoos" then I think I would get "hear no evil" in script behind my right ear (the deaf one), maybe in white ink.
How much we talkin?
But I like my Ray Ban's! They fit my face so welllll! I'm afraid to try any others haha
Soooo we'll start next month right? 0 -
it depends on what and where
0 -
I currently have pretty much the entire left side of my back covered in a pin-up girl. No one really sees it but me (unless I'm on a beach vacation), so it's definitely not "attention seeking". (Not to mention visible tattoos wouldn't really be a great idea in my profession)
You always hear the comment, "What about when you get older? It's going to look awful." My response is, "When I get older, I'll be more concerned that my heart, mind, hips and knees are healthy. No one will care what I look like when I'm 80."
Tattoos on others really depends. I like it when tattoos follow the natural flow of the body, and I appreciate a lot of the beautiful artwork that's out there. Just because a guy/girl has tattoos doesn't automatically make me like them all. All depends on what's done and where it is, and whether it fits the personality of the person they're on. I'm not a big fan of tattoos that are kind of sporadically placed here and there and have no real cohesion to them. Just doesn't make sense.
But hey, to each their own!1 -
I got my first one last year for my 60th Birthday. It is a memorial for my Dad who passed away 30 years ago and for my son who was stillborn, he would have been 18 last year.
I am saving up for a big one on my lower back to cover some scaring but I can't decide what I want. So many amazing designs out there and then there are my own ideas and I keep changing my mind. It is a bit overwhelming. As it will be a large design it will need careful consideration.
I have a feeling it might not end there
I love nice tattoos on anyone.
ETA. It is the picture that is blurred not the tattoo
1 -
-
jjewell1981 wrote: »Alrighty let us know do you like tatts on your ladies or nah? I do, I'm all for them everywhere or just sporadic. I love them just above the lady bits off to the side, on the collarbone and ribs. I'm really into half and full sleeves on ladies too.
This is an all inclusive thread so ladies chime in too!
Am not impartial towards women who opt to wear their ink, hailing from a culture where women were marked with their patriarchal and their husbands' tribal markings before marriage - First "the micro mini skirt"ie the father's patriarchal motifs + the mother's patriarchal motifs, where "first strike" occurs following one's first menses (officially a woman) - A mark of a noble woman's primary protectors of her virtue. Once the official betrothal occurred the inking commenced. "The knee length tights" was where the father and the betrothed's markings were interwoven. Lastly, from the half-thigh towards the ankle, the young woman was stamped with her husband's patriarchal motifs only - for the complete leg. For us, the first layer of dress involves the hair from root to hips (to cover the upper body) then from the hipline down are the tatts. If one was caught in the water naked, she would not have been perceived as undressed/indecent or one to be meddled with.
For me personally,"dress" ink ie handpainted or tattoo-style lace skin tone matching stockings/tights/pantyhose are fun alternatives, along the lines of Tatul's Poppy, Tatul's Forest, Tatul's Birds, Tattoo socks Fishbone, Tattoo sock Forest symphony; Delicate and subtly playful enough to lighten the ensemble.
My sister is considering ink along her hipline to preserve our natural heritage, yet to not be too offensive, in your face about it. For us - it is a symbol of eliticism. A separation of class distinction.
Edit: Italics removed.1 -
888sisters_weight888 wrote: »jjewell1981 wrote: »Alrighty let us know do you like tatts on your ladies or nah? I do, I'm all for them everywhere or just sporadic. I love them just above the lady bits off to the side, on the collarbone and ribs. I'm really into half and full sleeves on ladies too.
This is an all inclusive thread so ladies chime in too!
Am not impartial towards women who opt to wear their ink, hailing from a culture where women were marked with their patriarchal and their husbands' tribal markings before marriage - First "the micro mini skirt"ie the father's patriarchal motifs + the mother's patriarchal motifs, where "first strike" occurs following one's first menses (officially a woman) - A mark of a noble woman's primary protectors of her virtue. Once the official betrothal occurred the inking commenced. "The knee length tights" was where the father and the betrothed's markings were interwoven. Lastly, from the half-thigh towards the ankle, the young woman was stamped with her husband's patriarchal motifs only - for the complete leg. For us, the first layer of dress involves the hair from root to hips (to cover the upper body) then from the hipline down are the tatts. If one was caught in the water naked, she would not have been perceived as undressed/indecent or one to be meddled with.
For me personally,"dress" ink ie handpainted skin tone matching stockings/tights/pantyhose are fun alternatives, along the lines of Tatul's Poppy, Tatul's Forest, Tatul's Birds, Tattoo socks Fishbone, Tattoo sock Forest symphony; Delicate and subtly playful enough to lighten the ensemble.
My sister is considering ink along her hipline to preserve our natural heritage, yet to not be too offensive, in your face about it. For us - it is a symbol of eliticism. A separation of class distinction.
Edit: Italics
You have a tramp stamp, don't you?
j/k0 -
I have tatts0
-
Motorsheen wrote: »888sisters_weight888 wrote: »jjewell1981 wrote: »Alrighty let us know do you like tatts on your ladies or nah? I do, I'm all for them everywhere or just sporadic. I love them just above the lady bits off to the side, on the collarbone and ribs. I'm really into half and full sleeves on ladies too.
This is an all inclusive thread so ladies chime in too!
Am not impartial towards women who opt to wear their ink, hailing from a culture where women were marked with their patriarchal and their husbands' tribal markings before marriage - First "the micro mini skirt"ie the father's patriarchal motifs + the mother's patriarchal motifs, where "first strike" occurs following one's first menses (officially a woman) - A mark of a noble woman's primary protectors of her virtue. Once the official betrothal occurred the inking commenced. "The knee length tights" was where the father and the betrothed's markings were interwoven. Lastly, from the half-thigh towards the ankle, the young woman was stamped with her husband's patriarchal motifs only - for the complete leg. For us, the first layer of dress involves the hair from root to hips (to cover the upper body) then from the hipline down are the tatts. If one was caught in the water naked, she would not have been perceived as undressed/indecent or one to be meddled with.
For me personally,"dress" ink ie handpainted skin tone matching stockings/tights/pantyhose are fun alternatives, along the lines of Tatul's Poppy, Tatul's Forest, Tatul's Birds, Tattoo socks Fishbone, Tattoo sock Forest symphony; Delicate and subtly playful enough to lighten the ensemble.
My sister is considering ink along her hipline to preserve our natural heritage, yet to not be too offensive, in your face about it. For us - it is a symbol of eliticism. A separation of class distinction.
Edit: Italics
You have a tramp stamp, don't you?
j/k
lmao0 -
Motorsheen wrote: »888sisters_weight888 wrote: »jjewell1981 wrote: »Alrighty let us know do you like tatts on your ladies or nah? I do, I'm all for them everywhere or just sporadic. I love them just above the lady bits off to the side, on the collarbone and ribs. I'm really into half and full sleeves on ladies too.
This is an all inclusive thread so ladies chime in too!
Am not impartial towards women who opt to wear their ink, hailing from a culture where women were marked with their patriarchal and their husbands' tribal markings before marriage - First "the micro mini skirt"ie the father's patriarchal motifs + the mother's patriarchal motifs, where "first strike" occurs following one's first menses (officially a woman) - A mark of a noble woman's primary protectors of her virtue. Once the official betrothal occurred the inking commenced. "The knee length tights" was where the father and the betrothed's markings were interwoven. Lastly, from the half-thigh towards the ankle, the young woman was stamped with her husband's patriarchal motifs only - for the complete leg. For us, the first layer of dress involves the hair from root to hips (to cover the upper body) then from the hipline down are the tatts. If one was caught in the water naked, she would not have been perceived as undressed/indecent or one to be meddled with.
For me personally,"dress" ink ie handpainted skin tone matching stockings/tights/pantyhose are fun alternatives, along the lines of Tatul's Poppy, Tatul's Forest, Tatul's Birds, Tattoo socks Fishbone, Tattoo sock Forest symphony; Delicate and subtly playful enough to lighten the ensemble.
My sister is considering ink along her hipline to preserve our natural heritage, yet to not be too offensive, in your face about it. For us - it is a symbol of eliticism. A separation of class distinction.
Edit: Italics
You have a tramp stamp, don't you?
j/k
Island Tramp - Don't I know it. Rep it 'til I die@Motorsheen :P1 -
888sisters_weight888 wrote: »Motorsheen wrote: »888sisters_weight888 wrote: »jjewell1981 wrote: »Alrighty let us know do you like tatts on your ladies or nah? I do, I'm all for them everywhere or just sporadic. I love them just above the lady bits off to the side, on the collarbone and ribs. I'm really into half and full sleeves on ladies too.
This is an all inclusive thread so ladies chime in too!
Am not impartial towards women who opt to wear their ink, hailing from a culture where women were marked with their patriarchal and their husbands' tribal markings before marriage - First "the micro mini skirt"ie the father's patriarchal motifs + the mother's patriarchal motifs, where "first strike" occurs following one's first menses (officially a woman) - A mark of a noble woman's primary protectors of her virtue. Once the official betrothal occurred the inking commenced. "The knee length tights" was where the father and the betrothed's markings were interwoven. Lastly, from the half-thigh towards the ankle, the young woman was stamped with her husband's patriarchal motifs only - for the complete leg. For us, the first layer of dress involves the hair from root to hips (to cover the upper body) then from the hipline down are the tatts. If one was caught in the water naked, she would not have been perceived as undressed/indecent or one to be meddled with.
For me personally,"dress" ink ie handpainted skin tone matching stockings/tights/pantyhose are fun alternatives, along the lines of Tatul's Poppy, Tatul's Forest, Tatul's Birds, Tattoo socks Fishbone, Tattoo sock Forest symphony; Delicate and subtly playful enough to lighten the ensemble.
My sister is considering ink along her hipline to preserve our natural heritage, yet to not be too offensive, in your face about it. For us - it is a symbol of eliticism. A separation of class distinction.
Edit: Italics
You have a tramp stamp, don't you?
j/k
Island Tramp - Don't I know it. Rep it 'til I die@Motorsheen :P
How you doing?1 -
888sisters_weight888 wrote: »Motorsheen wrote: »888sisters_weight888 wrote: »jjewell1981 wrote: »Alrighty let us know do you like tatts on your ladies or nah? I do, I'm all for them everywhere or just sporadic. I love them just above the lady bits off to the side, on the collarbone and ribs. I'm really into half and full sleeves on ladies too.
This is an all inclusive thread so ladies chime in too!
Am not impartial towards women who opt to wear their ink, hailing from a culture where women were marked with their patriarchal and their husbands' tribal markings before marriage - First "the micro mini skirt"ie the father's patriarchal motifs + the mother's patriarchal motifs, where "first strike" occurs following one's first menses (officially a woman) - A mark of a noble woman's primary protectors of her virtue. Once the official betrothal occurred the inking commenced. "The knee length tights" was where the father and the betrothed's markings were interwoven. Lastly, from the half-thigh towards the ankle, the young woman was stamped with her husband's patriarchal motifs only - for the complete leg. For us, the first layer of dress involves the hair from root to hips (to cover the upper body) then from the hipline down are the tatts. If one was caught in the water naked, she would not have been perceived as undressed/indecent or one to be meddled with.
For me personally,"dress" ink ie handpainted skin tone matching stockings/tights/pantyhose are fun alternatives, along the lines of Tatul's Poppy, Tatul's Forest, Tatul's Birds, Tattoo socks Fishbone, Tattoo sock Forest symphony; Delicate and subtly playful enough to lighten the ensemble.
My sister is considering ink along her hipline to preserve our natural heritage, yet to not be too offensive, in your face about it. For us - it is a symbol of eliticism. A separation of class distinction.
Edit: Italics
You have a tramp stamp, don't you?
j/k
Island Tramp - Don't I know it. Rep it 'til I die@Motorsheen :P
Good attitude
MAD Re5pext1 -
I have six, so yes to the tattoos. 0
-
I have 41
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.4K Getting Started
- 259.6K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 387 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.2K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 914 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions