1000-1200 calories, anyone?
buglesalmoncatgirl
Posts: 43 Member
Hello.
Have any of you been on a 1000-1200 calorie per day plan? Did you follow it strictly? What was your experience? (Plateaus, weight loss rates, sleep quality...)
It is what I am doing; I never had to go so low before.
Thanks kindly.
Have any of you been on a 1000-1200 calorie per day plan? Did you follow it strictly? What was your experience? (Plateaus, weight loss rates, sleep quality...)
It is what I am doing; I never had to go so low before.
Thanks kindly.
0
Replies
-
Or...you could exercise more.7
-
True. I am building up my workout routine gradually. I hit the gym 3 days a week and walk as often as I can.2
-
buglesalmoncatgirl wrote: »Hello.
Have any of you been on a 1000-1200 calorie per day plan? Did you follow it strictly? What was your experience? (Plateaus, weight loss rates, sleep quality...)
It is what I am doing; I never had to go so low before.
Thanks kindly.
Why does it seem this is what you must do? What are your stats? Goals? What have you tried previously? Do you have a medical condition that would require you to eat at a lower than recommended calorie level (1200 is the minimum recommended for women)?10 -
WinoGelato wrote: »buglesalmoncatgirl wrote: »Hello.
Have any of you been on a 1000-1200 calorie per day plan? Did you follow it strictly? What was your experience? (Plateaus, weight loss rates, sleep quality...)
It is what I am doing; I never had to go so low before.
Thanks kindly.
Why does it seem this is what you must do? What are your stats? Goals? What have you tried previously? Do you have a medical condition that would require you to eat at a lower than recommended calorie level (1200 is the minimum recommended for women)?
QFT. Very few women should be eating that low.3 -
Yeah... I'd murder someone if my calories were that low. Then I'd have to take up that Santa Clarita diet to cover it up. Seriously, there's no reason you need to eat below 1200. Eat at a sustainable level and lose weight more slowly
13 -
Eeek ... Can't fit my bacon and peanut butter in a 1,000 calorie diet
21 -
I read "Santa Claus" diet, and wondered what that was...11
-
addicted2cola wrote: »Yeah... I'd murder someone if my calories were that low. Then I'd have to take up that Santa Clarita diet to cover it up. Seriously, there's no reason you need to eat below 1200. Eat at a sustainable level and lose weight more slowly
BWAHAHAHA! ^^^This. So much this!
0 -
annaskiski wrote: »I read "Santa Clause" diet, and wondered what that was...
Um, milk and cookies, duh!
12 -
Mmmm all the candy, cookies and milk2
-
I have been on 1200 since the beginning of Jan. 2017. I am not very active. I have pretty much stuck to it with the exception of a couple days vacation or a meal out here and there. I have lost 16 lbs to date and 9.5". I have not had a lot of cravings which makes it easy for me to eat very well and keep treats and junk to a minimum. The 1200 calories is set for me to lose 2 lbs/week so even if I eat over I know I am still likely to lose 0.5-1.5 lbs a week. I am not looking at this like a diet that will end, but like a lifestyle change. It is working for me so far...but I'm only starting my 3rd month so that may change eventually. It definitely goes better with exercise, I am working on that somewhat.16
-
buglesalmoncatgirl wrote: »Hello.
Have any of you been on a 1000-1200 calorie per day plan? Did you follow it strictly? What was your experience? (Plateaus, weight loss rates, sleep quality...)
It is what I am doing; I never had to go so low before.
Thanks kindly.
Are you very petite? Because this range is generally for very petite, elderly, or extremely sedentary women.
Perhaps you think you need to go this low because you want to lose weight faster than is appropriate for your current size. Close to goal - a 1/2 pound a week goal is not uncommon.
But yeah @WinoGelato is correct.....what are your stats?7 -
OP what are your stats?1
-
I have been using MFP for the past 4 years. I am a small person and have no problem staying around 1200 calories. I also exercise about 3 times a week and average about 1 lb. loss each week. I have found that if I don't log, the weight creeps back. At 1200 calories, it is important to make good choices for every calorie. I don't find myself hungry if I eat healthy fats and proteins.8
-
I used to be one that would push for the 1200 calorie a day, however I found myself starving between meals or between-meal snacks, which made it easier to fail and gorge myself on unhealthy snacks, candy, etc. Plus getting to sleep was harder because I'd be hungry before going to bed, however I couldn't "afford" any more calories.
1000 calories is going to starve your body. I wouldn't even attempt that one. If you have an exercise level of zero and hardly do anything, I think the 1200 calorie intake would probably work. However, once you start moving, working out, being active in general, you are going to require more energy... that you get from calories.
Days that I have "rest day" I consume around 1400 calories a day. Days that I spend an hour and a half at the gym doing heavy lifting and cardio, I will consume up to 2000 calories. That system works for me.3 -
I sorta hate to be in the minority but after over a year I have found that if I do not keep the calories at 1200 as well as work out 3-5 times a week, the weight will simply not come off ! Sad face. I'm 54, 5'8" and have gone from 227 down to 184. Still have 25+/- to lose! Good luck friend!22
-
buglesalmoncatgirl wrote: »Hello.
Have any of you been on a 1000-1200 calorie per day plan? Did you follow it strictly? What was your experience? (Plateaus, weight loss rates, sleep quality...)
It is what I am doing; I never had to go so low before.
Thanks kindly.
1200 - 1300 is maintenance for me at my proper weight, so yes, I have to dip lower when I need to lose. It's normal for me, but I fall outside of the general norm. I don't think the experience is any different than anyone else though....I just have to eat a bit less than others. And I am a meticulous logger, weigh everything - after 12 years of journaling I know the drill, believe me.
I do get quite a bit of exercise - and while I track that on my FitBit site, I do not concern myself with how many calories I burned and if I need to "eat back" any. I try to keep below 1100, and really do best if I stay closer to 1000. If I do a LOT of exercise, and I find myself hungry, I will eat what I feel is necessary. But it does not ever really match calorie for calorie. For instance, I consumed 1036 calories on Sunday, and did a 17 mile bike ride that morning - at a decent clip, in a stiff cold wind. My Polar watch said I burned 579 calories for that ride. (Who know how accurate that really is, but all we have to go by is these devices, so...) I never found myself hungry that day - and did not feel like I had to eat extra to cover the calories I burned. But some days, I do. Yesterday I walked 4 miles, and rode about 18 miles, for an hour on the stationary bike at the gym. I was starving when I got home from the gym, and ate what wound up being an extra 300 calories. But I don't plan the calories/do any math on that stuff. I just eat what I need to, to feel good. I try to make sure get in my protein, and not eat too much sodium at night - that's really all I concern myself with. Oh and I have taken multi-vitamins, for years. That's a daily norm for me as well.4 -
1000 calories is going to starve your body. I wouldn't even attempt that one. If you have an exercise level of zero and hardly do anything, I think the 1200 calorie intake would probably work. However, once you start moving, working out, being active in general, you are going to require more energy... that you get from calories.
.
It might starve YOUR body. It certainly does not starve mine, or others that happen to be outliers.12 -
I sit at a desk all day, so I have MFP set at 1200 and if I don't exercise, I don't get that bump in calories, so I try to stay under the 1200. Is it bad for me to be on a 1200 cal diet? I'm trying to lose 6 more pounds. I'm 5'6 and 141 currently. I typically run 3-10 miles 5 days a week. (10 miles only once during the week)1
-
iv eaten 1200 since i was 232 pounds i have pcos and a heart problem though, And i am short. I add walking to burn more calories and i have an active job so i bump my calories to 1500-1800 depending on my steps and work that day (average 10-20k steps often more plus heavy lifting at work)
Some days i dont even need to eat many back i dont let it worry me to much but days i exercise alot more (just walking and work) I know i HAVE to eat more. Its not really an option to not eat back exercise following a 1200 calorie diet. Even honestly if i just add a chocolate bar to my day, Because yum and 1200 calories doesnt leave much room for snacks like that XD Good motivator to walk
Edit: im down 85 pounds in just under 10 months.5 -
I sorta hate to be in the minority but after over a year I have found that if I do not keep the calories at 1200 as well as work out 3-5 times a week, the weight will simply not come off ! Sad face. I'm 54, 5'8" and have gone from 227 down to 184. Still have 25+/- to lose! Good luck friend!
Hmmmm......medical issues or inaccurate logging?
An estimate of your maintenance with light exercise is 2082 calories. So a 1 pound a week loss should be doable at 1500 calories.
http://scoobysworkshop.com/calorie-calculator/
12 -
fitmom4lifemfp wrote: »buglesalmoncatgirl wrote: »Hello.
Have any of you been on a 1000-1200 calorie per day plan? Did you follow it strictly? What was your experience? (Plateaus, weight loss rates, sleep quality...)
It is what I am doing; I never had to go so low before.
Thanks kindly.
1200 - 1300 is maintenance for me at my proper weight, so yes, I have to dip lower when I need to lose. It's normal for me, but I fall outside of the general norm. I don't think the experience is any different than anyone else though....I just have to eat a bit less than others. And I am a meticulous logger, weigh everything - after 12 years of journaling I know the drill, believe me.
I do get quite a bit of exercise - and while I track that on my FitBit site, I do not concern myself with how many calories I burned and if I need to "eat back" any. I try to keep below 1100, and really do best if I stay closer to 1000. If I do a LOT of exercise, and I find myself hungry, I will eat what I feel is necessary. But it does not ever really match calorie for calorie. For instance, I consumed 1036 calories on Sunday, and did a 17 mile bike ride that morning - at a decent clip, in a stiff cold wind. My Polar watch said I burned 579 calories for that ride. (Who know how accurate that really is, but all we have to go by is these devices, so...) I never found myself hungry that day - and did not feel like I had to eat extra to cover the calories I burned. But some days, I do. Yesterday I walked 4 miles, and rode about 18 miles, for an hour on the stationary bike at the gym. I was starving when I got home from the gym, and ate what wound up being an extra 300 calories. But I don't plan the calories/do any math on that stuff. I just eat what I need to, to feel good. I try to make sure get in my protein, and not eat too much sodium at night - that's really all I concern myself with. Oh and I have taken multi-vitamins, for years. That's a daily norm for me as well.
Are you teeny tiny?2 -
VintageFeline wrote: »fitmom4lifemfp wrote: »buglesalmoncatgirl wrote: »Hello.
Have any of you been on a 1000-1200 calorie per day plan? Did you follow it strictly? What was your experience? (Plateaus, weight loss rates, sleep quality...)
It is what I am doing; I never had to go so low before.
Thanks kindly.
1200 - 1300 is maintenance for me at my proper weight, so yes, I have to dip lower when I need to lose. It's normal for me, but I fall outside of the general norm. I don't think the experience is any different than anyone else though....I just have to eat a bit less than others. And I am a meticulous logger, weigh everything - after 12 years of journaling I know the drill, believe me.
I do get quite a bit of exercise - and while I track that on my FitBit site, I do not concern myself with how many calories I burned and if I need to "eat back" any. I try to keep below 1100, and really do best if I stay closer to 1000. If I do a LOT of exercise, and I find myself hungry, I will eat what I feel is necessary. But it does not ever really match calorie for calorie. For instance, I consumed 1036 calories on Sunday, and did a 17 mile bike ride that morning - at a decent clip, in a stiff cold wind. My Polar watch said I burned 579 calories for that ride. (Who know how accurate that really is, but all we have to go by is these devices, so...) I never found myself hungry that day - and did not feel like I had to eat extra to cover the calories I burned. But some days, I do. Yesterday I walked 4 miles, and rode about 18 miles, for an hour on the stationary bike at the gym. I was starving when I got home from the gym, and ate what wound up being an extra 300 calories. But I don't plan the calories/do any math on that stuff. I just eat what I need to, to feel good. I try to make sure get in my protein, and not eat too much sodium at night - that's really all I concern myself with. Oh and I have taken multi-vitamins, for years. That's a daily norm for me as well.
Are you teeny tiny?
LOL. Definitely not. 5'7". 61 years old.0 -
I sit at a desk all day, so I have MFP set at 1200 and if I don't exercise, I don't get that bump in calories, so I try to stay under the 1200. Is it bad for me to be on a 1200 cal diet? I'm trying to lose 6 more pounds. I'm 5'6 and 141 currently. I typically run 3-10 miles 5 days a week. (10 miles only once during the week)
With less than 10 lbs to lose you should be aiming to lose 0.5 lb/week. With your stats, I would assume that is going to give you a higher baseline calorie target than 1200. What rate are you currently losing at? How accurate is your logging?
For what it's worth, I'm shorter (5'2) and lost most of my weight eating b/w 1500-1800 calories. I maintain a weight of 120 with a TDEE of ~2200. Setting mine at 1200 initially, even when I wasn't as active as I am now, was not enough for me. I upped my goal, eating back exercise calories still, and found that much more sustainable.5 -
fitmom4lifemfp wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »fitmom4lifemfp wrote: »buglesalmoncatgirl wrote: »Hello.
Have any of you been on a 1000-1200 calorie per day plan? Did you follow it strictly? What was your experience? (Plateaus, weight loss rates, sleep quality...)
It is what I am doing; I never had to go so low before.
Thanks kindly.
1200 - 1300 is maintenance for me at my proper weight, so yes, I have to dip lower when I need to lose. It's normal for me, but I fall outside of the general norm. I don't think the experience is any different than anyone else though....I just have to eat a bit less than others. And I am a meticulous logger, weigh everything - after 12 years of journaling I know the drill, believe me.
I do get quite a bit of exercise - and while I track that on my FitBit site, I do not concern myself with how many calories I burned and if I need to "eat back" any. I try to keep below 1100, and really do best if I stay closer to 1000. If I do a LOT of exercise, and I find myself hungry, I will eat what I feel is necessary. But it does not ever really match calorie for calorie. For instance, I consumed 1036 calories on Sunday, and did a 17 mile bike ride that morning - at a decent clip, in a stiff cold wind. My Polar watch said I burned 579 calories for that ride. (Who know how accurate that really is, but all we have to go by is these devices, so...) I never found myself hungry that day - and did not feel like I had to eat extra to cover the calories I burned. But some days, I do. Yesterday I walked 4 miles, and rode about 18 miles, for an hour on the stationary bike at the gym. I was starving when I got home from the gym, and ate what wound up being an extra 300 calories. But I don't plan the calories/do any math on that stuff. I just eat what I need to, to feel good. I try to make sure get in my protein, and not eat too much sodium at night - that's really all I concern myself with. Oh and I have taken multi-vitamins, for years. That's a daily norm for me as well.
Are you teeny tiny?
LOL. Definitely not. 5'7". 61 years old.
You must have a medical condition then? Because maintenance of 1200 calories for a 5'7 woman would be significantly outwith the usual variation.11 -
Hi! I am always put at 1200 calories and that is for a 1 to 1/2 pound loss a week. Scared to read what it would say if I wanted to lose 2 pounds per week. I have about 10 pounds to lose and I am 45. I could never go below 1200 and eat around that (and some exercise calories too) if I need it. Good luck.0
-
Hi! I am always put at 1200 calories and that is for a 1 to 1/2 pound loss a week. Scared to read what it would say if I wanted to lose 2 pounds per week. I have about 10 pounds to lose and I am 45. I could never go below 1200 and eat around that (and some exercise calories too) if I need it. Good luck.
Well, technically MFP won't go below 1200 for a recommendation, so you could put in 2 lbs/week and it would still provide you the same goal. With 10 lbs to lose you should be looking for 0.5 lb/week. You can improve consistency by making sure your logging is as accurate as possible, ideally using a food scale for all solid foods.
3 -
Hi there,
Currently I've been bringing in a lifestyle concept of a diet where everyday u want to eat like it's a general part of your life rather than physically acknowledging "oh it's another crash course diet"
With that being said based on my weight and macros to lose 2lbs roughly per week I must consume 2100 cals weekly however we all know we are average body types / consumers and all the demotions of daily food can get in the weight so from a lifestyle concept I ahoot for around 1700-1750 cals a day (HEALTHY MACROS) that way if I unintentionally slip up have a drink eat a high carb snack have a piece of candy or get tempted with fast food there is some room in my calorie consumption to still "lose" weight weekly. Now keep in mind to really make vast changes within days you must be honestly 100% consistent. I'm not however when u add in discipline , weight programs specified to your lifestyle to grow muscle, and your general diet then shooting for low calorie days versus not caring what you eat everyday will always benefit you overall from a 90-120 day diet/workout program perspective.
For all the nuances of eating low calorie days. Sleep won't get affected, physically weight loss you can see in the mirror will take place after about 5-6 days of consistent low cal days, and plateaus only occur from a muscular or strength standpoint, but diet...no. If you feel a little tired or weak in strength measure and calculate a few more carbs in your daily meal plan on days you are going to work out such as an orange or extra apple or banana to get that extra boost of fast energy as long as you are doing heavy weights that are relative to your strength levels.
I'm no expert in the concepts of essentially IF (intermittent fasting) but I do know from personal experience My head is clearer more focused I have seen more strength gains and weight loss around the waist faster with eating lower calories daily then going on these fast meaningless weight loss diets the media pushes.
Hope this helps! Let me know if you have more questions2 -
All great feedback. Thanks everyone.
I am 5'4". 32 years old. I have yo-yo'd more times than I can track (lost and gained 20lbs at least 4 times). I suspect my metabolism is slower, if you subscribe to that philosophy.
The MFP settings put me at 1200 for 2lbs per week, at 1370 for 1lb per week. To lose half a pound I need 1500-ish calories would be the amount to eat. Those are the numbers I am getting with the app.
2 -
buglesalmoncatgirl wrote: »All great feedback. Thanks everyone.
I am 5'4". 32 years old. I have yo-yo'd more times than I can track (lost and gained 20lbs at least 4 times). I suspect my metabolism is slower, if you subscribe to that philosophy.
The MFP settings put me at 1200 for 2lbs per week, at 1370 for 1lb per week. To lose half a pound I need 1500-ish calories would be the amount to eat. Those are the numbers I am getting with the app.
Unless you have a large amount of weight to lose (75+ pounds) and/or weigh more than 200 pounds, 2 pounds/week is not an appropriate goal; it's too aggressive.
Depending on how comfortable you are with accurately logging food, I'd either aim for 1 pound/week (to give wiggle room if you think you'll need it) or 0.5 pounds/week (if you're very confident that you can weigh and remember to log absolutely everything).6
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions