"How am I gaining weight in a deficit?" or: You're not losing fat because you're eating too much.
Options
Replies
-
doittoitgirl wrote: »Maxematics wrote: »Yes. It gets really annoying when people post here over and over how they're eating 1000 calories and not losing weight. They claim they're so accurate and even weigh food, then when they're asked to open their diary the truth comes out.
Sadly, I feel like I see women do this more often than men. Even with being quick to blame hypothyroidism, PCOS, carbs, etc. I never found it difficult to lose weight at all because I came equipped with a food scale, a realistic outlook, and a love for being active. Of course the same people attribute my success to my "super" metabolism, the fact that I haven't had kids, or my genes. Such nonsense.
All those things do effect weight-loss though. Do they have as large of an impact on weight-loss as calories in-calories out? Of course not. Just means some people have to be more strict than others. It's not nonsense, it's just used as an excuse for being unsuccessful in place of dietary failures.
I wasn't saying those things were nonsense; I was saying that the people who attribute my success to my genes or apparent super duper hyper metabolism are spouting nonsense. I agree that there are a multitude of factors that affect one's CO but how much of an impact it has is HIGHLY overestimated.4 -
doittoitgirl wrote: »What ever happened to that flowchart infographic to post when people complain they don't know why they aren't losing weight?
Honestly I was happy that people stopped circulating that tiresome chart. Now here it comes again!11 -
I'd like to put my 2 cents in on this discussion. Once one has honestly and accurately recorded one's calories and nutrition and is STILL not losing weight, OR inches, a visit to the doctor may be in order. (I stress inches as an importance since the scales can some times reflect water weight when there actually has been a fat loss.) I am a rare case of one of those who couldn't lose for love or money. I actually DID have health problems blocking my weight loss. One was inflammation from having a low vitamin D level which caused insulin resistance and slow metabolic rate, so, get your vitamin D level checked if you haven't already. The next was, my labs came back abnormal for both thyroid and parathyroid. I'm now getting treatment for both. Lastly, (but not necessarily an excuse) is my age...I'm older than some on this thread (56) and don't have the luxury of child-bearing hormones circulating through my wrinkled up ol carcass. Nevertheless, I don't use my age as an excuse and am logging in every day here and doing what's necessary. I hope to be soon losing weight and inches now that I am starting to recover from some of my health problems. I hope this helps someone else here. It is important to look at the WHOLE picture!23
-
I'd like to put my 2 cents in on this discussion. Once one has honestly and accurately recorded one's calories and nutrition and is STILL not losing weight, OR inches, a visit to the doctor may be in order. (I stress inches as an importance since the scales can some times reflect water weight when there actually has been a fat loss.) I am a rare case of one of those who couldn't lose for love or money. I actually DID have health problems blocking my weight loss. One was inflammation from having a low vitamin D level which caused insulin resistance and slow metabolic rate, so, get your vitamin D level checked if you haven't already. The next was, my labs came back abnormal for both thyroid and parathyroid. I'm now getting treatment for both. Lastly, (but not necessarily an excuse) is my age...I'm older than some on this thread (56) and don't have the luxury of child-bearing hormones circulating through my wrinkled up ol carcass. Nevertheless, I don't use my age as an excuse and am logging in every day here and doing what's necessary. I hope to be soon losing weight and inches now that I am starting to recover from some of my health problems. I hope this helps someone else here. It is important to look at the WHOLE picture!
Yup, 100% agree. Glad to hear you have started to recover!
0 -
Glad you're on the mend, @stit60 !
Medical problems do need to be ruled out, but like you said, generally only after the weighing and logging is as accurate as possible for both CI and CO. Getting some people to understand that part seems to be a struggle - I think a lot of folks would rather believe they have something wrong with them than it's their own inaccuracies causing their stall.
Another thing is that people tend to get very defensive when asked about their logging - they think, as mentioned above, that they're being accused of lying or just plain greed, when that's not what we mean at all when we say "you're eating more than you think". I try to find different ways of phrasing that, these days, to try and avoid triggering Defense Mode...!
Tell someone that if they were truly in a deficit they'd be losing weight, and they automatically think you're calling them a barefaced liar - while they carry on logging 1000 calories of exercise doing something minor and eating all those back. *sigh*
Being accurate is hard at the start, but it gets easier the more you do it. It's pretty much second nature to me now, and as I'm not very good at eyeballing I'm happy to keep weighing! I know that I get a bit sloppy at times, but right now it's not enough to cause me issues... if my weight loss stalled, the first thing I would do is tighten up my logging and make sure I'm weighing absolutely everything, before I (seriously) complained that I was stuck. We all gripe to friends at times, but I know that if I really do get stuck it's because I'm not doing something as well as I could.
6 -
I'd like to put my 2 cents in on this discussion. Once one has honestly and accurately recorded one's calories and nutrition and is STILL not losing weight, OR inches, a visit to the doctor may be in order. (I stress inches as an importance since the scales can some times reflect water weight when there actually has been a fat loss.) I am a rare case of one of those who couldn't lose for love or money. I actually DID have health problems blocking my weight loss. One was inflammation from having a low vitamin D level which caused insulin resistance and slow metabolic rate, so, get your vitamin D level checked if you haven't already. The next was, my labs came back abnormal for both thyroid and parathyroid. I'm now getting treatment for both. Lastly, (but not necessarily an excuse) is my age...I'm older than some on this thread (56) and don't have the luxury of child-bearing hormones circulating through my wrinkled up ol carcass. Nevertheless, I don't use my age as an excuse and am logging in every day here and doing what's necessary. I hope to be soon losing weight and inches now that I am starting to recover from some of my health problems. I hope this helps someone else here. It is important to look at the WHOLE picture!
I totally agree. I too was low in vitamin D (here in Oregon, we refer to that yellow thing in the sky as a UFO) and on top of that I'm a red head who can't be in the sun without burning. And needed thyroid meds. And, I'm 74 years old so my metabolism has slowed down from age. I also ate at about 1000 cals a day, and sometimes none at all if I forgot to eat when I smoked. This went on for up to 50 years. As I now understand it, that slowed my metabolism even more.
It took me over 3 years to get rid of 20 of the 30 lbs I gained when I quit smoking. And I retired from working at an active job, and I was diagnosed with COPD from all the years of smoking.
Even with all that, I have been at a normal weight for many years now, but have never been able to get rid of that last 10 lbs.
Since I had never needed to watch my weight before, I did pretty much whatever the "experts" told me to do. 6 months ago I joined the YMCA and upped my exercise. I am now working on strengthening my diaphragm and upper body. But, there is no way that I could do most of the exercises that are suggested without passing out due to lack of oxygen.
I just recently started studying about resetting one's metabolism and thought what the heck. Nothing else seems to work so I started eating more. I began with the 1400 suggested here. I use a program that computes the weekly daily average so it shows a trend line along with the daily ups and downs. I have used the program for many years so I have lots of control data. As of now, I'm up to almost 1600 cals a day and still showing a very slow reduction in weight.
So, it seems to me that something has improved my metabolism. I weighed 135 eating barely enough to keep me alive, and now I am losing while being in the 145-146 lb range eating much more.
Yes, I use a food scale. Yes, I track everything even my 15 cal salad.
I hope this post helps those who feel that all hope is lost. I sometimes think that the most important thing in weight issues is just being too stubborn to give up:)12 -
Ditto on The vitamin D thing. Mine was down to nearly nothing. I was a zombie. I had never felt so bad in all my life. I make sure to stay on top of my Vitamin D now. I can always tell if it's getting low because I get a funky "sleepy" feeling in my thumbs.3
-
Yep, great article. Saw it this morning on FB and read it.0
-
ThatUserNameIsAllReadyTaken wrote: »doittoitgirl wrote: »What ever happened to that flowchart infographic to post when people complain they don't know why they aren't losing weight?
Honestly I was happy that people stopped circulating that tiresome chart. Now here it comes again!
Why is the truth in an easy to read format tiresome?21 -
VintageFeline wrote: »ThatUserNameIsAllReadyTaken wrote: »doittoitgirl wrote: »What ever happened to that flowchart infographic to post when people complain they don't know why they aren't losing weight?
Honestly I was happy that people stopped circulating that tiresome chart. Now here it comes again!
Why is the truth in an easy to read format tiresome?
Gosh, good question. Wish I could answer one way or another, but the print in the chart is too small for me to read.1 -
southernoregongrape wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »ThatUserNameIsAllReadyTaken wrote: »doittoitgirl wrote: »What ever happened to that flowchart infographic to post when people complain they don't know why they aren't losing weight?
Honestly I was happy that people stopped circulating that tiresome chart. Now here it comes again!
Why is the truth in an easy to read format tiresome?
Gosh, good question. Wish I could answer one way or another, but the print in the chart is too small for me to read.
Most browsers will allow you to enlarge the page so as to make the text bigger.3 -
This is where I get confused. Assuming you are accurate in your logging and eating so that you should be losing weight, what does being close to your goal have anything to do with anything. Why does it take so long to lose the last ten or so pounds if you're adjusting your calories appropriately as you lose weight? It still should be all CICO right?1
-
VintageFeline wrote: »southernoregongrape wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »ThatUserNameIsAllReadyTaken wrote: »doittoitgirl wrote: »What ever happened to that flowchart infographic to post when people complain they don't know why they aren't losing weight?
Honestly I was happy that people stopped circulating that tiresome chart. Now here it comes again!
Why is the truth in an easy to read format tiresome?
Gosh, good question. Wish I could answer one way or another, but the print in the chart is too small for me to read.
Most browsers will allow you to enlarge the page so as to make the text bigger.
Lol. Behave.0 -
I actually measured out (by grams) exactly one serving of rocky road ice cream the other night. 170 calories and it was tiiiiiiny! Even in a small bowl it looked pathetic. My kids thought it was hilarious
The importance of accuracy in logging and measuring, especially high calorie items, cannot be overstated.11 -
CeeBeeSlim wrote: »This is where I get confused. Assuming you are accurate in your logging and eating so that you should be losing weight, what does being close to your goal have anything to do with anything. Why does it take so long to lose the last ten or so pounds if you're adjusting your calories appropriately as you lose weight? It still should be all CICO right?
Because your deficit will be smaller to remain safe. So if the safe deficit for your weight loss is now 250 calories per day as opposed to 500 calories per day, then you will lose 0.5lbs per week and not 1lb. So CICO still applies but the numbers change as you lose.2 -
VintageFeline wrote: »ThatUserNameIsAllReadyTaken wrote: »doittoitgirl wrote: »What ever happened to that flowchart infographic to post when people complain they don't know why they aren't losing weight?
Honestly I was happy that people stopped circulating that tiresome chart. Now here it comes again!
Why is the truth in an easy to read format tiresome?
It is not easy to read. When I see all those shapes of differing colors and sizes all over the page with a wall of fine print on each it makes me want to yank it of the computer screen and burn it. It is a visual circus for me, then the print is so small it's insane.3 -
ThatUserNameIsAllReadyTaken wrote: »doittoitgirl wrote: »What ever happened to that flowchart infographic to post when people complain they don't know why they aren't losing weight?
Honestly I was happy that people stopped circulating that tiresome chart. Now here it comes again!
Ah, so I'm not the only one who hates that annoying chart.12 -
@VintageFeline Thanks for the explanation. That does makes sense to me. But what if I was overly ambitious and continued to eat to lose 500 calories less - i.e. I don't go to 250 calories. Would my rate of loss automatically slow as I got closer to my goal, or would/should I continue to lose as I originally was losing? Hope that makes sense.0
-
CeeBeeSlim wrote: »@VintageFeline Thanks for the explanation. That does makes sense to me. But what if I was overly ambitious and continued to eat to lose 500 calories less - i.e. I don't go to 250 calories. Would my rate of loss automatically slow as I got closer to my goal, or would/should I continue to lose as I originally was losing? Hope that makes sense.
You could TRY to be overly ambitious but your body will most likely have other plans such as making you have uncontrollable hunger to the point of binging well beyond your TDEE to minimize that deficit.5 -
Traveler120 wrote: »ThatUserNameIsAllReadyTaken wrote: »doittoitgirl wrote: »What ever happened to that flowchart infographic to post when people complain they don't know why they aren't losing weight?
Honestly I was happy that people stopped circulating that tiresome chart. Now here it comes again!
Ah, so I'm not the only one who hates that annoying chart.
I thought I was the only one!5
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.4K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 388 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.2K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 917 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions