Swimming, water and caffiene

weluvmike69
weluvmike69 Posts: 8 Member
edited November 21 in Fitness and Exercise
Advanced/Expert Swimmer here; curious about My Own calorie-intake partnered with my own caffeine consumption. I'm Fairly certain that I Burn a Lot of calories during my swims, 1500-2000/per swim session and I swim 2x/week! I like this app bc I'm able to input my diet and among the Many restaurants that I visit, it takes into consideration my Water intake. I suppose that there *may* be an update coming to where I Could input my caffeine intake.

Replies

  • Djproulx
    Djproulx Posts: 3,084 Member
    Not quite sure of your questions here. You can input your exercise minutes to get MFP's estimate of calories burned, or as many of us do, link your device (I use a garmin 920XT) and let the data flow to MFP. I must admit that I'm curious about your swim volume, since burning 1500 calories equates to a long swim workout.

    Regarding caffeine, if you get it from coffee, you could enter that today. I don't track caffeine, so no idea if any direct caffeine input is possible.
  • usmcmp
    usmcmp Posts: 21,219 Member
    You can enter it into the notes portion. Are you trying to cut back or just tracking out of curiosity?
  • glevinso
    glevinso Posts: 1,895 Member
    Advanced/Expert Swimmer here; curious about My Own calorie-intake partnered with my own caffeine consumption. I'm Fairly certain that I Burn a Lot of calories during my swims, 1500-2000/per swim session and I swim 2x/week! I like this app bc I'm able to input my diet and among the Many restaurants that I visit, it takes into consideration my Water intake. I suppose that there *may* be an update coming to where I Could input my caffeine intake.

    What sort of volume are you doing to burn that much? For me, swimming at around 1:30/100m it will easily take me around 5000m to get to around 1000 calories. All rough calculations off my Garmin. Are you trying to tell me you are doing 2hr swims, or 10km per session?
  • lorrpb
    lorrpb Posts: 11,463 Member
    glevinso wrote: »
    Advanced/Expert Swimmer here; curious about My Own calorie-intake partnered with my own caffeine consumption. I'm Fairly certain that I Burn a Lot of calories during my swims, 1500-2000/per swim session and I swim 2x/week! I like this app bc I'm able to input my diet and among the Many restaurants that I visit, it takes into consideration my Water intake. I suppose that there *may* be an update coming to where I Could input my caffeine intake.

    What sort of volume are you doing to burn that much? For me, swimming at around 1:30/100m it will easily take me around 5000m to get to around 1000 calories. All rough calculations off my Garmin. Are you trying to tell me you are doing 2hr swims, or 10km per session?

    OP self describes as "Advanced/Expert Swimmer " so that burn might be accurate.
  • glevinso
    glevinso Posts: 1,895 Member
    lorrpb wrote: »
    glevinso wrote: »
    Advanced/Expert Swimmer here; curious about My Own calorie-intake partnered with my own caffeine consumption. I'm Fairly certain that I Burn a Lot of calories during my swims, 1500-2000/per swim session and I swim 2x/week! I like this app bc I'm able to input my diet and among the Many restaurants that I visit, it takes into consideration my Water intake. I suppose that there *may* be an update coming to where I Could input my caffeine intake.

    What sort of volume are you doing to burn that much? For me, swimming at around 1:30/100m it will easily take me around 5000m to get to around 1000 calories. All rough calculations off my Garmin. Are you trying to tell me you are doing 2hr swims, or 10km per session?

    OP self describes as "Advanced/Expert Swimmer " so that burn might be accurate.

    I saw that... and question what that even means. Unless he is nearly Olympic-level competitive, I find it hard to believe he is burning 2000 calories per session simply due to the volume required. My rough calculations based on my own experience as a solid long distance swimmer (I can swim sub-hour at an Ironman) indicate it would take 10km to get to 2000 calories in a session. Someone swimming twice a week is not likely to have the endurance to swim 10km sessions.
  • Djproulx
    Djproulx Posts: 3,084 Member
    glevinso wrote: »
    lorrpb wrote: »
    glevinso wrote: »
    Advanced/Expert Swimmer here; curious about My Own calorie-intake partnered with my own caffeine consumption. I'm Fairly certain that I Burn a Lot of calories during my swims, 1500-2000/per swim session and I swim 2x/week! I like this app bc I'm able to input my diet and among the Many restaurants that I visit, it takes into consideration my Water intake. I suppose that there *may* be an update coming to where I Could input my caffeine intake.

    What sort of volume are you doing to burn that much? For me, swimming at around 1:30/100m it will easily take me around 5000m to get to around 1000 calories. All rough calculations off my Garmin. Are you trying to tell me you are doing 2hr swims, or 10km per session?

    OP self describes as "Advanced/Expert Swimmer " so that burn might be accurate.

    I saw that... and question what that even means. Unless he is nearly Olympic-level competitive, I find it hard to believe he is burning 2000 calories per session simply due to the volume required. My rough calculations based on my own experience as a solid long distance swimmer (I can swim sub-hour at an Ironman) indicate it would take 10km to get to 2000 calories in a session. Someone swimming twice a week is not likely to have the endurance to swim 10km sessions.

    ^^^ my thoughts exactly........
  • weluvmike69
    weluvmike69 Posts: 8 Member
    lorrpb wrote: »
    glevinso wrote: »
    Advanced/Expert Swimmer here; curious about My Own calorie-intake partnered with my own caffeine consumption. I'm Fairly certain that I Burn a Lot of calories during my swims, 1500-2000/per swim session and I swim 2x/week! I like this app bc I'm able to input my diet and among the Many restaurants that I visit, it takes into consideration my Water intake. I suppose that there *may* be an update coming to where I Could input my caffeine intake.

    What sort of volume are you doing to burn that much? For me, swimming at around 1:30/100m it will easily take me around 5000m to get to around 1000 calories. All rough calculations off my Garmin. Are you trying to tell me you are doing 2hr swims, or 10km per session?

    OP self describes as "Advanced/Expert Swimmer " so that burn might be accurate.

    -~2 hour swims; every stroke with Kick/fins-Zoomers plus kickboard to Target abs. I sense some Skepticism in regard to my OG calorie burn-estimation. Just an estimation; judging from my Exhaustion level. Perhaps is just a Gross Over-Estimation though. Expert swimmer though, plus the Fins Help Isolate my abdominal muscles.
  • Djproulx
    Djproulx Posts: 3,084 Member
    What is the point of a 2 hour kick set? Do you have a specific training goal in mind?

  • stickersticker
    stickersticker Posts: 140 Member
    I'm skeptical of what I burn per 45 minute lap sessions
  • GrumpyHeadmistress
    GrumpyHeadmistress Posts: 666 Member
    There's an online calculator that gives reasonable estimates based on stroke, speed, distance etc. Might be worth a try to get an figure. Doesn't differentiate between kick and stroke sets though.

    http://www.swimmingcalculator.com/swim_calories_calculator.php
  • earlnabby
    earlnabby Posts: 8,171 Member
    There's an online calculator that gives reasonable estimates based on stroke, speed, distance etc. Might be worth a try to get an figure. Doesn't differentiate between kick and stroke sets though.

    http://www.swimmingcalculator.com/swim_calories_calculator.php

    I used that calculator plus this one: https://caloriesburnedhq.com/calories-burned-swimming/

    I then found the equivalent in MFP's database. I swim breast stroke at 1 mph. Currently I am doing 1.17 miles (42 laps). One of the calculators gives me a burn of 680 calories and the other 772 calories. The closest I found in MFP was "Swimming, Leisurely, general" which gives me a burn of 739 calories. The breast stroke burns in MFP were just too high to be believable.

    I go by distance rather than time. At 1 mph, every 3 laps takes 5 minutes. I am back in the pool after a year long break so I am actually swimming at a 65 minute mile instead of 60. I still do 5 minutes per 3 laps so I don't overestimate the burn while swimming slower. Every 5 minutes adds 53 calories to the burn. If I do the mile in 65 minutes rather than 60, there is no way I burned more calories. If anything, I may have burned fewer but not enough to worry about.
  • ryenday
    ryenday Posts: 1,540 Member
    Thank you both for those calculators! Both aligned more closely with what I *thought* I was burning and were sensibly lower than MFP estimates.
  • robm1brown
    robm1brown Posts: 71 Member
    earlnabby wrote: »
    The breast stroke burns in MFP were just too high to be believable.

    I half every exercise measure MFP gives me for that reason and quarter the tennis ones knowing that I am more efficient than they seem to players are.
  • earlnabby
    earlnabby Posts: 8,171 Member
    ryenday wrote: »
    Thank you both for those calculators! Both aligned more closely with what I *thought* I was burning and were sensibly lower than MFP estimates.

    You're welcome. Like so many things . . . if it sounds too good to be true it probably is. I would love to burn over 1000 calories per swim session but I know that there is no way. I am meticulous in my logging of food so I have a pretty good idea how much I am burning by how much I am losing on average per week.
  • Skipjack66
    Skipjack66 Posts: 102 Member
    @earlnabby - Thanks for posting this hq calculator. It is more accurate. I think that the MFP calculator is using a formula for fairly proficient/ advanced swimmers who are covering a lot of distance in the exercise time. The breast stroke calorie burn is a good example. I do 400m of breaststroke in just under 9 min, and I'm working hard. I'm proficient, but I'm an older bird and I've slowed down because of breaststroker's knee. MFP gives me 99 calories for that time and the hq calculator gives me 82. But my bet is that if I was covering more distance in my 9 minutes (about 50m more) I'd be burning at least 99 calories. The OP here who says he is expert most likely burns a lot more than the MFP numbers for the same swim.

    As for freestyle, MFP combines "light effort" with "moderate effort" which I don't think is a great idea. My usual pace for a freestyle workout is about 3km per 65 min. I always log that as "light/moderate effort" because it's not my fastest speed (fast, vigorous effort is the only next choice and I won't log that unless I'm doing sprints). The MFP calculator gives me 504 calories burned for light/moderate. If I logged it as "fast/vigorous" I would get 719. But the hq calculator gives me 630 - pretty much smack in the middle, which is pretty much how I feel about my swim - It's "moderate" effort. My guess it's probably what I'm actually burning based on my CICO (I'm losing more than the .5 lb a week I've set), so in my case MFP has been underestimating my calories burned for freestyle. However the one weird thing is that the hq calculator only gives 758 for double my distance in the hour, which at 6km an hour I'd be doing a race pace the whole time and I think I'd be burning a lot more.

    If the OP is an advanced swimmer and covering 5 or 6km an hour then I'm pretty sure his burns are close to 1000 an hour. Although I'm not sure what happens when you add zoomers into the equation. They make you work harder on your kick but they also take you further in your distance.
  • earlnabby
    earlnabby Posts: 8,171 Member
    robm1brown wrote: »
    earlnabby wrote: »
    The breast stroke burns in MFP were just too high to be believable.

    I half every exercise measure MFP gives me for that reason and quarter the tennis ones knowing that I am more efficient than they seem to players are.


    I usually cut by 1/3. Again, I can get a good sense of my burn by my average weekly weight loss so that is the number that keeps me close to my target.
  • Sarah_Shapes_Up
    Sarah_Shapes_Up Posts: 76 Member
    edited August 2017
    lorrpb wrote: »
    glevinso wrote: »
    Advanced/Expert Swimmer here; curious about My Own calorie-intake partnered with my own caffeine consumption. I'm Fairly certain that I Burn a Lot of calories during my swims, 1500-2000/per swim session and I swim 2x/week! I like this app bc I'm able to input my diet and among the Many restaurants that I visit, it takes into consideration my Water intake. I suppose that there *may* be an update coming to where I Could input my caffeine intake.

    What sort of volume are you doing to burn that much? For me, swimming at around 1:30/100m it will easily take me around 5000m to get to around 1000 calories. All rough calculations off my Garmin. Are you trying to tell me you are doing 2hr swims, or 10km per session?

    OP self describes as "Advanced/Expert Swimmer " so that burn might be accurate.

    -~2 hour swims; every stroke with Kick/fins-Zoomers plus kickboard to Target abs. I sense some Skepticism in regard to my OG calorie burn-estimation. Just an estimation; judging from my Exhaustion level. Perhaps is just a Gross Over-Estimation though. Expert swimmer though, plus the Fins Help Isolate my abdominal muscles.

    If you're really expert/advanced, that indicates a level of skill and technique involved to make swimming easier. Coupled with adaptation to the exercise, and the fact that fins, and zoomers actually make it easier to get more speed, I think you're grossly over estimating calorie burn. I was a competitive swimmer in college, and my burn would barely get that high with two 2-3 hour sessions per day swimming 100yrds at 1:30 or under. If you really want to work your abs while swimming, try butterfly kicking on your back in stream line for 200 yds without fins.
  • fbchick51
    fbchick51 Posts: 240 Member
    Skipjack66 wrote: »
    If the OP is an advanced swimmer and covering 5 or 6km an hour then I'm pretty sure his burns are close to 1000 an hour. Although I'm not sure what happens when you add zoomers into the equation. They make you work harder on your kick but they also take you further in your distance.

    Actually, I'd argue less, as the OP clearly indicates that he is using aids (Kickboard and fins). Kickboards are great for isolating the kick movements to build leg strength and improve kick performance, but it will actually reduce the calorie burn by at least half. Though, an expert swimmer it's probably more since most of the work and strength in swimming comes from the upper body strokes rather then the kicks.

    While the fins don't cut the calorie burn down, they do artificially inflate the distance and speed one can cover in a specific time without actually increasing calorie burn all that much. Which makes pretty much ALL the calorie calculators useless.

    I usually cut the calcultor estimates in half for any time spent using aides (Fins, paddles, kickboards and pull bouys).
    however, bc I'm an 'Expert' it is My contention that I burn a Tremendous amount of calories!

    Actually, your contention would be misguided as "expert" in anything tends to reduce calorie burns as strokes and kicks become more efficient and you body becomes accustomed to workouts. Though the actual difference between beginner burns and expert burns is pretty minimal to not be worth stressing about.

    If you are really curious about you actual calorie burn, rather then "perceived" (which is very fallible), keep track of the total distance swam and use the above calculator. I swim a mile 4 days a week in about 45 mins. Since about a fifth of the workout uses training aides (Who doesn't love the ab work of a flutter kick!), I calculate .8 miles at full calorie count and .2 miles at half calorie count. At 215 lbs, this gives me a solid 550 cals burned for a 45 min workout.

    That said, depending on your current weight, I can easily see 1500 calories for a solid 2 hr workout if it's primarily aid free and probably even slightly higher then 2000 cals for a 3hr workout. But if your goal is to lose weight, as your profile suggests, then being more accurate then what you perceive is pretty important.
  • earlnabby
    earlnabby Posts: 8,171 Member
    Skipjack66 wrote: »
    Today I actually swam with an expert. I shared a lane with an Olympic trials veteran. He swam 4km in 40 min. No fins. No board. Just blasting by. He must have done 10 x100 IMs. It was a sight to behold! That is what I call expert.

    We have one of those who teaches swimming at my pool. Sometimes he stays late and does his laps. Yes, it is a sight.
  • Skipjack66
    Skipjack66 Posts: 102 Member
    earlnabby wrote: »
    Skipjack66 wrote: »
    Today I actually swam with an expert. I shared a lane with an Olympic trials veteran. He swam 4km in 40 min. No fins. No board. Just blasting by. He must have done 10 x100 IMs. It was a sight to behold! That is what I call expert.

    We have one of those who teaches swimming at my pool. Sometimes he stays late and does his laps. Yes, it is a sight.

    The amazing thing is that he was not really working that hard. I mean he was working steady, but no sprints. It was nowhere near his maximal effort and it still blew me away. His breast stroke is nothing short of amazing. It made me start working on my own, because after my calculation for the 400 on MFP - I wanted to get my time down. And I managed to by another 20 sec, but maybe the real reason was that I was trying to go fast enough to stay the heck out of his way! There's nothing like having someone so good swim with you to make you want to swim better!
  • Djproulx
    Djproulx Posts: 3,084 Member
    Yes, the truly talented swimmers are impressive to watch. Their stroke seems so effortless and their glide is so smooth that it seems as if they are being pulled by a cable.
  • azulvioleta6
    azulvioleta6 Posts: 4,195 Member
    How far are you going in the full two hours?

    What exactly is your question?
  • weluvmike69
    weluvmike69 Posts: 8 Member
    fbchick51 wrote: »
    Skipjack66 wrote: »
    If the OP is an advanced swimmer and covering 5 or 6km an hour then I'm pretty sure his burns are close to 1000 an hour. Although I'm not sure what happens when you add zoomers into the equation. They make you work harder on your kick but they also take you further in your distance.

    Actually, I'd argue less, as the OP clearly indicates that he is using aids (Kickboard and fins). Kickboards are great for isolating the kick movements to build leg strength and improve kick performance, but it will actually reduce the calorie burn by at least half. Though, an expert swimmer it's probably more since most of the work and strength in swimming comes from the upper body strokes rather then the kicks.

    While the fins don't cut the calorie burn down, they do artificially inflate the distance and speed one can cover in a specific time without actually increasing calorie burn all that much. Which makes pretty much ALL the calorie calculators useless.

    I usually cut the calcultor estimates in half for any time spent using aides (Fins, paddles, kickboards and pull bouys).
    however, bc I'm an 'Expert' it is My contention that I burn a Tremendous amount of calories!

    Actually, your contention would be misguided as "expert" in anything tends to reduce calorie burns as strokes and kicks become more efficient and you body becomes accustomed to workouts. Though the actual difference between beginner burns and expert burns is pretty minimal to not be worth stressing about.

    If you are really curious about you actual calorie burn, rather then "perceived" (which is very fallible), keep track of the total distance swam and use the above calculator. I swim a mile 4 days a week in about 45 mins. Since about a fifth of the workout uses training aides (Who doesn't love the ab work of a flutter kick!), I calculate .8 miles at full calorie count and .2 miles at half calorie count. At 215 lbs, this gives me a solid 550 cals burned for a 45 min workout.

    That said, depending on your current weight, I can easily see 1500 calories for a solid 2 hr workout if it's primarily aid free and probably even slightly higher then 2000 cals for a 3hr workout. But if your goal is to lose weight, as your profile suggests, then being more accurate then what you perceive is pretty important.

    BC I actually AM an Expert when I Utilize a Kickboard in conjunction with my Zoomers, it Helps Isolate my Abdominal muscles, it's a Drill that I'm doing. I don't swim the entire workout with the Zoomers, only for a portion. And to be honest, of Course I realize that the fins assist with my propulsion, which is Why I don't use them the entire hour.5 workout!
  • matti422
    matti422 Posts: 26 Member
    I'm not sure anyone really knows what the question is here, other than something to do with calorie burn calculated by MFP. Given that the OP is "Expert" (and swimming at paces that rival competitive Olympians), I suggest he work with his coach on proper nutrition for training. Professional advice will be more useful, personalized and helpful.
  • earlnabby
    earlnabby Posts: 8,171 Member
    matti422 wrote: »
    I'm not sure anyone really knows what the question is here, other than something to do with calorie burn calculated by MFP. Given that the OP is "Expert" (and swimming at paces that rival competitive Olympians), I suggest he work with his coach on proper nutrition for training. Professional advice will be more useful, personalized and helpful.

    I try to be kind because not everyone here is a native English speaker but I have no idea what the OP is talking about or asking here either.
This discussion has been closed.