Post 'em here. All those disappointing meals you thought were healthy but are really high calorie
Options
Replies
-
Dates and ground beef.0
-
Hubby and I are both trying to lose weight. Just today, Hubby made a chicken recipe called, "Cornell Chicken". It's an awesomely delicious recipe and one we've made in the past. The marinade was 2 cups of vinegar, a cup of oil and a tbl of salt. I don't know what make us think it was harmless, after all, it was chicken. Anyway, one serving (4 oz) was 600+ calories. We won't be eating that anytime soon.
0 -
Hubby and I are both trying to lose weight. Just today, Hubby made a chicken recipe called, "Cornell Chicken". It's an awesomely delicious recipe and one we've made in the past. The marinade was 2 cups of vinegar, a cup of oil and a tbl of salt. I don't know what make us think it was harmless, after all, it was chicken. Anyway, one serving (4 oz) was 600+ calories. We won't be eating that anytime soon.
Yeah I don't even bother with marinade anymore. Too much oil!3 -
BusyRaeNOTBusty wrote: »kristen8000 wrote: »All salads at any restaurant - don't even look at them anymore.
What suprised me the most recently was Buffalo Wild Wings WHOLE menu. Recently they were required to put the calorie count on everything, which made it easier know what to avoid, but I had a hard time getting out of there under 500 calories.
My BF and I made a pact that we split meals at restaurants now - so we can have what we want and still not over eat. It's really surprising just HOW much food you get in 1 meal. Sometimes now, we don't even finish one.
The naked tenders from BWW aren't bad. 6 tenders for only 280 calories. You could even get them with a side of fries (330) and still come out at 610 calories. Dipping them in buffalo sauce won't add much either. The ranch will kill you though. And the beer.
My GF and I do this with desserts! Satisfies that sweet tooth without eating the whole dish!0 -
Everything
1 -
-
Tortilla chips. 7 chips per serving. 7. chips.0
-
MonkeyMel21 wrote: »Tortilla chips. 7 chips per serving. 7. chips.
Make sure you weigh them. You can usually have more than 7 in 1 oz.1 -
Hubby and I are both trying to lose weight. Just today, Hubby made a chicken recipe called, "Cornell Chicken". It's an awesomely delicious recipe and one we've made in the past. The marinade was 2 cups of vinegar, a cup of oil and a tbl of salt. I don't know what make us think it was harmless, after all, it was chicken. Anyway, one serving (4 oz) was 600+ calories. We won't be eating that anytime soon.
Yeah I don't even bother with marinade anymore. Too much oil!
I find marinades so hard to count becuase you do actually end up throwing out a lot of it!1 -
Hubby and I are both trying to lose weight. Just today, Hubby made a chicken recipe called, "Cornell Chicken". It's an awesomely delicious recipe and one we've made in the past. The marinade was 2 cups of vinegar, a cup of oil and a tbl of salt. I don't know what make us think it was harmless, after all, it was chicken. Anyway, one serving (4 oz) was 600+ calories. We won't be eating that anytime soon.
Cornell chicken is FANTASTIC.0 -
Jancandoit7 wrote: »half and half in my coffee is my downfall-I love coffee with cream.... I did switch to low fat half and half
(nope- not ready for the fat free version- ewwwww)
Make room for your half & half.
I did the FF version for quite a while, and it tends to curdle or separate in the coffee.0 -
The nutritional stats for sushi are pretty disappointing.3
-
Wine. I mean I knew it wasn't low calorie but I didn't realize that my favorite wine was like 600 calories a bottle. My friend and I would get together weekly and could easily drink a bottle each. A few years ago on New Year's Eve we drank an astounding five bottles of champagne over the course of the day in addition to a whole pizza. I cringe thinking about how many calories I drank that day.
Definitely had to cut wayyyyy down on the drinking.0 -
kristen8000 wrote: »All salads at any restaurant - don't even look at them anymore.
What suprised me the most recently was Buffalo Wild Wings WHOLE menu. Recently they were required to put the calorie count on everything, which made it easier know what to avoid, but I had a hard time getting out of there under 500 calories.
My BF and I made a pact that we split meals at restaurants now - so we can have what we want and still not over eat. It's really surprising just HOW much food you get in 1 meal. Sometimes now, we don't even finish one.
This was largely how I navigated my French holiday this summer. I generally split a main with our son anyway (neither of us being huge eaters) and a dessert 3 ways means about 2 bites each. Even works with cheese.
And while I know it's not restaurant's responsibility to offer low-calorie dishes on their menu, it does drive me mad to walk in somewhere, say 'whelp' and walk right back out again because nothing they offer is calorie efficient. We make amazing food at home, so I know it can be done. Fat is where the flavour's at (as an old housemate of mine would say) but the sad fact is that if you're on restrictive calories, eating out poses a challenge. I know the MFP blog goes over this in detail (and it may have been covered in this thread as well), but how wonderful would it be if those of us who have decided to take our health into our own hands voted enough with our wallets to change the trends of too-large portions, of too much unnecessary stuff added to everything to trends like more vegetables than starch on the plate, or dressing and sauces always on the side.
Hey, a girl can dream.3 -
-
stephanne13 wrote: »The nutritional stats for sushi are pretty disappointing.
It's the rice. Stick with Sashimi and the counts are much easier to manage. Specialty rolls are almost horrible because of the size and sauces (which are inevitably sugar or mayonnaise based).
2 -
kristen8000 wrote: »All salads at any restaurant - don't even look at them anymore.
What suprised me the most recently was Buffalo Wild Wings WHOLE menu. Recently they were required to put the calorie count on everything, which made it easier know what to avoid, but I had a hard time getting out of there under 500 calories.
My BF and I made a pact that we split meals at restaurants now - so we can have what we want and still not over eat. It's really surprising just HOW much food you get in 1 meal. Sometimes now, we don't even finish one.
This was largely how I navigated my French holiday this summer. I generally split a main with our son anyway (neither of us being huge eaters) and a dessert 3 ways means about 2 bites each. Even works with cheese.
And while I know it's not restaurant's responsibility to offer low-calorie dishes on their menu, it does drive me mad to walk in somewhere, say 'whelp' and walk right back out again because nothing they offer is calorie efficient. We make amazing food at home, so I know it can be done. Fat is where the flavour's at (as an old housemate of mine would say) but the sad fact is that if you're on restrictive calories, eating out poses a challenge. I know the MFP blog goes over this in detail (and it may have been covered in this thread as well), but how wonderful would it be if those of us who have decided to take our health into our own hands voted enough with our wallets to change the trends of too-large portions, of too much unnecessary stuff added to everything to trends like more vegetables than starch on the plate, or dressing and sauces always on the side.
Hey, a girl can dream.
Yes!.. Steak is usually the *only* thing that isn't smothered with added fat at just about any restaurant.
On the bright side, I get another 2-3 meals out of any meal I order at a restaurant, so I don't mind the gigantic portions... but it would be nice if a cup of broccoli, for instance, wasn't hundreds of calories. (I can't blame them though - most people don't watch their calorie intake and prefer everything doused in butter or cream sauce).2 -
stephanne13 wrote: »The nutritional stats for sushi are pretty disappointing.
Sushi is usually pretty low in calories. You can get a small platter for only ~300 calories (even the rolls with rice). Some of the rolls you get here do have a pile of mayonnaise-based sauce or cream cheese or are topped with fried shrimp- those aren't exactly going to be low cal.0 -
I didn't even know that people used oil in marinades before reading this thread. All the marinades I know of are either soy sauce based or vinegar based without oil. Regional thing, maybe?3
-
stephanne13 wrote: »The nutritional stats for sushi are pretty disappointing.
It's the rice. Stick with Sashimi and the counts are much easier to manage. Specialty rolls are almost horrible because of the size and sauces (which are inevitably sugar or mayonnaise based).
Sashimi is awesome, and I generally get ebi, maguro and amoebi sushi, which are very manageable calorie-wise (and provide a bit of protein) even with the rice. Combine that with the teeny-tiny ginger salad, the teeny-tiny clear soup, a teeny-tiny squid salad, and teeny-tiny cups of hot jasmine tea, and it is a very satisfying, low calorie dinner (if obnoxiously expensive).
My husband gets the fried shrimp heads with the amoebi...I can't stand the little bug-eyed decapitated critters looking at me.1
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.4K Getting Started
- 259.6K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 387 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.2K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 911 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions