Calories burned

natginza
natginza Posts: 6 Member
edited November 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
Hi guys!

Do you think that burn about 1500 to 1600 calories in a workout ( I use polar watch and apple, so yeah, it's real calories burned) during in a diet with 1600 calories a day at max is too much ?

Replies

  • Unknown
    edited November 2017
    This content has been removed.
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    Does your workout last three hours?

    More detail required - far more detail.
    No-one knows anything about you or your workout.
  • This content has been removed.
  • malibu927
    malibu927 Posts: 17,562 Member
    What are you doing that your watch registers 1500 calories burned?
  • rileysowner
    rileysowner Posts: 8,338 Member
    Is it possible? Yes. Is is likely? No.
  • callsitlikeiseeit
    callsitlikeiseeit Posts: 8,626 Member
    possible but not probable
  • natginza
    natginza Posts: 6 Member
    Well, i'm 1,64 cm hight and 52 kg. It takes about 3 and a half hours to burn all this calories, mixing weigth training and cardio. And it is real, i'm not super estimating.
  • collectingblues
    collectingblues Posts: 2,541 Member
    What you're not hearing is that we're saying that level of a calorie burn is difficult to create, even for endurance athletes. And if you're that tiny, it's even harder.

    What cardio are you doing that you're getting that much of a burn?
  • This content has been removed.
  • malibu927
    malibu927 Posts: 17,562 Member
    natginza wrote: »
    Well, i'm 1,64 cm hight and 52 kg. It takes about 3 and a half hours to burn all this calories, mixing weigth training and cardio. And it is real, i'm not super estimating.

    Yeah, it's not good for lifting. When I'm lifting I turn the HR sensor on my Fitbit off because it will skew everything.

    What is your goal? Lose/maintain/gain weight?
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    edited November 2017
    natginza wrote: »
    Well, i'm 1,64 cm hight and 52 kg. It takes about 3 and a half hours to burn all this calories, mixing weigth training and cardio. And it is real, i'm not super estimating.

    Three hours of cardio would be possible to burn that kind of number if you are very fit but weight training is a low calorie burner which your watch can't give an accurate estimate for.

    Do remember you can't measure energy with a watch.
    It's not "real" it's just a number on a gadget being used for a purpose it's not good at.
    Cardio can give reasonable estimate but even then intervals will seriously mess with any accuracy.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,764 Member
    natginza wrote: »
    Well, i'm 1,64 cm hight and 52 kg. It takes about 3 and a half hours to burn all this calories, mixing weigth training and cardio. And it is real, i'm not super estimating.

    Um, no. You're overestimating.

    I'm 165 cm, 57kg, and a longtime short-endurance athlete. I'm decently fit. There is literally nothing I can do for 3.5 hours continuously that will burn anything like that number of calories.

    And, if you're 52 kg, regularly eating 1600 "at max" gross calories, and exercising (energetically or otherwise) for 3.5 hours a day, you're seriously and dangerously underfueling yourself. Not a good plan.
  • Graelwyn75
    Graelwyn75 Posts: 4,404 Member
    I used to regularly get in 1200-1500 calorie burns, back when I was 62kg, but obviously, I was heavier then you, and as with everything, my chest strap based HRM might have been out. It was hard work and involved an hour and a half of my own cardio as well as a boxing class, weights and walking. I was very fit and very lean. I did not gain weight eating all of those back (and keeping them in). But it would take pretty darn intense training to burn that much at your weight, or several intense sessions per day.

    Also - why are you doing that much exercise in one day? I note no-one has asked that yet.
    For me, it was because it was immense stress relief, a challenge to prove to myself I could reach that level of fitness and to a degree, it was a bit of an addiction.
  • natginza
    natginza Posts: 6 Member
    6k8slfqiy60v.pngdlpo53k0cdy2.png
    that’s by Apple Watch and by Polar ft4 I burned 1600 Yes, it was a very moderate/ intense cardio and from weights just abou 150 kcal. It was a challenge I wanted to make with myself and I was wondering if it is too bad do it often
  • rileysowner
    rileysowner Posts: 8,338 Member
    natginza wrote: »
    6k8slfqiy60v.pngdlpo53k0cdy2.png
    that’s by Apple Watch and by Polar ft4 I burned 1600 Yes, it was a very moderate/ intense cardio and from weights just abou 150 kcal. It was a challenge I wanted to make with myself and I was wondering if it is too bad do it often

    I don't think you are hearing what people are saying. These gadgets are not as accurate as you think they are. The numbers they would give for weight lifting would be completely wrong.

    Realize this, it is very difficult to get the sort of burns you say you are getting. As a 200 pound male I only get close to this when cycling 3 hours or so.

    As to wondering if that sort of exercise level is bad to do often, it depends on what you mean by often. It would depend on you rest days, recovery program, and how you are eating to replenish your body.
  • Zedeff
    Zedeff Posts: 651 Member
    edited November 2017
    You (and your watch) are assuming that exercise + tachycardia = calorie burn.

    I can give myself a heart rate of 142 bpm without exercising. I can take stimulants, I can get scared, I can hold my breath... or I could get dehydrated. I'm willing to bet that after 3 continuous hours of aerobic exercise that you were quite dehydrated, and that your heart rate monitor was attributing your tachycardia to calorie burning.

    Just look at your two sessions. You did 220 calories in 40 minutes, and then 1200 calories in 3 hours. Do you think that you were actually working 20% harder for almost five times as long without getting fatigued and burning out? That seems unlikely.
  • PAV8888
    PAV8888 Posts: 14,356 Member
    edited November 2017
    Regardless of whether the OP burned 1600 Cal in 3.5 hours while eating 1600. Or burned 900 Cal in 3 hours while eating 1600.

    Eating 1600 calories and exercising on an elliptical for 3.5 hours... and asking if it would be "bad to do often" does not sound like a great diet and exercise plan for long term health.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,764 Member
    edited November 2017
    PAV8888 wrote: »
    Regardless of whether the OP burned 1600 Cal in 3.5 hours while eating 1600. Or burned 900 Cal in 3 hours while eating 1600.

    Eating 1600 calories and exercising on an elliptical for 3.5 hours... and asking if it would be "bad to do often" does not sound like a great diet and exercise plan for long term health.

    Yup. Either way, it's Just Wrong. Prediction, based on behavior so far: She will not listen to everyone.
  • This content has been removed.
  • thunderchild007
    thunderchild007 Posts: 43 Member
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    PAV8888 wrote: »

    Yup. Either way, it's Just Wrong. Prediction, based on behavior so far: She will not listen to everyone.

    I think you are slightly wrong, OP does not want to listen to anyone!
  • ZedTop
    ZedTop Posts: 58 Member
    moral of the story - take your fitbits and other gadgets straight to the garbage bin

    LOL
This discussion has been closed.