Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Exercise as a punishment in middle schoolers

1356

Replies

  • Posts: 5,727 Member
    Jruzer wrote: »

    You are obviously free to disagree with the policy.

    But your last sentence seems disingenuous to me. No one is claiming that exercise is a threat. I'm claiming that this teacher's punishment is unwarranted and unfair. Obviously in PE kids should be exercising.

    Except that those two statements are mutually exclusive

    You can't have both
    I'm claiming that this teacher's punishment is unwarranted and unfair.
    And
    Obviously in PE kids should be exercising.

  • Posts: 7,122 Member
    edited November 2017
    Jruzer wrote: »

    You are obviously free to disagree with the policy.

    But your last sentence seems disingenuous to me. No one is claiming that exercise is a threat. I'm claiming that this teacher's punishment is unwarranted and unfair. Obviously in PE kids should be exercising.

    If exercise is not a threat and is something the kids should obviously be doing in PE, then in what way is exercise a punishment?
  • Posts: 3,502 Member

    Just demonstrates that you have poor reading comprehension skills.

    None of that supports your case

    Further, here is a position statement from SHAPE which clarifies their position:
    https://www.shapeamerica.org//advocacy/positionstatements/pa/upload/Using-Physical-Activity-as-Punishment-2009.pdf
    A student’s motivation for being physically active by engaging in the important subject matter
    content of physical education and sport should never fall victim to the inappropriate use of
    physical activity as a disciplinary consequence. SHAPE America supports that view in its
    National Standards for Sport Coaches: Quality Coaches, Quality Sports, which states that
    coaches should “never use physical activity or peer pressure as a means of disciplining athlete
    behavior” (NASPE, 2005, p. 17).
    Examples of the inappropriate use of physical activity include:
     Withholding physical education class or recess time for students to complete unfinished
    school work or as a consequence for misbehavior;
     Forcing students to run laps or perform push-ups because of behavioral infractions (e.g.,
    showing up late, talking, and disruptive behavior);
    Threatening students with physical activity or no physical activity (e.g., no recess, no
    game time), and then removing the threat because of good behavior; and

     Making students run for losing a game or for poor performance (e.g., missing a foul shot,
    dropping the football).

    Feel free to disagree with the policy, but its intent is clear.
  • Posts: 5,789 Member
    edited November 2017
    Not sure why people think that body weight exercises/running isn't part of the curriculum

    ^^This, and usually it was for one day (and structured via curriculum). If we were screwing around during a game or something, we went to the weight room for the day...

    I don't see the issue, it wasn't a big deal.
  • Posts: 5,727 Member
    Jruzer wrote: »

    Further, here is a position statement from SHAPE which clarifies their position:
    https://www.shapeamerica.org//advocacy/positionstatements/pa/upload/Using-Physical-Activity-as-Punishment-2009.pdf

    Feel free to disagree with the policy, but its intent is clear.

    Not sure who this group is, but it's pretty clear they don't understand coaching or Physical training.
     Making students run for losing a game or for poor performance (e.g., missing a foul shot,
    dropping the football).
  • Posts: 5,600 Member
    Jruzer wrote: »

    Further, here is a position statement from SHAPE which clarifies their position:
    https://www.shapeamerica.org//advocacy/positionstatements/pa/upload/Using-Physical-Activity-as-Punishment-2009.pdf

    Feel free to disagree with the policy, but its intent is clear.

    and we are back to this - this occurred during a regularly scheduled PT session - so there is no threat of withholding recess or game time - calisthenics occur as part of a regularly scheduled PT curriculum - just because the teacher is not rewarding cheating (because face it, that is what this is all about) with the continuation of a game in which they were cheating...

    i would love to see what NASPE says is an appropriate punishment for cheating...because that is how (and this is me on my soapbox) we end up in a society where an adult cheats in a race and instead of highlighting how wrong it is - the general discussion is - why should I care, it doesn't affect me - allowing cheating early on with punishment to address the wrong doing is as bad
  • Posts: 335 Member
    I wonder if the teacher was formerly in the service. Did he make them wear PT belts?
  • Posts: 3,502 Member
    Aaron_K123 wrote: »

    If exercise is not a threat and is something the kids should obviously be doing in PE, then in what way is exercise a punishment?

    I'm sorry, @Aaron_K123 and @stanmann571, it seems that you are willfully misreading me.

    I'm going away after this post and may dive in again later today.

    Exercise is a necessary component of PE. Exercise is not the sole component of PE. In this particular case, the punishment administered by the teacher was a restriction of the classwork to exercise only, leaving out what are surely important parts of the PE coursework. I'm baffled that almost no one seems to have a problem with that.
  • Posts: 5,600 Member
    Jruzer wrote: »

    I'm sorry, @Aaron_K123 and @stanmann571, it seems that you are willfully misreading me.

    I'm going away after this post and may dive in again later today.

    Exercise is a necessary component of PE. Exercise is not the sole component of PE. In this particular case, the punishment administered by the teacher was a restriction of the classwork to exercise only, leaving out what are surely important parts of the PE coursework. I'm baffled that almost no one seems to have a problem with that.

    and what were the "important" parts of the PE coursework? no one has been able to enunciate that
  • Posts: 7,122 Member
    edited November 2017
    Jruzer wrote: »

    I'm sorry, @Aaron_K123 and @stanmann571, it seems that you are willfully misreading me.

    I'm going away after this post and may dive in again later today.

    Exercise is a necessary component of PE. Exercise is not the sole component of PE. In this particular case, the punishment administered by the teacher was a restriction of the classwork to exercise only, leaving out what are surely important parts of the PE coursework. I'm baffled that almost no one seems to have a problem with that.

    I'd agree with you that this would be inappropriate if this action replaced the rest of the years activities with absolutely nothing but push-ups. I very much doubt that is the case though as that seems unreasonable enough to be unlikely. Isn't it much more likely that this is something that is going to last a week? What in what the OP said makes you think this is some sort of permanent change to the ciriculum?

    I'm pretty okay with kids who were abusing a privilege they were given having that privilege removed temporarily as a form of lesson in discipline. I'm sorry but I don't view playing a particular sport as some sort of protected right. I think it would be extreme to remove that privilege forever and I would oppose that but that seems to be just a big assumption you are making that isn't actually backed up by anything.
  • Posts: 6,840 Member
    Jruzer wrote: »

    I'm sorry, @Aaron_K123 and @stanmann571, it seems that you are willfully misreading me.

    I'm going away after this post and may dive in again later today.

    Exercise is a necessary component of PE. Exercise is not the sole component of PE. In this particular case, the punishment administered by the teacher was a restriction of the classwork to exercise only, leaving out what are surely important parts of the PE coursework. I'm baffled that almost no one seems to have a problem with that.

    What "important parts"? There's no such thing, or at least there wasn't at my school. Exercise would at least have been useful. Learning the rules of volleyball? Not important.
  • Posts: 6,252 Member
    Jruzer wrote: »
    I'm going to reply here and then stop because I do have to get to work...

    I agree that this is based on hearsay, but that's all the information I have. I did note above that I would be in contact with the teacher. And my personal experience is all I have to go on, I'm afraid. But I am also a parent of 4 sons and a Cub Scout leader, so I actually do have some experience in dealing with rowdy, misbehaving kids. I will also add that there seems to be plenty of confirmation bias to go around here.

    I note that this is a coach in a voluntary sport. Not a forced educational process.

    Nope - PE coach as part of the mandatory curriculum.

    Note that this resulted with the coach suggesting that I try out for the track team after this.
  • Posts: 5,789 Member

    and what were the "important" parts of the PE coursework? no one has been able to enunciate that

    ^^This, I was about to ask the same thing. What did they lose in "course work" by performing one day from a different "lesson".

    Does anyone really think the teacher was serious that this is all they'll do the rest of the year? If I had $1 for every time I heard that in middle school....
  • Posts: 7,122 Member
    I'm glad I'm not a teacher. Granted they make sightly more than a night manager at Taco Bell, but they just can't win. It's a job where every decision you make is going to be second guessed by dozens of people and their parents.

    Ugh seriously, I cannot think of a job that couples difficulty with lack of pay with thanklessness more than that of a teacher.
  • Posts: 56 Member
    I believe that operant conditioning works. Make someone do something and associate bad feelings with it, they will want to avoid it. I use exercise as a way of bonding with my kids. I do some running and footwork drills with them and then we play some active games. I take the time to help shape their characters and develop mental toughness and confidence in them. They LOVE when dad asks if they want to go work out. If I heard a gym teacher was using exercise as a form of punishment I would definitely have some words with them. Sure, get kids to listen, but always consider the message you're sending to the subconscious.
  • Posts: 3,979 Member
    I agree with most of the above posters...to me, it seems like a completely appropriate punishment for a gym class. If they cannot behave doing the "fun" activities, then having them do the "boring" exercises as punishment seems logical.

    We're not talking kids forced to run laps until they vomit because their math homework was late, here. Just the removal of the privilege of playing games as exercise in favour of something less entertaining and more like work.
  • Posts: 3,502 Member

    I'm sorry to hear that.

    I guess I can't imagine not wanting to ski as an adult because a gym teacher made me do push-ups when I was a child.

    Coincidentally, learning to ski was one of the things that got me more into exercising. But that was in spite of my education, not because of it.
  • Posts: 3,502 Member
    Aaron_K123 wrote: »
    What in what the OP said makes you think this is some sort of permanent change to the ciriculum?

    From the OP:
    My daughter came home the other day (11yrs old, 6th grade) and said that since they didn't follow the rules Friday last week in gym they are only going to be doing exercises--bodyweight stuff--for the rest of the year or until they can prove they can listen and follow rules.

    I agree it's unlikely that the punishment would actually last all year, and said so upthread. Honestly I'm responding more to the myriad posters on this thread who seem to think this is totally fine. And since OP asked for opinions, I'm offering and sticking to mine. It's NOT OK.
  • Posts: 3,502 Member

    What "important parts"? There's no such thing, or at least there wasn't at my school. Exercise would at least have been useful. Learning the rules of volleyball? Not important.

    If that's the case, then to hell with PE.
  • Posts: 3,502 Member
    CSARdiver wrote: »

    Nope - PE coach as part of the mandatory curriculum.

    Note that this resulted with the coach suggesting that I try out for the track team after this.

    I stand corrected. It sounds like you had a good relationship with your coach.
  • Posts: 6,252 Member
    Jruzer wrote: »

    I stand corrected. It sounds like you had a good relationship with your coach.

    Oh I hated the man during this. I hated PE prior to this and was the class clown. Point is he challenged me to be better than I was. I never would have tried out for sports had it not been for this man.

    I believe this has far more to do with the "sales pitch" of the coach. The goal is reaching students and this will take multiple attempts to reach kids. Some will be on board immediately, some need tough love, others a more gentle approach. There is nothing gained by lowering expectations.
  • Posts: 3,502 Member
    BTW,

    SHAPamerica.org is just one organization and not the policy every athletic department, school or intermural program all over America.

    You wrote that it states: " Examples of the inappropriate use of physical activity include:
     Withholding physical education class or recess time for students to complete unfinished
    school work or as a consequence for misbehavior"

    I am not only a former middle school teacher but the parent of a 9yo with poor classroom work ethics. Situations with his biological mother in his formable years put his head on sideways. He has tested exceptionally intellectually gifted...and we work very hard with his teacher to keep him learning. His future can be amazing.

    We, his teacher, school, his Dad and I, all subscribe to withholding recess time to complete unfinished school work. He was "recessing" in the classroom when he should have been working on school work. Recess is an earned reward not an entitlement.

    I am blessed that the teacher is willing to give up her time for him and the idea that he is entitled to recess outside the classroom when he chooses to not meet obligations is outrageous. He makes that choice and he lives by his choice. Exactly when...if not at this young age, should he be learning responsibilities for his actions? The rules are defined...he knows them...he is not going to get a reward for breaking the rules.

    Like a previous poster stated...these kids are not made to exercise until they vomit nor is my son, missing recess to do math a science work going to make him vomit. It may however, teach him responsibility for his actions and decisions...or should that wait until it morphs into a more serious crime?

    Honestly...this idea of ENTITLEMENTS is just ridicules.

    Who is talking about entitlements? I'm not. Our 11 yo often has to stay in for recess because he has work to make up. I have no issue with that.

    But for crying out loud, if you're going to have gym class, have gym class. If you have mandatory exercise hour instead of PE, fire the PE teacher and get an hourly supervisor who can watch the kids do burpees.
This discussion has been closed.