Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Exercise as a punishment in middle schoolers

1246

Replies

  • deannalfisher
    deannalfisher Posts: 5,600 Member
    how is doing calisthenics not physical education? because that is essentially what push-ups/sit-ups etc are...
  • Aaron_K123
    Aaron_K123 Posts: 7,122 Member
    edited November 2017
    Jruzer wrote: »
    Aaron_K123 wrote: »
    What in what the OP said makes you think this is some sort of permanent change to the ciriculum?

    From the OP:
    My daughter came home the other day (11yrs old, 6th grade) and said that since they didn't follow the rules Friday last week in gym they are only going to be doing exercises--bodyweight stuff--for the rest of the year or until they can prove they can listen and follow rules.

    I agree it's unlikely that the punishment would actually last all year, and said so upthread. Honestly I'm responding more to the myriad posters on this thread who seem to think this is totally fine. And since OP asked for opinions, I'm offering and sticking to mine. It's NOT OK.

    I mean I did read what the OP said but I am capable of reading context as well. I think we both know that the coach said this as a way of saying hey if you want to do X then what you need to do is listen and follow the rules. Shape up or ship out. That the coach is going to then instruct them on what to do to be in compliance with the rules and then they are going to go back to doing X. It is unfathomably unlikely that the coach's actual plan is to have them do bodyweight exercises for the rest of the year. Let us be realistic and not talk in terms of theoretical absolutes.

    If you want to know my opinion on whether or not a single infraction by a group of people should result in a total change to the curriculum of a course for an entire year for the entire class then no I don't think that should happen. I also don't think that is going to happen so I'm not going to react to it as if it was going to happen. That said if I told my kid eat your vegetables or you are never going to get ice-cream again I would not expect to have child-protective services bust down my door to take my kid away because I was threatening them with an unreasonable punishment. Do this or you aren't going to be able to do this is a typical way of instructing a child.
  • Jruzer
    Jruzer Posts: 3,501 Member
    Aaron_K123 wrote: »
    I have two children, currently young enough that they are not yet in school. When they do attend school I hope that the school they attend has teachers that are empowered with the ability to provide disciplinary action. They shouldn't be allowed to hit children or lock them in solitary but they certainly should be able to make them run some laps if they mouth off in gym class I mean come on.

    I want my children to be resilient because the real world requires resilience. I want them to have discipline because being disciplined is how you become an effective adult. How are they going to become resilient if they aren't made to cope with situations that make them uncomfortable? How are they going to become disciplined if they cannot be punished for misbehavior? If there is an opportunity to discipline them for misbehavior in a way that is actually beneficial to their health while introducing a level of discomfort they then have to cope with then thumbs high up from me.

    If we protect them all throughout school years from any sort of discomfort how are they going to survive the inevitable kick to the gut that real life will be giving them at some point. Are we protecting them or are we protecting ourselves because we don't like to see them uncomfortable or upset? Am I really that crazy?

    Here's the last thing I'm going to say on this subject. To my mind, this discussion isn't about discipline, or teachers having authority in the classroom, or children being resilient, or protecting children from real-world consequences.

    Who is saying that children should be "protect[ed] ... from any sort of discomfort" anyway? If you're claiming that I'm arguing this, then you are incorrect. It's maddening to me that I'm being interpreted this way. I listed multiple options for disciplining students, and one of my options was even to change the coursework for a few days! How would the options that I presented, including conferences, extra homework, and the like, count as "shielding them from situations that make them uncomfortable"? How did my listing multiple punishments somehow come to mean they "cannot be punished for their misbehavior"?

    I've got 4 sons who are all fine young men, including 2 Eagle Scouts. We've dealt with many teachers and many situations. I don't think I've ever complained about discipline any teacher used on any of my sons.

    This discussion is, as stated in the OP, should exercise be used as punishment? I still say no. It will make some children (not all, as many of you have pointed out) hate exercise. I've seen it in myself and in many of my friends and family. It's counterproductive toward the goal of making young people enjoy and appreciate exercise, and I doubt its efficacy as a punishment.
  • canadianlbs
    canadianlbs Posts: 5,199 Member
    i suspect a lot of it comes down to intangibles like the teacher's own attitude and the delivery of the message. my kid played baseball, so i've seen technically 'constructive' punishments handed out in a manner that was not backed by a constructive manner at all.

    there's a huge difference between 'you're goofing off so do pushups to work out the energy' or 'you're throwing poorly so some scapular strength ought to help you with that' . . . and something that comes across to the kid as 'you're pissing me off so you have to suffer. physically.'

    and i think the difference is quite real. it doesn't really work for me to say 'well, the outcome is positive [physically] so the tone is irrelevant'. the tone still counts and what the teacher intended is likely to come across regardless of what kind of gloss they paint on after the fact.
  • Aaron_K123
    Aaron_K123 Posts: 7,122 Member
    edited November 2017
    Jruzer wrote: »
    Aaron_K123 wrote: »
    I have two children, currently young enough that they are not yet in school. When they do attend school I hope that the school they attend has teachers that are empowered with the ability to provide disciplinary action. They shouldn't be allowed to hit children or lock them in solitary but they certainly should be able to make them run some laps if they mouth off in gym class I mean come on.

    I want my children to be resilient because the real world requires resilience. I want them to have discipline because being disciplined is how you become an effective adult. How are they going to become resilient if they aren't made to cope with situations that make them uncomfortable? How are they going to become disciplined if they cannot be punished for misbehavior? If there is an opportunity to discipline them for misbehavior in a way that is actually beneficial to their health while introducing a level of discomfort they then have to cope with then thumbs high up from me.

    If we protect them all throughout school years from any sort of discomfort how are they going to survive the inevitable kick to the gut that real life will be giving them at some point. Are we protecting them or are we protecting ourselves because we don't like to see them uncomfortable or upset? Am I really that crazy?

    Here's the last thing I'm going to say on this subject. To my mind, this discussion isn't about discipline, or teachers having authority in the classroom, or children being resilient, or protecting children from real-world consequences.

    Who is saying that children should be "protect[ed] ... from any sort of discomfort" anyway? If you're claiming that I'm arguing this, then you are incorrect. It's maddening to me that I'm being interpreted this way. I listed multiple options for disciplining students, and one of my options was even to change the coursework for a few days! How would the options that I presented, including conferences, extra homework, and the like, count as "shielding them from situations that make them uncomfortable"? How did my listing multiple punishments somehow come to mean they "cannot be punished for their misbehavior"?

    I've got 4 sons who are all fine young men, including 2 Eagle Scouts. We've dealt with many teachers and many situations. I don't think I've ever complained about discipline any teacher used on any of my sons.

    This discussion is, as stated in the OP, should exercise be used as punishment? I still say no. It will make some children (not all, as many of you have pointed out) hate exercise. I've seen it in myself and in many of my friends and family. It's counterproductive toward the goal of making young people enjoy and appreciate exercise, and I doubt its efficacy as a punishment.

    Alright fair enough I don't want to mischaracterize you and I certainly don't want to have some sort of parent-off about who has the better guiding principles for their children.

    Out of curiosity if a student was goofing off in math class, passing notes...being disrespectful. Do you think it would be appropriate if the teacher took away their notepad that they were using for passing notes and put in front of them a pop-quiz of math problems and instructed the student to complete it by end of class? Or would you view that as inappropriately using math as punishment in a way that would turn the student away from math in the future?
  • Packerjohn
    Packerjohn Posts: 4,855 Member
    Jruzer wrote: »
    CSARdiver wrote: »
    This isn't punishment, but a corrective and instructive measure. Military forces have this ingrained throughout their lives:

    Not paying attention? 20 pushups
    Last man in line? 20 pushups
    Fall asleep in class? 20 pushups

    My 9 year old son gets corrected for not paying attention in baseball and the team runs laps.

    Punishment on the other hand incorporates an element of retribution.

    Except that elementary school kids in gym class are not on a team and are not in the military. They are supposed to be getting educated along with participating in physical activity. This removes the education aspect in favor of a retributive measure. Athletic kids will do fine and probably will blow it off as easy, while the less athletic kids will be the ones who will find it miserable. Perhaps some of those kids will develop a distaste for exercise as a result. Maybe it will take them decades to develop a taste for it.

    Ask me how I know.

    Or maybe if they do some pushups and run some they will get better at those activities.
  • NorthCascades
    NorthCascades Posts: 10,968 Member
    As to the question of whether this will turn children away from exercise forever, here's a good read:

    https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/19/phys-ed-do-our-genes-influence-our-desire-to-exercise/

    Is the urge to exercise bred in our bones? That’s the intriguing question that European researchers recently set out to examine by looking at the activity habits of 37,051 sets of twins. Twins are popular with geneticists, because they provide a neat statistical model for determining whether a behavior is influenced by genetics or exclusively by environment. Identical twins share 100 percent of their genome, fraternal twins share 50 percent. All twin pairs, if raised together, share approximately the same early environment. So if a behavior is more common between identical twins than between fraternal twins, it is presumably being directed to some degree by genes.

    In the study, scientists looked at the decision to exercise or not. They turned to survey data covering twin pairs ages 19 to 40 in Australia, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Although the researchers set a very loose standard of one hour per week of light jogging or an equivalent activity to classify someone as an ‘‘exerciser,’’ only about 44 percent of the males and 35 percent of the females met the standard. Across the board, however, the identical-twin pairs were more likely to share an exercise pattern than the fraternal twins.


    I ride a bike most of the year and ski cross country in the winter because I find these things enjoyable. That's why a lot of runners run. I think people who are drawn to exercise will still do it regardless of what happened in school, at least for the most part.
  • Sp1tfire
    Sp1tfire Posts: 1,120 Member
    edited November 2017
    I think what is happening there is over the line. Kids need team building fun activity while being exercise at the same time. A little bodyweight stuff to teach is fine but only that doesn't seem good to help foster a love of fitness for kids. Let's be honest, most kids may not find pushups and planks to be fun.

    It's one thing to say "Hey you didn't stop throwing balls when I said so so you're gonna run an extra lap or 2" and a whole other to say "Only bodyweight exercises for the rest of the year. No more tag, kickball, or volleyball."

    ETA: an 'extra lap' for not listening during P.E was typical in my grade school years. No one seemed traumatized over running around the gym an extra time. I don't see the problem with it now unless a kid has asthma.
  • Lounmoun
    Lounmoun Posts: 8,423 Member
    They should do square dancing. To one song. Every gym class for 3 months.

    I think not doing games that they cheated at for a month or so is reasonable at that age. The instructor probably is not going to take them on 10 mile hikes or push ups until they puke just have them doing boring exercises instead of games. The rest of the school year with no games would be a bit much for 11 year olds.

  • TR0berts
    TR0berts Posts: 7,739 Member
    Jruzer wrote: »
    Aaron_K123 wrote: »
    What in what the OP said makes you think this is some sort of permanent change to the ciriculum?

    From the OP:
    My daughter came home the other day (11yrs old, 6th grade) and said that since they didn't follow the rules Friday last week in gym they are only going to be doing exercises--bodyweight stuff--for the rest of the year or until they can prove they can listen and follow rules.

    I agree it's unlikely that the punishment would actually last all year, and said so upthread. Honestly I'm responding more to the myriad posters on this thread who seem to think this is totally fine. And since OP asked for opinions, I'm offering and sticking to mine. It's NOT OK.

    Did you stop reading at the part you bolded? Because there's a very important part you seem to be missing that comes immediately after:
    for the rest of the year or until they can prove they can listen and follow rules.

    So, the "punishment" may very well last less than one class period. That's pretty much all it took for me (and most of the kids I knew from school) back when I was a kid.
  • DananaNanas
    DananaNanas Posts: 665 Member
    edited November 2017

    Withdrawal of privilege is not punishment.

    Playing fun sports is a privilege. By acting out, they lost that privilege. Since PE/gym class is where physical activity happens, going to a more regimented less fun activity is not punishment, it's appropriate teaching of consequence.

    And honestly, Doing less fun activity is less fun for the instructor as well as the students.

    Alllll of this. x1000


    For the arguments that "school is for education, not the military..."
    Playing kickball and dodgeball 3 times a week is not nearly as educational as learning how to properly condition your body with crunches, pull-ups, sit-ups, push-ups, etc...

    Unless you think your kid is going to grow up to be some sort of professional dodgeball athlete?
  • ritzvin
    ritzvin Posts: 2,860 Member
    Jruzer wrote: »

    Except that elementary school kids in gym class are not on a team and are not in the military. They are supposed to be getting educated along with participating in physical activity. This removes the education aspect in favor of a retributive measure. Athletic kids will do fine and probably will blow it off as easy, while the less athletic kids will be the ones who will find it miserable. Perhaps some of those kids will develop a distaste for exercise as a result. Maybe it will take them decades to develop a taste for it.

    Ask me how I know.
    And some people are the exact opposite. I have zero depth perception, and poor coordination. Having the teacher make us do “less fun” things, that unfortunately never dominate a PE class, was amazing for me. I found out I was strong, fast, and in non team sports could excell. I loved when someone misbehaved and we had to do less fun things! So this removal of priveledge could totally remind the less team focussed kids that exercise can be great and we can edit out being the last kid chosen for the team.

    ditto. As a non-athletic kid, I hated team sports.

  • ryenday
    ryenday Posts: 1,540 Member
    Jruzer wrote: »
    CSARdiver wrote: »
    This isn't punishment, but a corrective and instructive measure. Military forces have this ingrained throughout their lives:

    Not paying attention? 20 pushups
    Last man in line? 20 pushups
    Fall asleep in class? 20 pushups

    My 9 year old son gets corrected for not paying attention in baseball and the team runs laps.

    Punishment on the other hand incorporates an element of retribution.

    Except that elementary school kids in gym class are not on a team and are not in the military. They are supposed to be getting educated along with participating in physical activity. This removes the education aspect in favor of a retributive measure. Athletic kids will do fine and probably will blow it off as easy, while the less athletic kids will be the ones who will find it miserable. Perhaps some of those kids will develop a distaste for exercise as a result. Maybe it will take them decades to develop a taste for it.

    Ask me how I know.

    And some people are the exact opposite. I have zero depth perception, and poor coordination. Having the teacher make us do “less fun” things, that unfortunately never dominate a PE class, was amazing for me. I found out I was strong, fast, and in non team sports could excell. I loved when someone misbehaved and we had to do less fun things! So this removal of priveledge could totally remind the less team focussed kids that exercise can be great and we can edit out being the last kid chosen for the team.

    LOL!! Me too. No depth perception, dyspraxia & proprioceptive disorder. I LOVED calisthenics days!
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 1,249 Member
    Exercise should never be used as punishment. It is a good, natural thing that should improve the person, not make them fear it.
  • tomteboda
    tomteboda Posts: 2,171 Member
    I'm another one who will say that it's OK to not do team sports. Kids who are out of control need to be brought into civil behavior, and a teacher only has so many methods at their disposal.

    I also thought the individual conditioning was the best. I was the youngest in my grade, and even though I was tall, I was physically coordinated in a typical way for my age. Calisthenics days were great. So were the challenge courses (balance, climbing etc) and gymnastics days. I'd take all of that any day over dodgeball, which was a day that I got almost no exercise standing against a wall.
  • mkeonem
    mkeonem Posts: 41 Member
    Lots of assumptions have been made since I last looked at this. I admit I haven't read everything but I wanted to defend a couple of the assumptions I did read.

    My daughter LOVES TO WORK OUT. She will regularly do body weight exercises in her room 3-5x/week. I have no problem with her working out and encourage her to do it and continue to LOVE doing it. I want her to have a healthy relationship with working out.

    I have not called the teacher out on this. I think it is BS to call a teacher and tell them how I think they should do their job just as I would not appreciate someone calling me and telling me how to do mine. Believe me, my kid isn't some entitled brat. If she wants something she knows she has to work for it, nothing is handed to her. I don't call teachers when she doesn't like their assignments. I don't bring her stuff when she forgets it cause she is old enough to do her and if she forgets it that is HER mistake, not mine. She has chores around the house that she is expected to do weekly and she even does her own laundry. I am probably the most *kitten* parent in my neighborhood, lol. My kid is an A/B student and in all advanced classes (has been since they had them available in school) and absolutely loves school. She is the kid during the summer that misses going and counts down the days until its back in session. She also likes PE class, she wasn't upset about the work outs cause she likes doing them just as much as the team sports.

    I personally didn't think it was right to use working out specifically as a punishment because I have been forced to do things as punishment and as a direct result avoided the very thing I was forced to do for a long time after. EG: my mom was a boat captain, when I misbehaved for something--which I don't even remember what it was--I was forced to go out on her friends fishing boat and bait everyone's hooks all trip long. Took me 19 YEARS to give fishing another try. I actively avoided it until some friends talked me into going and now I actually like it. I was also on my HS soccer team for 2 years. I hated running extra or doing exercises because of others not doing what they were supposed to be doing. Which is why I quit and why I stopped doing physical activities. It made something that was a fun activity a terribly boring and unenjoyable chore.

    To note, yesterday was day 3 of their punishment. They are supposed to do it again today, at least that's what I have been told.
  • MsMaeFlowers
    MsMaeFlowers Posts: 261 Member
    edited November 2017
    I would like to note that I absolutely loathed PE class as a child, but was active and athletic outside of school. One didn't impact the other. In fact I was receiving zeroes for refusing to dress out in gym in the same year I was traveling to another country to participate in the Junior Olympics.

    I also think that making a bunch of cheaters wall sit until they fall over sounds sort of funny. But I really really despise cheaters. Making the whole class endure punishment because of some individuals is inappropriate, lazy, and stupid, but par for the course for coaches, and is a good example of the sort of thing that made me loathe PE class and refuse to dress out.

    This right here I agree with. I HATED PE as a child and a teenager. Fortunately in high school, my PE teacher never figured out that his punishments were never actually punishments. (Go sit on the sideline for the rest of class for not participating. Uh sure thing teach, thanks!)

    I don't believe in punishing the whole class for the actions of the few. I don't have an issue with the punishment itself. Take away the fun game for cheating at it, and be forced to do the unfun stuff until you can prove you learned your lesson? That's absolutely fine by me, IF he/she wasn't including the students who did nothing wrong in the punishment. That would be far more effective IMO. The well behaved students get to continue doing fun activities while the cheaters clearly see what happens when they cheat. I would be more upset with the fact that the teacher is punishing the innocent students than the actual punishment itself.
  • singingflutelady
    singingflutelady Posts: 8,736 Member
    I would like to note that I absolutely loathed PE class as a child, but was active and athletic outside of school. One didn't impact the other. In fact I was receiving zeroes for refusing to dress out in gym in the same year I was traveling to another country to participate in the Junior Olympics.

    I also think that making a bunch of cheaters wall sit until they fall over sounds sort of funny. But I really really despise cheaters. Making the whole class endure punishment because of some individuals is inappropriate, lazy, and stupid, but par for the course for coaches, and is a good example of the sort of thing that made me loathe PE class and refuse to dress out.

    This right here I agree with. I HATED PE as a child and a teenager. Fortunately in high school, my PE teacher never figured out that his punishments were never actually punishments. (Go sit on the sideline for the rest of class for not participating. Uh sure thing teach, thanks!)

    I don't believe in punishing the whole class for the actions of the few. I don't have an issue with the punishment itself. Take away the fun game for cheating at it, and be forced to do the unfun stuff until you can prove you learned your lesson? That's absolutely fine by me, IF he/she wasn't including the students who did nothing wrong in the punishment. That would be far more effective IMO. The well behaved students get to continue doing fun activities while the cheaters clearly see what happens when they cheat. I would be more upset with the fact that the teacher is punishing the innocent students than the actual punishment itself.

    Depends on how many are involved. It's kinda hard to play games if the majority of the class isn't involved.
  • Gisel2015
    Gisel2015 Posts: 4,189 Member
    mkeonem wrote: »
    My daughter came home the other day (11yrs old, 6th grade) and said that since they didn't follow the rules Friday last week in gym they are only going to be doing exercises--bodyweight stuff--for the rest of the year or until they can prove they can listen and follow rules.

    While I agree they need to be given some kind of repercussion for not following the rules I do not think that exercises as a "punishment" is the healthy way to go. Not that working out is bad for them but because they are being taught that working out is a punishment for being bad/not following the rules. With obesity issues all over I think it is better to foster a positive relationship with exercising, not a negative one.

    What do you think about using exercising in school PE class as a punishment? Any alternatives you recommend instead if you don't agree with it?

    What kind of rules were the kids supposed to be following and what kind of exercises or sports were they doing before?
  • rheddmobile
    rheddmobile Posts: 6,840 Member
    mkeonem wrote: »
    Lots of assumptions have been made since I last looked at this. I admit I haven't read everything but I wanted to defend a couple of the assumptions I did read.

    My daughter LOVES TO WORK OUT. She will regularly do body weight exercises in her room 3-5x/week. I have no problem with her working out and encourage her to do it and continue to LOVE doing it. I want her to have a healthy relationship with working out.

    I have not called the teacher out on this. I think it is BS to call a teacher and tell them how I think they should do their job just as I would not appreciate someone calling me and telling me how to do mine. Believe me, my kid isn't some entitled brat. If she wants something she knows she has to work for it, nothing is handed to her. I don't call teachers when she doesn't like their assignments. I don't bring her stuff when she forgets it cause she is old enough to do her and if she forgets it that is HER mistake, not mine. She has chores around the house that she is expected to do weekly and she even does her own laundry. I am probably the most *kitten* parent in my neighborhood, lol. My kid is an A/B student and in all advanced classes (has been since they had them available in school) and absolutely loves school. She is the kid during the summer that misses going and counts down the days until its back in session. She also likes PE class, she wasn't upset about the work outs cause she likes doing them just as much as the team sports.

    I personally didn't think it was right to use working out specifically as a punishment because I have been forced to do things as punishment and as a direct result avoided the very thing I was forced to do for a long time after. EG: my mom was a boat captain, when I misbehaved for something--which I don't even remember what it was--I was forced to go out on her friends fishing boat and bait everyone's hooks all trip long. Took me 19 YEARS to give fishing another try. I actively avoided it until some friends talked me into going and now I actually like it. I was also on my HS soccer team for 2 years. I hated running extra or doing exercises because of others not doing what they were supposed to be doing. Which is why I quit and why I stopped doing physical activities. It made something that was a fun activity a terribly boring and unenjoyable chore.

    To note, yesterday was day 3 of their punishment. They are supposed to do it again today, at least that's what I have been told.

    I think there's going to be a disconnect between punishment and cause when it goes on for so long. I do hope the coach was kidding about it being for the rest of the semester. And when it was said that it was "until they can prove they know how to follow the rules," some method of doing that should have been offered.
  • jenilla1
    jenilla1 Posts: 11,118 Member
    edited November 2017
    Jruzer wrote: »
    tmoneyag99 wrote: »
    ...The fun and recreation of gym class is something he looks forward to every day. If his gym teacher pulled this crap she would be hearing from us. School is for education. It's not a voluntary sports team and it's not the military.

    What are we supposed to do? Just let there be chaos as long as the kids are having fun? I think it's important that we "educate" kids that if they are misbehaving, cheating, acting like jerks or whatever, they don't get to keep doing whatever they want. When there are group activities there are group consequences - that's a valuable lesson in life. It's not just all about you - everyone's affected on your team (class, group, whatever.)

    Usually, if one or two kids did something egregious and the rest of the kids are serious and trying to do right, only that one kid is punished. It's the times when lots of kids are acting out and the majority are just going along with it or finding it humorous that they all get busted. I used to hate it when jerks in the class would get us all in trouble, but I understood that we all paid the price as a group when individuals in our group acted out AND the majority of the group encouraged that bad behavior by giggling about it, or even egging it on. When the whole class was pissed off at the jerks who got us in trouble, they almost always stopped doing it. (I'm not talking about some little sociopath who wreaks havoc and doesn't care about his/her classmates - that's not usually the scenario that gets the group in trouble. The group gets in trouble when the majority are acting like *kitten* and/or acting like it's funny or entertaining.) Punishments happen. We all have experienced it - fair and unfair. That's life.

    I absolutely HATED P.E. as a kid, but I LOVE fitness as an adult. Discipline didn't scar me for life. :D
  • mkeonem
    mkeonem Posts: 41 Member
    Gisel2015 wrote: »
    mkeonem wrote: »
    My daughter came home the other day (11yrs old, 6th grade) and said that since they didn't follow the rules Friday last week in gym they are only going to be doing exercises--bodyweight stuff--for the rest of the year or until they can prove they can listen and follow rules.

    While I agree they need to be given some kind of repercussion for not following the rules I do not think that exercises as a "punishment" is the healthy way to go. Not that working out is bad for them but because they are being taught that working out is a punishment for being bad/not following the rules. With obesity issues all over I think it is better to foster a positive relationship with exercising, not a negative one.

    What do you think about using exercising in school PE class as a punishment? Any alternatives you recommend instead if you don't agree with it?

    What kind of rules were the kids supposed to be following and what kind of exercises or sports were they doing before?

    They were playing some thing called butler ball, whatever that is. Some kids were cheating, others kept telling on them and after so many times the coaches got fed up from what my daughter said.
  • jdlobb
    jdlobb Posts: 1,232 Member
    mkeonem wrote: »
    Gisel2015 wrote: »
    mkeonem wrote: »
    My daughter came home the other day (11yrs old, 6th grade) and said that since they didn't follow the rules Friday last week in gym they are only going to be doing exercises--bodyweight stuff--for the rest of the year or until they can prove they can listen and follow rules.

    While I agree they need to be given some kind of repercussion for not following the rules I do not think that exercises as a "punishment" is the healthy way to go. Not that working out is bad for them but because they are being taught that working out is a punishment for being bad/not following the rules. With obesity issues all over I think it is better to foster a positive relationship with exercising, not a negative one.

    What do you think about using exercising in school PE class as a punishment? Any alternatives you recommend instead if you don't agree with it?

    What kind of rules were the kids supposed to be following and what kind of exercises or sports were they doing before?

    They were playing some thing called butler ball, whatever that is. Some kids were cheating, others kept telling on them and after so many times the coaches got fed up from what my daughter said.

    yep. sounds like the little gremlins deserved what they got. Cheaters and slackers get LAPS
  • jdlobb
    jdlobb Posts: 1,232 Member
    newmeadow wrote: »
    In the seventh grade we had to learn square dancing in gym class at the beginning of the year. After we moved on to other things (field hockey, rope climbing, obstacle courses, effing soccer).

    If anyone misbehaved in gym class after they'd learned the square dancing, the teacher would call the offender to the head of the class and force them to show some square dancing moves while the teacher clapped rhythmically and called out "Now doe-see-doe without a partner!""Promenade head high!" and so forth. It was, like really embarrassing.

    Would that have been okay with you guys or would you have written an angry letter to the principal?

    As far as I know, no one in the class ever sought out square dancing again as a hobby or a pastime.

    Correlative or causative?

    Inspired work by your gym teacher. Marvelous.
This discussion has been closed.