Intermittent Fasting
Options
Replies
-
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »MeanderingMammal wrote: »ladyhusker39 wrote: »
I feel a bit dense, but what's "metabolic confusion"?
Nonsense...
Its not ... its valid ... The metabolic confusion is a strstetgy and employers a concept of dieting known as “calorie shifting”... its what you want ftom intermittent fasting.
No.
Intermittent fasting primarily is about making adherence to a long term calorie goal easier for some people.11 -
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »MeanderingMammal wrote: »ladyhusker39 wrote: »
I feel a bit dense, but what's "metabolic confusion"?
Nonsense...
Its not ... its valid ... The metabolic confusion is a strstetgy and employers a concept of dieting known as “calorie shifting”... its what you want ftom intermittent fasting.
It's not what I want from intermittent fasting. What I want is to be able to use most of my cals in the evening when I find I'm hungrier than during the day. It's a calorie intake/timing restriction for me, nothing more.7 -
MeanderingMammal wrote: »ladyhusker39 wrote: »
I feel a bit dense, but what's "metabolic confusion"?
Nonsense...
Metabolic confusion Is wath you are achieving during a successful intermittent fasting. It's that simple.10 -
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »MeanderingMammal wrote: »ladyhusker39 wrote: »
I feel a bit dense, but what's "metabolic confusion"?
Nonsense...
Its not ... its valid ... The metabolic confusion is a strstetgy and employers a concept of dieting known as “calorie shifting”... its what you want ftom intermittent fasting.
No.
Intermittent fasting primarily is about making adherence to a long term calorie goal easier for some people.
Yes which is why i said im not a fsn of the short cycle format. Read first then comment.
7 -
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »01189998819991197253Z wrote: »MeanderingMammal wrote: »ladyhusker39 wrote: »
I feel a bit dense, but what's "metabolic confusion"?
Nonsense...
Its not ... its valid ... The metabolic confusion is a strstetgy and employers a concept of dieting known as “calorie shifting”... its what you want ftom intermittent fasting.
No.
Intermittent fasting primarily is about making adherence to a long term calorie goal easier for some people.
Yes which is why i said im not a fsn of the short cycle format. Read first then comment.
I did read, I just completely disagree with your opinion.
Feedback for you - if you set spelling auto-correct on your phone your credibility might increase, just a tiny bit.10 -
RuNaRoUnDaFiEld wrote: »01189998819991197253Z wrote: »MeanderingMammal wrote: »ladyhusker39 wrote: »
I feel a bit dense, but what's "metabolic confusion"?
Nonsense...
Its not ... its valid ... The metabolic confusion is a strstetgy and employers a concept of dieting known as “calorie shifting”... its what you want ftom intermittent fasting.
I think my metabolism must be amazing then, mine has never seemed confused before.
Edit to addI just woo'd 2 of your posts as you seem to like to know for some reason.
Well thank you for helping to perpetuate bro sciences. Well done you. Im talking about good well established practice and science.9 -
JerSchmare wrote: »01189998819991197253Z wrote: »JerSchmare wrote: »OMG. The BS in this thread. It must be January.
Remember “muscle confusion”, invented by the P90 guy? Lol
Now, we have metabolic confusion? Lol
Until you link to the peer reviewed research study, I’m calling total BS.
Muscle confusion" really is rooted in fitness science. The basic science marketed as "muscle confusion" comes from research at PhD level you can download s paper on the subject.
Link please?
This is one
http://sciencedrivennutrition.com/dieting-and-metabolism/
this is one helps;
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/2015/12/16/dr-david-ludwig-clears-up-carbohydrate-confusion/
I seem to remember a mata study to4 -
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »MeanderingMammal wrote: »ladyhusker39 wrote: »
I feel a bit dense, but what's "metabolic confusion"?
Nonsense...
Its not ... its valid
I'd be interested to see peer reviewed, replicated, research on that.
2 -
And om... its not the wrong link....cross over onto carbohydrate and metabolism of sugars cones to to play as part of the the bodies starvation responses.5
-
JerSchmare wrote: »01189998819991197253Z wrote: »JerSchmare wrote: »OMG. The BS in this thread. It must be January.
Remember “muscle confusion”, invented by the P90 guy? Lol
Now, we have metabolic confusion? Lol
Until you link to the peer reviewed research study, I’m calling total BS.
Muscle confusion" really is rooted in fitness science. The basic science marketed as "muscle confusion" comes from research at PhD level you can download s paper on the subject.
Link please?
The original work was done im the 60s by Tudor Bompa,
https://mafiadoc.com/the-muscle-confusion-edition_598908221723ddd269e53525.html5 -
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »JerSchmare wrote: »01189998819991197253Z wrote: »JerSchmare wrote: »OMG. The BS in this thread. It must be January.
Remember “muscle confusion”, invented by the P90 guy? Lol
Now, we have metabolic confusion? Lol
Until you link to the peer reviewed research study, I’m calling total BS.
Muscle confusion" really is rooted in fitness science. The basic science marketed as "muscle confusion" comes from research at PhD level you can download s paper on the subject.
Link please?
This is one
http://sciencedrivennutrition.com/dieting-and-metabolism/
this is one helps;
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/2015/12/16/dr-david-ludwig-clears-up-carbohydrate-confusion/
I seem to remember a mata study to
Neither one of these links has anything to do with the pseudoscience known as "metabolic confusion." Try again.
7 -
I've never understood the idea of "confusing" my body. Shouldn't we be on the same team? Will it try to confuse me for revenge?
OP, if you're still here, your schedule is fine assuming you have the energy you need throughout the day and you're eating the right number of calories for your goals.7 -
AnvilHead, Isn't eating meant to fuel the body? Eating a large dinner at 7:30 doesn't seem smart. I go to bed around 9:30... not leaving my body much time to use that food. Maybe it will be stored if the carbs aren't used initially?... You're stomach never rests, but if there is nothing in it... the body will pull from other places (fat, muscle) for the energy....
1) The first error is assuming that the body won't "use" that food while asleep. Everything in your body is still functioning at night, and it takes energy to fuel it. Your brain is still working, your central nervous system is still functioning, your heart is still pumping, you're still breathing, your body is constantly in the process of digestion, nutrient transport, cellular repair, balancing all the hormones, etc. necessary for homeostasis and a ton of other functions. You don't go into suspended animation when you sleep. Your brain and liver are the two organs in your body which use the largest percentage of the energy needs which constitute your BMR, and both of them are still fully functioning while you sleep (see research review here.) As shown in the research review, your liver, brain, kidneys and heart constitute around 70-80% of your resting caloric expenditure - and guess what? All those things are busily working away while you're sleeping.
2) The entire process of digestion takes longer than most people think. While your stomach empties in a few hours, the food remains in your intestines (where it's further digested/metabolized/absorbed) for up to 30-40 hours. It's not like you eat and your body is all done with that food and has neatly tucked it away into compartments by the time you're done sleeping.
3) There is no net storage of fat in a caloric deficit, regardless of what you eat or when you eat it. There is certainly some storage of nutrients, or your body wouldn't function - but that doesn't mean it automagically turns to fat. There are actually very limited and rare circumstances where carbs are converted to fat. Carbs are primarily metabolized into glucose (which is used for cellular processes) and glycogen (which is stored in the muscles and liver).
4) The thought of your body only pulling from other places when your stomach is empty, or only when you're asleep, makes the assumption that the process is like a light switch - on or off. We're in a constant flux between anabolism and catabolism all day, every day, and it's not a light switch, it's a continuum.15 -
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »RuNaRoUnDaFiEld wrote: »01189998819991197253Z wrote: »MeanderingMammal wrote: »ladyhusker39 wrote: »
I feel a bit dense, but what's "metabolic confusion"?
Nonsense...
Its not ... its valid ... The metabolic confusion is a strstetgy and employers a concept of dieting known as “calorie shifting”... its what you want ftom intermittent fasting.
I think my metabolism must be amazing then, mine has never seemed confused before.
Edit to addI just woo'd 2 of your posts as you seem to like to know for some reason.
Well thank you for helping to perpetuate bro sciences. Well done you. Im talking about good well established practice and science.
Actually you're not. You're talking about woo and BS which completely ignores/contradicts basic physiology. In other words, perpetuating broscience. There is no scientific basis for basically anything you've said.14 -
purpleannex wrote: »What do you all think about intermittent fasting?
Here is my schedule:
Wake Up
No breakfast (Black Coffee only)
Lunch at 11AM
Dinner at 5:15PM
No snacking
Bed
I eat all of my calories for the day between 11am-5:15pm in the day. This gives my body 17 hours of fasting through the night/morning hours.
I wouldn't really consider what you're doing as fasting, billions do and have lived perfectly well on two meals a day. Its only modern western convention that says we should eat three meals a day. To me, fasting is not eating for days on end, nothing. Fasting isn't what they do in Ramadan either, that's a total cop out.
That's why it's called "intermittent fasting" and not "fasting" proper...
in·ter·mit·tent
ˌin(t)ərˈmitnt/Submit
adjective
occurring at irregular intervals; not continuous or steady.8 -
JerSchmare wrote: »AnvilHead, Isn't eating meant to fuel the body? Eating a large dinner at 7:30 doesn't seem smart. I go to bed around 9:30... not leaving my body much time to use that food. Maybe it will be stored if the carbs aren't used initially?... You're stomach never rests, but if there is nothing in it... the body will pull from other places (fat, muscle) for the energy....
1) The first error is assuming that the body won't "use" that food while asleep. Everything in your body is still functioning at night, and it takes energy to fuel it. Your brain is still working, your central nervous system is still functioning, your heart is still pumping, you're still breathing, your body is constantly in the process of digestion, nutrient transport, cellular repair, balancing all the hormones, etc. necessary for homeostasis and a ton of other functions. You don't go into suspended animation when you sleep. Your brain and liver are the two organs in your body which use the largest percentage of the energy needs which constitute your BMR, and both of them are still fully functioning while you sleep (see research review here.) As shown in the research review, your liver, brain, kidneys and heart constitute around 70-80% of your resting caloric expenditure - and guess what? All those things are busily working away while you're sleeping.
2) The entire process of digestion takes longer than most people think. While your stomach empties in a few hours, the food remains in your intestines (where it's further digested/metabolized/absorbed) for up to 30-40 hours. It's not like you eat and your body is all done with that food and has neatly tucked it away into compartments by the time you're done sleeping.
3) There is no net storage of fat in a caloric deficit, regardless of what you eat or when you eat it. There is certainly some storage of nutrients, or your body wouldn't function - but that doesn't mean it automagically turns to fat. There are actually very limited and rare circumstances where carbs are converted to fat. Carbs are primarily metabolized into glucose (which is used for cellular processes) and glycogen (which is stored in the muscles and liver).
4) The thought of your body only pulling from other places when your stomach is empty, or only when you're asleep, makes the assumption that the process is like a light switch - on or off. We're in a constant flux between anabolism and catabolism all day, every day, and it's not a light switch, it's a continuum.
Not arguing at all. All points are valid.
One question though as it relates to sleeping. There are a few differences. For instance, I have read that your heart rate slows but your body heats up. This is supposedly a process that ensures you get rest (slow heart rate), but stay safe (warm).
I only bring this up out of interest. I realize it’s off-topic but maybe relevant as your body does some tricky things while sleeping. While I don’t think you go into suspension or anything, things happen that are different when you are awake.
I don’t know if any of that is relevant at all. Probably not. Just thought it might be worth bringing up.
If the sleep tracking on my Garmin is any indicator, the heart rate certainly does go down while sleeping. My heart rate stays from the high 40s to low/mid 50s pretty much the entire time I'm asleep, and you can then see the elevation after I get up and start moving around. I'm not sure what body temp does during sleep.
I'm no expert on sleep, but I'm sure the body does different things while sleeping. IIRC, EEGs show that your brain patterns are altered, you're moving around less than when you're awake, etc. Nonetheless, all your involuntary functions (metabolism, respirations, circulation, etc.) are still going on, so energy expenditure is still happening via all the nonstop physiological processes.
Of the four processes that expend energy (BMR, NEAT, EAT, TEF), BMR is the main one still happening while you sleep. For most people, BMR constitutes about 65-70% of their daily energy expenditure, so what I was addressing was the apparently pretty common misconception that the body doesn't burn anything while we're asleep and that any food remaining in your stomach/intestines will instantly be converted to fat because you didn't "burn it off" before you laid down to sleep.4 -
The thing I don't understand about that belief is why not burning it off while sleeping (let alone not continuing to digest it) would mean that you would add net fat. The amount you take in and the amount you burn within the 24 hour period is not affected by when you eat, right? I just really don't get WHY people think it matters, beyond the fact that it's been one of those things people say for, like, forever.7
-
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »You are just a troll
Disagreeing you with you is not the definition of a troll.
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1077746/starvation-mode-adaptive-thermogenesis-and-weight-loss/p15 -
Dear Posters,
The debate section is designed for users to debate various topics of interest. If you have to resort to insulting other members to make your point then you are no longer debating, you are attacking. Attacking is against the MFP guidelines. If you need to review the guidelines prior to further posting they can be found here:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/welcome/guidelines
Sincerely,
4legs
2
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 390 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 921 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions