Anyone accept a weight that wasn't their "ultimate goal"?
Replies
-
This is exactly the thread I need in my life right now...
I started at 221 (highest weight ever was 236). In about six months I lost around 50 pounds. For the last month I've been hovering at 172.something - the .something varies daily, but the 172 has stayed steady. I want to lose more, at least I think I do... but I don't have it in me right now.
In high school (yes, it was 17 years ago), I weighed about 140-145, thought I was in great shape, and wore a size 12. I ran track and threw shot put, tended goal in soccer, and was all around pretty active. I thought I should get back to 150-ish to be doing well at this point in my life. So, I'm at 172, like I said, and I'm wearing a size 10. At this point I'm not even sure I can get back to 150-ish and maintain the muscle I've put on. I know I'm stronger now than I have ever been, definitely in better cardiovascular shape too. I don't have any desire to be a size 2 (or 4, or even a 6). I might want to see a size 8 though - that would put my waist at half of my height which I read is one of the new recommendations for assessing whether or not you have too much fat around the midsection (at 5'4", even in high school I was on the high side of healthy BMI). All in all, I'm like 2" of waistline away from that measure which feels pretty good for the moment. To date, I've lost close to 12" from my waistline.
I think I've landed at eating at maintenance (or at least trying to figure out what maintenance even is given my current activity level) and seeing if I can recomp by focusing on consuming protein. I don't know if that's good or bad, but it's my current operating theory. I accept that I won't be 150, but will probably take a few months to just eat right and maintain my overall weight while focusing on building some more muscle before I make another push to hopefully land somewhere around 160.7 -
OK I know this is not what yall mean, but I "have" accepted a weight which was not my ultimate goal. I started out at about 131 and although I usually in my yo yo life have put 102 as my goal since thats the lowest I have ever been, this time I realized I needed to focus on maintaining. Typically I can make it down under 110 and then I start binging and yo ing up again. So, I thought. OK set your goal at 106. Then instead of ending your diet in a binge and gain, really CHANGE and do something different like maintaining. LOL. I lurk here a lot because I think it's probably the most important place in MFP if you want to succeed forever.
So... I got to 106 in Sept and set to maintenance. But I knew that just changing to a MUCH higher intake right away would trigger a binge, so I followed the method of adding 100 cals every other week. I felt like I was rewarding myself but OH MY GOD the scale kept going down? I reached 102 and kept adding calories. I hit 100 and was like, I don't EVER remember weighing 100. I kept adding calories upped by 150 every other week. I reached 97-98 and you know what. It was NOT my ultimate goal, but honestly I really REALLY like it - how I feel, how I look etc (well Im 59 so I got some skin stuff of course). So I have accepted 98 or 99 or something in that range as my ultimate goal. Not where I started at all.
And I am not restrictive but I think my TDEE is still climbing. I even thought maybe my thyroid meds were off and ran to get a blood test check because I couldn't believe I was losing while continuing to eat more and more. Not BINGE eating mind you but solid steady cal up ticks.
I know that the books say you eat less to maintain at a lower weight but there are just SO Many variables. 1 +1 doesn't always mean 2. Each person is individual.
What I am trying to say is hell yeah, accept a goal which is not your dream goal. maintain. let your body figure it out. You might be surprised when you decide you are going to MAINTAIN that you actually drop more. Best of luck. Lots of very insightful inputs on this thread.9 -
I love how I look at 125 but I just can't maintain at that weight. I am 133 (5'7) and I have the energy to keep up with my 2 kids, workout 4-5 days a week and get 10,000 steps + a day. When I get under 130 I start to become fatigued, moody, and feel over-trained.4
-
I have no science to support this so take it with a grain of salt, but I think sometimes our bodies just have a 'preferred weight' at which point losing becomes much more difficult. I lost upwards of 40 lbs fairly easily (well, it was hard but it was doable) but I've been averaging between 130-135 for months and months and months. At my height I could weigh as little as 110 and still be in a healthy range (115 was my original goal), but it's very tough to get there. I've worked my *kitten* off before and gotten in the 125-130 range a couple times, but I just get too hungry and end up back between 130-135. I struggled with it for a while but I'm mostly ok with it now. I haven't completely abandoned my goal weight but I'm happy and healthy where I am now.10
-
Thank you again everyone for your insightful responses! I love the internet because it allows you to not feel alone in your experiencesfitoverfortymom wrote: »
I remember this time last year I ended up with a pretty decent vitamin D deficiency, and I'm wondering if that's creeped up again.
Either way, I've decided I'm going to eat at maintenance for a while--maybe until it warms up later in the spring--and give these last pounds some serious thought then. If anything, the maintenance practice will be good for me and I will be better fueled for reaching my running goals.
I also just found out I have an iron and vitamin D deficiency again (I live in Canada and have malabsorption issues). Winter sucks for exercise and motivation!I'm also full-time working mom and it IS HARD. Before kids, I was 130 (5'7), but it was a lot of worrying about food and exercising in almost all of my free-time. That isn't something I'm interested in now, so I'm happy at 140 for now. I eat smart and lift progressively heavier 3x/week and do cardio 2x, but I just don't have the brain power to spend quality time with two preschoolers AND futz with every bite I eat AND spend any more time in the gym than absolutely necessary. The scale does read more than I wish it did, but I know that if I ever wanted to shift my priorities, I could. I just figure that right now, I want to be healthy as a model for my kids and to live a long life, but anything beyond that is just vanity (for me, maybe not for everyone).
Best of luck finding your balance!
Thank you! Yeah, I'm also mostly focused on healthy habits that I can teach to my daughter and feeling comfortable in my skin. The difference between a size 4 and an 8 isn't a priority right now. I hope to have another soon so I'll have baby weight to lose again as well. Perhaps once I'm past the pregnancy and young kids years I'll have different priorities.
3 -
I’m stuck at about 5 pounds over my goal weight. I’m set to lose weight but have maintained in a narrow range for 7 months because I go over my calories. I’m waiting for the weather to warm up to try for the final 5 pounds. My thinking is that once I get the weight off, the maintenance calories will be about the same so my body doesn’t nee 5 pounds of extra fat. I’m 5’2” and 129.10
-
Also a working mom. 3 kids. I hit vanity GW 2 years ago in April / May, and since then, I have tried (and FAILED!) to find a maintenance rhythm that works for me.
I seem to have 2 modes: losing and gaining. It might simply be that I'm aiming to "maintain" a GW that is unrealistic or at least inconsistent with the lifestyle I want to lead. It is probably also inconsistent with my fitness goals (which involve lifting and recomp). Even knowing this, my brain continues to be programmed to want to see certain numbers on the scale.
My solution has been to set fitness goals and basically, avoid the scale.7 -
Also a working mom. 3 kids. I hit vanity GW 2 years ago in April / May, and since then, I have tried (and FAILED!) to find a maintenance rhythm that works for me.
I seem to have 2 modes: losing and gaining. It might simply be that I'm aiming to "maintain" a GW that is unrealistic or at least inconsistent with the lifestyle I want to lead. It is probably also inconsistent with my fitness goals (which involve lifting and recomp). Even knowing this, my brain continues to be programmed to want to see certain numbers on the scale.
My solution has been to set fitness goals and basically, avoid the scale.
This is so my life @_piaffe - I could have written this myself, minus the the kids part.
2 -
I actually lost too much weight. My body went haywire. I am now trying to "bulk" up to 210lbs from 180 and maintain there. Slowly I might add. About 18 months or so. I am willing to accept a higher body fat at this weight, if it means feeling better3
-
I had a baby 18 months ago and pre-baby I was 134 and a size 4 (I'm 5'6''). I was really happy at that weight but I worked out a lot, cycled 100miles a week and weight lifted 3-4x a week. I have been maintaining at about 140 for a year and I'm now a size 6 or 8. My diet is similar, 1600-1800 calories a day (I use a food scale), but I'm not working out as often (weight lifting 2x a week).
For the past year I've had MFP set to "lose 1lb" a week, but I'm obviously eating too much/not exercising enough to lose the last 6lbs. I'm a full-time working mom and I just don't have the time, energy or motivation to workout like that anymore. Anyone experience this? I feel like I should stop feeling like "I can't lose weight" and just accept that I am in maintenance and at this stage in my life this is good enough.
@LisaTcan I did take weight loss off my my goal list in 2014 but I still have the goal to walk 1/4 of a mile daily outside of just normal daily moving. I just posted what I do now and how it is resolving weight and many other issues at:
community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10642943/i-gained-all-my-weight-back-starting-from-square-1#latest
Best of success and yes on the advice to give yourself more time.5 -
Yes, I maintained at 170 for a year and a half even though I need to get down to 140-150. Gained back 20 pounds and I’m using it to jump start me back into counting and logging so maybe I can finally get down to where I want and need to be. I never let it bring me down, though, I’ve loved my body through this whole process!! I’m proud to have lost the 140 I did and prouder that I could see I was gaining too much and I’m back on track now. It’s a process, and eventually I’ll get there! Life happens sometimes.11
-
Oh, la. I could have written that post. I stopped 2lbs shy of my ultimate weight loss goal of 50lbs in the summer of 2016 - maintained that more or less for a year and then over the past year I have put on 10 lbs. Grrr.
Work, life, you name it. Eating slightly more and exercising slightly less - put on a slight amount of weight. Lol.
I think my 'happy' weight is around 150lbs so if I can get back there I will be happier. But I also realize I am happier when I am counting calories and conscientiously thinking about everything I eat or drink. I spent years in denial so I think the accountability is good for me.
I am not giving up. Glad to read there are more people just like me out there.
7 -
140lbs at 5'6" is perfectly healthy. If trying to get below that makes you miserable don't do it. Just try to maintain. I'm kind of at that stage myself. I'm about 15lbs over where I'd like to be, but at almost 50 and having several health issues that make it hard to exercise I've just about decided to work at just not gaining anymore and stop trying to lose. You don't want losing weight to become an obsession. Enjoy your little one and your life first, lose weight second.7
-
I'm 5'6" and got down to 136 a few years ago, but it was too hard to maintain and I had people I trust expressing concern that I looked too thin. I also found myself having dizzy spells when getting up on a regular basis, which motivated me to check my BP and I was hypotensive. My body is a lot happier at about 150 and I don't have to kill myself to maintain that. When I went to nursing school while working full time night shifts, I gained some weight back and now have about 20 to lose to get back to 150. I'm being lackadaisical about it, but Lent just started so I am going to use it as an opportunity to help me be more disciplined. But my goal is 150 and will stay there, because I can be comfortable there and it's in my healthy weight range.7
-
I wonder if 5'6" and 135 is like a weird, magic, impossible number. I see a lot of us are right around it. I'm between 5'5" and 5'6" and also struggle to hit 135. I maintain around 142 but in my head am still trying to be 135 (and have been for the last 10 years.) At this point I chalk it up to young children and a stressful job. I know several people that have "retired" early and lost weight magically (just because they had time and lower stress).6
-
I wonder if for many people that lower weight they give up on is really a proxy for being smaller and the real goal should shift to body composition. As an example, I'm 165 and 18% BF and my priority is now that BF as the goal and that's a mix of fat loss and muscle gain vs total weight loss.6
-
richardgavel wrote: »I wonder if for many people that lower weight they give up on is really a proxy for being smaller and the real goal should shift to body composition. As an example, I'm 165 and 18% BF and my priority is now that BF as the goal and that's a mix of fat loss and muscle gain vs total weight loss.
Yes! I see a lot of people stuck with a number in mind from when they were younger and that number just may not be achievable anymore based upon their body composition. I believe it's must better to use BF%, measurements, pictures, etc. to go by rather than a number on a scale.4 -
richardgavel wrote: »I wonder if for many people that lower weight they give up on is really a proxy for being smaller and the real goal should shift to body composition. As an example, I'm 165 and 18% BF and my priority is now that BF as the goal and that's a mix of fat loss and muscle gain vs total weight loss.
When I hit my target of 135 the first time I was still unhappy with my body because I was thin but not lean. After bulking a cutting a few times for training and weightlifting meets my measurements now at 145 are significantly smaller than when I weighed 135 so I TOTALLY agree that body composition should be the goal vs. weight loss, however it's a hard mentality for many to wrap their heads around (especially those that haven't been involved in fitness long) because a weight number goal is an easy goal to set and track for most people, body composition isn't as easy to track and people lose that "successful" feeling when they're not getting that pat on the back from seeing the scale move in the direction they want.10 -
I'm older & lost 48 lbs. I'm 148 & want to lose 10 more but I don't seem to be able to so I may stay where I'm at1
-
I am looking at accepting this now .. my goal was 70kg based purrely on it being a nice round number .. I am only 2kg away and not sure its worth pushing for the 70kg mark
I dont think I am going to look any more defined if I drop 2 more kg ... I think I am still too far away from permanent visible abs, so all its going to get me is overall thinness and bit more muscle loss.
so right now considering maintaining and getting my strength and power back ..... its a hard descition to make though. so used to being in a deficit it seems wrong to just stop7 -
StarBrightStarBright wrote: »I wonder if 5'6" and 135 is like a weird, magic, impossible number. I see a lot of us are right around it. I'm between 5'5" and 5'6" and also struggle to hit 135. I maintain around 142 but in my head am still trying to be 135 (and have been for the last 10 years
Interesting... I'm 5'5" and goal was 135. I'm between 143 and 146. Can't seem to get that last 10 pounds off no matter what I do. I'm also 61 years old so my already icky metabolism (I have low thyroid) is pretty slow. Makes me feel better to know I'm not alone.
2 -
The last 10 or 20 pounds can be hard and take years. Having been under 200 for three years for the first time in 25 years I finally made health markers my 'goals'. Actually longevity is my health goal.
60 is my goal for triglycerides, HDL and Vit D (ng) levels. On last tests they were 83, 63 and 104ng. Google gives a lot of info from varied sources about how to change these levels in the direction that one may desire.
60 is just my personal objective since quality and quantity of life are key to me.
As I get older I want as few of things to track as possible should my family have to do more of my thinking on health matters.4 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »The last 10 or 20 pounds can be hard and take years. Having been under 200 for three years for the first time in 25 years I finally made health markers my 'goals'. Actually longevity is my health goal.
60 is my goal for triglycerides, HDL and Vit D (ng) levels. On last tests they were 83, 63 and 104ng. Google gives a lot of info from varied sources about how to change these levels in the direction that one may desire.
60 is just my personal objective since quality and quantity of life are key to me.
As I get older I want as few of things to track as possible should my family have to do more of my thinking on health matters.
Still within normal ranges.1 -
I went the other way. I tried to be realistic about what I would be able to accomplish and stick to, so I chose a weight I used to be happy with before I put on substantially more weight. When I got to it I decided I was going too easy on myself; I was actually still overweight. So I changed the goal and kept going.6
-
If I can get back to my profile pic weight again, I'll probably just maintain that and be happy1
-
I hired a pro body builder years ago to get me started on lifting and perfecting my form and I follow her on Instagram. She built much of her clientele by showing 2 pics - one when she was killing herself with cardio and weighing 115 lbs and another when she shifted to resistance training and at 130 lbs. Aesthetically speaking she looks much better at 130. Don't focus on a number on the scale.
Focus on the output that matters - strength, speed, endurance, aesthetics, etc.
Don't allow weight to matter more than it does.8 -
psychod787 wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »The last 10 or 20 pounds can be hard and take years. Having been under 200 for three years for the first time in 25 years I finally made health markers my 'goals'. Actually longevity is my health goal.
60 is my goal for triglycerides, HDL and Vit D (ng) levels. On last tests they were 83, 63 and 104ng. Google gives a lot of info from varied sources about how to change these levels in the direction that one may desire.
60 is just my personal objective since quality and quantity of life are key to me.
As I get older I want as few of things to track as possible should my family have to do more of my thinking on health matters.
Still within normal ranges.
As is an IQ of 90-110 is in the normal range but many work to get it to 111+.
iqcomparisonsite.com/iqbasics.aspx7 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »psychod787 wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »The last 10 or 20 pounds can be hard and take years. Having been under 200 for three years for the first time in 25 years I finally made health markers my 'goals'. Actually longevity is my health goal.
60 is my goal for triglycerides, HDL and Vit D (ng) levels. On last tests they were 83, 63 and 104ng. Google gives a lot of info from varied sources about how to change these levels in the direction that one may desire.
60 is just my personal objective since quality and quantity of life are key to me.
As I get older I want as few of things to track as possible should my family have to do more of my thinking on health matters.
Still within normal ranges.
As is an IQ of 90-110 is in the normal range but many work to get it to 111+.
iqcomparisonsite.com/iqbasics.aspx
Fair enough. Lol1 -
Yes, and no. I haven't lost ANY weight since starting this journey again two months ago and it's making me rethink my overall goals, body composition, etc. For the longest time my goal was 130-132. It's what I weighed my senior year in high school and my first couple years in college. I had an unhealthy relationship with food, but overall it was one of the few times in my life I've really liked my appearance. So now I'm about 35 pounds heavier and don't know if I'll ever be able to reach that weight again. I don't want to set myself up for disappointment, so I'm going to set a series of small, hopefully tangible goals. Each time I reach a goal, I'll reassess and decide if losing any more weight is necessary/feasible.6
-
Yes, and no. I haven't lost ANY weight since starting this journey again two months ago and it's making me rethink my overall goals, body composition, etc. For the longest time my goal was 130-132. It's what I weighed my senior year in high school and my first couple years in college. I had an unhealthy relationship with food, but overall it was one of the few times in my life I've really liked my appearance. So now I'm about 35 pounds heavier and don't know if I'll ever be able to reach that weight again. I don't want to set myself up for disappointment, so I'm going to set a series of small, hopefully tangible goals. Each time I reach a goal, I'll reassess and decide if losing any more weight is necessary/feasible.
7
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions