Anyone accept a weight that wasn't their "ultimate goal"?

2

Replies

  • ChelzFit
    ChelzFit Posts: 292 Member
    I love how I look at 125 but I just can't maintain at that weight. I am 133 (5'7) and I have the energy to keep up with my 2 kids, workout 4-5 days a week and get 10,000 steps + a day. When I get under 130 I start to become fatigued, moody, and feel over-trained.
  • LisaTcan
    LisaTcan Posts: 410 Member
    edited February 2018
    Thank you again everyone for your insightful responses! I love the internet because it allows you to not feel alone in your experiences :)

    I remember this time last year I ended up with a pretty decent vitamin D deficiency, and I'm wondering if that's creeped up again.

    Either way, I've decided I'm going to eat at maintenance for a while--maybe until it warms up later in the spring--and give these last pounds some serious thought then. If anything, the maintenance practice will be good for me and I will be better fueled for reaching my running goals.

    I also just found out I have an iron and vitamin D deficiency again (I live in Canada and have malabsorption issues). Winter sucks for exercise and motivation!
    Alexson50 wrote: »
    I'm also full-time working mom and it IS HARD. Before kids, I was 130 (5'7), but it was a lot of worrying about food and exercising in almost all of my free-time. That isn't something I'm interested in now, so I'm happy at 140 for now. I eat smart and lift progressively heavier 3x/week and do cardio 2x, but I just don't have the brain power to spend quality time with two preschoolers AND futz with every bite I eat AND spend any more time in the gym than absolutely necessary. The scale does read more than I wish it did, but I know that if I ever wanted to shift my priorities, I could. I just figure that right now, I want to be healthy as a model for my kids and to live a long life, but anything beyond that is just vanity (for me, maybe not for everyone).

    Best of luck finding your balance!

    Thank you! Yeah, I'm also mostly focused on healthy habits that I can teach to my daughter and feeling comfortable in my skin. The difference between a size 4 and an 8 isn't a priority right now. I hope to have another soon so I'll have baby weight to lose again as well. Perhaps once I'm past the pregnancy and young kids years I'll have different priorities.
  • sofchak
    sofchak Posts: 862 Member
    _piaffe wrote: »
    Also a working mom. 3 kids. I hit vanity GW 2 years ago in April / May, and since then, I have tried (and FAILED!) to find a maintenance rhythm that works for me.

    I seem to have 2 modes: losing and gaining. It might simply be that I'm aiming to "maintain" a GW that is unrealistic or at least inconsistent with the lifestyle I want to lead. It is probably also inconsistent with my fitness goals (which involve lifting and recomp). Even knowing this, my brain continues to be programmed to want to see certain numbers on the scale.

    My solution has been to set fitness goals and basically, avoid the scale.

    This is so my life @_piaffe - I could have written this myself, minus the the kids part.

  • psychod787
    psychod787 Posts: 4,099 Member
    edited February 2018
    I actually lost too much weight. My body went haywire. I am now trying to "bulk" up to 210lbs from 180 and maintain there. Slowly I might add. About 18 months or so. I am willing to accept a higher body fat at this weight, if it means feeling better
  • mom23mangos
    mom23mangos Posts: 3,069 Member
    I wonder if for many people that lower weight they give up on is really a proxy for being smaller and the real goal should shift to body composition. As an example, I'm 165 and 18% BF and my priority is now that BF as the goal and that's a mix of fat loss and muscle gain vs total weight loss.

    Yes! I see a lot of people stuck with a number in mind from when they were younger and that number just may not be achievable anymore based upon their body composition. I believe it's must better to use BF%, measurements, pictures, etc. to go by rather than a number on a scale.
  • Evamutt
    Evamutt Posts: 2,743 Member
    I'm older & lost 48 lbs. I'm 148 & want to lose 10 more but I don't seem to be able to so I may stay where I'm at
  • cheryldumais
    cheryldumais Posts: 1,907 Member
    I wonder if 5'6" and 135 is like a weird, magic, impossible number. I see a lot of us are right around it. I'm between 5'5" and 5'6" and also struggle to hit 135. I maintain around 142 but in my head am still trying to be 135 (and have been for the last 10 years

    Interesting... I'm 5'5" and goal was 135. I'm between 143 and 146. Can't seem to get that last 10 pounds off no matter what I do. I'm also 61 years old so my already icky metabolism (I have low thyroid) is pretty slow. Makes me feel better to know I'm not alone.

  • GaleHawkins
    GaleHawkins Posts: 8,159 Member
    The last 10 or 20 pounds can be hard and take years. Having been under 200 for three years for the first time in 25 years I finally made health markers my 'goals'. Actually longevity is my health goal. :)

    60 is my goal for triglycerides, HDL and Vit D (ng) levels. On last tests they were 83, 63 and 104ng. Google gives a lot of info from varied sources about how to change these levels in the direction that one may desire.

    60 is just my personal objective since quality and quantity of life are key to me.

    As I get older I want as few of things to track as possible should my family have to do more of my thinking on health matters.
  • psychod787
    psychod787 Posts: 4,099 Member
    The last 10 or 20 pounds can be hard and take years. Having been under 200 for three years for the first time in 25 years I finally made health markers my 'goals'. Actually longevity is my health goal. :)

    60 is my goal for triglycerides, HDL and Vit D (ng) levels. On last tests they were 83, 63 and 104ng. Google gives a lot of info from varied sources about how to change these levels in the direction that one may desire.

    60 is just my personal objective since quality and quantity of life are key to me.

    As I get older I want as few of things to track as possible should my family have to do more of my thinking on health matters.

    Still within normal ranges.
  • Go_Deskercise
    Go_Deskercise Posts: 1,630 Member
    If I can get back to my profile pic weight again, I'll probably just maintain that and be happy :)
  • psychod787
    psychod787 Posts: 4,099 Member
    psychod787 wrote: »
    The last 10 or 20 pounds can be hard and take years. Having been under 200 for three years for the first time in 25 years I finally made health markers my 'goals'. Actually longevity is my health goal. :)

    60 is my goal for triglycerides, HDL and Vit D (ng) levels. On last tests they were 83, 63 and 104ng. Google gives a lot of info from varied sources about how to change these levels in the direction that one may desire.

    60 is just my personal objective since quality and quantity of life are key to me.

    As I get older I want as few of things to track as possible should my family have to do more of my thinking on health matters.

    Still within normal ranges.

    As is an IQ of 90-110 is in the normal range but many work to get it to 111+. :)

    iqcomparisonsite.com/iqbasics.aspx

    Fair enough. Lol