Intermittent fasting ? Does it work for you????

Options
13567

Replies

  • annaskiski
    annaskiski Posts: 1,212 Member
    edited August 2018
    Options
    gebeziseva wrote: »
    I'm trying a new (for me) approach to losing weight at the moment which now that I think might classify as an IF somewhat. I alter one week of deficit (with 1lbs a week loss rate) with one or two weeks of maintanance. It is working so far.

    Psychologicaly I've gotten a bit tired of trying (and not succeeding) to sustain a small (200cal) deficit for what it seems forever (I've been counting for 3 years). I think that it is better for me now to be more restrictive for a limited time and then take a week or two a break at maintanance. This way I might be able to afford eating every-so-often the deserts and treats that I think of all the time. I normally can't afford them while eating at a deficit without having to trade them for lunch or another meal. And I can't skip meals without a great discomfort. So a constant deficit makes me feel deprived and I can't sustain it for a long time.

    I only have 10ish pounds to lose now so the calorie budget is small. My sedentiary maintanance is about 1500 and I exercise for around 300 more. So tdee gets to about 1800. I eat 1300 for a week and then 1800 for a week and so on.

    This isn't IF, but a diet break. It's highly recommended by Lyle McDonald, esp. if you've been dieting for a long time.

    good thread about it here....
    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10604863/of-refeeds-and-diet-breaks/p1
  • Jerrypeoples
    Jerrypeoples Posts: 1,541 Member
    Options
    ive dropped probably 10 or so lbs in the past month doing so. there may be other factors at play here

    for example

    intermittent fasting for me is 16 hours no food 8 hours to eat 2000cals (usually ends up at 2150 or so)
    have been doing a new workout program called Mass2 and it has really been busting my tail
    i do 2.5 mile jog/walk at lunch during work
    shoot hoops for 30-45 minutes after work just to clear my head and not think for a bit

    find out what works for you. take advice from people who do it and do not be afraid to adjust

    people who say they like breakfast too much believe breakfast as a meal should happen no later than 8am. by definition breakfast means to break fast. so whether you eat breakfast at 3am, 8am or 10am its still breakfast
  • CharlieBeansmomTracey
    CharlieBeansmomTracey Posts: 7,682 Member
    Options
    mathura06 wrote: »
    I usually intermittent fast, as I don’t really eat dinner so I do a 18:6 fast (or the other way round sorry) but it really works, cause it causes your body to go into starvation mode to burn more fat, but if you want to start, start with a low fats so like 12:12 or 14:10 (or the other way round again sorry) as then you can increase as your hunger stops!

    NO,IF does NOT cause your body to go into starvation mode to burn more fat. you only burn so much body fat at a time as it is, and if you were truly starving your body would burn more than just fat it would be burning lean mass/muscle as well just to create energy to function. starvation mode when dieting doesnt exist. starvation does exist.

    I kinda wondered about this. The old definition of starvation mode was that your body holds onto all of the fat...but now it causes you to burn fat faster?
    I must have been away too long. I can't keep my woo straight anymore. :smiley:

    starvation mode is believed to be when your body thinks its starving so it hold on to everything,but of course thats wrong.your body doesnt hold on to anything if starving of course.
  • CharlieBeansmomTracey
    CharlieBeansmomTracey Posts: 7,682 Member
    Options
    mathura06 wrote: »
    I usually intermittent fast, as I don’t really eat dinner so I do a 18:6 fast (or the other way round sorry) but it really works, cause it causes your body to go into starvation mode to burn more fat, but if you want to start, start with a low fats so like 12:12 or 14:10 (or the other way round again sorry) as then you can increase as your hunger stops!

    NO,IF does NOT cause your body to go into starvation mode to burn more fat. you only burn so much body fat at a time as it is, and if you were truly starving your body would burn more than just fat it would be burning lean mass/muscle as well just to create energy to function. starvation mode when dieting doesnt exist. starvation does exist.

    I kinda wondered about this. The old definition of starvation mode was that your body holds onto all of the fat...but now it causes you to burn fat faster?
    I must have been away too long. I can't keep my woo straight anymore. :smiley:

    starvation mode is believed to be when your body thinks its starving so it hold on to everything,but of course thats wrong.your body doesnt hold on to anything if starving of course.

    I'm a good example of "starvation mode" not being a thing thanks to gastroparesis

    I'm 5'8

    5/8 124
    5/12 123.2
    5/15 122.5
    5/18 122
    5/24 122.5
    5/25 121.7
    5/27 120.9
    5/30 119.7
    6/1 118.9
    6/3 117.9
    6/7 118. 7
    6/23 118.1
    6/24 117.5
    6/27 117.1
    7/2 116.3
    7/3 115.7
    7/6 114.1
    7/7 113.3
    7/10 112.9
    7/13 112.5
    7/15 111.9
    7/20 110.9
    7/26 109.7
    8/7 109.7
    8/10 108.9
    8/13 107.9
    8/27 106.7


    starvation mode would mean you wouldnt lose weight if it were a thing. and sorry you have to deal with having that health issue.
  • singingflutelady
    singingflutelady Posts: 8,736 Member
    Options
    mathura06 wrote: »
    I usually intermittent fast, as I don’t really eat dinner so I do a 18:6 fast (or the other way round sorry) but it really works, cause it causes your body to go into starvation mode to burn more fat, but if you want to start, start with a low fats so like 12:12 or 14:10 (or the other way round again sorry) as then you can increase as your hunger stops!

    NO,IF does NOT cause your body to go into starvation mode to burn more fat. you only burn so much body fat at a time as it is, and if you were truly starving your body would burn more than just fat it would be burning lean mass/muscle as well just to create energy to function. starvation mode when dieting doesnt exist. starvation does exist.

    I kinda wondered about this. The old definition of starvation mode was that your body holds onto all of the fat...but now it causes you to burn fat faster?
    I must have been away too long. I can't keep my woo straight anymore. :smiley:

    starvation mode is believed to be when your body thinks its starving so it hold on to everything,but of course thats wrong.your body doesnt hold on to anything if starving of course.

    I'm a good example of "starvation mode" not being a thing thanks to gastroparesis

    I'm 5'8

    5/8 124
    5/12 123.2
    5/15 122.5
    5/18 122
    5/24 122.5
    5/25 121.7
    5/27 120.9
    5/30 119.7
    6/1 118.9
    6/3 117.9
    6/7 118. 7
    6/23 118.1
    6/24 117.5
    6/27 117.1
    7/2 116.3
    7/3 115.7
    7/6 114.1
    7/7 113.3
    7/10 112.9
    7/13 112.5
    7/15 111.9
    7/20 110.9
    7/26 109.7
    8/7 109.7
    8/10 108.9
    8/13 107.9
    8/27 106.7


    starvation mode would mean you wouldnt lose weight if it were a thing. and sorry you have to deal with having that health issue.

    Thanks and yup I know.