Not Losing?

germangirl2007
germangirl2007 Posts: 31 Member
edited November 28 in Motivation and Support
I started tracking on MFP about 6 weeks ago. Haven’t missed a day. Almost every day (minus a few I’ve allowed myself) I’ve finished under my calorie goals. I just joined a gym finally this week, and I’ve been here every day for 45-60 min. That said, I’ve been fluctuating on the same 2 pounds +/- for the past 3 weeks or so. This should be simple - CICO. Why isn’t the scale moving?

Replies

  • 88olds
    88olds Posts: 4,538 Member
    edited September 2018
    How much have you set out to lose?

    Are you using a food scale?

    Are you adding calories based on your exercise?

    And don’t fret. There’s a significant calorie counting learning curve that is rarely discussed. You can work through this.
  • Running2Fit
    Running2Fit Posts: 702 Member
    Maybe your calorie goal isn’t low enough or you are miscalculating the number of calories you are eating. Lots of gyms offer a free personal training session to new members maybe see if your gym does and see if you can get some helpful feedback from a PT
  • germangirl2007
    germangirl2007 Posts: 31 Member
    I weigh 167 and my goal is 140. I’m eating between 1200 and 1300 calories a day. Sometimes i do add more for exercise but on those days i have always finished under goal. I’m either tracking things according to the package (I.e. 1 pkg of oatmeal is 100 calories), or I’m measuring to the extent possible. I’ll scan barcodes or look up nutrition information online if I’m going somewhere. It’s definitely possible that I’m off sometimes, but I’m really diligent about being as accurate as possible and tracking everything. Maybe I’m eating at the wrong times? Does that matter?
  • Cahgetsfit
    Cahgetsfit Posts: 1,912 Member
    meal times are not relevant. Could be miscalculations. But, here i will get "woo'd" for this, but I kinda agree with the first response up the top - yes CICO is a MAJOR factor, however personally I feel there is more to it than just that. Hormonal imbalances for example. When I started my weight loss journey it was soooo hard to lose and my oestrogen was stupid. Now when I pack some on, it's easy to lose. I just need to shut my mouth a bit. Anyway I won't go into any big answers here coz I know i'll just get slammed, but yeah, also, another thing, more than one professional very good nutritionists and trainers who I have worked with (as in been their clients) have said that unless you are tiny short you should be at more than 1200 cals. 1200 cals only for short periods of time when dieting down for particular things.

    aaaand again lots of people will disagree with me there so i better just shut up now.
  • germangirl2007
    germangirl2007 Posts: 31 Member
    I have an appt w/a personal trainer tomorrow so maybe that will help. I’ve worked w/a nutritionist before but I’ve noticed that things have definitely changed since I had my second baby and got old! Haha! I just need to figure out what will work for me now. I’ve done really well on Whole30, but that’s not sustainable for me. :(
  • L1zardQueen
    L1zardQueen Posts: 8,753 Member
    kami3006 wrote: »
    Meal timing is not relevant to weight loss. Logging accurately is the biggest factor. Using measuring cups can put you off significantly as can going off of packages, which are by law allowed to be up to 20% off. Using erroneous entries can also be an issue and scanning labels only pulls up user-created data just like any other search.

    The simplest way is to use a food scale and see exactly what you're eating. They can make a significant difference.

    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10634517/you-dont-use-a-food-scale/p1

    This^^. Food scale
  • germangirl2007
    germangirl2007 Posts: 31 Member
    I should also say that up until I started tracking again (6-ish weeks ago), I was probably eating close to double this amount of calories in a day, so I’ve cut WAY back.
  • countcurt
    countcurt Posts: 593 Member
    I'm impressed. You've managed to touch on every possible reason (no matter how unlikely) for not losing weight. Except that you're eating too much. You've discussed all sorts of potential 'fixes' and it's been pointed out to you several times that you are obviously eating too much and your current tools are not providing you with what you need to achieve your goal.

    So, here's the question set...

    Do you currently use a food scale?
    If yes, what is it telling you?
    If no, is this something you would consider going forward?
  • kimny72
    kimny72 Posts: 16,011 Member
    edited September 2018

    yes they do!


    How do they matter as far as whether someone is losing weight or not?
  • germangirl2007
    germangirl2007 Posts: 31 Member
    countcurt wrote: »
    I'm impressed. You've managed to touch on every possible reason (no matter how unlikely) for not losing weight. Except that you're eating too much. You've discussed all sorts of potential 'fixes' and it's been pointed out to you several times that you are obviously eating too much and your current tools are not providing you with what you need to achieve your goal.

    So, here's the question set...

    Do you currently use a food scale?
    If yes, what is it telling you?
    If no, is this something you would consider going forward?

    I think I specifically said that I may be miscalculating, despite trying diligently to be accurate. I hadn’t previously used a food scale but read packages, scanned barcodes, and measured using measuring cups. Since it was pointed out in this thread by multiple people that none of those things actually work well, I’ve ordered a food scale. Know better, do better. Any other failings you’d like to point out?
  • germangirl2007
    germangirl2007 Posts: 31 Member
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    You may want to take the time to read this article - it explains every possible reason why you could not be losing weight, and offers helpful advice in overcoming every one of them. The most thorough article of its kind I've ever seen: https://www.aworkoutroutine.com/why-am-i-not-losing-weight/

    Thank you so much! This is definitely the most comprehensive I've ever seen, and honestly, there are probably a handful of things on here or more that apply to me. I will dig in!
  • Machka9
    Machka9 Posts: 25,681 Member
    I weigh 167 and my goal is 140. I’m eating between 1200 and 1300 calories a day. Sometimes i do add more for exercise but on those days i have always finished under goal. I’m either tracking things according to the package (I.e. 1 pkg of oatmeal is 100 calories), or I’m measuring to the extent possible. I’ll scan barcodes or look up nutrition information online if I’m going somewhere. It’s definitely possible that I’m off sometimes, but I’m really diligent about being as accurate as possible and tracking everything. Maybe I’m eating at the wrong times? Does that matter?

    You don't mention a food scale ... are you using one?

    For your 45-60 min of exercise, how many calories do you think you're burning?
  • Machka9
    Machka9 Posts: 25,681 Member
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    You may want to take the time to read this article - it explains every possible reason why you could not be losing weight, and offers helpful advice in overcoming every one of them. The most thorough article of its kind I've ever seen: https://www.aworkoutroutine.com/why-am-i-not-losing-weight/

    That is good!
  • kmurray617
    kmurray617 Posts: 1 Member
    Honestly, it doesn't matter what the scale says. You are most likely losing fat and replacing it with muscle. Start measuring yourself instead of weighing yourself and make sure to eat a good amount of protein. I would also advise you to not eat processed foods and if you have time, make as many home made meals as possible! If you're still concerned, i would see a Dr just to make sure you don't have health problems that are preventing you from losing weight.

    Good luck!!
  • AnvilHead
    AnvilHead Posts: 18,343 Member
    edited September 2018
    kmurray617 wrote: »
    Honestly, it doesn't matter what the scale says. You are most likely losing fat and replacing it with muscle.
    Unless she ‘forgot’ to mention that she’s taking supraphysical doses of anabolic steroids, that’s definitely not what’s happening. You don’t build muscle at a rate which would offset fat loss while in a caloric deficit.
  • beellllaa
    beellllaa Posts: 1 Member
    I hope I don't get my head chewed off for this, but the absolute least amount of calories you should be eating a day is 1200 - generally speaking - just to survive. So maybe it would be more beneficial for you to get your body used to eating more food, roughly 1800 or so calories, then do a cut to around 1300 or 1400 a day + exercising.
This discussion has been closed.