Should I eat back my exercise calories?
jmath0303
Posts: 71 Member
Ghjj
0
Replies
-
Try eating about 75% of your earned exercise calories for a couple weeks and see how you do.0
-
Yes, eat most of them back. Try 50% for starters and if you are losing too much then you can safely eat more1
-
No17
-
No...17
-
I set my diet at maintenance calories, with high protein, mid range fat and then enough carbs for daily workout energy. I consume 90% of my carbs before daily workout my calories in addition to fat and protein and then eat the rest of my daily calories after I work out and before I log my work out at the end of the day. I do not back eat but use these as my loss for the day. Using this method I am cutting just under 1% body fat per week but not losing massive pounds or muscle mass. Over last 5 weeks down 4.5% body fat but only three total pounds body weight.1
-
Yes, at least a portion until you know they're accurate.
If my normal maintenance calories for my activity level at 2000 and I do 200 calorie workout I will absolutely eat those calories back. That's how MFP is set to work.0 -
Stockholm_Andy wrote: »Nojanicelo1971 wrote: »No...
This is the answer if you're following a TDEE calculation that includes exercise. If you're going by MFP's goals, then you should be eating at least a portion of them.12 -
Yes - at least some of them. The MFP goal is calculated before any exercise, and you want to fuel your activity. However, be mindful of whether the numbers are likely to be accurate. Things like step trackers with HR monitors have a tendency to ridiculously over-estimate calories, including resting time or over-estimating exertion level when logging an activity, stuff like aerobics is a complete wildcard, etc.. which is why many people suggest only eating back a fraction. Logging walking/running based on mileage (or distance & average speed) will usually be pretty spot-on though.1
-
I always do. I need to fuel my workouts and I earned those calories. Starving myself would not be sustainable in the long term. I've been eating back most of my exercise calories for over 7 years now with success in both losing and maintaining.4
-
If you want to maintain weight then you must eat back all your exercise calories burned.
(But your actual burn and your estimated burn may not be the same.)3 -
I'm eating 1200 calories a day...I'm 12 stone and 5'7 .I started running today so I'm earning quite a lot..I don't want to hinder my weight loss2
-
I'd do it at maintenance ..why wouldn't you? In reduction, yes if you're hungry or want to eat more. But so near goal...i'm not eating them back...i want to lose faster.1
-
Usually when this question is asked, the answer is a disappointing no. Calories burned are never accurate, so if say your fitbit and MFP integration said you burned 560 cals, chances are you didn't actually burn this much. The way I look at it is if I'm absolutely STARVING then I'll have something extra in say the 100-200 cal range max when I have that exercise "deficit but not really a deficit". Also exercising so you can eat more is an unhealthy mindset to get into, it can actually turn into a disorder called exercise bulimia.12
-
I am trying to maintain and lost more so I plan on eating some this week.1
-
catsareevil wrote: »Usually when this question is asked, the answer is a disappointing no. Calories burned are never accurate, so if say your fitbit and MFP integration said you burned 560 cals, chances are you didn't actually burn this much. The way I look at it is if I'm absolutely STARVING then I'll have something extra in say the 100-200 cal range max when I have that exercise "deficit but not really a deficit". Also exercising so you can eat more is an unhealthy mindset to get into, it can actually turn into a disorder called exercise bulimia.
The site is designed for you to eat your exercise calories and it works. Not as a reward, but as a way to fuel your body. Yes, calculators are estimates but it doesn't take much effort to determine what your calorie burns are. Start conservatively and adapted based on real results. Not eating exercise calories greatly affects my workouts. And MFP was actually pretty darn close for me in both cardio and lifting so it's not correct to say they're never close.
Worth linking again: https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10300319/most-helpful-posts-general-health-fitness-and-diet-must-reads#latest
6 -
I am trying to maintain and lost more so I plan on eating some this week.
But you need to eat ALL of your actual exercise burns or you will continue losing.
If you are having trouble getting reasonable estimates then maybe use the common net calorie formula for walking as that looks to be your predominate exercise....
Bodyweight in lbs x distance in miles x 0.302 -
That is terrifying going to have to experiment a bit at a time1
-
catsareevil wrote: »Usually when this question is asked, the answer is a disappointing no. Calories burned are never accurate, so if say your fitbit and MFP integration said you burned 560 cals, chances are you didn't actually burn this much. The way I look at it is if I'm absolutely STARVING then I'll have something extra in say the 100-200 cal range max when I have that exercise "deficit but not really a deficit". Also exercising so you can eat more is an unhealthy mindset to get into, it can actually turn into a disorder called exercise bulimia.
My FitBit underestimates my calories by about 200 per day. If I were using MFP numbers, it would be appropriate to eat ALL of the adjustment calories.
Hopefully, OP has it figured out by now as to what works for him.2 -
Stockholm_Andy wrote: »Nojanicelo1971 wrote: »No...
This is the answer if you're following a TDEE calculation that includes exercise. If you're going by MFP's goals, then you should be eating at least a portion of them.
It's not even the right answer if you are doing the TDEE method - TDEE takes exercise into account when the goal is calculated. They are eating exercise calories, they just aren't separating them out like MFP does. They are actually making an even less accurate estimate. That the method still works when the actual duration of exercise isn't known should reassure people exercise calories aren't to be feared.
When you see people get to maintenance and then sat they are "terrified" to eat back their exercise burns then it should be obvious that it's a skill best to learn while losing weight.9 -
In my opinion, it’s yes and no.
For example, if I burn 400cals on a cycle, I wouldn’t necessarily think of it as 400extra but I would see it as a buffer if I crept over my allowance.
Sometimes, I’m just not hungry and won’t eat for the sake of it but if I went over my allocation and had the extra, it wouldn’t bother me. I also would not want to use the entire amount, maybe 50% of it but that’s only down to accuracy of the calories burnt.0 -
I eat them back but I suspect they're over estimated.
If I don't eat them back, I lose weight and my goal, having successfully gained weight, is to maintain1 -
the calories earned through exercise are a guesstimate. Calories burned doing exercise are different for everybody and most amounts listed as exercise per hour are estimated.
I personally ignore the calories earned portion in MFP as do I ignore the "if every day were like today..." because it is not accurate.
Then again counting calories isn't exactly 100% accurate either. The key is to adjust based on your needs. Just eat healthy, eat wholesome, eat reasonable portions and exercise as much as you can!1 -
the calories earned through exercise are a guesstimate. Calories burned doing exercise are different for everybody and most amounts listed as exercise per hour are estimated.
I personally ignore the calories earned portion in MFP as do I ignore the "if every day were like today..." because it is not accurate.
Then again counting calories isn't exactly 100% accurate either. The key is to adjust based on your needs. Just eat healthy, eat wholesome, eat reasonable portions and exercise as much as you can!
I never understood this concept... yes, they are estimates and they could be wrong, but if you are exercising, you are burning SOME calories so there is one number that is definitively wrong and that’s ZERO. Why would you choose the one number you know is wrong and go with that for how many calories to eat back?7 -
the calories earned through exercise are a guesstimate. Calories burned doing exercise are different for everybody and most amounts listed as exercise per hour are estimated.
I personally ignore the calories earned portion in MFP as do I ignore the "if every day were like today..." because it is not accurate.
Then again counting calories isn't exactly 100% accurate either. The key is to adjust based on your needs. Just eat healthy, eat wholesome, eat reasonable portions and exercise as much as you can!
I'm not seeing any logic in that at all.
By that reasoning you would log all your fruit and veg intake as zero as the calories are estimated rather than accurate and will vary with ripeness and variety.
Exercise estimates can be low as well as high - it's the nature of estimating, my Garmin tends to underestimate my cycling quite significantly. What exercise burns simply can't be is zero.
If I ignored the estimated 173,000 calories (just from sports cycling) in the last 365 days not eating them back would be pretty disastrous.
IMHO the key to calorie counting is estimate sensibly and with some care on both sides of the CICO equation.5
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions