Increased appetite after losing weight..??

ennailllieno1
ennailllieno1 Posts: 14 Member
edited December 19 in Health and Weight Loss
So I lost about 25 lbs since starting MFP a year ago.
I was on 1200 cal/day. Now I've decided to slow it down. I still want to get leaner (not necessarily going by weight)
I've noticed now that it's extremely difficult for me to stay within my calorie goal which is actually 1680 now. I'm eating like 1800-1900 cals daily, easily, even when I'm not doing any activity and I still feel like I'm only eating when I'm hungry.
So what's the deal? I think its partially because I'm less motivated because I only wanna lose like 5 lbs now, and also partially my appetite has increased significantly.
Is this a problem? Have you experienced this?
How important are calories anyway?
I'm worried I'll gain the weight back if I keep consuming 1800 + per day (even though that's my maintenance amount) because it's so much more than I was eating before.
Any tips or info?
Thx!
«1

Replies

  • admaarie
    admaarie Posts: 4,297 Member
    It is a *thing* when increasing calories to suddenly be experiencing increased appetite.

    That's one reason why we preach to not have a huge deficit at the end of weight loss. Going from 1200 to 1800 in one jump will cause this. It's also possible that even 1800 is too low for your lifestyle. You'll have to play around with it. My "maintenance" calories are 1500 if I use online calculators, but I actually maintain on 2000+ Exercise calories.

    The good news is that it will settle down if you're at the right level and can maintain your weight at that calorie level. Just keep doing the right things and stay at that level for a couple more weeks and you should get back down to manageable appetite.

    It's a real thing! It happens to me every time I raise calories. It does go away. :)

    Piggybacking off this, which is so true! I found that my maintenance was higher than I thought it was too. So you could perhaps use this as a method to figure out what your true maintenance is and potentially be able to eat more. I was really hungry for months after and overate quite a bit but thankfully I stopped as was able to get everything under control. I feel more satisfied now eating at maintenance than I did a few months back.
  • PAV8888
    PAV8888 Posts: 14,300 Member
    Especially when coming from a large deficit into maintenance it is not uncommon to continue being very hungry for an extended period of time.

    An extended time period of eating at or above maintenance seems to be the only cure.

    The obvious caveat and issue is that eating above true maintenance has the obvious effect. Usually most people end up gaining everything back plus a little bit more before things settle down.

    Thus the only suggestion I have is fighting to stay within true maintenance or accepting as slow of a controlled weight gain as possible in the hopes that things will stabilize over time at below the original weight. a weight trend application may be helpful to you if you're not already using one

    I appreciate my helpful woo fans and would love for them to point out to me how informing the original poster that eating at their true maintenance will not result in a weight change (when the OP specifically mentioned in their post that they were concerned that doing so would result in weight gain) does not meet their exacting standards.

    Short term increasing food to actual maintenance may result in weight changes due to food volume, or increased carbs for people who low carb, but eating at actual maintenance obviously does not increase long-term fat storage.

  • ennailllieno1
    ennailllieno1 Posts: 14 Member
    PAV8888 wrote: »
    Especially when coming from a large deficit into maintenance it is not uncommon to continue being very hungry for an extended period of time.

    An extended time period of eating at or above maintenance seems to be the only cure.

    The obvious caveat and issue is that eating above true maintenance has the obvious effect. Usually most people end up gaining everything back plus a little bit more before things settle down.

    Thus the only suggestion I have is fighting to stay within true maintenance or accepting as slow of a controlled weight gain as possible in the hopes that things will stabilize over time at below the original weight. a weight trend application may be helpful to you if you're not already using one

    I appreciate my helpful woo fans and would love for them to point out to me how informing the original poster that eating at their true maintenance will not result in a weight change (when the OP specifically mentioned in their post that they were concerned that doing so would result in weight gain) does not meet their exacting standards.

    Short term increasing food to actual maintenance may result in weight changes due to food volume, or increased carbs for people who low carb, but eating at actual maintenance obviously does not increase long-term fat storage.

    I didnt go from 1200-1800 overnight. It was a gradual process over several months. I was at 1500 in September of last year, and have noticed the amount of calories to stay satiated has steadily increased where I just have a really hard time eatng less than 1800 in a day. Its disappointing.
    I would like to have discipline but also want to make sure I'm nourished.
    Being a full tme student also increases my appetite.
  • leejoyce31
    leejoyce31 Posts: 794 Member
    Being in a deficit for a prolonged period of time has an impact on various hormones that influence eating behaviors. The same is true for weight loss. I had this same issue when I first started eating more after losing weight and being in an prolonged deficit. These hormones should eventually settle and your appetite should become more manageable. Give it some time. Hang in there.
  • ennailllieno1
    ennailllieno1 Posts: 14 Member
    leejoyce31 wrote: »
    Being in a deficit for a prolonged period of time has an impact on various hormones that influence eating behaviors. The same is true for weight loss. I had this same issue when I first started eating more after losing weight and being in an prolonged deficit. These hormones should eventually settle and your appetite should become more manageable. Give it some time. Hang in there.

    So you think I should continue with a small deficit and eventually you think my appetite will decrease maybe?
  • csplatt
    csplatt Posts: 1,206 Member
    Same. But I also look at hunger differently on either side of maintenance. When trying to lose, I learn to live with empty stomach feeling or not being fully satiated. In maintenance I have an expectation that feeling should be gone perhaps? So I reach for food more often?
  • ennailllieno1
    ennailllieno1 Posts: 14 Member
    ahoy_m8 wrote: »
    ^^ I am not a low carber by any stretch, but I do notice if I eat high carb for breakfast, I'm hungry much much faster, and for the rest of the day, I just can't seem to get enough. E.g. oatmeal. Totally love the stuff, but I have to eat it in the afternoon as a snack. If I eat it first thing, I can't quell the ravenous.

    I've just started eating oats for breakie almost every day. That could be it
  • psychod787
    psychod787 Posts: 4,099 Member
    PAV8888 wrote: »
    Especially when coming from a large deficit into maintenance it is not uncommon to continue being very hungry for an extended period of time.

    An extended time period of eating at or above maintenance seems to be the only cure.

    The obvious caveat and issue is that eating above true maintenance has the obvious effect. Usually most people end up gaining everything back plus a little bit more before things settle down.

    Thus the only suggestion I have is fighting to stay within true maintenance or accepting as slow of a controlled weight gain as possible in the hopes that things will stabilize over time at below the original weight. a weight trend application may be helpful to you if you're not already using one

    I appreciate my helpful woo fans and would love for them to point out to me how informing the original poster that eating at their true maintenance will not result in a weight change (when the OP specifically mentioned in their post that they were concerned that doing so would result in weight gain) does not meet their exacting standards.

    Short term increasing food to actual maintenance may result in weight changes due to food volume, or increased carbs for people who low carb, but eating at actual maintenance obviously does not increase long-term fat storage.

    That's what I am doing.
    It is a *thing* when increasing calories to suddenly be experiencing increased appetite.

    That's one reason why we preach to not have a huge deficit at the end of weight loss. Going from 1200 to 1800 in one jump will cause this. It's also possible that even 1800 is too low for your lifestyle. You'll have to play around with it. My "maintenance" calories are 1500 if I use online calculators, but I actually maintain on 2000+ Exercise calories.

    The good news is that it will settle down if you're at the right level and can maintain your weight at that calorie level. Just keep doing the right things and stay at that level for a couple more weeks and you should get back down to manageable appetite.

    It's a real thing! It happens to me every time I raise calories. It does go away. :)

    Sorry. I dont really mean to call you out on this, but do you have any links to studies or scientific evidence of this?
  • kimny72
    kimny72 Posts: 16,011 Member
    psychod787 wrote: »
    PAV8888 wrote: »
    Especially when coming from a large deficit into maintenance it is not uncommon to continue being very hungry for an extended period of time.

    An extended time period of eating at or above maintenance seems to be the only cure.

    The obvious caveat and issue is that eating above true maintenance has the obvious effect. Usually most people end up gaining everything back plus a little bit more before things settle down.

    Thus the only suggestion I have is fighting to stay within true maintenance or accepting as slow of a controlled weight gain as possible in the hopes that things will stabilize over time at below the original weight. a weight trend application may be helpful to you if you're not already using one

    I appreciate my helpful woo fans and would love for them to point out to me how informing the original poster that eating at their true maintenance will not result in a weight change (when the OP specifically mentioned in their post that they were concerned that doing so would result in weight gain) does not meet their exacting standards.

    Short term increasing food to actual maintenance may result in weight changes due to food volume, or increased carbs for people who low carb, but eating at actual maintenance obviously does not increase long-term fat storage.

    That's what I am doing.
    It is a *thing* when increasing calories to suddenly be experiencing increased appetite.

    That's one reason why we preach to not have a huge deficit at the end of weight loss. Going from 1200 to 1800 in one jump will cause this. It's also possible that even 1800 is too low for your lifestyle. You'll have to play around with it. My "maintenance" calories are 1500 if I use online calculators, but I actually maintain on 2000+ Exercise calories.

    The good news is that it will settle down if you're at the right level and can maintain your weight at that calorie level. Just keep doing the right things and stay at that level for a couple more weeks and you should get back down to manageable appetite.

    It's a real thing! It happens to me every time I raise calories. It does go away. :)

    Sorry. I dont really mean to call you out on this, but do you have any links to studies or scientific evidence of this?

    I dont imagine there could be scientific evidence of people's appetites. I read that as cmriverside relaying experience. I know there are many posts in the diet break thread of folks experiencing increased appetite with increased calories. It's possible there's some kind of data to back that up in the Lyle McDonald video posted in there or the following up discussion, it's been a while since I read it.
  • psychod787
    psychod787 Posts: 4,099 Member
    kimny72 wrote: »
    psychod787 wrote: »
    PAV8888 wrote: »
    Especially when coming from a large deficit into maintenance it is not uncommon to continue being very hungry for an extended period of time.

    An extended time period of eating at or above maintenance seems to be the only cure.

    The obvious caveat and issue is that eating above true maintenance has the obvious effect. Usually most people end up gaining everything back plus a little bit more before things settle down.

    Thus the only suggestion I have is fighting to stay within true maintenance or accepting as slow of a controlled weight gain as possible in the hopes that things will stabilize over time at below the original weight. a weight trend application may be helpful to you if you're not already using one

    I appreciate my helpful woo fans and would love for them to point out to me how informing the original poster that eating at their true maintenance will not result in a weight change (when the OP specifically mentioned in their post that they were concerned that doing so would result in weight gain) does not meet their exacting standards.

    Short term increasing food to actual maintenance may result in weight changes due to food volume, or increased carbs for people who low carb, but eating at actual maintenance obviously does not increase long-term fat storage.

    That's what I am doing.
    It is a *thing* when increasing calories to suddenly be experiencing increased appetite.

    That's one reason why we preach to not have a huge deficit at the end of weight loss. Going from 1200 to 1800 in one jump will cause this. It's also possible that even 1800 is too low for your lifestyle. You'll have to play around with it. My "maintenance" calories are 1500 if I use online calculators, but I actually maintain on 2000+ Exercise calories.

    The good news is that it will settle down if you're at the right level and can maintain your weight at that calorie level. Just keep doing the right things and stay at that level for a couple more weeks and you should get back down to manageable appetite.

    It's a real thing! It happens to me every time I raise calories. It does go away. :)

    Sorry. I dont really mean to call you out on this, but do you have any links to studies or scientific evidence of this?

    I dont imagine there could be scientific evidence of people's appetites. I read that as cmriverside relaying experience. I know there are many posts in the diet break thread of folks experiencing increased appetite with increased calories. It's possible there's some kind of data to back that up in the Lyle McDonald video posted in there or the following up discussion, it's been a while since I read it.

    Thanks Kimny, I am always just looking for new research in things. I used to be the type of person that fell for guru's bs. I now read scientific research that I put much more stock in.😉
  • ahoy_m8
    ahoy_m8 Posts: 3,053 Member
    ahoy_m8 wrote: »
    ^^ I am not a low carber by any stretch, but I do notice if I eat high carb for breakfast, I'm hungry much much faster, and for the rest of the day, I just can't seem to get enough. E.g. oatmeal. Totally love the stuff, but I have to eat it in the afternoon as a snack. If I eat it first thing, I can't quell the ravenous.

    I've just started eating oats for breakie almost every day. That could be it

    Well, maybe try experimenting with high fat breakfasts with decent protein for a week or two and see if it makes a difference? It's really hard to beat eggs for nutrition (and cost). They're also extremely versatile.
  • h7463
    h7463 Posts: 626 Member
    ahoy_m8 wrote: »
    ^^ I am not a low carber by any stretch, but I do notice if I eat high carb for breakfast, I'm hungry much much faster, and for the rest of the day, I just can't seem to get enough. E.g. oatmeal. Totally love the stuff, but I have to eat it in the afternoon as a snack. If I eat it first thing, I can't quell the ravenous.

    Same here! Whatever I eat for breakfast, seems to set the path (to the fridge and back) for me. I love my oats, but by noon, my stomach starts growling. I can go til 2 pm on 3 scrambled eggs and some turkey without even realizing...
  • AnitaCRice
    AnitaCRice Posts: 114 Member
    ahoy_m8 wrote: »
    ^^ I am not a low carber by any stretch, but I do notice if I eat high carb for breakfast, I'm hungry much much faster, and for the rest of the day, I just can't seem to get enough. E.g. oatmeal. Totally love the stuff, but I have to eat it in the afternoon as a snack. If I eat it first thing, I can't quell the ravenous.

    I've just started eating oats for breakie almost every day. That could be it

    I can't eat oatmeal for breakfast, or I'm also starving about 1-2 hours later. I'm better off if I eat nothing than if I eat cereal or oatmeal only for breakfast.
  • Panini911
    Panini911 Posts: 2,325 Member
    edited February 2019
    Everyone is different, we all have to experiment.

    I like a big portion of steel cut oats in the morning. But yes I also plan for a mid-morning snack on weekdays because it's a long wait from 7-1pm. then lunch at 1ish. but that is just what works for me. I get more protein the rest of the day.
  • ennailllieno1
    ennailllieno1 Posts: 14 Member
    Thanks guys! Yeah, I eat breakfast, small mid morning snack, lunch, afternoon snack and then dinner.
    I will try the higher protein and fat breakfasts for a bit and see what happens!
  • lorrpb
    lorrpb Posts: 11,463 Member
    Have you changed your macro split? If you added back a disproportional amount of carbs, that could be causing hunger spikes due to wider fluctuations in glucose.
  • Lillymoo01
    Lillymoo01 Posts: 2,865 Member
    ahoy_m8 wrote: »
    ^^ I am not a low carber by any stretch, but I do notice if I eat high carb for breakfast, I'm hungry much much faster, and for the rest of the day, I just can't seem to get enough. E.g. oatmeal. Totally love the stuff, but I have to eat it in the afternoon as a snack. If I eat it first thing, I can't quell the ravenous.

    I've just started eating oats for breakie almost every day. That could be it

    I find that if I add a scoop of protein powder and have some greek yoghurt with my oats I can easily remain satisfied until lunchtime. Without the protein, it is a totally different story. Some also go down the path of savoury oats with egg and vegetables added instead but I prefer a sweeter breakfast.
  • ennailllieno1
    ennailllieno1 Posts: 14 Member
    lorrpb wrote: »
    Have you changed your macro split? If you added back a disproportional amount of carbs, that could be causing hunger spikes due to wider fluctuations in glucose.

    Yeah I recently took a break from eating meat. That could be it.
    Eating more beans and lentils which have more carbs.
    I generally am pretty good with my macros though, and I haven't changed it since not eatng meat.
  • ennailllieno1
    ennailllieno1 Posts: 14 Member
    I also eat a lot of fruits and veggies which I count but I feel like it adds up the calories without ablctually making me full
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    lorrpb wrote: »
    Have you changed your macro split? If you added back a disproportional amount of carbs, that could be causing hunger spikes due to wider fluctuations in glucose.

    Yeah I recently took a break from eating meat. That could be it.
    Eating more beans and lentils which have more carbs.
    I generally am pretty good with my macros though, and I haven't changed it since not eatng meat.

    What percentage of protein is your goal and how often do you hit or exceed it?

    I find beans and lentils very filling.

    Oats, not at all, even when I add Greek yogurt. A little more so when I also add a half scoop of protein powder. (Can't add too much or it becomes inedible.) It comes to 25 g protein total, 332 calories, and I still don't find it especially filling.
This discussion has been closed.