Poor excercise and food management

2»

Replies

  • Panini911
    Panini911 Posts: 2,325 Member
    maybe, maybe not. it's hard to say without being there!

    for example, what does the actual container of eggs and cheese list on their nutritonal info? How are you selecting the entries in MFP?
  • Skrilus
    Skrilus Posts: 19 Member
    yes it does have the info on it, and i'm selecting the closest thing that matches my search
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,632 Member
    I'm not so sure about that sugar entry. Half an ounce (0.5 oz) of sugar is 55 calories, but that's also about 3.5 teaspoons of sugar. For 2 calories of sugar to be accurate, it would have to be around an eighth of a teaspoon.

    Something doesn't add up, there.
  • Salixiana
    Salixiana Posts: 37 Member
    Yes, the sugar one is definitely off. Oh, how I wish that a half ounce of sugar only had 2 calories! But yes, it's between 54 and 55 calories for 1/2 ounce of sugar.
  • Salixiana
    Salixiana Posts: 37 Member
    Eggs are pretty easy: a standard large egg is 70 calories. I don't think you actually have to weigh eggs. If you're off a bit because the egg is bigger or smaller, it won't be by much. Plus most of the calories are in the yolks, and some chickens lay larger-yolked eggs than others. But kudos for your attempt to be precise!

    The cheese, now. That I weigh out by the gram. Because it's so delicious and so calorie dense. Volume measures can be WAY off.
  • jbarr9011
    jbarr9011 Posts: 26 Member
    Skrilus - I would start by weighing your food until such time that you can accurately eyeball your portions. I started entering my foods in MFP a week in advance so that I knew my caloric and nutrient measures before I ate any food. I always thought I was doing good until I started measuring... With regard to exercise, you don't have to go to the gym. Invest in some resistance bands and you can purchase them through Amazon and they come with instructions. You can get a decent workout with the bands. I bought them because it's almost 20 miles for me to go to the gym so that is a battle from the start. Don't forget your cardio. Best to you.
  • Kathryn247
    Kathryn247 Posts: 570 Member
    Skrilus - just wanted to say great job for taking the advice on here and working on weighing your food. I know it sounds little "extra" at first, but it really is the way to go. It takes some practice but you've got this! I've been doing this for 2 years and still weigh everything. It turns into a habit soon enough.
  • ahoy_m8
    ahoy_m8 Posts: 3,053 Member
    ^^ditto to everything Kathryn said. Excellent start. Once you have your regular entries down, logging goes really fast. It takes a couple minutes to preload a whole day. Then you can make minor adjustments for weight discrepancies. The scale does become second nature. I hope yours has a tare function so you don’t have to subtract dish weight. Just put your plate on scale, slide cooked eggs on, tare to 0, add cheese noting weight, tare, add sauce noting weight, and so on. No measuring spoons to clean. It truly simplifies and demystifies so much. Good luck, OP!
  • Skrilus
    Skrilus Posts: 19 Member
    1rws7kvgmrj8.png

    my official day all recorded
  • ceiswyn
    ceiswyn Posts: 2,256 Member
    Well done, but there are still some improvements you can make :)

    For starters, you're still not weighing as much as you need to. For example you've logged your bread as slices, but slices vary in size even when you're using presliced. I've had a lot of loaves that list their calories assuming that 1 slice is, say, 35g, but when I actually weighed I found that that was pretty much the minimum and most of their slices were closer to 45g. That sort of thing can make quite a difference.

    With the chicken (and meats in general) it's better, if you can, to log the raw weight. Everyone cooks slightly differently, for different lengths of time, so the amount of water that's lost (or gained!) during cooking varies a lot, which means that the calorie content varies a lot as well.
  • psychod787
    psychod787 Posts: 4,099 Member
    Skrilus wrote: »
    interesting video what are you getting at with it?

    That as we lose weight. We can get pulled back to regain. Movement can help mitigate these effects. People always say move more eat less. Not always that easy. I lost a monkey ton of weight. Some far to quickly. My sedentary maintenance is about 2300 cals. Well from my data collected over the last 1.5 yrs of maintenance and macro composition my current maintenance is 3400 cals. Which seems easier to stick to? Hence, move more eat more. I am bulking at 3700 cals right now. Well, some body weight regain in attempt to help rebalance hunger, satiety, and hormones.
  • sarabushby
    sarabushby Posts: 784 Member
    Massive thumbs up to someone for actually demonstrating that they’re taking peoples advice on board. Good work Skrilus!!!

    You may not have used any, but if you do, just don’t forget to add any oil used in cooking for example the sweet potato and the chicken. You may have used butter or nothing at all, but if others are reading this thread it’s definitely something that needs weighing and logging. It’s terribly easy to forget the 1tbsp of oil you cooked in and also to log it as just 1 teaspoon when in fact it was in honesty more like 1 tablespoon and thus 3x the calories.

    Good luck with your journey :)
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,632 Member
    sarabushby wrote: »
    Massive thumbs up to someone for actually demonstrating that they’re taking peoples advice on board. Good work Skrilus!!!

    You may not have used any, but if you do, just don’t forget to add any oil used in cooking for example the sweet potato and the chicken. You may have used butter or nothing at all, but if others are reading this thread it’s definitely something that needs weighing and logging. It’s terribly easy to forget the 1tbsp of oil you cooked in and also to log it as just 1 teaspoon when in fact it was in honesty more like 1 tablespoon and thus 3x the calories.

    Good luck with your journey :)

    Oil is easier to weigh than measure, too. Put the bottle or can on the scale, tare (zero) it, pour a bit into the pan (or spray, if it's oil spray), put the container back on the scale, note the negative grams: That's the amount you used.

    This method works great for anything in jars (like peanut butter - just dip out your portion as the jar sits on the scale and note the negative) - or chunks (like cheese - put the block on the scale, tare, cut off your desired chunk, note the negative.

    Quick'n'easy.
  • AnaSoluna
    AnaSoluna Posts: 16 Member
    It is certainly your choice to weigh or not weigh your food. I personally measure by volume but do so knowing that it means my data...

    Agreed with everything Emma said. It's a cliche, but small changes over time really do build up. Two years ago, I was a person who made an at-home cafe mocha every morning, but now I've been happily drinking black coffee for a year and mochas are too sweet for my palette. Maybe make a few changes for non-weigjt reasons, so their success or failure isn't tied to the scale.

    And I don't weigh my food either, with the knowledge that I'm being less accurate and probably not losing as fast as I could.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,632 Member
    Skrilus wrote: »
    Thanks for the advice from everyone the last few days have been some of the better days, still work on that weighing routine but over all i'm getting more used to it.

    You're doing fine. It's a process, but just keep working on connecting up that stack of tinker-toys, and you'll build something good in the long run. If you hit an obstacle, rethink, and keep working. Persistence is priceless.

    Best wishes!
This discussion has been closed.