Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
I always thought weight gain was a result of to many calories & not enough exercise !
Options
Replies
-
I think sometimes new dieters think of 1200 calories as an abstract concept and not something that should be meticulously tracked to be accurate. They have a mental idea of how much food that is end up wondering why it doesn't work. I also wonder about those who feel "stuffed" all day on 1200 calories.15
-
I think sometimes new dieters think of 1200 calories as an abstract concept and not something that should be meticulously tracked to be accurate. They have a mental idea of how much food that is end up wondering why it doesn't work. I also wonder about those who feel "stuffed" all day on 1200 calories.
I think that low ball number is often used BECAUSE people greatly underestimate their calories.
Feeling stuffed at under 1200 puzzles me but when some people start a diet they are fine under eating for awhile not feeling "hungry". Excitement of a new plan especially if there is quick water drop making scale go down. Some people may not be big eaters (gained the weight eating little food quantity wise but food high in calories). So maybe when they go to so called "diet food" which is lower in cal/fat it's more in quantity than they can handle being smaller quantity eaters.
but yes i think most are not calculating their intake properly.12 -
I think sometimes new dieters think of 1200 calories as an abstract concept and not something that should be meticulously tracked to be accurate. They have a mental idea of how much food that is end up wondering why it doesn't work. I also wonder about those who feel "stuffed" all day on 1200 calories.
I think that low ball number is often used BECAUSE people greatly underestimate their calories.
Feeling stuffed at under 1200 puzzles me but when some people start a diet they are fine under eating for awhile not feeling "hungry". Excitement of a new plan especially if there is quick water drop making scale go down. Some people may not be big eaters (gained the weight eating little food quantity wise but food high in calories). So maybe when they go to so called "diet food" which is lower in cal/fat it's more in quantity than they can handle being smaller quantity eaters.
but yes i think most are not calculating their intake properly.
For what it's worth, even hovering at maintenance I'm still not happy about it, so I let myself have "those days"
Worth it, but certainly not something I would do consistently unless I want to regain that weight.
7 -
before mfp, I ate a meal once a day & took green beans & tuna for lunch to work. Rarely had any snacks, rarely ate anything out, no candy bars, no soda, no bread. Made mostly sauted chicken with veggies & cream cheese on top of rice for dinner, drank lots of coffee & was 50lbs over weight for 20yrs. Lost 50 lbs by eating more often & just more food21
-
before mfp, I ate a meal once a day & took green beans & tuna for lunch to work. Rarely had any snacks, rarely ate anything out, no candy bars, no soda, no bread. Made mostly sauted chicken with veggies & cream cheese on top of rice for dinner, drank lots of coffee & was 50lbs over weight for 20yrs. Lost 50 lbs by eating more often & just more food
You may have lost weight by eating more food, but your total calorie consumption was without a doubt less. Your whole post is confusing and really doesn't make sense. You didn't eat just once a day if you had lunch and dinner. That's two meals right there. You say you rarely snacked, but you didn't say what you snacked on when you did. You could very easily be adding enough calories on snacks alone to go over maintenance. Also, your sauteed chicken, veggies and rice for dinner could very easily have been a high calorie meal depending on whatever oils/butter you sauteed everything in. Cream cheese can also be calorie dense and I would imagine if you were to guess at how many calories your cream cheese and rice contained, you would be severely underestimating.
13 -
I think sometimes new dieters think of 1200 calories as an abstract concept and not something that should be meticulously tracked to be accurate. They have a mental idea of how much food that is end up wondering why it doesn't work. I also wonder about those who feel "stuffed" all day on 1200 calories.
I think that low ball number is often used BECAUSE people greatly underestimate their calories.
Feeling stuffed at under 1200 puzzles me but when some people start a diet they are fine under eating for awhile not feeling "hungry". Excitement of a new plan especially if there is quick water drop making scale go down. Some people may not be big eaters (gained the weight eating little food quantity wise but food high in calories). So maybe when they go to so called "diet food" which is lower in cal/fat it's more in quantity than they can handle being smaller quantity eaters.
but yes i think most are not calculating their intake properly.
It's a funny thing about not feeling hungry on low calories. Why as a 400lbs man did I not experience much hunger until i went lower than a certain weight? I went on a high protein, lower fat, high fruit and vegetable diet. I had hunger issues at the start for about 5 days. Then.... nothing...NOTHING... I underrate by up to 2000 calories a day. Not recommending this btw. When I started weighing and measuring my food is when I am pretty certain I was eating less than 2000 calories a day with a tdee estimate of over 4000? I did not get hunger until I went under 210lbs. Why? Bf set point? Why not until I hit that weight? I was eating more, but same diet style? It's a freaking mystery to me.2 -
psychod787 wrote: »I think sometimes new dieters think of 1200 calories as an abstract concept and not something that should be meticulously tracked to be accurate. They have a mental idea of how much food that is end up wondering why it doesn't work. I also wonder about those who feel "stuffed" all day on 1200 calories.
I think that low ball number is often used BECAUSE people greatly underestimate their calories.
Feeling stuffed at under 1200 puzzles me but when some people start a diet they are fine under eating for awhile not feeling "hungry". Excitement of a new plan especially if there is quick water drop making scale go down. Some people may not be big eaters (gained the weight eating little food quantity wise but food high in calories). So maybe when they go to so called "diet food" which is lower in cal/fat it's more in quantity than they can handle being smaller quantity eaters.
but yes i think most are not calculating their intake properly.
It's a funny thing about not feeling hungry on low calories. Why as a 400lbs man did I not experience much hunger until i went lower than a certain weight? I went on a high protein, lower fat, high fruit and vegetable diet. I had hunger issues at the start for about 5 days. Then.... nothing...NOTHING... I underrate by up to 2000 calories a day. Not recommending this btw. When I started weighing and measuring my food is when I am pretty certain I was eating less than 2000 calories a day with a tdee estimate of over 4000? I did not get hunger until I went under 210lbs. Why? Bf set point? Why not until I hit that weight? I was eating more, but same diet style? It's a freaking mystery to me.
Because as a 400 pound man you had a lot more fat stores to tap into so you were able to sustain a larger deficit. The more body fat you have, the larger the deficit your body can sustain as it will tap into those fat stores.
I am 110 pounds now but started out at 139 with a high BF%. Because of my body fat percentage, I was able to get away with 1200 to 1400 calories gross, not net, for a few months without feeling tired despite being highly active. I dropped 20 pounds within my first two months even though it's not advisable to do so for someone at my starting weight. Now at 110 pounds, I need to eat 2000 to 2400 calories gross on average to maintain. If I even tried to eat 1200 to 1400 calories, I would gnaw my arm off. I usually eat that many calories by lunchtime and my body will surely let me know if I haven't.10 -
Maxematics wrote: »psychod787 wrote: »I think sometimes new dieters think of 1200 calories as an abstract concept and not something that should be meticulously tracked to be accurate. They have a mental idea of how much food that is end up wondering why it doesn't work. I also wonder about those who feel "stuffed" all day on 1200 calories.
I think that low ball number is often used BECAUSE people greatly underestimate their calories.
Feeling stuffed at under 1200 puzzles me but when some people start a diet they are fine under eating for awhile not feeling "hungry". Excitement of a new plan especially if there is quick water drop making scale go down. Some people may not be big eaters (gained the weight eating little food quantity wise but food high in calories). So maybe when they go to so called "diet food" which is lower in cal/fat it's more in quantity than they can handle being smaller quantity eaters.
but yes i think most are not calculating their intake properly.
It's a funny thing about not feeling hungry on low calories. Why as a 400lbs man did I not experience much hunger until i went lower than a certain weight? I went on a high protein, lower fat, high fruit and vegetable diet. I had hunger issues at the start for about 5 days. Then.... nothing...NOTHING... I underrate by up to 2000 calories a day. Not recommending this btw. When I started weighing and measuring my food is when I am pretty certain I was eating less than 2000 calories a day with a tdee estimate of over 4000? I did not get hunger until I went under 210lbs. Why? Bf set point? Why not until I hit that weight? I was eating more, but same diet style? It's a freaking mystery to me.
Because as a 400 pound man you had a lot more fat stores to tap into so you were able to sustain a larger deficit. The more body fat you have, the larger the deficit your body can sustain as it will tap into those fat stores.
I am 110 pounds now but started out at 139 with a high BF%. Because of my body fat percentage, I was able to get away with 1200 to 1400 calories gross, not net, for a few months without feeling tired despite being highly active. I dropped 20 pounds within my first two months even though it's not advisable to do so for someone at my starting weight. Now at 110 pounds, I need to eat 2000 to 2400 calories gross on average to maintain. If I even tried to eat 1200 to 1400 calories, I would gnaw my arm off. I usually eat that many calories by lunchtime and my body will surely let me know if I haven't.
Thanks for the info. I am away that I was carrying hundreds of thousands of extra calories of potential energy. So, of course I could go long periods with less energy intake. Why only hunger issues when i dropped under 210. I know some about the lipostatic pathways of leptin to the hypothalamus. So, yes my leptin was probably very high as heavy as I was. According to the theory of leptin resistance contributing to he continual obese state, my hunger SHOULD have been fighting me the whole way. Why only at the beginning and at that point. My leptin should have been low enough to make me hungry at say 300lbs.... I am kind of just grasping for straws I guess.3 -
I think sometimes new dieters think of 1200 calories as an abstract concept and not something that should be meticulously tracked to be accurate. They have a mental idea of how much food that is end up wondering why it doesn't work. I also wonder about those who feel "stuffed" all day on 1200 calories.
Yes, Im dreading the time (if I ever get there - I need to hope that I will), that my goal is 1200 calories because I will literally be starving on that. I will try and eat passers by. Its so small. I am more than a few stone away from that at the moment so I'll have to try and manage it when it comes.
As much as I like seeing the new weight I put in when I have lost some, I hate the fact that it knocks some calories off my intake!1 -
I've always believed that if you reduce your food intake and increase exercise you would lose weight, and when I was younger it was true.
I eat a very healthy diet, mostly vegetables and protein, I try to avoid starchy foods. I have never indulged in "junk" food, and I don't like any food or drink that contains sugar. I also keep my calorie intake to around 1000-1200 calories a day. I go to the gym 4-5 times a week and walk an hour a day. However, I am really struggling to lose weight.
I suffer from hypothyroidism known as Hashimotos Disease. When I told my doctor of my struggle to lose weight, he laughed and said. "Most people blame their hormones for not being able to lose weight but in your case it is actually true and you will just have to put up with it". No help there then. I have read all the scientific studies on Hashimotos and it does seem that reducing calories and increasing exercise is counter-productive if you have Hashimotos, so I despair really.
I wondered if there is anybody on this website who has Hashimotos and yet has succeeded losing weight? I feel very much on my own with this and don't know what to do for the best. I shall keep watching the calories, because I have no difficult gaining weight even if I can't lose it.
8 -
ninoratsoc wrote: »I've always believed that if you reduce your food intake and increase exercise you would lose weight, and when I was younger it was true.
I eat a very healthy diet, mostly vegetables and protein, I try to avoid starchy foods. I have never indulged in "junk" food, and I don't like any food or drink that contains sugar. I also keep my calorie intake to around 1000-1200 calories a day. I go to the gym 4-5 times a week and walk an hour a day. However, I am really struggling to lose weight.
I suffer from hypothyroidism known as Hashimotos Disease. When I told my doctor of my struggle to lose weight, he laughed and said. "Most people blame their hormones for not being able to lose weight but in your case it is actually true and you will just have to put up with it". No help there then. I have read all the scientific studies on Hashimotos and it does seem that reducing calories and increasing exercise is counter-productive if you have Hashimotos, so I despair really.
I wondered if there is anybody on this website who has Hashimotos and yet has succeeded losing weight? I feel very much on my own with this and don't know what to do for the best. I shall keep watching the calories, because I have no difficult gaining weight even if I can't lose it.
8 -
In some cases this could come down to perception. My employer always moans about not being able to lose weight despite limiting her food and eating 'healthily'. Somehow she didn't count the bottle of wine she drinks almost every evening! Technically, not eating.9
-
jessicaredman8 wrote: »In some cases this could come down to perception. My employer always moans about not being able to lose weight despite limiting her food and eating 'healthily'. Somehow she didn't count the bottle of wine she drinks almost every evening! Technically, not eating.
One of the PTA I work with was going on and on about how he can't lose weight and he has been doing IF for months. He said "yeah I have a few shakes and smoothies during the day but only eat 4 hour window". *facepalm*5
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.5K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 392 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 927 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions