Over 50 and finding it harder then ever to lose weight...
Options
montyeva1114
Posts: 78 Member
I’ve put on 15 pounds in the last 3 years and I haven’t changed my diet or exercise routine. What’s changed is 1. Menopause 2. Thyroid condition. I’ve always exercised and eaten a 2000 calories or less diet. Crazy, but I’m feeling stuck on how to start losing weight again. Obviously, eat less. But I don’t do very well being hungry. Exercise more; I average 40 minutes to an hour each day. I welcome suggestions. I’m hoping for encouragement. I realize that just writing down what I eat is not the answer. Anyone out there with ideas?
5
Replies
-
Well you came to the right place. My doctor said exercise is great for a million reasons, but when it comes to losing weight it's 20% exercise, and 80% food intake. This site will show you how to calculate how many calories you should stick to if you want to lose weight. Track everything and stay under that amount and you'll lose. You don't need to be hungry- there are many threads here on low cal, filling foods. And yes, I agree. I'm also a woman over 50 and it is indeed harder...but it's possible.3
-
if you are averaging 40 min of "moderate" to intense exercise, then there is no reason for you to be hungry because you can eat back those calories lost. The main thing though is weigh every morsel of food and drink and stay within your allotted calorie deficit. I'm 54 and had 100 lbs to lose at the start, and I am down 64 lbs. I average around 1800-1900 calories a day with 6 days a week of 30-45 min of intense cardio and weight training. I may eat back 1/2 my exercise calories if I am more hungry. Good luck! PS...You can eat much more healthy food than junk, and feel fuller longer.6
-
How is it that you find losing weight after 50 difficult? Don't get me wrong I am well past 50...60...65. I have seen similar posts such as this one stating that it is more difficult but I am never sure why someone thinks that it is. Medical conditions might contribute...maybe we can't exercise as much or as hard as younger people but I don't find actual "dieting" any harder than I did when I was young. I actually find it easier in a way. I can cook/eat what I want when I want and not have to worry about feeding a family. Work and social engagements are no longer a hindrance and I can experiment with different WOE and not worry about others adapting.
I get that we need less calories to maintain but in all honesty it is not that much less. If I compare my goal weight maintenance calories at 67 with what it would be at 27 there is only about a 250 calorie difference. I can make up that difference by eating 2 slices of pizza instead of 3 slices.
The one thing that might contribute to it being "harder" is that we have had longer to instill our bad habits but even that is surmountable. Even at an older age we are able to change...reinvent ourselves in to how we want our remaining time on this planet to be. If you think about...it could be an exciting adventure. Finally time to concentrate on ourselves instead of having to put everyone else first.
We all lose weight the same way...calorie deficit. I just refuse to let age be an excuse not to succeed on what I want for myself.12 -
Welcome to the community!
If you haven't already, read the stickies at the top of the getting started forum. Very informative and helpful.
Weigh everything you consume. Logging foods into the food diary and staying in a calorie deficit is the answer.
Good luck with your journey!3 -
Wow... I wasn’t expecting so many responses. Well, I’m inspired. Well I’m starting today! I just went for a 30 minute run and I am going to log all my food. I will watch portions. Here goes! Thank you.9
-
Do you have a food scale?
If it matters, I'm 61 and happy with my success so far. 😉4 -
montyeva1114 wrote: »Wow... I wasn’t expecting so many responses. Well, I’m inspired. Well I’m starting today! I just went for a 30 minute run and I am going to log all my food. I will watch portions. Here goes! Thank you.
That's a really good plan.
Your OP said "I realize that just writing down what I eat is not the answer." While logging is not the only possible way to lose weight, it is a really excellent way to manage two things you mention in your OP: Eating less, and doing that in a way that will help you stay as happy and satiated as possible while doing it.
Satiation is very individual, but logging what you eat will help you begin to see which foods "cost" a lot of calories, but don't contribute enough to your nutrition, satiation, or happiness to be worth those calories. You can gradually remodel your eating to stay pretty satisfying, but on reduced calories. If you want to exercise more, that's great for fitness, and will earn you some extra calories to eat, but it's technically optional for weight loss.
I'm (1) menopausal (since my 40s when chemotherapy put me in hard-stop menopause), and (2) hypothyroid (quite severely, but treated properly with 175mcg synthroid which I take like religion). Using MFP helped me lose from an obese weight to a healthy weight back in 2015 at age 59-60, after decades of obesity, and stay at a healthy weight since, without materially changing my exercise routine (like you, I was already active).
Go, you!3 -
It is possible. I'm well into all that meno-fun and am losing weight more effectively than before. (There is nothing special about me - or my will-power.)
Really, it is just a question of finding out what works for you AND believing that it is possible. (There are many voices of doom out there telling you there is no point... usually because they haven't found a way that works for them and age is a great hanger for excuses.)
Having support on here makes a great deal of difference.
Food matters more than exercise (unless you are taking up daily marathons).4 -
My big concern is that logging what I eat does not necessarily equate to weight loss. I haven’t quite found the right way to eat that doesn’t cause me to eat too much, but will keep me satisfied. I have not been successful at 1. Gluten free diet or 2. Sugar free. They have literally both pushed me into a low grade depression! Right now my goal is to eat under 1500 calories a day and continue to hit my 10000 steps a day. I’m a very mobile person so exercise is always a part of my life. I did get on a scale for the first time in more tha a year. That was difficult; but I needed to know where I was starting. I’m definitely encouraged to see there are women my age having success!1
-
montyeva1114 wrote: »My big concern is that logging what I eat does not necessarily equate to weight loss. I haven’t quite found the right way to eat that doesn’t cause me to eat too much, but will keep me satisfied. I have not been successful at 1. Gluten free diet or 2. Sugar free. They have literally both pushed me into a low grade depression! Right now my goal is to eat under 1500 calories a day and continue to hit my 10000 steps a day. I’m a very mobile person so exercise is always a part of my life. I did get on a scale for the first time in more tha a year. That was difficult; but I needed to know where I was starting. I’m definitely encouraged to see there are women my age having success!
It may not suit your temperament, but this is what I did while losing weight (and for nearly 4 years since to stay at a healthy weight so far):
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10636388/free-customized-personal-weight-loss-eating-plan-not-spam-or-mlm/p1
Special restrictions are optional, and what matters IMO is a good overall way of eating (as opposed to thinking in terms of individual "bad foods" or "good foods" for weight loss).0 -
Forget gluten free unless medically recommended. By sugar free, I presume you mean no added sugar and not naturally occurring sugars.
If you're depriving yourself from day one, you're destined to fail.
Eat the foods you love and stay in a calorie deficit and lose weight. That's it.3 -
I agree it is hard to lose weight after menopause. I’m 68. It takes me a good month to lose five pounds. That’s on a 1200-1300;cal diet. Slower metabolism, less active in general since retiring last year. Have started walking 3,4 times a week. Logging all intake and reducing portion sizes is helping.4
-
It is odd isn't it? As cars get older, they get less and less fuel-efficient. Humans seem to work the other way and hardly need any fuel to keep going after menopause.4
-
Yes!!!!!!0
-
suzygoff51 wrote: »I agree it is hard to lose weight after menopause. I’m 68. It takes me a good month to lose five pounds. That’s on a 1200-1300;cal diet. Slower metabolism, less active in general since retiring last year. Have started walking 3,4 times a week. Logging all intake and reducing portion sizes is helping.
How much are you wanting to lose? I think 5lbs a month is a good rate of loss. You should be proud of yourself. I think sometimes the difficulty in losing weight is that we are expecting too much of ourselves. At 5lbs a month that is 60lbs in a year...slightly over 1lb a week.
4 -
I have read about this all quite a bit - our metabolisms don't actually change very much at all - we just tend to move less in general as we get older (I'm 54 so have had some personal experience!). I managed to lose some annoying extra pounds (about 10-12 during perimenopause) by calorie counting, and have been strength training (partly to keep my old bones strong, and partly for aesthetics). I didn't actually find that menopause made any difference at all - I'm reasonably active (walk a fair bit) despite my desk job. I have put on a couple of kilos since starting HRT, but I think that is also down to a little bit of muscle gain as well.3
-
Well done Pipsqueak - you sound to be doing all the right things and you look great on this too
(Mind you, HRT should be keeping you free of all the menopause-symptoms... including slower weight loss.)0 -
My experience has been similar to @Pipsqueak1965, except that I'm 9 years older (63), am random/rare/lacadaisical about formal strength training, and took anti-HRT (i.e., I took anti-estrogen drugs after estrogen-fed breast cancer for 7.5 years, and certainly take no HRT now (I'd expect it to kill me, given my history).
I still think that much of our individualized caloric profile comes from activity level and body composition. Even the so-called "calculator" estimates suggest a pretty minor caloric "penalty" per year of increased age at consistent height/weight/activity level (for me, at my current size, the estimated difference from age 43 to age 63 is a non-whopping 100 calories daily at sedentary. . . and that's based on population statistics that likely include influenceable body composition changes in the first place).
For interpretation purposes, I'm formerly obese (lost to a healthy weight at age 59-60 in 2015), severely hypothyroid (treated), 5'5", weight now mid-130s pounds.
I think this is a thing most of us can do. I'm not pretending it will necessarily always be easy, but most of the important factors are within our control.3 -
WOW. I’m so impressed with you!! I love to hear it’s possible to maintain a weight loss!! After so many years of losing and gaining, my confidence is low.2
-
What I have found is that part (a significant part) is believing in your capabilities to do this. Figure out what you want your life to look like and then fight for it. That is not to say that you won't have your moments of self doubt but don't let those moments define who you are and what you can become.6
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.5K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 392 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 927 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions