Can you keep it going asking ONLY QUESTIONS?
Options
Replies
-
@cmsienk May I give you a cup or two today?
Did you notice that @frankwbrown left something with the coffee for you? π
Was it a moon pie? π€£ Aren't those lattes lovely?0 -
@cmsienk May I give you a cup or two today?
Did you notice that @frankwbrown left something with the coffee for you? π
Was it a moon pie? π€£ Aren't those lattes lovely?
π Arenβt I pretending it was a brownie since I now see itβs just a chocolate? Perhaps I need to have one of those cups after all?0 -
@cmsienk May I give you a cup or two today?
Did you notice that @frankwbrown left something with the coffee for you? π1 -
Doesnβt that suggest weβd be better off limiting each post to a single question in order to maximize the number of pages this thread generates?
Isn't there a hidden assumption here that each person will ask only a set number of questions within a certain time frame? Might some be inclined to post only a certain number of comments, regardless of number of questions, in a given time frame? Might others be rather verbose in their responses? And still others may have a tendency to ramble on, and on, and on?
Have there been any analytical studies to determine the optimum questions per comment and comments per hour minute second needed to maximize the screen real estate consumed by said questions/comments?
π€π€π€π
P.S. Is one question per comment the true minimum? Could a single question span multiple comments, thus consuming vastly more space than would otherwise be the case? π0 -
frankwbrown wrote: Β»Doesnβt that suggest weβd be better off limiting each post to a single question in order to maximize the number of pages this thread generates?
Isn't there a hidden assumption here that each person will ask only a set number of questions within a certain time frame? Might some be inclined to post only a certain number of comments, regardless of number of questions, in a given time frame? Might others be rather verbose in their responses? And still others may have a tendency to ramble on, and on, and on?
Have there been any analytical studies to determine the optimum questions per comment and comments per hour minute second needed to maximize the screen real estate consumed by said questions/comments?
π€π€π€π
P.S. Is one question per comment the true minimum? Could a single question span multiple comments, thus consuming vastly more space than would otherwise be the case? π
Is it safe to say you fit nicely into the category of those who have a tendency towards rambling on and on? π€£
0 -
How much coffee has Frank consumed this morning? π1
-
I doubt it would have killed me but donβt you think my fingers would have been tired from the extra steps? π0 -
frankwbrown wrote: Β»Doesnβt that suggest weβd be better off limiting each post to a single question in order to maximize the number of pages this thread generates?
Isn't there a hidden assumption here that each person will ask only a set number of questions within a certain time frame? Might some be inclined to post only a certain number of comments, regardless of number of questions, in a given time frame? Might others be rather verbose in their responses? And still others may have a tendency to ramble on, and on, and on?
Have there been any analytical studies to determine the optimum questions per comment and comments per hour minute second needed to maximize the screen real estate consumed by said questions/comments?
π€π€π€π
P.S. Is one question per comment the true minimum? Could a single question span multiple comments, thus consuming vastly more space than would otherwise be the case? π
Is it safe to say you fit nicely into the category of those who have a tendency towards rambling on and on? π€£
moi? π€ππ€πππ0 -
I doubt it would have killed me but donβt you think my fingers would have been tired from the extra steps? π
Isn't that especially true when you're sneaking in a comment question or two while you're working?0 -
Wasn't I waiting for you to chime in?0 -
Would you believe I was a shy quiet introverted child?
Didn't relatives at family gatherings often ask, "What's the matter, Frank, cat got your tongue?"
Didn't my grandfather say in response, "It's okay, Frank. Still waters run deep."? (I loved my grandfather) π
So it must be the coffee then, right? ππ0 -
0
-
Huh? What? Why two questions?0
-
Why not two questions? Or why not three? That was three questions, wasn't it?
When does it stop? At four questions, or five? π€π€
Does this sound like an argument for fewer questions, possibly even one?
That's terribly misleading, isn't it? π0 -
Why not make it 6?0
-
NerdyScienceGrl wrote: Β»Huh? What? Why two questions?
Is math not your strong suit either, @NerdyScienceGrl?
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.5K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 392 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 926 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions