Heart Rate Monitor Recommendations

raelynne629
raelynne629 Posts: 24 Member
edited October 7 in Fitness and Exercise
Anyone have one that they love or hate? I'm probably looking for a fairly inexpensive one...
«1

Replies

  • careyharv
    careyharv Posts: 134 Member
    I currently use a Polar FT7 and I love it. My sister and husband use one as well. I did have a Timex one but it was not consistent in monitoring my heart rate. I checked out Heartmonitor.com and was able to get the Polar on sale.
  • JennC831
    JennC831 Posts: 628 Member
    Polar FT7 all the way!!!
  • CMmrsfloyd
    CMmrsfloyd Posts: 2,380 Member
    Love my Polar FT4 - it is one of the less expensive options that is regarded as being very accurate for calorie burn. The FT7 has more options but the FT4 will get the job done if your only concern is calories.
  • htimpaired
    htimpaired Posts: 1,404 Member
    I just ordered an FT4 and it should be coming this week. I can't wait to try it! It cost me $66 on Amazon.
  • scssam
    scssam Posts: 23 Member
    Got the FT4 for $79 at Sports Authority.. Couldn't wait ... works great.. good choice.
  • trybefan
    trybefan Posts: 488 Member
    FT4, I have been using it for the past 2 weeks and love it...got mine on Amazon for around $50. Really simple to use, shows calories burned, target zones, etc. Pretty basic. The chest strap is the most comfortable that I have found. Its easy on and off.
  • quiksandy
    quiksandy Posts: 246 Member
    I have the Polar FT4. Not a lot of bells and whistles with it but it seems accurate and gets the job done.

    My husband has a Polar FT60 and loves it! Many more stats with that one.
  • tiffany0127
    tiffany0127 Posts: 378 Member
    I use the Polar FT4 and love it! It works for me because my main concern is getting an accurate calorie burn.

    I use it 5-6 times a week. :)
  • RAFValentina
    RAFValentina Posts: 1,231 Member
    Polar RS300x ... You can add on optional extras such as foot pod or gps sensor to store more data but I just bought it with the polar flow link and it's great. Takes into account much more biometric data such as RHR, MHR and VO2 max which give a better calorie burn. You can also link the data up to polar personal trainer to maximise your training, it's gots lots of bells and whistles. Chest strap (wear link+) is amazingly comfy and chaff free compared to my old t31 chest strap which was made from plastic. Cost me £109.99 for the watch, strap and a polarflowlink + free carry case and free next day delivery from polar mega fitness store in Durham. X
  • caw001
    caw001 Posts: 3
    Anybody ever use the BodyBugg?
  • JoanWill
    JoanWill Posts: 217
    love my FT4.
  • Moriarty_697
    Moriarty_697 Posts: 226 Member
    I'm going to have to join the crowd and say Polar FT7. I don't like doing cardio without it anymore.
  • onefitdiva
    onefitdiva Posts: 331 Member
    I have the Polar FT7 and love it. I had 2 cheap ones before and well they sucked. Save up and invest in a good one. look on Amazon or Ebay for them, I got My Polar new for $50.00 with free shipping.
  • tkorthanke
    tkorthanke Posts: 9 Member
    I have a Polar FT7 and it works great. I got it off of EBAY for around $65.
  • Casi23
    Casi23 Posts: 138 Member
    Yikes! I'm the minority on here! I use a Garmin FR60 - a little pricier - I think I got it at a running store for 160.00. It's a HRM and GPS tracker in one. Which is great if you love to run/bike outdoors. But it can also be used inside at a gym or during a workout class. The pros are:

    A. Not as bulky because the watch is separate from the GPS tracking device - which is a little chip you hook onto your shoelaces.
    B. Tracking not only the calories you burn but your pace and distance too - and can be used with their web site to monitor and save your workouts.
    C. I found it very accurate with distances.

    But if you're not into outdoor sports it may not be worth it. Just the regular HRM's with out the GPS are much less expensive.

    Good luck!
  • weightofyourskin
    weightofyourskin Posts: 173
    Polar FT7! It was my Christmas present from my husband and I love it.
  • barbiecat
    barbiecat Posts: 17,194 Member
    :bigsmile: :bigsmile: :bigsmile: :bigsmile: I just got my Polar FT7 and I love it already......chest strap very comfortable.....watch easy to read.....back light great (I walk my dogs for two hours before sunrise).......not hard to learn to navigate the different screens :bigsmile: :bigsmile: :bigsmile:
  • erxkeel
    erxkeel Posts: 553 Member
    Polar FT7 all the way!!!
    ^^ this
  • hazelnut861
    hazelnut861 Posts: 390 Member
    Search the forums. You'll see mostly polar lol
  • tonyalegria
    tonyalegria Posts: 1 Member
    I am happy with my MIO Motiva (no chest strap) that I got online for $50 plus shipping.
  • Luv2BMommy
    Luv2BMommy Posts: 36
    bump
  • htimpaired
    htimpaired Posts: 1,404 Member
    So I got my Polar FT4 and tried it out today. I did a 45 minute boot camp class, talked on the treadmill doing incline intervals, and some lower body weight lifting. According to the HRM, I actually went OVER my "Range" and burned waaay more calories than what my fitbit used to say and the exercise log thingy here on MFP estimates. It almost seems too good to be true.
    So, is this thing accurate? Is my heart rate really possibly getting THAT high?
  • srhlaskey
    srhlaskey Posts: 5
    Like all fitness equipment that measures calorie burn, a heart rate monitor uses an estimate of what your maximum heart rate is to determine what the appropriate heart rate range for exercise should be. Even though a heart rate monitor is more accurate than the counter on an elliptical trainer, for example, it still uses a general formula to estimate that range. For instance, based on my age (23), my max heart rate should be around 197. But when I had a cardiac stress test (By a cardiologist--I work in exercise physiology), I found my maximum heart rate to be 211. That means that the appropriate heart rate range for me to work out in is actually a little higher than the one on my Polar FT4 (which I love!)

    So, bottom line, it's a great estimate for calorie burn, and it's more accurate than most things you can get outside a doctor's office, but it's also not super surprising if your heart rate exceeds the range for exercise.

    One more thing: For fat loss, it's recommended to maintain a heart rate between 65% and 85% of your max heart rate. But that's just for steady state cardio. If you took a Bootcamp class, it was likely more of a high-intensity interval format. In that case, its expected that your heart rate should exceed 85% of your max for short time periods. Great for conditioning and calorie burn :) Hope that helps!
  • vs1023
    vs1023 Posts: 417 Member
    Polar FT7 all the way!!!

    This. I have the F7 which is the old version. At least with the ft7 you can change the watch battery yourself.
  • htimpaired
    htimpaired Posts: 1,404 Member
    Like all fitness equipment that measures calorie burn, a heart rate monitor uses an estimate of what your maximum heart rate is to determine what the appropriate heart rate range for exercise should be. Even though a heart rate monitor is more accurate than the counter on an elliptical trainer, for example, it still uses a general formula to estimate that range. For instance, based on my age (23), my max heart rate should be around 197. But when I had a cardiac stress test (By a cardiologist--I work in exercise physiology), I found my maximum heart rate to be 211. That means that the appropriate heart rate range for me to work out in is actually a little higher than the one on my Polar FT4 (which I love!)

    So, bottom line, it's a great estimate for calorie burn, and it's more accurate than most things you can get outside a doctor's office, but it's also not super surprising if your heart rate exceeds the range for exercise.

    One more thing: For fat loss, it's recommended to maintain a heart rate between 65% and 85% of your max heart rate. But that's just for steady state cardio. If you took a Bootcamp class, it was likely more of a high-intensity interval format. In that case, its expected that your heart rate should exceed 85% of your max for short time periods. Great for conditioning and calorie burn :) Hope that helps!

    Thank you so much, that does help. I'm 32, but I suspect my max heart rate might be higher than the charts guess for someone in their 30s. Prob is, I don't know why my max is, and I don't have a cardiologist to help me find out. Any suggestions on something I can do to find out my max?
  • srhlaskey
    srhlaskey Posts: 5
    A slightly more accurate formula to determine your heart rate zone than 220-age is called the Karvonen formula. It is Target HR = ((HRmax − HRrest) × % intensity) + HRrest. It's also known as the heart rate reserve formula. Your true resting heart rate occurs right after you wake up in the morning, when you're still lying in bed. If you take that resting heart rate, and use the HR max (220-age), and then 0.65 and 0.85 as your intensities, you can get a more accurate read on the heart rate range you should be using. It does require a little more math though!

    This link has a pretty good calculator. Just fill in your age, gender, resting heart rate, and max heart rate and it will generate the heart rate zones you can train in.

    http://www.livelongbestrong.com/resources/karvonen.htm

    As for finding the more accurate heart rate max....you can see if the gym you go to offers fitness testing. I work as a trainer at a gym where we perform a submaximal (no cardiologist necessary) assessment for $35 for members. It's worth a shot, since short of that test I am not aware of a more accurate way to measure your max.

    This is what I use for training, personally! Just so I cover my butt here, I'm an ACSM certified personal trainer :) Good luck!
  • beckylawrence70
    beckylawrence70 Posts: 752 Member
    I have a Sportline I bought at Walmart and it works great! Had a Polar before this one and it wasn't any better than what I have now.
  • HugznKiki
    HugznKiki Posts: 170 Member
    I have the SportLine 125 but it is primarily made for women with the chest strap that sync's to the watch...so it may not be what you need. But I do love it!
  • BlackmetalCoffee79
    BlackmetalCoffee79 Posts: 108 Member
    I have a "Mio Classic Select" HRM i received as a gift for Christmas. Seems to work fine for me.
  • Monkee_Magic
    Monkee_Magic Posts: 32 Member
    I have used a garmin 305 for a while now, very reliable, with the GPS it plots routes etc, quite geeky, you can look up on google etc where you've been. It also has a little training partner you can pit yourself against too. Depends what you want one for as to prices, if you just want to monitor zones and work out manually then there are plenty of lower priced less gimmicky HRMs as most of the Polar ones mentioned are. As for peak HR, 220-37, puts me at 183, my max accordingly to my HRM used and near death feeling is 190bpm, though this has risen from what used to be 188. Good luck with it.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories