Clothes must be made bigger now?

Options
2

Replies

  • AmeMahoney
    Options
    Yes, sizes are bigger now. It's very frustrating. I only have the 20 pounds to lose I gained during grad school, and I've fit into a 6 for several years. However, these are the same as my old size 8's! When I'm really fit I wear a 4, which is a little scary to me. It's also EXTREMELY frustrating as most of the clothing stores around here start at a 6, so I feel like I can't get into the type of shape I want to be in because I'll have nowhere to shop! (Of course, that's probably just an excuse, haha.)
  • meanness67
    meanness67 Posts: 366 Member
    Options
    I know what you mean. I have pants anywhere from 6 to 10 that all fit about the same. Shirts I can wear small to large depending on the shirt. Very frustrating to shop.
  • reasonablyvain
    Options
    I'm from Canada and normally a size 6. In the US I'm a four and in the Europe I can be as high as a ten (yeeps). So it depends on where you live.

    It depends on the store too. Am I a six at aeropostle? Probably not. American eagle? max a size 6.

    But yes, I do think they are making clothes bigger than they used too. I like vintage clothes but they're often smaller than new clothes of the same "size."
  • Sara1978
    Sara1978 Posts: 213 Member
    Options
    Sizes are larger now, AND stores don't carry the smaller sizes at all!

    I'm having serious, serious problems buying clothes these days. Most of the stores around where I live do not carry anything smaller than a size four. Which of course, isn't really a size four, because it is vanity sized. So someone who is a size two? Sorry, no pants for you. >.<

    I never realized this would end up being such a big issue. I've decided to try ordering online-- I found a site that actually provides measurements for their clothing, so I'm hoping I'll be able to get things that actually fit me. It is going to cost more than Target, Kohl's or Fred Meyer's would have, but I don't have much choice.
  • happy_vegan
    happy_vegan Posts: 200 Member
    Options
    Mens are the same way. I have a 36 ish waist but I wear 34's no problem. The shirts are doing the same thing. Stores are going to do what makes the people happy.


    noooooo really? I'm a girl but I had always seen men check the size number, not try it on and leave and I was always so jealous. Why can't they just make clothes that are the inch size they say the are? What is this size 0, 00, 7/8 12/13 garbage?!
  • tatiana_13
    Options
    I think they are bigger. I wear a size 2. When I was in high school I wore a size 4, and I'm slightly heavier than I was then...not to mention that a high school girl should be naturally slimmer than a 35 year old woman due to muscle mass differences and expanding hips! Yeah...I definitely think clothes have gotten bigger.

    I also do a lot of thrift store/vintage shopping. And when I buy old clothes, I am 2 or 3 sizes larger. In a dress from the 50s or 60s I am a size 6! So, when people ask me what size I am, I look them in the eye and say, "I'm a true size 6." But I can wear anything from a 2 on up due to crazy vanity sizing!
  • FitJoani
    FitJoani Posts: 2,173 Member
    Options
    Take it and love it!!! :) I always used to whine about "clothes being too small" in an effort to mask my fatness...
  • That_Girl
    That_Girl Posts: 1,324 Member
    Options
    Sizing is insane now. I needed new workout shorts so we went to a sports store, I grabbed my usual medium and my husband said that they were way too big for me. I checked to see if it was an XL on a M hanger, but the tag inside said M. He grabbed an XS and held them up and said that was my size. Sure enough, they fit. At 144, I'm not an XS.

    I wonder what people who are 100 lbs soaking wet wear for yoga shorts because the XS would fall off of them!

    Special Order! When I was thin, I had to order half of my clothes online because my sizes weren't carried locally.

    I remember a time when really big people had to order their clothes because their sizes weren't carried. Times sure have changed!
  • kirstinlee
    kirstinlee Posts: 152 Member
    Options
    Haha this isn't in the last ten years, but I have a pair of my mom's old Levi's in my closet. She was complaining about my weight loss goals, saying that when she was my age, she wore 11's and was the weight that I am now. Thing is, when I was skinnier and about 15 lbs lighter, I still couldn't get them on and button them.
    I don't know about the last 10 years, but they definitely have in the last 20...
  • susanswan
    susanswan Posts: 1,194 Member
    Options

    So, I figure the only reasonable explanation is that clothes must be made bigger than they were 10 years ago. I really don't buy clothes that often, because it is usually torture. Please help me out. Anyone that has bought clothes in the last couple of years, are they bigger now? Or am I losing my mind. Is it possible that I might enjoy buying clothes now?

    I am 5' 5 1/2" tall and weigh today 138 pounds. I went through the same mind game as you! Overjoyed and disbelieving! Isn't it great? = D Okay, granted, there MIGHT be some vanity sizing from 30 or more years ago and certainly from the 50's and 60's. But lets ask the question the REAL way? How many of you have actually saved your clothes from decades ago only to fit back into them? Anyone? That's the only way to really tell. Okay, I did. I actually SAVED some old clothes from 15 years ago and I have my very first pair of Levi's 501 button fly cutoffs that I wore in 8th grade and 9th grade and I am 54 now. Those actually hang on me compared to me squeezing into them back then. I'd say when I was 13 and 14 I had a much more athletic body just because of regular PE at school and riding my bike or walking a either half a mile or a mile to school every day each way not to mention riding my bike to my friends houses or to go to the store or do anything. I weigh less now, but lets face it age and gravity after weight gain and loss are not my friends. But the cutoffs swim on me.

    I saved a pair of size 12 Wranglers (not stretchy) when I briefly weighed 135 (not exercising) from 15 years ago. Wranglers were always the smallest jeans for me. That and Levi's that I could never wear as an adult. Judging on how they fit my right this minute, I'd say the Wranglers were 2 sizes too big as I wore them skin tight back then. I also have a pair of size 12 baggy Lee high waisted shorts from 20 years ago that have at least 2 inches in the waist. I saved a Jessica McClintock evening dress which is form fitting around the hips size 10 from 15 years ago and it is big on me now.

    I also wear a size 4 in slacks, a size 6 in Levi's 512 (I think that is the number), and just bought 3 cocktail dresses just before Christmas all on the same day in sizes 4, 6, & 8 , but I think I typically wear a 6 after all the try ons. I got a size xs in a Michael Kors bomber type jacket that has lots of tummy and boob room but the sleeves are a little short when I stretch out my arms in front of me. I have heavy legs but lost the "pear" and hips so still wearing medium stretch pants, but tops are small or medium (broad shoulders), and I'd wear a small belt. Also lost half a shoe size back to my normal 8 to 8 1/2 depending on how wide they are for my wide feet.

    Whatever the answer is NOBODY can take away from you how fantastic you look, what a marvelous job you have done losing 100 pounds! I am teetering at 70 pounds lost. Just sorry I had to gain it in the first place when being accountable for food now and doing moderate exercise is NOT that much to ask.

    So who cares what the numbers are, enjoy your pretty new clothes everyone! It is okay if we are secretly impressed with ourselves! = D Take us off the statistics about Americans being whatever percent obese because we are now "normal"!

    Good work!
  • LuciaLongIsland
    LuciaLongIsland Posts: 815 Member
    Options
    :laugh: I lke the way you write ' when she was alive she was a 16...lol Id hate to know what size she is now ...sorry bad taste:noway:


    huh:frown:
  • LuciaLongIsland
    LuciaLongIsland Posts: 815 Member
    Options

    So, I figure the only reasonable explanation is that clothes must be made bigger than they were 10 years ago. I really don't buy clothes that often, because it is usually torture. Please help me out. Anyone that has bought clothes in the last couple of years, are they bigger now? Or am I losing my mind. Is it possible that I might enjoy buying clothes now?

    I am 5' 5 1/2" tall and weigh today 138 pounds. I went through the same mind game as you! Overjoyed and disbelieving! Isn't it great? = D Okay, granted, there MIGHT be some vanity sizing from 30 or more years ago and certainly from the 50's and 60's. But lets ask the question the REAL way? How many of you have actually saved your clothes from decades ago only to fit back into them? Anyone? That's the only way to really tell. Okay, I did. I actually SAVED some old clothes from 15 years ago and I have my very first pair of Levi's 501 button fly cutoffs that I wore in 8th grade and 9th grade and I am 54 now. Those actually hang on me compared to me squeezing into them back then. I'd say when I was 13 and 14 I had a much more athletic body just because of regular PE at school and riding my bike or walking a either half a mile or a mile to school every day each way not to mention riding my bike to my friends houses or to go to the store or do anything. I weigh less now, but lets face it age and gravity after weight gain and loss are not my friends. But the cutoffs swim on me.

    I saved a pair of size 12 Wranglers (not stretchy) when I briefly weighed 135 (not exercising) from 15 years ago. Wranglers were always the smallest jeans for me. That and Levi's that I could never wear as an adult. Judging on how they fit my right this minute, I'd say the Wranglers were 2 sizes too big as I wore them skin tight back then. I also have a pair of size 12 baggy Lee high waisted shorts from 20 years ago that have at least 2 inches in the waist. I saved a Jessica McClintock evening dress which is form fitting around the hips size 10 from 15 years ago and it is big on me now.

    I also wear a size 4 in slacks, a size 6 in Levi's 512 (I think that is the number), and just bought 3 cocktail dresses just before Christmas all on the same day in sizes 4, 6, & 8 , but I think I typically wear a 6 after all the try ons. I got a size xs in a Michael Kors bomber type jacket that has lots of tummy and boob room but the sleeves are a little short when I stretch out my arms in front of me. I have heavy legs but lost the "pear" and hips so still wearing medium stretch pants, but tops are small or medium (broad shoulders), and I'd wear a small belt. Also lost half a shoe size back to my normal 8 to 8 1/2 depending on how wide they are for my wide feet.

    Whatever the answer is NOBODY can take away from you how fantastic you look, what a marvelous job you have done losing 100 pounds! I am teetering at 70 pounds lost. Just sorry I had to gain it in the first place when being accountable for food now and doing moderate exercise is NOT that much to ask.

    So who cares what the numbers are, enjoy your pretty new clothes everyone! It is okay if we are secretly impressed with ourselves! = D Take us off the statistics about Americans being whatever percent obese because we are now "normal"!

    Good work!

    Susan, we are the same height and hopefully I will weigh 135 in some time. I only have a pair of cutoffs from 1968, I doubt they will ever fit!! I have short shorts from 16 years ago. We shall see. I have a ways to go.
  • Babrao
    Babrao Posts: 152 Member
    Options
    Congrats on all your hard work and your weight loss!!!! To answer your question, yes, I am wearing a size 16 jeans now in any store I go into, but all of my old jeans from around 2005-2006 I can only wear the 18s, the 16s are not close to fitting at all yet. Something is definitely different, lol.
  • Horskrzy
    Horskrzy Posts: 71 Member
    Options
    Just went through this yesterday!

    I've lost 34 of my 57 pound goal and have dropped from atight 38 waist pants to a comfortable 34 and yet, my waist size went from 40 to 37. If these morons would just follow a standard then I could safely order pants with a specific waist size and length and call it good. Stores carry up to 34W X 34L and then the Tall Man section carries 36W X 36L thus leaving me in the "deadzone" with the 34 X 36. Went to the Mall Saturday and the only thing I found was the deadzone.:explode:

    I'm now forced to order the pants on-line and once received try them on and if not a good fit, return. What a pain!
  • DQMD
    DQMD Posts: 193
    Options
    Vanity Sizing is crazy...

    I just wear the size that fits me the best and Eff the number. I have clothes in my closet ranging from a 4 to a 10.

    The true test for me is when I buy my horse riding clothes. Those cuts have not changed especially when I buy things from Europe.

    I am in mostly 8's right now..but my goal size is to wear the majority of 2/4. I will also have to buy my stuff online..the local stores carry a lot of 6's but under that I am up the creek.
  • LorinaLynn
    LorinaLynn Posts: 13,247 Member
    Options
    Congrats on your hard work! You look amazing!

    Sizing is screwy. Sometimes I think that sizes have changed drastically... I typically nowadays wear a size 2 or 4 in jeans, and a 5 or 7 in juniors jeans. I have size 5 and 7 from high school in the 80s that fit. And a pair of size 7 bell bottoms from the 70s (they weren't mine) that fit. A size 10 swimsuit from the 50s fits, but it's very stretchy and fit when I weighed 15 pounds more or less than I do now. So maybe they haven't changed that much.
  • LoViNlIFe0225
    Options
    I've see it so many ways! I'm a size 6 in stores like American Eagle and Old Navy, but a size 11 in Lee Branch Jeans. There appears to be no rhym or reason. I'm 5'3" and approximately 143 lbs...I would think I would be bigger than a size six...but definitley smaller than a size 11. Congrats on your accomplishment! I would just enjoy the size 2!!!!
  • cruisintolose
    cruisintolose Posts: 25 Member
    Options
    I think it really depends on the store. The higher end brands seem to do the vanity sizing more so than say target or the cheaper clothes. Although I will say Old Navy seems to not even keep a consistency within the same size. It depends on the color there! LOL
  • Lynnmi07
    Lynnmi07 Posts: 131 Member
    Options
    I don't understand this vanity sizing... You still look the same whether the jeans you put on say size 16 or size 10. I say the size should reflect the true size. If I put on a pair of jeans and my thighs and butt look big it doesn't matter what size the jeans say they are. I'm pretty sure we can all look in the mirror and tell if we need to lose some weight. So I don't understand why people are happy they can fit in a size 10 (or whatever their magic number is) when it's truly a size 16. Plus, it actually makes it a pain to go shopping when you have to try on 4 different sizes because you don't know how the pants sizes are going to run.

    However, I have noticed that higher end stores seem to run smaller (maybe more true to size) and the cheaper stores (such as kohls) run bigger.
  • jillica
    jillica Posts: 554 Member
    Options
    TOTALLY AGREE! It varies from brand to brand and store to store, but in general I believe this to be true.
Do you Love MyFitnessPal? Have you crushed a goal or improved your life through better nutrition using MyFitnessPal?
Share your success and inspire others. Leave us a review on Apple Or Google Play stores!