What will make you fatter...?
Replies
-
But did you not find it interesting that despite the greater CHO in the CHO overfeeding diet and therefore more insulin, there wasn't a significant amount more fat gained by the high CHO diet?
What I found interesting is that CHO led to more increased EE, but the net result was equivalent fat gain. Does this mean the CHO eater expended more energy but also gained the same amount of weight as the fat eater?
Here's another one that dealt with overfeeding
Lammert O, et al. Effects of isoenergetic overfeeding of either carbohydrate or fat in young men. British Journal of Nutrition, 2000; 84: 233-245.
http://cnr.berkeley.edu/hellerstein-lab/pdfs/grunnet.pdf
But dude what am I missing on this? Why does it say there was more storage from overefeeding of fat, but at the same time they say the weight gain was the same among both?
What are you trying to say that increased EE due to CHO overfeeding + similar fat gains means?0 -
But did you not find it interesting that despite the greater CHO in the CHO overfeeding diet and therefore more insulin, there wasn't a significant amount more fat gained by the high CHO diet?
What I found interesting is that CHO led to more increased EE, but the net result was equivalent fat gain. Does this mean the CHO eater expended more energy but also gained the same amount of weight as the fat eater?
Here's another one that dealt with overfeeding
Lammert O, et al. Effects of isoenergetic overfeeding of either carbohydrate or fat in young men. British Journal of Nutrition, 2000; 84: 233-245.
http://cnr.berkeley.edu/hellerstein-lab/pdfs/grunnet.pdf
But dude what am I missing on this? Why does it say there was more storage from overefeeding of fat, but at the same time they say the weight gain was the same among both?
What are you trying to say that increased EE due to CHO overfeeding + similar fat gains means?
I'm asking why they are saying there was more fat storage from fat overfeeding and more EE from CHO overfeeding, if the end result of both diets was the same as far as weight gain?0 -
1000 cal excess = 1000 cal excess .......bottom line
No need to explain any further than this!0 -
1000 cal excess = 1000 cal excess .......bottom line
No need to explain any further than this!
^^ This. This thread is giving me a headache.0 -
But did you not find it interesting that despite the greater CHO in the CHO overfeeding diet and therefore more insulin, there wasn't a significant amount more fat gained by the high CHO diet?
What I found interesting is that CHO led to more increased EE, but the net result was equivalent fat gain. Does this mean the CHO eater expended more energy but also gained the same amount of weight as the fat eater?
Here's another one that dealt with overfeeding
Lammert O, et al. Effects of isoenergetic overfeeding of either carbohydrate or fat in young men. British Journal of Nutrition, 2000; 84: 233-245.
http://cnr.berkeley.edu/hellerstein-lab/pdfs/grunnet.pdf
But dude what am I missing on this? Why does it say there was more storage from overefeeding of fat, but at the same time they say the weight gain was the same among both?
What are you trying to say that increased EE due to CHO overfeeding + similar fat gains means?
I'm asking why they are saying there was more fat storage from fat overfeeding and more EE from CHO overfeeding, if the end result of both diets was the same as far as weight gain?Carbohydrate overfeeding produced a very different picture. Progressive increases in both carbohydrate oxidation and total energy expenditure were seen with carbohydrate overfeeding. Both were evident on the first day of overfeeding and reached maximum by day 7. The increased energy expenditure seen with carbohydrate overfeeding was approximately double that which could be explained by the combination of increased TEF and increased body mass. Thus with carbohydrate overfeeding, more of the excess energy was oxidized and less stored in the body than was seen during fat overfeeding.0 -
1000 cal excess = 1000 cal excess .......bottom line
No need to explain any further than this!
^^ This. This thread is giving me a headache.
Me too. Mostly because I had to look up CHO, EE, TED. Why can't people just speak English unless they are trying to baffle ya with BS?0 -
Carbohydrate overfeeding produced a very different picture. Progressive increases in both carbohydrate oxidation and total energy expenditure were seen with carbohydrate overfeeding. Both were evident on the first day of overfeeding and reached maximum by day 7. The increased energy expenditure seen with carbohydrate overfeeding was approximately double that which could be explained by the combination of increased TEF and increased body mass. Thus with carbohydrate overfeeding, more of the excess energy was oxidized and less stored in the body than was seen during fat overfeeding.0
-
Carbohydrate overfeeding produced a very different picture. Progressive increases in both carbohydrate oxidation and total energy expenditure were seen with carbohydrate overfeeding. Both were evident on the first day of overfeeding and reached maximum by day 7. The increased energy expenditure seen with carbohydrate overfeeding was approximately double that which could be explained by the combination of increased TEF and increased body mass. Thus with carbohydrate overfeeding, more of the excess energy was oxidized and less stored in the body than was seen during fat overfeeding.
I'm still not getting it. Figure 1 and Figure 2 seem to contradict each other when looking at those and Table 2.0 -
Just take a carb blocker and you can have all the pasta you want!0
-
If you don't believe in set points, then there is no reason for us to discuss this any further with you.0
-
If you don't believe in set points, then there is no reason for us to discuss this any further with you.
I don't believe this either, so we do have one thing in common.0 -
Surely the fat would make you fatter if you were still ingesting enough carbs to allow your body to do it's thang, carbs being the preferred fuel?
Imma go with fat! Going to follow this topic, hopefully I'll learn something!
Wouldn't all the carbs you were overeating lead to crazy spiking of insulin, turning you into a fat storing monster? Thought I read somewhere that carbs ---->insulin spike---->fat gain
^^^I'm more inclined to think this way, but I am insulin resistant to begin with, so carbs (especially processed carbs) are a big no-no for me.0 -
I wonder if the people claiming the 1000 cals of fat is different from 1000 cals of carbs also correct people who say muscle is heavier than fat since clearly 1lb of muscle to 1lb of fat was assumed and not weight by volume.0
-
Carbs, because they would inevitably have gluten, to which I am terribly intollerant. So, while it would give me a month of "the runs", I know it would still make me more bloated . . . giving me gurth.
If we're talking 1000 calories of just carbs, would gluten be an issue? Gluten is a protein, isn't it?
I wasn't talking about everyone, I was talking specifically about ME and the way that MY body processes the gluten protein as most often found in wheat. I PERSONALLY would have a difficult time upping my calories by 1000 calories per day in pure carb and avoiding wheat . . . mostly out of temptation.0 -
I'm going to go with the variations in TEF and throw my hat in the "gain more weight with 1000 cals of fat" ring. Source: The thermic effect of carbohydrate versus fat feeding in man http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/00260495859001490
-
Acg, another thing I don't understand is why fasting insulin levels were so different in lean individuals on Day 0 between CHO and Fat overfeeders. Wasn't this before the overfeeding began?0
-
Acg, another thing I don't understand is why fasting insulin levels were so different in lean individuals on Day 0 between CHO and Fat overfeeders. Wasn't this before the overfeeding began?
That is a good question and isn't brought up in the study, I'll have to think why that could be.0 -
Found this when I was looking for an external analysis on the study, for anyone who cares.
http://ramblingsofacarnivore.blogspot.com/0 -
In a seminar for my biology course, we learned the effects of a high fat diet on the production of insulin. An insulin problem is the cause of type 2 diabetes.0
-
In a healthy individual, your body will shift to oxidize whatever you're feeding it. However, obese individuals are metabolically inflexible, meaning they primarily oxidize glucose regardless of whether they're being challenged with a high-fat meal. So those FA's are stored rather than being oxidized.0
-
Plus there's the whole gut-brain-liver axis wherein high-fat feeding promotes the release of endotoxin from the intestines via chylomicron binding and gut permeability...that's a whole 'nother' can of worms.0
-
Acg, another thing I don't understand is why fasting insulin levels were so different in lean individuals on Day 0 between CHO and Fat overfeeders. Wasn't this before the overfeeding began?
That is a good question and isn't brought up in the study, I'll have to think why that could be.
You still haven't answered my other question. Can you explain in your own words why there seems to be a contradiction between Figures 1 and 2 when looking at Table 2. True or false, the dieters gained the same amount of fat mass on both fat and CHO overfeeding? If so, how is it possible that CHO overfeeding led to higher total energy expenditure?0 -
Let's assume you are currently maintaining on 2,000 calories a day 50/30/20 C/F/P and you were to overeat consistently by 1,000 calories of either pure carbs or pure fat for a month, which would make you fatter, or would there be no difference and why?
Curious as to what people think. I've seen people state that anything over 15g of cho in a meal will be stored as fat or that fat makes you fat etc etc. So which is worse to overeat, carbs or fats or does it not matter?
Just saw this. Didn't read the comments following. But it's an interesting question and I don't know the answer for sure, but I'm gonna guess 1000 calories of excess fat because you can skip the conversion step needed to make carbs into fat.
Now I'll read the responses and see if anyone has anything interesting to say.0 -
Let's assume you are currently maintaining on 2,000 calories a day 50/30/20 C/F/P and you were to overeat consistently by 1,000 calories of either pure carbs or pure fat for a month, which would make you fatter, or would there be no difference and why?
Curious as to what people think. I've seen people state that anything over 15g of cho in a meal will be stored as fat or that fat makes you fat etc etc. So which is worse to overeat, carbs or fats or does it not matter?
Just saw this. Didn't read the comments following. But it's an interesting question and I don't know the answer for sure, but I'm gonna guess 1000 calories of excess fat because you can skip the conversion step needed to make carbs into fat.
Now I'll read the responses and see if anyone has anything interesting to say.
But, fat isn't as insulogenic. But carbs don't increase plasma endotoxin. But the binding of endotoxin to chylomicrons destines it for the liver where it will be acetylated and filtered. And mice on high-sucrose, high-fat diets don't experience that chylomicron filtration to the same extent. AHHHHH *brain explosion*0 -
Acg, another thing I don't understand is why fasting insulin levels were so different in lean individuals on Day 0 between CHO and Fat overfeeders. Wasn't this before the overfeeding began?
That is a good question and isn't brought up in the study, I'll have to think why that could be.0 -
Acg, another thing I don't understand is why fasting insulin levels were so different in lean individuals on Day 0 between CHO and Fat overfeeders. Wasn't this before the overfeeding began?
That is a good question and isn't brought up in the study, I'll have to think why that could be.
If insulin has nothing to do with obesity, then why would you think that?
And can you answer the question I am still confused about? It seems like CHO overfeeding defies the laws of physics, unless someone can help me explain the discrepancy.0 -
Acg, another thing I don't understand is why fasting insulin levels were so different in lean individuals on Day 0 between CHO and Fat overfeeders. Wasn't this before the overfeeding began?
That is a good question and isn't brought up in the study, I'll have to think why that could be.
If insulin has nothing to do with obesity, then why would you think that?
And can you answer the question I am still confused about? It seems like CHO overfeeding defies the laws of physics, unless someone can help me explain the discrepancy.
Lean individuals DO have better insulin sensitivity. CHO is needed to make oxaloacetate (OAA)...well, not totally necessary, but the more the merrier....anyway, OAA is required for fat oxidation. But I didn't look at the study and I can't be arsed to look at any scientific paper I don't need to. :laugh: There are a lot of reasons fat and CHO influence your metabolism. I for one believe it's gut-regulated...you have TRILLIONS of bacteria in your gut with a genome 100 times greater than your own. Those little guys can do a number on you.0 -
Acg, another thing I don't understand is why fasting insulin levels were so different in lean individuals on Day 0 between CHO and Fat overfeeders. Wasn't this before the overfeeding began?
That is a good question and isn't brought up in the study, I'll have to think why that could be.
If insulin has nothing to do with obesity, then why would you think that?
And can you answer the question I am still confused about? It seems like CHO overfeeding defies the laws of physics, unless someone can help me explain the discrepancy.0 -
Acg, another thing I don't understand is why fasting insulin levels were so different in lean individuals on Day 0 between CHO and Fat overfeeders. Wasn't this before the overfeeding began?
That is a good question and isn't brought up in the study, I'll have to think why that could be.
If insulin has nothing to do with obesity, then why would you think that?
And can you answer the question I am still confused about? It seems like CHO overfeeding defies the laws of physics, unless someone can help me explain the discrepancy.
But do you think insulin has anything to do with your eating patterns as it pertains to carbs? The consensus on this forum is that the majority of obese people have no problem with carbs or insulin at all, and that the number of people who do is so small that it shouldn't even be mentioned as a possibility most of the time. Do you take that stance as well?0 -
It depends on the type of fats and carbs but I'm going with carbs. Chronically elevated levels of insulin from over consumption of carbs will lead to more fat storage. Insulin regulates our fat metabolism, the higher the insulin levels the higher fat content in our bodies.
Fat may have more calories per gram than carbs but fat makes us feel full sooner and causes a slow rise in blood sugar, if any at all, so we can fill up on less basically.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions