I think we should

How soon before this gets locked??

3.....2.....1......

why would it get locked?

For dangerous levels of utterly, utterly idiotic opinions as offered by you.

Then you can leave... don't let the door hit you on the way out. :happy:

Or, I can stick around and pity you. :flowerforyou:

I think that punishments should fit the crime, and that's what our legal system tries to do. A lot of people do get off the hook, or plea bargains and stuff like that. I do think that sometimes people get off way too easy, and I'm not sure how often the innocent is declared guilty.

While I do sometimes think that people should get more punishment than they do, I know that God is the ultimate judge, knows what people have an have not done. He will get vengeance however He sees fit in this life or the next. So while life is unfair, and it seems like "karma" does not always work, I believe that in the end it really does all work out better in that - God can set the record straight and "punish" more correctly and fairly than we can and also "reward" too. I would not want a police state. :ohwell:

ETA: And if you don't believe this, fine. I haven't demanded that you believe it. I'm just stating my opinion I'm adding the disclaimer because sometimes people go nuts when a religious view is presented.

Perhaps we should just kill all stupid people. Because, let's face it, they are the only ones who get caught. Just ask my ex-husband. Oh wait, you can't ask him because he mysteriously disappeared 12 years ago.

Wow...that really sucks...


And, to everyone being total as5holes....why? You don't have to respond if you don't like what you read...tearing someone down or disrespecting them only makes you look bad, not them.

Or, I can stick around and pity you. :flowerforyou:

That's the kind of self-righteousness I expect from the Internet.

Not surprising that someone who would post something like this thinks they control who gets to post in it.

It seemed more like a suggestion, as in, if you disagree then you're free to not continue posting or reading, or perhaps to provide thoughtful responses instead of something asinine, such as name calling.

You may disagree with the OP—I know I do—but you don't have to be a *kitten*. (This name calling isn't asinine, as it's warranted and wasn't simply a pejorative in lieu of discourse.)

You shared your opinion now let me share mine.

That would be a GREAT idea if the judicial system wasn't so screwed up. Before you start talking about an eye for an eye wouldn't you rather know for a fact that these people committed said crimes?

Also how would the laws be for kids, rather than giving them a chance to better themselves we're going to chop off their finger? Makes perfect sense.

And your idea for those who lie is just asinine.

To me it sounds like you need a hug and a better grasp on reality.

Or, I can stick around and pity you. :flowerforyou:

That's the kind of self-righteousness I expect from the Internet.

Not surprising that someone who would post something like this thinks they control who gets to post in it.

It seemed more like a suggestion, as in, if you disagree then you're free to not continue posting or reading, or perhaps to provide thoughtful responses instead of something asinine, such as name calling.

You may disagree with the OP—I know I do—but you don't have to be a *kitten*. (This name calling isn't asinine, as it's warranted and wasn't simply a pejorative in lieu of discourse.)

I said her opinion is idiotic.

Rationalise your name calling however you see fit. It's still everything you claim it not to be.

Why is it that you chose this particular comment to take issue with, and not the one in which the OP herself was called an idiot?

Could it be that you didn't like ER's reply to your comment in another thread, so you're taking the up the matter within this one?


As I understood it, the OP isn't here to engage in discourse.

you never made the debate team did you?

this is not a debate, this is my opinion.