Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Why are some WOE more acceptable than others?

Options
12346»

Replies

  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    edited January 2018
    Options
    Thanks for all the thoughts everyone! The ethical standpoint of vegetarian/veganism is actually, embarrassingly, completely honestly, something I had forgotten. Of the IRL people I know who eat in those styles only one does so because she can’t stand the texture of meat. Not a love for the animal but just a dislike of meat. The rest do it for “health”.

    I still don’t think that having a moral standpoint on it should make it “more ok” and less questioned than Keto eating. Not saying either should be questioned. It just feels like there is a mad rush to be the first person the tell them that they don’t have to eat that way instead of actually helping them.
    No, it's just a mad rush to be the person to convince them :D
    Do you really think NOT telling them that they don't have to if they don't want to, is helping?

    I do actually. Once they have made a decision, why make them question it every step of the way? That just screws with people’s self worth. Maybe I just assume a basic level of research, comprehension, common sense. Etc. On what they are choosing. Naive on my part I guess. In real life I don’t flat out tell grown adults they are wrong if their choices don’t affect me. Unless they want my opinion. Asking for an opinion about the Keto diet vs asking how to set their macros for the Keto diet warrant completely different answers.

    I'm coming into this a few days late, but I'll offer my perspective.

    On threads where newbies are suffering on keto and unsure, I offer perspective from 40 years spent dieting. Ten of those years were spent eating low carb. I never once got closer than 15 pounds above the upper range of overweight BMI.


    I have some unique perspective to offer on sustainability to conversations about this. If someone is starting off and struggling, I think it would be foolish not to share it.

    I know everyone is different and my experience is unique to me, but if you're going in with doubts, having more information on board is always a good thing. I wasted ten years never reaching goal because of lack of information.
    This is what I told myself too, only it was twenty+ years. But the information was provided to me, I just chose to ignore it and stick to what I believed was necesssary (low fat, low sugar, low salt, high fiber, low taste). I have spent a few years being bitter, "why couldn't someone have explained this to me", and trying to explain "losing weight doesn't have to feel like torture" to newcomers; while at the same time being perfectly aware of the adage "I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you", even pressing that "you have to do the job yourself". I don't think the most common problem is a lack of information - it could have been that for you though - I think the overarching problem is too much information and lack of judgement. What I've really been trying to do - but now aiming to stop - is to understand something for someone else, do the job for them. That doesn't work. I didn't make the connection until a few days ago! I had to do the job myself, and a big part of that job was to change my attitude and challenge my beliefs. All I can do is present the facts I believe to be true and as I understand them, as clearly and neutral as possible, and let the other person use that information as they see fit and to the extent they are able to. Noone could have done more for me either.

    Oh, I dieted for 40 years. That ten years was spent low carbing being told it would magically regulate my intake and make me as thin as I'd always wanted to be.

    But the thing is, I started falling for the misinformation and never had a lot of success.

    I knew the general "eat less, move more", but it was all somewhat vague to me how to quantify my intake, and I was a very credulous person back then. If it wasn't some silly crash diet, it was eat hardly anything. There was no middle path.

    Quite silly of me. Yes, I had to do a lot of belief challenging and responsibility taking. But I also had to learn a lot about exact numbers and how all the puzzle pieces fit together to make "eat less, move more" work.
  • Lounmoun
    Lounmoun Posts: 8,426 Member
    Options
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    Generally, I think a lot of people (me included) are more likely to notice/remember when their own pet beliefs are - in their view - criticized or countered, thus to think that it occurs more frequently than it actually does.

    I think this is a good point about perception of frequency.
    People who post that they are drinking meal replacement shakes, expensive diet meals, nutritionists/coaches, avoiding processed foods, drinking an ocean of water, spending hours at the gym are told those things are not absolutely necessary for weight loss every time they come up. I don't think keto is targeted negatively more than other things.

    I think a major reason you will continually see posts saying this or that isn't necessary only calorie deficit is that many of us have been through plans that promised weight loss without talking about calories and did not have consistant or sustainable results. We have collectively spent lots of money and time on these things. I'm glad people point it out so often in this community that weight loss boils down to CICO because I did struggle in the past more than necessary trying to stick to things that were not a good fit for me and hating myself for failing. Calorie information is out there but there are more books, videos, celebrity diets, etc telling you to do some diet of the day. It is easy for someone new to weight loss to think they need to do what they hear about most.

  • nvmomketo
    nvmomketo Posts: 12,019 Member
    Options
    Want an example of why Keto gets shot down?

    Read the post I responded to in this thread

    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10600973/lose-200lbs-in-less-then-a-year/p38

    I don't see anyone in that thread suggesting going vegan.

    As stated earlier, vegan is often about ethical choices and not weight loss.

    Someone also suggested WLS too. I did not read the entire thread - it is LONG one - but if someone is having trouble losing by simply moderating calories, and they have that much to lose, trying different woes to make weight loss easier (as some find keto more satiating) is not really a bad thing.

    JMO
  • nvmomketo
    nvmomketo Posts: 12,019 Member
    Options
    nvmomketo wrote: »
    Want an example of why Keto gets shot down?

    Read the post I responded to in this thread

    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10600973/lose-200lbs-in-less-then-a-year/p38

    I don't see anyone in that thread suggesting going vegan.

    As stated earlier, vegan is often about ethical choices and not weight loss.

    Someone also suggested WLS too. I did not read the entire thread - it is LONG one - but if someone is having trouble losing by simply moderating calories, and they have that much to lose, trying different woes to make weight loss easier (as some find keto more satiating) is not really a bad thing.

    JMO

    If you read that thread, it appears that OP is having consistent progress without keto. That's why the suggestion to switch doesn't really make sense -- especially since he has already shared, IIRC, that he doesn't think it would be a good choice for him personally.

    Ah. Gotcha. I'll take your word for it. I only looked at the one page.