Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Why are some WOE more acceptable than others?
Options
Replies
-
Have to say: If someone posts that they're thinking of going vegetarian because it's better for weight loss, or they think it's more morally pure but they love meat, or other things along those lines, I routinely suggest that they reconsider, and tell them why I think that's good advice. I've done so a bunch of times.
That's pushback on vegetarians, isn't it?
(Please note: I've been vegetarian for 43 years. That makes me feel just a little tiny bit expert.)
Usually, I only fuss at low-carb/keto folks who insult other WOEs, pop into threads unrelated to carby-ness to power evangelize well beyond "this worked for me", insist it's the only way to lose weight, insist that carb eaters who claim satiation are lying/deluded, pitch bad science, or that sort of thing.
Does that happen often? No. But it does happen. (I'd simiarly fuss at analogous "logic" from evangelists for other specialty WOEs, BTW.)
I think its legit to suggest to someone who's struggling with low carb that it isn't essential for weight loss, mainly in the form of saying I didn't have to go low carb to lose. (I also think it's legit to suggest to someone struggling in relevant ways that they could try low carb or keto, but I'd rarely suggest it because I didn't do it.)
Generally, I think a lot of people (me included) are more likely to notice/remember when their own pet beliefs are - in their view - criticized or countered, thus to think that it occurs more frequently than it actually does.15 -
youngmomtaz wrote: »kommodevaran wrote: »youngmomtaz wrote: »Thanks for all the thoughts everyone! The ethical standpoint of vegetarian/veganism is actually, embarrassingly, completely honestly, something I had forgotten. Of the IRL people I know who eat in those styles only one does so because she can’t stand the texture of meat. Not a love for the animal but just a dislike of meat. The rest do it for “health”.
I still don’t think that having a moral standpoint on it should make it “more ok” and less questioned than Keto eating. Not saying either should be questioned. It just feels like there is a mad rush to be the first person the tell them that they don’t have to eat that way instead of actually helping them.
Do you really think NOT telling them that they don't have to if they don't want to, is helping?
I do actually. Once they have made a decision, why make them question it every step of the way? That just screws with people’s self worth. Maybe I just assume a basic level of research, comprehension, common sense. Etc. On what they are choosing. Naive on my part I guess. In real life I don’t flat out tell grown adults they are wrong if their choices don’t affect me. Unless they want my opinion. Asking for an opinion about the Keto diet vs asking how to set their macros for the Keto diet warrant completely different answers.
I'm coming into this a few days late, but I'll offer my perspective.
On threads where newbies are suffering on keto and unsure, I offer perspective from 40 years spent dieting. Ten of those years were spent eating low carb. I never once got closer than 15 pounds above the upper range of overweight BMI.
I have some unique perspective to offer on sustainability to conversations about this. If someone is starting off and struggling, I think it would be foolish not to share it.
I know everyone is different and my experience is unique to me, but if you're going in with doubts, having more information on board is always a good thing. I wasted ten years never reaching goal because of lack of information.11 -
GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »youngmomtaz wrote: »kommodevaran wrote: »youngmomtaz wrote: »Thanks for all the thoughts everyone! The ethical standpoint of vegetarian/veganism is actually, embarrassingly, completely honestly, something I had forgotten. Of the IRL people I know who eat in those styles only one does so because she can’t stand the texture of meat. Not a love for the animal but just a dislike of meat. The rest do it for “health”.
I still don’t think that having a moral standpoint on it should make it “more ok” and less questioned than Keto eating. Not saying either should be questioned. It just feels like there is a mad rush to be the first person the tell them that they don’t have to eat that way instead of actually helping them.
Do you really think NOT telling them that they don't have to if they don't want to, is helping?
I do actually. Once they have made a decision, why make them question it every step of the way? That just screws with people’s self worth. Maybe I just assume a basic level of research, comprehension, common sense. Etc. On what they are choosing. Naive on my part I guess. In real life I don’t flat out tell grown adults they are wrong if their choices don’t affect me. Unless they want my opinion. Asking for an opinion about the Keto diet vs asking how to set their macros for the Keto diet warrant completely different answers.
I'm coming into this a few days late, but I'll offer my perspective.
On threads where newbies are suffering on keto and unsure, I offer perspective from 40 years spent dieting. Ten of those years were spent eating low carb. I never once got closer than 15 pounds above the upper range of overweight BMI.
I have some unique perspective to offer on sustainability to conversations about this. If someone is starting off and struggling, I think it would be foolish not to share it.
I know everyone is different and my experience is unique to me, but if you're going in with doubts, having more information on board is always a good thing. I wasted ten years never reaching goal because of lack of information.7 -
kommodevaran wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »youngmomtaz wrote: »kommodevaran wrote: »youngmomtaz wrote: »Thanks for all the thoughts everyone! The ethical standpoint of vegetarian/veganism is actually, embarrassingly, completely honestly, something I had forgotten. Of the IRL people I know who eat in those styles only one does so because she can’t stand the texture of meat. Not a love for the animal but just a dislike of meat. The rest do it for “health”.
I still don’t think that having a moral standpoint on it should make it “more ok” and less questioned than Keto eating. Not saying either should be questioned. It just feels like there is a mad rush to be the first person the tell them that they don’t have to eat that way instead of actually helping them.
Do you really think NOT telling them that they don't have to if they don't want to, is helping?
I do actually. Once they have made a decision, why make them question it every step of the way? That just screws with people’s self worth. Maybe I just assume a basic level of research, comprehension, common sense. Etc. On what they are choosing. Naive on my part I guess. In real life I don’t flat out tell grown adults they are wrong if their choices don’t affect me. Unless they want my opinion. Asking for an opinion about the Keto diet vs asking how to set their macros for the Keto diet warrant completely different answers.
I'm coming into this a few days late, but I'll offer my perspective.
On threads where newbies are suffering on keto and unsure, I offer perspective from 40 years spent dieting. Ten of those years were spent eating low carb. I never once got closer than 15 pounds above the upper range of overweight BMI.
I have some unique perspective to offer on sustainability to conversations about this. If someone is starting off and struggling, I think it would be foolish not to share it.
I know everyone is different and my experience is unique to me, but if you're going in with doubts, having more information on board is always a good thing. I wasted ten years never reaching goal because of lack of information.
Oh, I dieted for 40 years. That ten years was spent low carbing being told it would magically regulate my intake and make me as thin as I'd always wanted to be.
But the thing is, I started falling for the misinformation and never had a lot of success.
I knew the general "eat less, move more", but it was all somewhat vague to me how to quantify my intake, and I was a very credulous person back then. If it wasn't some silly crash diet, it was eat hardly anything. There was no middle path.
Quite silly of me. Yes, I had to do a lot of belief challenging and responsibility taking. But I also had to learn a lot about exact numbers and how all the puzzle pieces fit together to make "eat less, move more" work.4 -
Something I was hoping I'd see in this thread, but haven't. . .I've eaten keto not as a diet, but for a specific medical issue. (People have been using keto to treat these sorts of disorders for a very, very long time.) I don't like it, and I don't do it when I can get away with eating normally (noms to king cake), but I WILL do it when necessary. I restrict calories to lose weight.
So yeah, keto can just be a means to living a normal life and have nothing do to with weight loss. (And believe me, when you HAVE to do it and you crave a slice of bread or a french fry, you whine, even when it's only to yourself.)5 -
Generally, I think a lot of people (me included) are more likely to notice/remember when their own pet beliefs are - in their view - criticized or countered, thus to think that it occurs more frequently than it actually does.
I think this is a good point about perception of frequency.
People who post that they are drinking meal replacement shakes, expensive diet meals, nutritionists/coaches, avoiding processed foods, drinking an ocean of water, spending hours at the gym are told those things are not absolutely necessary for weight loss every time they come up. I don't think keto is targeted negatively more than other things.
I think a major reason you will continually see posts saying this or that isn't necessary only calorie deficit is that many of us have been through plans that promised weight loss without talking about calories and did not have consistant or sustainable results. We have collectively spent lots of money and time on these things. I'm glad people point it out so often in this community that weight loss boils down to CICO because I did struggle in the past more than necessary trying to stick to things that were not a good fit for me and hating myself for failing. Calorie information is out there but there are more books, videos, celebrity diets, etc telling you to do some diet of the day. It is easy for someone new to weight loss to think they need to do what they hear about most.
4 -
My general experience (as a vegan) is that the members here are very open to different ways of eating (including veganism/vegetarianism, religious dietary restrictions, keto/low carbohydrate, "whole foods"). When it becomes an issue is when advocates for those diets advance them as the only way to be healthy or the easiest way for everyone to get healthier.
When someone posts about how they just saw "What the Health" and now they have to go vegan because they're scared or how they love potatoes but they know keto is the only way to lose weight, etc . . . that's when they get pushback.
As far as me being vegan, I can count on one hand all the people I've encountered (in about 3 years of active posting) who seem to have issues with it. That's actually less than some other places I've spent time in online! I imagine that would be very different if I was telling people that veganism was the best way to lose weight or that people had to do it in order to avoid heart attacks . . . or if I was attempting to actively recruit people to veganism when they had expressed no interest in it. From what I've seen, keto/low carbohydrate people have about the same experience I do.
(This is not to express that I think veganism and keto/low carbohydrate are equivalent -- I think there are important differences between the two, but since the OP originally compared them I am continuing with that instead of going into the various ways I believe the two differ).7 -
Want an example of why Keto gets shot down?
Read the post I responded to in this thread
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10600973/lose-200lbs-in-less-then-a-year/p38
I don't see anyone in that thread suggesting going vegan.6 -
Tacklewasher wrote: »Want an example of why Keto gets shot down?
Read the post I responded to in this thread
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10600973/lose-200lbs-in-less-then-a-year/p38
I don't see anyone in that thread suggesting going vegan.
As stated earlier, vegan is often about ethical choices and not weight loss.
Someone also suggested WLS too. I did not read the entire thread - it is LONG one - but if someone is having trouble losing by simply moderating calories, and they have that much to lose, trying different woes to make weight loss easier (as some find keto more satiating) is not really a bad thing.
JMO3 -
Tacklewasher wrote: »Want an example of why Keto gets shot down?
Read the post I responded to in this thread
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10600973/lose-200lbs-in-less-then-a-year/p38
I don't see anyone in that thread suggesting going vegan.
As stated earlier, vegan is often about ethical choices and not weight loss.
Someone also suggested WLS too. I did not read the entire thread - it is LONG one - but if someone is having trouble losing by simply moderating calories, and they have that much to lose, trying different woes to make weight loss easier (as some find keto more satiating) is not really a bad thing.
JMO
If you read that thread, it appears that OP is having consistent progress without keto. That's why the suggestion to switch doesn't really make sense -- especially since he has already shared, IIRC, that he doesn't think it would be a good choice for him personally.7 -
janejellyroll wrote: »Tacklewasher wrote: »Want an example of why Keto gets shot down?
Read the post I responded to in this thread
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10600973/lose-200lbs-in-less-then-a-year/p38
I don't see anyone in that thread suggesting going vegan.
As stated earlier, vegan is often about ethical choices and not weight loss.
Someone also suggested WLS too. I did not read the entire thread - it is LONG one - but if someone is having trouble losing by simply moderating calories, and they have that much to lose, trying different woes to make weight loss easier (as some find keto more satiating) is not really a bad thing.
JMO
If you read that thread, it appears that OP is having consistent progress without keto. That's why the suggestion to switch doesn't really make sense -- especially since he has already shared, IIRC, that he doesn't think it would be a good choice for him personally.
Yes. I've been reading along in this thread but just now commenting. I eat low carb and ate a ketogenic diet for a year for reason other than weight management (been maintaining for a few years) and currently eat very LCHF for hunger suppression. It seems to work for me.
That aside, I just shook my head at the comment of "Hey, try eating keto" for precisely the reasons you mention.5 -
Tacklewasher wrote: »Want an example of why Keto gets shot down?
Read the post I responded to in this thread
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10600973/lose-200lbs-in-less-then-a-year/p38
I don't see anyone in that thread suggesting going vegan.
As stated earlier, vegan is often about ethical choices and not weight loss.
Someone also suggested WLS too. I did not read the entire thread - it is LONG one - but if someone is having trouble losing by simply moderating calories, and they have that much to lose, trying different woes to make weight loss easier (as some find keto more satiating) is not really a bad thing.
JMO
Trouble is (and I don't mean you) that by reading the thread before making the drive-by comment, you would see the topic had been discussed and really wasn't helpful to suggest again. But too many of the Keto followers (and it does seem like a *kitten* religion at times) don't take the time to read what the poster says and just assume Keto.
Honestly, I don't see vegans doing that, and I think that goes a long way to answer what the OP of this thread was asking.
8 -
janejellyroll wrote: »Tacklewasher wrote: »Want an example of why Keto gets shot down?
Read the post I responded to in this thread
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10600973/lose-200lbs-in-less-then-a-year/p38
I don't see anyone in that thread suggesting going vegan.
As stated earlier, vegan is often about ethical choices and not weight loss.
Someone also suggested WLS too. I did not read the entire thread - it is LONG one - but if someone is having trouble losing by simply moderating calories, and they have that much to lose, trying different woes to make weight loss easier (as some find keto more satiating) is not really a bad thing.
JMO
If you read that thread, it appears that OP is having consistent progress without keto. That's why the suggestion to switch doesn't really make sense -- especially since he has already shared, IIRC, that he doesn't think it would be a good choice for him personally.
Ah. Gotcha. I'll take your word for it. I only looked at the one page.1
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.5K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 391 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 925 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions