Diet Drinks
Replies
-
Wow guys thanks for all the advice and tips!0
-
Water and coffee daily and the odd herbal tea at night. Sometimes I'll make homemade iced tea from my herbal tea and sweeten it with a bit of honey and I'll brew it with some mint along with the tea bag.0
-
I love diet pepsi, pelligrino, sparkling ice water!0
-
jwolford90 wrote: »ps - almond milk is a wonderful substitute for milk. I get the vanilla with reduced sugar. I think it's 60 calories a cup.
0 -
Research how the 'artificial sweeteners' fool your body so much, that for 6hrs after that diet-pepsi, if will make you crave 'sugar'! (stevia may not affect the body the same way).0
-
hanymamdouh wrote: »Try to stay away of any artificially sweetened beverages or drinks link Pepsi Diet and Cola Zero, they contain aspartame as sweetener which is very harmful, I got a lot of problems regarding to my thyroid gland because of using aspartame.
AAARRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
You do realise that the official line from the FDA is that aspartame is "one of the most thoroughly tested and studied food additives the agency has ever approved"?
Please provide us with evidence that this is not the case?
The British Food Standards Agency funded a clinical study of people who claimed to experience side-effects after consuming aspartame. The double blind controlled study has concluded there was no evidence of safety issues or side effects even amongst those volunteers who had previously claimed sensitivity. No differences were observed in clinical, biochemical, psychological and metabonomic parameters following consumption of aspartame in either group.
The FSA's Committee on Toxicity evaluated the results at its meeting in October 2013, and determined that "the results presented did not indicate any need for action to protect the health of the public
http://www.food.gov.uk/science/research/foodcomponentsresearch/t01programme/t01projlist/fs231010
The European Food Safety Authority re-evaluated aspartame as part of the systematic re-evaluation of all food additives authorised in the EU prior to 20 January 2009. All 600 datasets are available publicly. This includes previously unpublished scientific data including the 112 original studies on aspartame which were submitted to support the request for authorisation of aspartame in Europe in the early 1980s.
The EFSA draft report found that aspartame and its metabolites "pose no toxicity concern for consumers at current levels of exposure. The current Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) is considered to be safe for the general population and consumer exposure to aspartame is below this ADI".
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/dataclosed/call/110601.htm
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/130108.htm
Again, do you have evidence to show that the FSA and EFSA are wrong in their findings?
0 -
hanymamdouh wrote: »Try to stay away of any artificially sweetened beverages or drinks link Pepsi Diet and Cola Zero, they contain aspartame as sweetener which is very harmful, I got a lot of problems regarding to my thyroid gland because of using aspartame.
AAARRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
You do realise that the official line from the FDA is that aspartame is "one of the most thoroughly tested and studied food additives the agency has ever approved"?
Please provide us with evidence that this is not the case?
The British Food Standards Agency funded a clinical study of people who claimed to experience side-effects after consuming aspartame. The double blind controlled study has concluded there was no evidence of safety issues or side effects even amongst those volunteers who had previously claimed sensitivity. No differences were observed in clinical, biochemical, psychological and metabonomic parameters following consumption of aspartame in either group.
The FSA's Committee on Toxicity evaluated the results at its meeting in October 2013, and determined that "the results presented did not indicate any need for action to protect the health of the public
http://www.food.gov.uk/science/research/foodcomponentsresearch/t01programme/t01projlist/fs231010
The European Food Safety Authority re-evaluated aspartame as part of the systematic re-evaluation of all food additives authorised in the EU prior to 20 January 2009. All 600 datasets are available publicly. This includes previously unpublished scientific data including the 112 original studies on aspartame which were submitted to support the request for authorisation of aspartame in Europe in the early 1980s.
The EFSA draft report found that aspartame and its metabolites "pose no toxicity concern for consumers at current levels of exposure. The current Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) is considered to be safe for the general population and consumer exposure to aspartame is below this ADI".
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/dataclosed/call/110601.htm
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/130108.htm
Again, do you have evidence to show that the FSA and EFSA are wrong in their findings?
PubMed and its 24 million+ citations from worldwide biomedical literature says differently.
Do you want to buy some unicorn droppings?0 -
paperhearts32 wrote: »Hi All I'm new to dieting and I was wondering what y'all like to drink? I love arizona green tea and of course sweet tea, but apparently those are not good for ya. Any input is appreciated
Try vitamin water zero and propel flavored water they both taste great and have zero calories0 -
I drink green tea, use some sugar free flavored syrup, such as caramel or vanilla0
-
jaddin1953 wrote: »Research how the 'artificial sweeteners' fool your body so much, that for 6hrs after that diet-pepsi, if will make you crave 'sugar'! (stevia may not affect the body the same way).
Nope.0 -
hanymamdouh wrote: »Try to stay away of any artificially sweetened beverages or drinks link Pepsi Diet and Cola Zero, they contain aspartame as sweetener which is very harmful, I got a lot of problems regarding to my thyroid gland because of using aspartame.
AAARRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
You do realise that the official line from the FDA is that aspartame is "one of the most thoroughly tested and studied food additives the agency has ever approved"?
Please provide us with evidence that this is not the case?
The British Food Standards Agency funded a clinical study of people who claimed to experience side-effects after consuming aspartame. The double blind controlled study has concluded there was no evidence of safety issues or side effects even amongst those volunteers who had previously claimed sensitivity. No differences were observed in clinical, biochemical, psychological and metabonomic parameters following consumption of aspartame in either group.
The FSA's Committee on Toxicity evaluated the results at its meeting in October 2013, and determined that "the results presented did not indicate any need for action to protect the health of the public
http://www.food.gov.uk/science/research/foodcomponentsresearch/t01programme/t01projlist/fs231010
The European Food Safety Authority re-evaluated aspartame as part of the systematic re-evaluation of all food additives authorised in the EU prior to 20 January 2009. All 600 datasets are available publicly. This includes previously unpublished scientific data including the 112 original studies on aspartame which were submitted to support the request for authorisation of aspartame in Europe in the early 1980s.
The EFSA draft report found that aspartame and its metabolites "pose no toxicity concern for consumers at current levels of exposure. The current Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) is considered to be safe for the general population and consumer exposure to aspartame is below this ADI".
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/dataclosed/call/110601.htm
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/130108.htm
Again, do you have evidence to show that the FSA and EFSA are wrong in their findings?
PubMed and its 24 million+ citations from worldwide biomedical literature says differently.
Do you want to buy some unicorn droppings?
0 -
hanymamdouh wrote: »Try to stay away of any artificially sweetened beverages or drinks link Pepsi Diet and Cola Zero, they contain aspartame as sweetener which is very harmful, I got a lot of problems regarding to my thyroid gland because of using aspartame.
AAARRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
You do realise that the official line from the FDA is that aspartame is "one of the most thoroughly tested and studied food additives the agency has ever approved"?
Please provide us with evidence that this is not the case?
The British Food Standards Agency funded a clinical study of people who claimed to experience side-effects after consuming aspartame. The double blind controlled study has concluded there was no evidence of safety issues or side effects even amongst those volunteers who had previously claimed sensitivity. No differences were observed in clinical, biochemical, psychological and metabonomic parameters following consumption of aspartame in either group.
The FSA's Committee on Toxicity evaluated the results at its meeting in October 2013, and determined that "the results presented did not indicate any need for action to protect the health of the public
http://www.food.gov.uk/science/research/foodcomponentsresearch/t01programme/t01projlist/fs231010
The European Food Safety Authority re-evaluated aspartame as part of the systematic re-evaluation of all food additives authorised in the EU prior to 20 January 2009. All 600 datasets are available publicly. This includes previously unpublished scientific data including the 112 original studies on aspartame which were submitted to support the request for authorisation of aspartame in Europe in the early 1980s.
The EFSA draft report found that aspartame and its metabolites "pose no toxicity concern for consumers at current levels of exposure. The current Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) is considered to be safe for the general population and consumer exposure to aspartame is below this ADI".
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/dataclosed/call/110601.htm
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/130108.htm
Again, do you have evidence to show that the FSA and EFSA are wrong in their findings?
PubMed and its 24 million+ citations from worldwide biomedical literature says differently.
Do you want to buy some unicorn droppings?
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
0 -
hanymamdouh wrote: »Try to stay away of any artificially sweetened beverages or drinks link Pepsi Diet and Cola Zero, they contain aspartame as sweetener which is very harmful, I got a lot of problems regarding to my thyroid gland because of using aspartame.
AAARRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
You do realise that the official line from the FDA is that aspartame is "one of the most thoroughly tested and studied food additives the agency has ever approved"?
Please provide us with evidence that this is not the case?
The British Food Standards Agency funded a clinical study of people who claimed to experience side-effects after consuming aspartame. The double blind controlled study has concluded there was no evidence of safety issues or side effects even amongst those volunteers who had previously claimed sensitivity. No differences were observed in clinical, biochemical, psychological and metabonomic parameters following consumption of aspartame in either group.
The FSA's Committee on Toxicity evaluated the results at its meeting in October 2013, and determined that "the results presented did not indicate any need for action to protect the health of the public
http://www.food.gov.uk/science/research/foodcomponentsresearch/t01programme/t01projlist/fs231010
The European Food Safety Authority re-evaluated aspartame as part of the systematic re-evaluation of all food additives authorised in the EU prior to 20 January 2009. All 600 datasets are available publicly. This includes previously unpublished scientific data including the 112 original studies on aspartame which were submitted to support the request for authorisation of aspartame in Europe in the early 1980s.
The EFSA draft report found that aspartame and its metabolites "pose no toxicity concern for consumers at current levels of exposure. The current Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) is considered to be safe for the general population and consumer exposure to aspartame is below this ADI".
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/dataclosed/call/110601.htm
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/130108.htm
Again, do you have evidence to show that the FSA and EFSA are wrong in their findings?
PubMed and its 24 million+ citations from worldwide biomedical literature says differently.
Do you want to buy some unicorn droppings?
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
the long story is, I was stabilized on the med, lost weight, but we didn't adjust the dose fast enough and I stalled. all the advice here said to up calories and reset....well that was a bust since my body started holding on to everything I ate.. now it's a long slog...disgusted with the no lose situation,I killed the sweeteners in February, started to lose again,, then hit my busy time of the year and couldn't maintain decent logging and exercise. Starting again fresh. by the way, you're a HUGE inspiration here.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.8K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 430 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions