A very interesting and informational read on deficits...

Options
1356712

Replies

  • djkronyx
    djkronyx Posts: 77 Member
    Options
    Great read! Thanks for sharing.
  • SlinkyAndHerAmazingBunsOfSteel
    Options
    Saving for later! :wink:
  • Vailara
    Vailara Posts: 2,454 Member
    Options
    This seems like a really sensible article - thank you! It's actually the first I've seen that explains "Why 1200?" as well (if it's correct). It also helps to explain why doctors will prescribe very low calorie diets.

    The only thing that didn't click with me was the part saying that fatter people feel full on a larger deficit. That wasn't the case for me when very obese, sadly! But I think that may just be an individual difference, and I appreciate that the article does have information for the more overweight amongst us.
  • JenCatwalk
    JenCatwalk Posts: 285 Member
    Options
    bumpity
  • ApocalypticFae
    ApocalypticFae Posts: 217 Member
    Options
    Adding to my summer reading list.
  • Dewdropps
    Dewdropps Posts: 111
    Options
    This seems like a really sensible article - thank you! It's actually the first I've seen that explains "Why 1200?" as well (if it's correct). It also helps to explain why doctors will prescribe very low calorie diets.

    The only thing that didn't click with me was the part saying that fatter people feel full on a larger deficit. That wasn't the case for me when very obese, sadly! But I think that may just be an individual difference, and I appreciate that the article does have information for the more overweight amongst us.

    It's because you go off of your current weight maintenance level. A 400 pound female around 5' 7 would be nearly 4000 calories/day for maintenance. If you take a 50% deficit for them, that would still be 2,000 calories in per day plus whatever they earn with exercise. 2,000 calories is still a butt load of food, and more than enough opportunity to feel full.

    That same female at 150 lbs would only be at around 1600 calories or so, so they would definitely not even be able to come close to feeling the same fullness on a 50% deficit, which would only be around 800 calories.

    So yes, a bigger person would naturally be able to have a higher % deficit without as many of the risks or massive hunger bordering on starvation.

    Hope that answers it for you <3
  • ddellner
    ddellner Posts: 58 Member
    Options
    Thanks for posting. The more info we have the better decisions we can make
  • aditifoodie
    aditifoodie Posts: 125 Member
    Options
    bump
  • Vailara
    Vailara Posts: 2,454 Member
    Options
    This seems like a really sensible article - thank you! It's actually the first I've seen that explains "Why 1200?" as well (if it's correct). It also helps to explain why doctors will prescribe very low calorie diets.

    The only thing that didn't click with me was the part saying that fatter people feel full on a larger deficit. That wasn't the case for me when very obese, sadly! But I think that may just be an individual difference, and I appreciate that the article does have information for the more overweight amongst us.

    It's because you go off of your current weight maintenance level. A 400 pound female around 5' 7 would be nearly 4000 calories/day for maintenance. If you take a 50% deficit for them, that would still be 2,000 calories in per day plus whatever they earn with exercise. 2,000 calories is still a butt load of food, and more than enough opportunity to feel full.

    That same female at 150 lbs would only be at around 1600 calories or so, so they would definitely not even be able to come close to feeling the same fullness on a 50% deficit, which would only be around 800 calories.

    So yes, a bigger person would naturally be able to have a higher % deficit without as many of the risks or massive hunger bordering on starvation.

    Hope that answers it for you <3

    Thank you. Yes, I understand why a bigger person can have a bigger deficit. I was just talking about the this bit:

    "In fact, I've found that since overweight folks have higher calorie requirements than smaller folks, they often find that a small calorie deficit of 15-20% is still a lot of food and leaves them feeling pretty full! Not only is the 25-30% more effective in their situation, it's more practical too because the food quantity is more appropriate relative to their appetite."

    I didn't find that was the case for me, personally. I don't find that a 15-20% deficit feels like "a lot of food" and I'm never really full. I would have found 25 - 30 % very hard even at my biggest. (Partly because of the hunger and partly because of unwanted psychological symptoms). A 30% reduction would only give me about 1200 calories in total (being older and shorter doesn't help!). So I'm sure it's been the author's experience that overweight/obese people can cope with a bigger cut, but in my case, I found a smaller cut easier to live with and therefore more successful.
  • EricJonrosh
    EricJonrosh Posts: 823 Member
    Options
    Tom Venudo's the best. Body fat solution is a great book.
  • TheFitnessTutor
    TheFitnessTutor Posts: 356 Member
    Options
    Venuto is certainly a great author. Don't know why he left out the power of refeeding, even for a larger individual. But great post nontheless.
  • lynty2
    lynty2 Posts: 48 Member
    Options
    Bump
  • Ophidion
    Ophidion Posts: 2,065 Member
    Options
    bump for later
  • Balance_Breathe
    Options
    Saving to read tomorrow! Thanks for posting.
  • impudentputz
    impudentputz Posts: 479 Member
    Options
    Bump for later
  • sweetpea101077
    sweetpea101077 Posts: 58 Member
    Options
    Bump
  • TheChangingMan77
    Options
    Bump for later.
  • amys1410
    amys1410 Posts: 22 Member
    Options
    Bump for later :)
  • annakow
    annakow Posts: 385 Member
    Options
    Very interesting article , thanks
  • TheVimFuego
    TheVimFuego Posts: 2,412 Member
    Options
    Tom Venudo's the best. Body fat solution is a great book.

    Yup, in a world of fads he tells it straight, good book that.