Dog Park Drama

2

Replies

  • MSeel1984
    MSeel1984 Posts: 2,297 Member
    MEANWHILE, the dog's human/owner did NOTHING to stop his dog...the other people there seemed to think this was just fine because Zoey is "dominant" or an "alpha"...NO...this is NOT ok!

    Did you say anything to the dog's owner? I bet if you spoke up and said something, others who seem to be okay with it, might back you up. Sometimes all it takes is one person speaking up to get others to do the same.

    I was giving him looks-but the others at the park weren't saying anything except laughing a little or saying "oohh...Zoey...leave her alone." or "She's just being Zoey".

    That's not acceptable. When I go back I'll speak up like I should have last night. I mean...our other dog didn't behave when we brought him which is why 1.) we kept him on a leash and 2.) We won't be bringing him back until he behaves.
  • hbrittingham
    hbrittingham Posts: 2,518 Member
    Dog parks are a recipe for disaster. Caesar is a moron. There are plenty of other ways to get adequate, well-rounded exercise for your dogs.

    I agree. Dogs don't NEED dog parks and a lot of them are really stressed out by going to them.

    The whole "Zoey is just being alpha/dominate" stuff is BS, too. She's an out of control dog who apparently thinks it's her job to correct other dogs. It's her owner's job to keep her from doing that. Unfortunately, I think you will find that the average dog park dog owner is clueless to true dog behavior and you will keep running into incidents like this. Which is why I don't go to dog parks.
  • sillygoosie
    sillygoosie Posts: 1,109 Member
    The owners should know better and have proper dog park etiquette. I don't take my dog to the dog park because he is also alpha and appears aggressive. I know that he just wants to act that way until he feels comfortable and can play normally, but the other dogs owners don't know that. I would rather not put him in the position of being the "bad dog" and making other owners uncomfortable. He sticks to socializing with the dogs we already know.
  • MSeel1984
    MSeel1984 Posts: 2,297 Member
    You're a huge fan of Caesar Milan? There is the problem right there. There were a bunch of other people at the park who are also fans of Caesar Milan or other pseudoscience advocates like him. Dominance/submission is possibly the worst approach for rearing animals with one foot in wolf culture and one foot in human culture. The real result of Caesar's way is a bunch of people who think bullying is "natural" and that dogs can "work it out".

    A well educated dog owner uses rewards to shape their dog's behavior, in a way that decreases aggression and increases play. If you reward dominance, you get dominance until it is self rewarding, and in the dog park, it should become obvious why this is the wrong trait to reinforce in a pet dog trying to fit into urban human culture.

    Dogs have a very high degree of social adaptability. I can't fathom why anyone would put less emphasis on that, and more emphasis on how they can be similar to wolves, other than the quick and visible but illusory results achieved by learning to act like an animal instead of teaching the animal something. That and I guess you feel like an instant badass when you "correct" (punish) a dog, whereas patiently working with treats and clickers feels like it can't possibly get results at first.

    Not entirely sure that you understand what I was saying, but let's roll with it.

    My theory is that with regard to dominance, the HUMAN is the assertive one, not the dog...so if you're using the excuse of your dog being "dominant", that's not ok. The human should be the alpha in the household. And say what you want about Cesar...but...I see his results so I can't argue with that. Plus dog behavior is his job...I'm not a professional-so there's that.

    I do use training rewards with our puppy and she responds well to them. She's a boxer and naturally a bit stubborn, but she responds to training as long as I make it fun.

    She gets walks for exercise, not the dog park. the dog park I thought was an opportunity to socialize her with people and with other dogs...especially since there are puppies around her age there so she can play a bit (our older dog gets a little annoyed by how excited she is all the time).

    However, thank you for your input. You are not hesitant to share your opinions...
  • MSeel1984
    MSeel1984 Posts: 2,297 Member
    The owners should know better and have proper dog park etiquette. I don't take my dog to the dog park because he is also alpha and appears aggressive. I know that he just wants to act that way until he feels comfortable and can play normally, but the other dogs owners don't know that. I would rather not put him in the position of being the "bad dog" and making other owners uncomfortable. He sticks to socializing with the dogs we already know.

    That's why we didn't bring our other dog back...he's stressed by the dog park. Zuzu had seemed to enjoy it until this dog started to pick on her.
  • ironanimal
    ironanimal Posts: 5,922 Member
    I've had dogs my whole life and Zoey would have got a kick in the head.

    Also, I've seen Caesar Milan live and his stuff does work if you apply it correctly. My own dog is a Siberian Husy cross and can be trusted 100% off the lead - never aggressive, never strays too far.

    Dogs are pack animals, and they do need structure, and you do need to be in a higher position in the pack than said dog. Zoey is simply fulfilling the role of alpha over her owner. And she still would have got a kick in the head.
  • go2grrl
    go2grrl Posts: 190 Member
    You're a huge fan of Caesar Milan? There is the problem right there. There were a bunch of other people at the park who are also fans of Caesar Milan or other pseudoscience advocates like him. Dominance/submission is possibly the worst approach for rearing animals with one foot in wolf culture and one foot in human culture. The real result of Caesar's way is a bunch of people who think bullying is "natural" and that dogs can "work it out".

    A well educated dog owner uses rewards to shape their dog's behavior, in a way that decreases aggression and increases play. If you reward dominance, you get dominance until it is self rewarding, and in the dog park, it should become obvious why this is the wrong trait to reinforce in a pet dog trying to fit into urban human culture.

    Dogs have a very high degree of social adaptability. I can't fathom why anyone would put less emphasis on that, and more emphasis on how they can be similar to wolves, other than the quick and visible but illusory results achieved by learning to act like an animal instead of teaching the animal something. That and I guess you feel like an instant badass when you "correct" (punish) a dog, whereas patiently working with treats and clickers feels like it can't possibly get results at first.

    ^^This.

    And how old is your puppy? The socialization window closes around 14 or so weeks. If your dog is younger and socialization is your primary goal, you might try looking for local meetups with dogs similarly aged and sized. I'd definitely skip the dog park for anything other than exercise during non-peak hours if it's the only enclosed area to which you have access.
  • Quest529
    Quest529 Posts: 103 Member
    Dominance Theory (CM teachings) has been disproven by science. Below are numerous supporting resources.

    "american veterinary society for animal behavior
    http://avsabonline.org/blog/view/dom...shaw-blackwell


    Jean donaldson
    http://academyfordogtrainers.com/blo...-pack-animals/

    Dr. Yin DVM
    http://drsophiayin.com/philosophy/dominance/



    The Dominance Controversy and Cesar Millan

    and my favorite site...

    http://www.nonlineardogs.com/

    the specifics of dominance theory...from non linear dogs.com
    http://www.nonlineardogs.com/100MostSillyPart1-2.html

    Association of Pet Dog trainers
    http://www.apdt.com/about/ps/dominance.aspx


    http://www.examiner.com/article/dog-...e-21st-century
    BEYOND CESAR MILLAN - Home


    VIN News

    http://www.dogforum.com/redirect-to/...and_wolves.pdf

    http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...hey-coordinate

    http://www.dogboston.com/askjo/cesarmillan.htm


    David Mech
    http://www.mnforsustain.org/wolf_mec...pha_status.htm


    http://www.reddit.com/r/dogs/comment...dominancepack/

    Clickersolutions
    http://www.clickersolutions.com/arti.../dominance.htm

    this one is heavy, for indept understanding.

    http://www.nonlineardogs.com/socialorganisation.html

    A few more

    http://www.apdt.com/about/ps/dominance.aspx

    http://beyondcesarmillan.weebly.com/...defend-cm.html

    http://www.clickertraining.com/node/2297?SSAID=314743 "

    This list was taken from a discussion on DogForum.com (this thread: http://www.dogforum.com/dog-training/dominance-dogs-4076/ ). Sorry, links from quote didn't come up as active. Please take a look if you'd like to learn more about it and positive reinforcement training.

    As for the dog park, they are generally dirty, people don't follow rules, and can quickly become a place you don't want to be. Even if you can control your dog, as you saw, you cannot control others and their dogs.

    We used to go every week, 3-4 times a week. Sometimes twice in a day. I saw awful changes in my pup (he was about 8 months at the time). He lost a lot of confidence, is now on edge around dogs bigger than him (due to a fight and bullying - which is what that husky was doing to your pup). Since the fall out, we've been hiking, doing agility and obedience (though positive reinforcement) he has really blossomed. Positive reinforcement does not mean permissive. There are just better ways to communicate with your dog than alpha rolls and hand-bites/jabs/taps. Yes, "clicker training" uses quiet a bit of treats starting out, but those are faded (as is the clicker) once the dog understands the behavior. The click can also signal another type of reward (playing tug, a ball, belly rubs). Rewards are the things your dog finds rewarding.

    To the poster who questioned how to handle the pup going after your hands. You would signal play was over and remove yourself from play. Teeth on skin ends playtime. A playful pup will learn quickly. If you have trouble getting away, go into another room and close the door or set up a gate to step over. The only response you need to give is removing yourself.

    This video from Kikopup goes through the process:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c77--cCHPyU

    BTW: Kikopup and Tab289 are great channels to watch on youtube. They address various behaviors and training challenges, but approach them from a positive reinforcement direction.
  • Joreanasaurous
    Joreanasaurous Posts: 1,384 Member
    Dog parks are a recipe for disaster. Caesar is a moron. There are plenty of other ways to get adequate, well-rounded exercise for your dogs.

    Also want to echo speaking up. It's a public place, yes, but rules are rules.

    This guy put it very bluntly, but I have to admit, I agree with him. I've never had luck with dog parks. It's the equivalent of letting a bunch of sugar high 3 year old' who have never met run around in the playground when there is only 1 basketball and 1 swing, while their parents turn their back. I prefer structured dog classes as a way to social my dog (who also has dog aggressive behaviors/problems).

    In regards to Cesar- I personally don't like the relationship he establishes with his dogs. I would equate it to parents who say their kids are behaved because they are afraid of them. And granted, some dogs need that. But a dog with a delicate psyche who has been traumatized before does NOT need to be scared into submission. I would recommend looking into Victoria Stillwell. An amazing dog trainer who believes in positive reinforcement, patience, and consistency. Her techniques have worked wonders for my traumatized Jack Russel.

    I can understand how speaking up could be awkward and confrontational. However, it is public property. If the rule is posted (which I'm sure it must), a simple call to animal control could prompt an officer to monitor the park on a more regular basis.

    Simply put- no, you were not out of line. I hope you can find a more structured socialization for your dog.

    This x1000
  • fluffykitsune
    fluffykitsune Posts: 236 Member
    Zoey is insecure, not dominant.
    The thought of her not being able to control her environment sends her into a fit. So she tries to correct (and ends up over correcting) things that she think will endanger her.
    The opportunity to repeat these actions make her more insecure and reactive.

    The dog park is an adult playground where they can gossip while their dogs cause havoc.
    Make a post on facebook or craigslist looking for puppy playdates and avoid the dog park.

    Let me guess, shes a herding breed? She sounds like one.
  • MSeel1984
    MSeel1984 Posts: 2,297 Member
    Zoey is insecure, not dominant.
    The thought of her not being able to control her environment sends her into a fit. So she tries to correct (and ends up over correcting) things that she think will endanger her.
    The opportunity to repeat these actions make her more insecure and reactive.

    The dog park is an adult playground where they can gossip while their dogs cause havoc.
    Make a post on facebook or craigslist looking for puppy playdates and avoid the dog park.

    Let me guess, shes a herding breed? She sounds like one.

    LOL, yes...Cattle dog.
  • JustJennie1
    JustJennie1 Posts: 3,749 Member
    Zoey is insecure, not dominant.
    The thought of her not being able to control her environment sends her into a fit. So she tries to correct (and ends up over correcting) things that she think will endanger her.
    The opportunity to repeat these actions make her more insecure and reactive.

    The dog park is an adult playground where they can gossip while their dogs cause havoc.
    Make a post on facebook or craigslist looking for puppy playdates and avoid the dog park.

    Let me guess, shes a herding breed? She sounds like one.

    While I am by no means a dog trainer I disagree.

    Zoey is asserting her dominance by barking, nipping, going after the other dogs. My dog was/is the same way. He would see another dog and take off after them and start barking, jumping on top of them, grabbing them by the scruff of their neck. Even now with his dog friend he tries to assert his dominance by "body checking" him, mounting him etc. My friend who owns the other dog and has trained dogs said that my dog is trying to show he's dominant. Thankfully the other dog is really cool and just ignores him.
  • MyOwnSunshine
    MyOwnSunshine Posts: 1,312 Member
    Dog parks are not a good environment for dogs. Dogs are "pack" animals and instinctively socialize with a small number of other dogs within a stable and known group where every dog has a relatively set place within the social order. Dogs determine that social order by utilizing dominant and submissive behavior, including overt aggression between wanna-be alphas. When you take your dog to the dog park to interact with strange dogs, you are creating this pack order drama every single time, because you are putting your dog in the middle of a bunch of strange dogs and forcing them to determine social order amongst themselves. It would be the equivalent of the first day of high school for a human -- not a relaxing and enjoyable experience.

    Ever notice when you watch "The Dog Whisperer" that Caesar's stable pack is always acting calm and happy until he adds a new dog to the mix and then all the dogs get squirrelly and aggressive? Ummm... yeah. Not a great idea to dump your dog into an unstable pack with unknown dogs who have the potential to be aggressive.

    Dogs don't need to interact with 100 other dogs. They are perfectly happy interacting within their home canine/human pack, where they understand their place and don't have to constantly assess and prove their place in the social order.

    Dog parks serve no purpose for dogs. They serve a purpose for humans who want to treat their dogs like human babies instead of dogs. Dog parks are also a great place for your dog to catch a canine virus or parasites (worms/fleas/ticks), because many owners don't vaccinate or provide veterinary care.

    I take my dogs to the park or out in the woods/desert/country where there are no other dogs so they can run and play. I stay far away from other dogs because I don't trust other dog owners and their undisciplined "babies."
  • fluffykitsune
    fluffykitsune Posts: 236 Member
    Zoey is insecure, not dominant.
    The thought of her not being able to control her environment sends her into a fit. So she tries to correct (and ends up over correcting) things that she think will endanger her.
    The opportunity to repeat these actions make her more insecure and reactive.

    The dog park is an adult playground where they can gossip while their dogs cause havoc.
    Make a post on facebook or craigslist looking for puppy playdates and avoid the dog park.

    Let me guess, shes a herding breed? She sounds like one.

    While I am by no means a dog trainer I disagree.

    Zoey is asserting her dominance by barking, nipping, going after the other dogs. My dog was/is the same way. He would see another dog and take off after them and start barking, jumping on top of them, grabbing them by the scruff of their neck. Even now with his dog friend he tries to assert his dominance by "body checking" him, mounting him etc. My friend who owns the other dog and has trained dogs said that my dog is trying to show he's dominant. Thankfully the other dog is really cool and just ignores him.
    No.
    You're mistaken. That is not dominance.
    This is an insecure dog that does not know how to read other dogs or communicate properly. It probably had this same stuff happen to it as a puppy and now has social issues.
    A dominant dog is a dog who can control its environment and get what it wants, a dog rolling over can be the dominant one in many situations. Dominant dogs are crafty and know social hierarchy very well and are manipulative. They are NOT the loudest / most aggressive one. Dominant dogs are the quiet, well rounded and stable ones.

    Your dog is trying to play, but is doing horribly at it. Humping, biting the scruff, jumping and barking.. All play behaviors. All signs of a stressed out dog. He is having fun, but does not know how to effectively control/communicate the other dog to get the response that he wants (either more play or no play). So he gets rough, trying to do things the only way he know(knew?) how, which is essentially being a bully.
  • hbrittingham
    hbrittingham Posts: 2,518 Member
    Zoey is insecure, not dominant.
    The thought of her not being able to control her environment sends her into a fit. So she tries to correct (and ends up over correcting) things that she think will endanger her.
    The opportunity to repeat these actions make her more insecure and reactive.

    The dog park is an adult playground where they can gossip while their dogs cause havoc.
    Make a post on facebook or craigslist looking for puppy playdates and avoid the dog park.

    Let me guess, shes a herding breed? She sounds like one.

    While I am by no means a dog trainer I disagree.

    Zoey is asserting her dominance by barking, nipping, going after the other dogs. My dog was/is the same way. He would see another dog and take off after them and start barking, jumping on top of them, grabbing them by the scruff of their neck. Even now with his dog friend he tries to assert his dominance by "body checking" him, mounting him etc. My friend who owns the other dog and has trained dogs said that my dog is trying to show he's dominant. Thankfully the other dog is really cool and just ignores him.
    No.
    You're mistaken. That is not dominance.
    This is an insecure dog that does not know how to read other dogs or communicate properly. It probably had this same stuff happen to it as a puppy and now has social issues.
    A dominant dog is a dog who can control its environment and get what it wants, a dog rolling over can be the dominant one in many situations. Dominant dogs are crafty and know social hierarchy very well and are manipulative. They are NOT the loudest / most aggressive one. Dominant dogs are the quiet, well rounded and stable ones.

    Your dog is trying to play, but is doing horribly at it. Humping, biting the scruff, jumping and barking.. All play behaviors. All signs of a stressed out dog. He is having fun, but does not know how to effectively control/communicate the other dog to get the response that he wants (either more play or no play). So he gets rough, trying to do things the only way he know(knew?) how, which is essentially being a bully.

    Totally agree with you!

    Dominance is a bunch of boloney, when it's used in the manner that many here are. A dominant/alpha dog is calm and relaxed. They aren't running around trying to hump other dogs, biting them or rolling them. Insecure dogs are doing those things.

    My alpha is 12 1/2 years old and all of the dogs that come to train with us or board with us defer to her without her having to do many, if any corrections. They just know she's the queen bee and they defer to her. She has NEVER actively gone after another dog.

    I don't ascribe to the belief that dogs are trying to take over the world. They don't want to be in charge. They are no different than children in the fact that they want and need boundaries to feel happy and secure. Like children, they don't do well when beaten into submission or manhandled.
  • MSeel1984
    MSeel1984 Posts: 2,297 Member
    Not that anyone is accusing here, but I just wanted to clarify something.

    If my puppy does something I don't want her to do, I gently reprimand her (claw-shape hand to the rear or two fingers to the neck...touch only, not hitting/slapping/etc). I do reward for good behaviors that I want to reinforce.

    I think a combination of training is important...I do think of it in terms of how I'd treat a child...

    You don't reward a child for misbehaving or stepping outside their boundaries...you ground them. you put them in time out...if the behavior is good, you reward it.

    I don't think that training solely based on treats and rewards will be effective...that's my own opinion and I stick to it.
  • fluffykitsune
    fluffykitsune Posts: 236 Member
    Not that anyone is accusing here, but I just wanted to clarify something.

    If my puppy does something I don't want her to do, I gently reprimand her (claw-shape hand to the rear or two fingers to the neck...touch only, not hitting/slapping/etc). I do reward for good behaviors that I want to reinforce.

    I think a combination of training is important...I do think of it in terms of how I'd treat a child...

    You don't reward a child for misbehaving or stepping outside their boundaries...you ground them. you put them in time out...if the behavior is good, you reward it.

    I don't think that training solely based on treats and rewards will be effective...that's my own opinion and I stick to it.
    Ok but the problem is that 90% of people / can not / issue a correction correctly. Their timing, form, application and reasoning is ALL off. By the time you get to your dog to correct her and issue the correction, it means absolutely nothing to her. I'm not against corrections, I use an e-collar, pinch and clicker/treats. But I would never ever tell anyone to use them simply because these tools are abused. If you're issuing more than 5 corrections a day then something is seriously flawed in your training methods. The behavior should be trained with treats then corrected after the dog has a knowledge of what it should be doing. Corrections are to proof behaviors.

    When has grounding or time-outs ever worked for children? Look at todays teenagers.. They just continue to defy you. Besides, dogs are NOT humans and corrections do not work the same way. Humans can think abstractedly and feel guilt. Dogs can't go "Remember that time I pee'd on the couch.." They can't make the connections that we do, and even then, humans also suck with communication. Haven't you ever gotten into an argument with someone that you thought was because of X, but it was really because of Y? Yeah, me too.
    The problem is that with the numbers of unstable and ill-bred dogs there are now-a-days, this can make or break a dog and get it sent to the shelter, abandoned, abused or killed.

    I did not intend this to seem directed at you, but in a general speaking term, I'm speaking to everyone. :flowerforyou:
    These are my guidelines to using corrections in training:

    Only use when dog is engaged
    Do not use on a stressed dog
    Know when to call it quits
    Use in conjunction with treats
    Only use when dog knows what you're asking of it
    Do not use to teach behaviors, but to proof them
    Do not attempt if your timing is horrible and risk correcting too late or you're prone to getting frustrated/upset and over correcting
    And if you're issuing more than 5 corrections in a 30 minute time span you aren't doing it right and have no business issuing a correction.
  • fluffykitsune
    fluffykitsune Posts: 236 Member
    Totally agree with you!

    Dominance is a bunch of boloney, when it's used in the manner that many here are. A dominant/alpha dog is calm and relaxed. They aren't running around trying to hump other dogs, biting them or rolling them. Insecure dogs are doing those things.

    My alpha is 12 1/2 years old and all of the dogs that come to train with us or board with us defer to her without her having to do many, if any corrections. They just know she's the queen bee and they defer to her. She has NEVER actively gone after another dog.

    I don't ascribe to the belief that dogs are trying to take over the world. They don't want to be in charge. They are no different than children in the fact that they want and need boundaries to feel happy and secure. Like children, they don't do well when beaten into submission or manhandled.
    Thank you. :flowerforyou:
    My guy in my pic is my alpha, he just turned 3 years. I've used him to rehabilitate a dozen dog-aggressive and fearful dogs. He knows how to communicate very well and has lots of self control. He knows exactly when to submit to calm the dog, and how to deflect dogs that want to bite his head off. The dog's owners are always so amazed how he can just calmly turn his back to their dog and disengage entirely when their dog is snapping in his face and trying to start trouble. Soon their dog stops displaying signs of insecurities and looks to him for approval.

    All dogs want is order and stability. When there is no one playing leader they assume they must fill the role. They don't want to be a leader, it is too much stress for the majority of dogs and they do not know how to handle it. You must (gently) show your dog that you can control their environment and resources so they feel secure.
    This is why everyone says 'Consistency is key'. Just wish everyone took that phrase more seriously lol.
  • 3dogsrunning
    3dogsrunning Posts: 27,167 Member
    Not that anyone is accusing here, but I just wanted to clarify something.

    If my puppy does something I don't want her to do, I gently reprimand her (claw-shape hand to the rear or two fingers to the neck...touch only, not hitting/slapping/etc). I do reward for good behaviors that I want to reinforce.

    I think a combination of training is important...I do think of it in terms of how I'd treat a child...

    You don't reward a child for misbehaving or stepping outside their boundaries...you ground them. you put them in time out...if the behavior is good, you reward it.

    I don't think that training solely based on treats and rewards will be effective...that's my own opinion and I stick to it.
    Ok but the problem is that 90% of people / can not / issue a correction correctly. Their timing, form, application and reasoning is ALL off. By the time you get to your dog to correct her and issue the correction, it means absolutely nothing to her. I'm not against corrections, I use an e-collar, pinch and clicker/treats. But I would never ever tell anyone to use them simply because these tools are abused. If you're issuing more than 5 corrections a day then something is seriously flawed in your training methods. The behavior should be trained with treats then corrected after the dog has a knowledge of what it should be doing. Corrections are to proof behaviors.

    When has grounding or time-outs ever worked for children? Look at todays teenagers.. They just continue to defy you. Besides, dogs are NOT humans and corrections do not work the same way. Humans can think abstractedly and feel guilt. Dogs can't go "Remember that time I pee'd on the couch.." They can't make the connections that we do, and even then, humans also suck with communication. Haven't you ever gotten into an argument with someone that you thought was because of X, but it was really because of Y? Yeah, me too.
    The problem is that with the numbers of unstable and ill-bred dogs there are now-a-days, this can make or break a dog and get it sent to the shelter, abandoned, abused or killed.

    I did not intend this to seem directed at you, but in a general speaking term, I'm speaking to everyone. :flowerforyou:
    These are my guidelines to using corrections in training:

    Only use when dog is engaged
    Do not use on a stressed dog
    Know when to call it quits
    Use in conjunction with treats
    Only use when dog knows what you're asking of it
    Do not use to teach behaviors, but to proof them
    Do not attempt if your timing is horrible and risk correcting too late or you're prone to getting frustrated/upset and over correcting
    And if you're issuing more than 5 corrections in a 30 minute time span you aren't doing it right and have no business issuing a correction.

    You, I like.
    Even if your nickname first made me think of cats. :)
  • MSeel1984
    MSeel1984 Posts: 2,297 Member
    [/quote]
    Thank you. :flowerforyou:
    My guy in my pic is my alpha, he just turned 3 years. I've used him to rehabilitate a dozen dog-aggressive and fearful dogs. He knows how to communicate very well and has lots of self control. He knows exactly when to submit to calm the dog, and how to deflect dogs that want to bite his head off. The dog's owners are always so amazed how he can just calmly turn his back to their dog and disengage entirely when their dog is snapping in his face and trying to start trouble. Soon their dog stops displaying signs of insecurities and looks to him for approval.

    All dogs want is order and stability. When there is no one playing leader they assume they must fill the role. They don't want to be a leader, it is too much stress for the majority of dogs and they do not know how to handle it. You must (gently) show your dog that you can control their environment and resources so they feel secure.
    This is why everyone says 'Consistency is key'. Just wish everyone took that phrase more seriously lol.
    [/quote]

    So you wanna help me rehabilitate my older dog? LoL...I've been very frustrated because I love him and he's such a sweetheart around people but...other dogs make him very skittish. He's very insecure (abandoned for the first year of his life)...

    I agree about the points with the training. Now that she's older and growing to understand more (not to bite hands, not to chew on things, not to be overly aggressive with our other dog, etc) we're not reprimanding her as much...when it came to potty training we NEVER reprimanded her...just try to catch her in the act and take her outside where we wanted her to go potty. She's doing pretty well with potty training....it's a process LoL
  • MelsAuntie
    MelsAuntie Posts: 2,833 Member
    My dogs are English springer spaniels, not an aggressive breed per se, but I would NEVER permit them to act like that. Showing aggression ( to another dog, a human, or a tree for that matter) in the presence of ME, the pack alpha bytch, would bring the wrath of Dog down on their heads. As they well know.
  • ced1389
    ced1389 Posts: 96 Member
    I've only read about half of the replies so I apologize if this is a repeat response. I haven't had much luck with dog parks simply BECAUSE my dog is a husky. It actually warms my heart that your boxer made friends with a husky! I know it's the same thing with boxers, but I actually had a gentleman in my own backyard (of an apartment complex, before we bought our house) have his dog run up and attack my dog while he walked nonchalantly towards his dog, never rushing his pace or reprimanding his dog. He simply said "He's a husky, don't tell me he doesn't know how to hold his own." Okay... and people wonder where stereotypes of dogs come from! Sigh. My husky is very timid when he first meets another dog, but once he establishes the initial smell and whatnot, he's so playful! So for anybody to assume that my dog can "hold his own" is nonsense. Your boxer, which I'm sure faces criticism of his own simply for his breed, should not have to hide by you because of an intimidating dog.

    Furthermore, I find it EMBARRASSING when Kato growls at people, dogs, anything. I wouldn't want my child throwing a temper tantrum in public, so I will certainly not tolerate my dog disrespecting anybody either. That's all training. If this dog owner at the park allows their dog to snarl, growl, and snip at your dog, tell that guy off!!!!! Don't get a dog if you're not going to invest the time to train him and certainly don't bring him to the park if he's not going to be friendly (exactly as you described with your other dog... I understand there are extenuating circumstances where sometimes, they are just scared).

    I think you would be totally within your right to holler at the owner AND the dog. Who knows where that will get you though... after all, "he's a boxer, blah blah blah."
  • Blacklance36
    Blacklance36 Posts: 755 Member
    The bottom line for me is that the owner did not take any responsibility for his dogs bad behavior. I would consider calling animal control. Once a dog starts down that dominant road its very important to make it stop as that behavior is inappropriate.
    I have no tolerance for bad owners.
  • MSeel1984
    MSeel1984 Posts: 2,297 Member
    The bottom line for me is that the owner did not take any responsibility for his dogs bad behavior. I would consider calling animal control. Once a dog starts down that dominant road its very important to make it stop as that behavior is inappropriate.
    I have no tolerance for bad owners.

    Amen.
  • simplyciera
    simplyciera Posts: 168 Member
    My dog is like my child. If another dog was attacking it & the owner was doing nothing, my only response would've been "Get your damn dog under control!" I wouldn't be surprised if that dog has bitten someone or will bite someone in the future. Unacceptable & even worse that it was barking at you & the owner did nothing to calm it down. Rude. I hate when people are inconsiderate to others. Ugh. The worst.

    Oh & I had a Chow Chow Akita mix as a child. He was NEVER allowed to be mean even though his breed is considered aggressive. We took him to obedience classes as well as trained him to respond to commands. We only did that because he was super playful; we got him from the spca at like 12 weeks & raised him like a baby. So, he just loved everyone. Never was aggressive because we raised him right & never allowed it to happen.
  • KatrinaWilke
    KatrinaWilke Posts: 372 Member
    You're a huge fan of Caesar Milan? There is the problem right there. There were a bunch of other people at the park who are also fans of Caesar Milan or other pseudoscience advocates like him. Dominance/submission is possibly the worst approach for rearing animals with one foot in wolf culture and one foot in human culture. The real result of Caesar's way is a bunch of people who think bullying is "natural" and that dogs can "work it out".

    A well educated dog owner uses rewards to shape their dog's behavior, in a way that decreases aggression and increases play. If you reward dominance, you get dominance until it is self rewarding, and in the dog park, it should become obvious why this is the wrong trait to reinforce in a pet dog trying to fit into urban human culture.

    Dogs have a very high degree of social adaptability. I can't fathom why anyone would put less emphasis on that, and more emphasis on how they can be similar to wolves, other than the quick and visible but illusory results achieved by learning to act like an animal instead of teaching the animal something. That and I guess you feel like an instant badass when you "correct" (punish) a dog, whereas patiently working with treats and clickers feels like it can't possibly get results at first.

    Thank you!!!
  • bearkisses
    bearkisses Posts: 1,252 Member
    I only brought my dog there once. She loved the open space, the friendly dogs. But she doesn't know her own size, and tries to play fight with the bigger dogs...not too far in and she starts yelping and trying to get away but the big dogs don't know their boundaries! I once picked her up from the centre of them and held her over my head and they were jumping on me and nearly knocked me over. Never again!
  • KatrinaWilke
    KatrinaWilke Posts: 372 Member
    Dog parks are not a good environment for dogs. Dogs are "pack" animals and instinctively socialize with a small number of other dogs within a stable and known group where every dog has a relatively set place within the social order. Dogs determine that social order by utilizing dominant and submissive behavior, including overt aggression between wanna-be alphas. When you take your dog to the dog park to interact with strange dogs, you are creating this pack order drama every single time, because you are putting your dog in the middle of a bunch of strange dogs and forcing them to determine social order amongst themselves. It would be the equivalent of the first day of high school for a human -- not a relaxing and enjoyable experience.

    Ever notice when you watch "The Dog Whisperer" that Caesar's stable pack is always acting calm and happy until he adds a new dog to the mix and then all the dogs get squirrelly and aggressive? Ummm... yeah. Not a great idea to dump your dog into an unstable pack with unknown dogs who have the potential to be aggressive.

    Dogs don't need to interact with 100 other dogs. They are perfectly happy interacting within their home canine/human pack, where they understand their place and don't have to constantly assess and prove their place in the social order.

    Dog parks serve no purpose for dogs. They serve a purpose for humans who want to treat their dogs like human babies instead of dogs. Dog parks are also a great place for your dog to catch a canine virus or parasites (worms/fleas/ticks), because many owners don't vaccinate or provide veterinary care.

    I take my dogs to the park or out in the woods/desert/country where there are no other dogs so they can run and play. I stay far away from other dogs because I don't trust other dog owners and their undisciplined "babies."

    Dog parks ruined my chocolate lab. She was attacked by other dogs on numerous occasions. She eventually got to the point where she would attack any dog that came near her out of fear that they would attack her first. She can no longer be around any other dogs.........I will NEVER take any other dog I get to a dog park! Oh and she got parvo!
  • MSeel1984
    MSeel1984 Posts: 2,297 Member
    I don't know why Cesar Milan's getting so much hate. From my perspective his kind of training is really about the energy that you project when dealing with a dog. You have to be serious about your corrections or they're not going to work. And a correction can simply be a sound or a word, it doesn't mean hitting your dog. My dog responds to correction words only when I'm serious about it; she can feel the energy behind my voice. It's just like dealing with kids, you can say, "Wash your hands and set the table" halfheartedly and be ignored, or you can say the same thing in a strong, clear voice with no-nonsense energy behind it and they will hop to and do what you've asked. There's a difference between being feared and being respected, and being a strong leader and setting boundaries will earn respect from your dogs and they will be glad to know that you're in charge.

    I agree. Those that hate Cesar Milan-I'm not going to say how you should feel about the topic, you are entitled to your opinions the same as I'm entitled to mine. I can't argue with his results.

    Corrections for my dog are a noise and a touch...not a hit, not a slap...not screaming. Both of them respond well to it and they're not afraid.

    I do appreciate all the feedback and I don't think I'll be taking my pups to the dog park again...I wouldn't want the negative experiences to impact their approach to other dogs. On a lighter note, I'm looking at possibly entering my pup in a beginner/puppy dog show next month. A way for her to meet pups her own age :)
  • StarChanger
    StarChanger Posts: 605 Member

    I do think however you should still be taking the big boxer with you. Even if he is on a leash and sitting with you, he is still watching and learning what is acceptable and what is not simply by being there.

    Having an unsocialized, potentially fear-aggressive, dog ON leash at the dog park is a recipe for disaster as well. They will feel completely trapped while free-roaming dogs come around to sniff, etc. I agree that she should take him back, but he needs to stay ON-leash, OUTside the fence, to watch.

    People should also leave their un-altered dogs at home. Even if the unaltered (usually male) dog is friendly, many neutered males, seem to have what can only be described as "testicle envy". I've seen several sweet, un-neutered male dogs get jumped on at the dog park. I've also seen the hump fest that they bring as well.......not cool, since most spayed females do NOT appreciate being mounted (my old Chessie almost ate the face off of a lab for doing that....)