We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Just sayin'.

13»

Replies

  • Posts: 49,126 Member

    I completely agree with that statement, but eating unhealthily does play a part in that.
    But you haven't defined eating unhealthy. Let's say I have a 300 calorie cheese burger from McDonald's daily, but still achieve my correct macro/micro nutrients and stay with a correct calorie count................how does that cheese burger affect my health? Remember correct macros which means I'm not exceeding my fats or carbs for the day.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • Posts: 642 Member
    But you haven't defined eating unhealthy. Let's say I have a 300 calorie cheese burger from McDonald's daily, but still achieve my correct macro/micro nutrients and stay with a correct calorie count................how does that cheese burger affect my health? Remember correct macros which means I'm not exceeding my fats or carbs for the day.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    That's completely fine. Remember, I am talking about eating McDonald's multiple times per day.
  • Posts: 34,415 Member

    That's completely fine. Remember, I am talking about eating McDonald's multiple times per day.

    The positional linguistic gymnastics in this thread so far are fascinating to watch.
  • Posts: 642 Member
    Well, this was fun.

    Goodnight. :laugh: :flowerforyou:
  • Posts: 2,305 Member

    There is no question.

    why would you post a statement without a question? is there meant to be a rebuttal?
  • Posts: 349 Member

    that definitely changes things. I'm no whistleblower and could care less, but will point out that making a thread to mock another thread is one of those big no-no's.

    I'm no whistle blower either. Except I have counted 2 or 3 "regulars" like yourself on this thread who have in the past week posted mock threads of other threads. Give the kid a break, she's learning.
  • Posts: 5,573 Member

    I'm no whistle blower either. Except I have counted 2 or 3 "regulars" like yourself on this thread who have in the past week posted mock threads of other threads. Give the kid a break, she's learning.

    Care to point out where I've created a thread to mock a thread? No? Didn't think so. And, I wasn't giving her a hard time. I was stating a fact.
  • Posts: 49,126 Member

    That's completely fine. Remember, I am talking about eating McDonald's multiple times per day.
    Just have to tell you that it can be done. You do know that lots of Olympic athletes eat fast food/high calorie foods (usually high in fat/salt) because there's no way they could intake the amount of calories needed eating clean? Michael Phelps is a good example. To eat 9,000 calories in a day eating "clean" would mean eating on the hour and being full all the time. How would he train or compete being on a full stomach? And since they do this way, would you call them unhealthy?

    A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • Posts: 17,857 Member
    Let's look at it in a different perspective.

    What if it's not just about losing weight? What if it's about overall health?
    How about let's keep it in context, which was you stating that people were wondering why they were not losing or on a plateau. They weren't saying "why isn't my overall health excellent?" They were saying "why am I not losing weight?" This called "moving the goalposts."
  • Posts: 349 Member

    Care to point out where I've created a thread to mock a thread? No? Didn't think so. And, I wasn't giving her a hard time. I was stating a fact.

    No. Didn't say you made one. Re-read. Pointing out the fact that she made a "mock thread" in the chit chat section where dozens of regs like yourself do all day long....yeah I do think that was busting her balls a bit. Even if it was factual. Nevertheless, I'm sure she'll think twice next time.
  • Posts: 5,573 Member

    No. Didn't say you made one. Re-read. Pointing out the fact that she made a "mock thread" in the chit chat section where dozens of regs like yourself do all day long....yeah I do think that was busting her balls a bit. Even if it was factual. Nevertheless, I'm sure she'll think twice next time.

    hmm, I didn't point it out from the blue. It was actually in response to her saying...
    Okay, I made this post because I just read another thread in which a woman was asking why she wasn't losing weight when a majority of her diary entries consisted of fast food for each meal.

    Was it a little over the top for me to take the time to make a whole new post about it? Of course.

    Sorry I didn't quote that in my initial response where I made the comment in reference to that. I'm not a "reg" that creates those types of threads. So, next time, stalk better. :flowerforyou:
  • Posts: 349 Member

    hmm, I didn't point it out from the blue. It was actually in response to her saying...

    Sorry I didn't quote that in my initial response where I made the comment in reference to that. I'm not a "reg" that creates those types of threads. So, next time, stalk better. :flowerforyou:

    Lurk? Most certainly! Stalk....no, girlfriend. Not me. However I will be looking for your crusading on mock threads from now on :tongue:
  • Posts: 5,573 Member

    Lurk? Most certainly! Stalk....no, girlfriend. Not me. However I will be looking for your crusading on mock threads from now on :tongue:

    I genuinely don't care and wouldn't have said anything, had she not pointed out the reason behind creating this one. :tongue: You can usually find me standing up for others. Or, cracking jokes in the real joke threads. :laugh:
  • Posts: 1,058 Member

    I dare you to do it.
    It's been done.

    http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/11/08/twinkie.diet.professor/index.html

    Granted, Twinkies aren't cheeseburgers, but they do adhere to the 'chemicals and saturated fats' complaint - with tons of extra sugar to boot!
  • Posts: 2,305 Member
    It's been done.

    http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/11/08/twinkie.diet.professor/index.html

    Granted, Twinkies aren't cheeseburgers, but they do adhere to the 'chemicals and saturated fats' complaint - with tons of extra sugar to boot!

    ahh... well it kind of has been done.. average of 2-3 big macs a day, thats 1/2 to 2/3 of his caloric intake

    25,000 Big Macs: burger a day keeps the doctor away (since 1972, 34 years)
    McDonald's restaurant in Wisconsin unfurls banner to mark loyal customer Don Gorske's 25,000th burger

    ku-xlarge.jpg

    so yeh. what were you saying? does a big mac count as junk? its like 2 cheeseburgers with mayo per serve.

    source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/may/18/mcdonalds-customer-eats-25000-big-macs
  • Posts: 1,058 Member
    O______o'

    A Big Mac was $3.57 in 2008... if someone did that today, they would spend a total of $89,250 on Big Macs.
This discussion has been closed.