Skip to content
  • Register
    • We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

    Help needed from all you veterans. To say I'm getting frustrated is an understatement! Pleeaassee

    2»

    Replies

    • Posts: 8,488 Member
      Nothing is working right now and there are too many variables to isolate where the error is.

      I would do a month trial using a TDEE calculator instead of any tracking devices. ( put them away in a drawer so you are not comparing results.

      I just did a trial off the stats I had and your TDEE comes out to 2800+. This is including working out 6 days a week.

      Take 500 off for 1lbs loss= 2300
      Take 750 off for 1.5 loss= 2050.

      Simplify everything so you know where the error is.
      Log accurately and, because your workout routine is consistent, use the goal dirt iced from a TDEE estimate.

      Here is the calculator I like to use.
      http://www.fitnessfrog.com/calculators/tdee-calculator.html

      Cheers, h.
    • Posts: 89 Member
      ilex70 wrote: »
      So you start your post stating that 1200 - 1400 was not enough calories for you, but then the follow up is that you are netting a max of 1100 and not losing?

      There is a possibility that you have some water retention going on, but at 3 weeks on your current plan I would expect that to reverse soon if that is your issue. Many have stated here that something like 2-3 weeks is a normal period of time to see water retention from starting a new strength training program.

      FWIW I'm 5'6, started this time at 211 pounds and have eaten less than 1400 pretty consistently. I mostly ignore my exercise calories. At the moment I'm doing 3 days of spinning class and then 3 days of mixed cardio (walk/row/precor) with the odd walk thrown in here and there. No regular strength training and lean mass is holding up thus far...shows increased actually by 4 pounds, but it is just by tape measure so who knows?

      Thanks for your reply. When I first started to lose weight early last year I wasn't as informed as I am now (thanks mfp forums). I felt fine eating at that amount but it is only now looking back, well, really since I started exercising mid July 2015 that I realised I was under nourished. My hair was falling out and I was exhausted but didn't really attribute it the low calories. Now, although I am 'supposedly netting' less calories I am actually EATING far more calories with a good range of food choices and my body is satisfied with the amount with no ill effects. As I've discovered, and looking back on the comments, as most people agree, my net calories will actually be far greater if my inaccurate fitbit guesstimating machine wasn't so generous.
    • Posts: 1,481 Member
      minamina27 wrote: »
      On the 'worst of such weeks my average daily calories were 1550 net.

      I know that the calorie burn given is inflated and that is why I'm trying different proportions of it to eat back. I am just using the best tools I have available to me and I'm sure my fitbit HR is a better estimator than MFP or the machines.

      The net data is only useful if you are 100% confident in your calorie burns from exercise.

      I went through your diary and did the same math for you that I do for myself. Over the last 21 days your average calorie intake was 2221. (yes I dropped all your daily food calories into excel and averaged them)

      If I go to Scooby's TDEE calculator (http://scoobysworkshop.com/calorie-calculator/) and plug in your weight, height and age I get a TDEE of 2289 if you are lightly active or 2522 if you are moderately active. If you were lightly active you are eating at maintenance. If you are moderately active you should have lost 1.8 lbs in the last 3 weeks. Since you say you just started stronglifts, it would not surprise me if you are retaining water and have in fact lost 1-2 lbs but the scale might not show it because your muscles are hanging on to extra water.

      However, just like many people undercount their food calories many people overestimate their exercise calories and activity level. So please keep that in mind. It is highly likely that you are eating at maintenance. I'm sure you didn't realize you're averaging 2200 over the last 3 weeks. I'm sure it felt like less. It's possible you have water retention going on, it's also possible you are eating at maintenance.
    • Posts: 1,515 Member
      I don't have a whole lot to add that hasn't already been said, but I did want to say that when I started Stronglifts the scale did not move for six weeks. I don't know if I was constantly retaining water to repair my sore muscles or if I was sleep eating because lifting turns me in to a ravenous she-beast, but my weight stayed exactly the same for six weeks and then resumed my normal loss rate like nothing had happened. Weird.
    • Posts: 8,488 Member
      blues4miles wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      The net data is only useful if you are 100% confident in your calorie burns from exercise.

      I went through your diary and did the same math for you that I do for myself. Over the last 21 days your average calorie intake was 2221. (yes I dropped all your daily food calories into excel and averaged them)

      If I go to Scooby's TDEE calculator (http://scoobysworkshop.com/calorie-calculator/) and plug in your weight, height and age I get a TDEE of 2289 if you are lightly active or 2522 if you are moderately active. If you were lightly active you are eating at maintenance. If you are moderately active you should have lost 1.8 lbs in the last 3 weeks. Since you say you just started stronglifts, it would not surprise me if you are retaining water and have in fact lost 1-2 lbs but the scale might not show it because your muscles are hanging on to extra water.

      However, just like many people undercount their food calories many people overestimate their exercise calories and activity level. So please keep that in mind. It is highly likely that you are eating at maintenance. I'm sure you didn't realize you're averaging 2200 over the last 3 weeks. I'm sure it felt like less. It's possible you have water retention going on, it's also possible you are eating at maintenance.

      That is reassuring. Your Scooby's numbers are very similar to what I got through Fitmessfrog in my post above.

      OP, as I said up thread. Do a month trial using TDEE instead of devices.

      Cheers, h.
    • Posts: 89 Member
      blues4miles wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      The net data is only useful if you are 100% confident in your calorie burns from exercise.

      I went through your diary and did the same math for you that I do for myself. Over the last 21 days your average calorie intake was 2221. (yes I dropped all your daily food calories into excel and averaged them)

      If I go to Scooby's TDEE calculator (http://scoobysworkshop.com/calorie-calculator/) and plug in your weight, height and age I get a TDEE of 2289 if you are lightly active or 2522 if you are moderately active. If you were lightly active you are eating at maintenance. If you are moderately active you should have lost 1.8 lbs in the last 3 weeks. Since you say you just started stronglifts, it would not surprise me if you are retaining water and have in fact lost 1-2 lbs but the scale might not show it because your muscles are hanging on to extra water.

      However, just like many people undercount their food calories many people overestimate their exercise calories and activity level. So please keep that in mind. It is highly likely that you are eating at maintenance. I'm sure you didn't realize you're averaging 2200 over the last 3 weeks. I'm sure it felt like less. It's possible you have water retention going on, it's also possible you are eating at maintenance.

      I was just coming back to say that I have used the runners world calculator. I ran for 2 miles after stronglifts today for which my fitbit gave me 288 calories. According to the runners world info I would have burned 300 so pretty close I would say.

      As for the rest, thank you. I really appreciate you taking the time and effort to do that. Sometimes it takes another pair of eyes, or twenty! to see what I am not. Hey, give me a 1.8lb loss and I would gladly accept it. Here's waiting for the water to go.

      I really appreciate all the effort from everyone who has replied, I knew I could rely on some good sound advice from you veterans. Hopefully, with a few adjustments I will be back to tell you all my weight loss results. Cheers.
    • Posts: 16,049 Member
      edited March 2016
      minamina27 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      Hi. I knew someone would pick up on that. However I have less than that but round it up to the nearest entry that I have previously added. I always overestimate not under. For instance if my chicken is 235g or 245 g I will log it as 250g thanks.
      show previous quotes

      No I haven't had any blood tests done. Although my fitbit says ~3000 I never ever eat that much, oh actually a party or two throughout the year. Mfp gives me 1250 a day and my fit bit is set to lose 1.5 lb a week so adjusts according to my deficit.

      I can't add to the great advice you've already received. But just wanted to say that I round up too most of the time, if I've pre logged something as 50g, I usually stop adding when I hit 46-48g on the scale and just leave the entry at 50 instead of fiddling about for 2-3g.
    • Posts: 89 Member
      I'm up for using tdee for a month. Could anyone advise what activity to use in the calculator for my level of exercise as in lighft, moderate, active? It won't decrease but I might add in a new class now and again. Thanks.
    • Posts: 26,368 Member
      minamina27 wrote: »
      I'm up for using tdee for a month. Could anyone advise what activity to use in the calculator for my level of exercise as in lighft, moderate, active? It won't decrease but I might add in a new class now and again. Thanks.

      I'd put you on moderately active.

      And yeah I think your fitbit way overestimates your activity.
    • Posts: 28,055 Member
      Christine_72 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      I can't add to the great advice you've already received. But just wanted to say that I round up too most of the time, if I've pre logged something as 50g, I usually stop adding when I hit 46-48g on the scale and just leave the entry at 50 instead of fiddling about for 2-3g.

      You're making me twitch :D
    • Posts: 28,055 Member
      minamina27 wrote: »
      ...

      This is my 3rd week on stronglifts ...

      The seven pound gain in November was from me starting to lift weights again. It came off unnaturally quickly because I got sick and for a while stopped lifting and lost my appetite.

      huz0ojkm44kz.png



    • Posts: 8,488 Member
      Try moderate for 2 weeks. If that is working stick with it.
      If you find your energy levels are getting low at the end of 2 weeks, up to active.
      I think it is going to be a bit of trial and error, but I think this may be the way to go.

      Cheers, h.
    • Posts: 16,049 Member
      kshama2001 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      You're making me twitch :D

      :laugh: I like to walk on the wild side :tongue:
    • Posts: 6,771 Member
      Mouse_Potato wrote: »
      I don't have a whole lot to add that hasn't already been said, but I did want to say that when I started Stronglifts the scale did not move for six weeks. I don't know if I was constantly retaining water to repair my sore muscles or if I was sleep eating because lifting turns me in to a ravenous she-beast, but my weight stayed exactly the same for six weeks and then resumed my normal loss rate like nothing had happened. Weird.

      Just to throw in another anecdote, I too had a jump at new year that stuck around for 6 weeks when I upped my overall training schedule, which included a lot more strength training. Then a whoosh and back to my usual stop and start losses (I have never been linear, my weight loss is a reflection of my life, ha!). So I think 3 weeks is a little too early to start panicking yet but the advice to pick a number, stick with it for a good amount of time and consistently is the best advice.
    • Posts: 2,145 Member
      I even thought my Fitbit HR was a tad high. I told it I was two inches shorter than my actual height & am happy with the results. I have mine set to sedentary & take calories from steps; I don't add in free weight training or yoga save for the few steps they might generate.
      I agree both your logging could be buttoned down a little tighter and your burns should be moderated because they strike me as high. But congrats on how far you've come! Just stick with it!
    • Posts: 89 Member
      Hi. Scooby decided I can eat 2514 calories a day to maintain. This is for 3-5 hours a week moderate exercise. MFP has suggested 1770 for me as active to lose 1.5lbs a week which is in line with scooby 2514-750=1764. So I am now setting my calories for 1770 a day and totally ignoring any extra calories given by my fitbit. I will see what happens over the course of the month and tweak the numbers depending on the results.
      scolaris wrote: »
      I even thought my Fitbit HR was a tad high. I told it I was two inches shorter than my actual height & am happy with the results. I have mine set to sedentary & take calories from steps; I don't add in free weight training or yoga save for the few steps they might generate.
      I agree both your logging could be buttoned down a little tighter and your burns should be moderated because they strike me as high. But congrats on how far you've come! Just stick with it!
      I read a previous comment of yours which prompted me to change my settings from non dominant hand to dominant for my fitbit. I may deduct a couple of inches too and compare.
      Yeah for the MFP community. I feel much better and more informed and glad I asked the question
      Thanks again everyone.
    • Posts: 1,481 Member
      PAV8888 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      For every anecdotal evidence leaning one way, there is another leaning the opposite way.

      According to MFP and Google Fit, for the three weeks ending March 12, I should have gained 3.5lbs. This is based on Google's GPS/wifi distance logging and my phone's step calculations. I judge my phone's calculations to be fairly accurate. On some few occasions I have the phone on a charger as opposed to on me. Usually i am in the house when that happens and working on my workstation.

      According to MFP and Fitbit, for the three weeks ending March 12, I should have lost 1.47lbs. This is based on the "overly generous" step count of the Fitbit Charge HR that occasionally gives me steps for typing.

      According to my trending weight app I lost 1.5lbs during the time period.

      In fact, since day 1, I've found Google Fit to be criminally insane in underestimating burns.

      All you can do is verify and cross-check your burns and see if they make sense for you and if they appear to match the reality of your trending weight app...

      The "gold" standard you may want to use are the MET tables in the compendium of physical activities. The speed of your walk or run has a heck of a lot to do with how many calories your activity burns.

      Someone posted this link today on another thread and I just wanted to throw it out there as relevant to this discussion....

      http://www.wthr.com/story/31285468/sometimes-your-fitness-tracker-lies-a-lot-fitbit-jawbone-garmin-ifit-misfit-accuracy

    • Posts: 16,049 Member
      minamina27 wrote: »
      Hi. Scooby decided I can eat 2514 calories a day to maintain. This is for 3-5 hours a week moderate exercise. MFP has suggested 1770 for me as active to lose 1.5lbs a week which is in line with scooby 2514-750=1764. So I am now setting my calories for 1770 a day and totally ignoring any extra calories given by my fitbit. I will see what happens over the course of the month and tweak the numbers depending on the results.
      show previous quotes
      I read a previous comment of yours which prompted me to change my settings from non dominant hand to dominant for my fitbit. I may deduct a couple of inches too and compare.
      Yeah for the MFP community. I feel much better and more informed and glad I asked the question
      Thanks again everyone.

      I deducted a couple inches from my height and stride length, can't say I have noticed any difference in the calories out numbers.
    This discussion has been closed.

    Welcome!

    It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
    Sign In
    Register

    Quick Links

    Categories