50 shades darker
Options
Replies
-
BTW you really shouldn't comment on other peoples fetishes as vile. Especially when you can't grasp the concept of being in a consenting adult relationship
^^^ This. Thank you.4 -
Char231023 wrote: »DeficitDuchess wrote: »tmanfromtexas wrote: »DeficitDuchess wrote: »While I am not, vanilla I'm not; vile either & thus I've no interest in, viewing this ill treatment of; people! To me it'd be, like watching a glorified sexual version of; Roots & to me consensual slavery's a, slap in the face to; those that're/were slaves whether, sexual or not. Plus it, also minimizes their; suffering because someone's then able to excuse it as not being so bad since, people consent to; being treated this way.
For instance we hospitalize anorexics despite, their consent to; starve themselves & thus their extreme behavior also minimizes the, suffering of people whom're truly starving without; it being a choice! 1 could become desensitized to the plight of starvation by indicating that since, there're people whom choose to starve themselves then; starving isn't a problem!
@Morgaen73 plus healthy sex isn't a, prerequisite to; rape. Just like, drinking water isn't to; drowning!
I think you are confused about eating disorders, slavery and sub/dom agreements.
BTW you really shouldn't comment on other peoples fetishes as vile. Especially when you can't grasp the concept of being in a consenting adult relationship.
Both of which're incidents within, which 1's consenting to; being harmed whether it be self inflicted or having, someone else; harm them! It's just that 1 of, them involves someone being hospitalized against; their will & the other, doesn't that's the; only difference but both're a, consent to harm so; that's the connection & thus, no confusion!
I had looked to see what my competition was, on a dating website most; were obvious fake profiles but 1 was shocking she, was using crutches for months after, allowing a couple to use sandpaper (& that's all that I am able to, say without; getting graphic) How's that, an okay; consensual agreement? That someone's literally, suffering via; such an encounter!-1 -
[/quote]Both of which're incidents within, which 1's consenting to; being harmed whether it be self inflicted or having, someone else; harm them! It's just that 1 of, them involves someone being hospitalized against; their will & the other, doesn't that's the; only difference but both're a, consent to harm so; that's the connection & thus, no confusion!
I had looked to see what my competition was, on a dating website most; were obvious fake profiles but 1 was shocking she, was using crutches for months after, letting a couple use sandpaper (& that's all I am able to, say without; getting graphic) How's that, okay?[/quote]
Your perception of harm is another person's pleasure. I don't think anorexics get any pleasure or happiness from being hospitalized against their will. But what in your mind constitutes harm? A scratch? A bruise? A paddle mark? What in your mind do you think is happening when two people are engaged in a consenting act ( lets say a flogging) and both are turned on as hell, and are deriving pure pleasure from it? They both want it to happen. It is NOT harm.
There are people who are on the more hardcore extreme side. There is still nothing wrong with that as long as you can get up and walk away and continue on with your regular life. It's their choice. It's still what they want to do. There is no harm there.
My only concern would be those who allow others to do permanent harm or injury to them. But that's not the conversation we are having here, and those books never broached that topic.
3 -
sorry for the format fail0
-
There wasn't any "good bits" PLOP!!! Your man is a fine thing tho I'd bet I would make him cry2
-
-
DeficitDuchess wrote: »Char231023 wrote: »DeficitDuchess wrote: »tmanfromtexas wrote: »DeficitDuchess wrote: »While I am not, vanilla I'm not; vile either & thus I've no interest in, viewing this ill treatment of; people! To me it'd be, like watching a glorified sexual version of; Roots & to me consensual slavery's a, slap in the face to; those that're/were slaves whether, sexual or not. Plus it, also minimizes their; suffering because someone's then able to excuse it as not being so bad since, people consent to; being treated this way.
For instance we hospitalize anorexics despite, their consent to; starve themselves & thus their extreme behavior also minimizes the, suffering of people whom're truly starving without; it being a choice! 1 could become desensitized to the plight of starvation by indicating that since, there're people whom choose to starve themselves then; starving isn't a problem!
@Morgaen73 plus healthy sex isn't a, prerequisite to; rape. Just like, drinking water isn't to; drowning!
I think you are confused about eating disorders, slavery and sub/dom agreements.
BTW you really shouldn't comment on other peoples fetishes as vile. Especially when you can't grasp the concept of being in a consenting adult relationship.
Both of which're incidents within, which 1's consenting to; being harmed whether it be self inflicted or having, someone else; harm them! It's just that 1 of, them involves someone being hospitalized against; their will & the other, doesn't that's the; only difference but both're a, consent to harm so; that's the connection & thus, no confusion!
I had looked to see what my competition was, on a dating website most; were obvious fake profiles but 1 was shocking she, was using crutches for months after, allowing a couple to use sandpaper (& that's all that I am able to, say without; getting graphic) How's that, an okay; consensual agreement? That someone's literally, suffering via; such an encounter!
Can I ask why you like using commas and semicolons so much?
I'm reading everything like William Shatner.
Ah stop been the grammar police1 -
JennyHsavage wrote: »There wasn't any "good bits" PLOP!!! Your man is a fine thing tho I'd bet I would make him cry
I Laughed out Loud at this!1 -
JennyHsavage wrote: »There wasn't any "good bits" PLOP!!! Your man is a fine thing tho I'd bet I would make him cry
I Laughed out Loud at this!
Hehehe just been honest0 -
YvetteK2015 wrote: »
I had looked to see what my competition was, on a dating website most; were obvious fake profiles but 1 was shocking she, was using crutches for months after, letting a couple use sandpaper (& that's all I am able to, say without; getting graphic) How's that, okay?[/quote]
Your perception of harm is another person's pleasure. I don't think anorexics get any pleasure or happiness from being hospitalized against their will. But what in your mind constitutes harm? A scratch? A bruise? A paddle mark? What in your mind do you think is happening when two people are engaged in a consenting act ( lets say a flogging) and both are turned on as hell, and are deriving pure pleasure from it? They both want it to happen. It is NOT harm.
There are people who are on the more hardcore extreme side. There is still nothing wrong with that as long as you can get up and walk away and continue on with your regular life. It's their choice. It's still what they want to do. There is no harm there.
My only concern would be those who allow others to do permanent harm or injury to them. But that's not the conversation we are having here, and those books never broached that topic.
[/quote]
Of course anorexics don't get, pleasure via; being forced to eat but they do from, the image that they try to achieve while; starving themselves! So if their harmful pleasure isn't okay (especially legally) despite, not harming anyone else how's any other form of; harmful pleasure not just as awful?-1 -
DeficitDuchess wrote: »Char231023 wrote: »DeficitDuchess wrote: »tmanfromtexas wrote: »DeficitDuchess wrote: »While I am not, vanilla I'm not; vile either & thus I've no interest in, viewing this ill treatment of; people! To me it'd be, like watching a glorified sexual version of; Roots & to me consensual slavery's a, slap in the face to; those that're/were slaves whether, sexual or not. Plus it, also minimizes their; suffering because someone's then able to excuse it as not being so bad since, people consent to; being treated this way.
For instance we hospitalize anorexics despite, their consent to; starve themselves & thus their extreme behavior also minimizes the, suffering of people whom're truly starving without; it being a choice! 1 could become desensitized to the plight of starvation by indicating that since, there're people whom choose to starve themselves then; starving isn't a problem!
@Morgaen73 plus healthy sex isn't a, prerequisite to; rape. Just like, drinking water isn't to; drowning!
I think you are confused about eating disorders, slavery and sub/dom agreements.
BTW you really shouldn't comment on other peoples fetishes as vile. Especially when you can't grasp the concept of being in a consenting adult relationship.
Both of which're incidents within, which 1's consenting to; being harmed whether it be self inflicted or having, someone else; harm them! It's just that 1 of, them involves someone being hospitalized against; their will & the other, doesn't that's the; only difference but both're a, consent to harm so; that's the connection & thus, no confusion!
I had looked to see what my competition was, on a dating website most; were obvious fake profiles but 1 was shocking she, was using crutches for months after, allowing a couple to use sandpaper (& that's all that I am able to, say without; getting graphic) How's that, an okay; consensual agreement? That someone's literally, suffering via; such an encounter!
Can I ask why you like using commas and semicolons so much?
I'm reading everything like William Shatner.
I dislike, finishing sentences & I use semicolons incorrectly to, not overuse commas within; 1 sentence unless listing!1 -
DeficitDuchess wrote: »Kepplekakes wrote: »I suspect someone is actually more vanilla than they think they are.
Choosing not to be disrespectful of, victim's plights via mocking them; isn't being vanilla!
Lol wat? ;:-.,0 -
Of course anorexics don't get, pleasure via; being forced to eat but they do from, the image that they try to achieve while; starving themselves! So if their harmful pleasure isn't okay (especially legally) despite, not harming anyone else how's any other form of; harmful pleasure not just as awful?
Anorexia can cause permanent damage or death. That is the difference. Having your butt smacked, or being cracked with a crop, or being tied up shibari style will not do that. And again, I'm not talking about legitimate psychopaths who would harm people regardless of the lifestyle or not. That's not the issue.
I don't know what your definition of harm is, but I think it's very different from most people.3 -
DeficitDuchess wrote: »Char231023 wrote: »DeficitDuchess wrote: »tmanfromtexas wrote: »DeficitDuchess wrote: »While I am not, vanilla I'm not; vile either & thus I've no interest in, viewing this ill treatment of; people! To me it'd be, like watching a glorified sexual version of; Roots & to me consensual slavery's a, slap in the face to; those that're/were slaves whether, sexual or not. Plus it, also minimizes their; suffering because someone's then able to excuse it as not being so bad since, people consent to; being treated this way.
For instance we hospitalize anorexics despite, their consent to; starve themselves & thus their extreme behavior also minimizes the, suffering of people whom're truly starving without; it being a choice! 1 could become desensitized to the plight of starvation by indicating that since, there're people whom choose to starve themselves then; starving isn't a problem!
@Morgaen73 plus healthy sex isn't a, prerequisite to; rape. Just like, drinking water isn't to; drowning!
I think you are confused about eating disorders, slavery and sub/dom agreements.
BTW you really shouldn't comment on other peoples fetishes as vile. Especially when you can't grasp the concept of being in a consenting adult relationship.
Both of which're incidents within, which 1's consenting to; being harmed whether it be self inflicted or having, someone else; harm them! It's just that 1 of, them involves someone being hospitalized against; their will & the other, doesn't that's the; only difference but both're a, consent to harm so; that's the connection & thus, no confusion!
I had looked to see what my competition was, on a dating website most; were obvious fake profiles but 1 was shocking she, was using crutches for months after, allowing a couple to use sandpaper (& that's all that I am able to, say without; getting graphic) How's that, an okay; consensual agreement? That someone's literally, suffering via; such an encounter!
Can I ask why you like using commas and semicolons so much?
I'm reading everything like William Shatner.
I have to skip right over those posts. I'm sure she's very sweet and likable but the punctuation makes my eyes literally hurt.1 -
CowgirlBaby42 wrote: »this movie is so different then the real life of BDSM
You'd know?1 -
DeficitDuchess wrote: »Char231023 wrote: »DeficitDuchess wrote: »tmanfromtexas wrote: »DeficitDuchess wrote: »While I am not, vanilla I'm not; vile either & thus I've no interest in, viewing this ill treatment of; people! To me it'd be, like watching a glorified sexual version of; Roots & to me consensual slavery's a, slap in the face to; those that're/were slaves whether, sexual or not. Plus it, also minimizes their; suffering because someone's then able to excuse it as not being so bad since, people consent to; being treated this way.
For instance we hospitalize anorexics despite, their consent to; starve themselves & thus their extreme behavior also minimizes the, suffering of people whom're truly starving without; it being a choice! 1 could become desensitized to the plight of starvation by indicating that since, there're people whom choose to starve themselves then; starving isn't a problem!
@Morgaen73 plus healthy sex isn't a, prerequisite to; rape. Just like, drinking water isn't to; drowning!
I think you are confused about eating disorders, slavery and sub/dom agreements.
BTW you really shouldn't comment on other peoples fetishes as vile. Especially when you can't grasp the concept of being in a consenting adult relationship.
Both of which're incidents within, which 1's consenting to; being harmed whether it be self inflicted or having, someone else; harm them! It's just that 1 of, them involves someone being hospitalized against; their will & the other, doesn't that's the; only difference but both're a, consent to harm so; that's the connection & thus, no confusion!
I had looked to see what my competition was, on a dating website most; were obvious fake profiles but 1 was shocking she, was using crutches for months after, allowing a couple to use sandpaper (& that's all that I am able to, say without; getting graphic) How's that, an okay; consensual agreement? That someone's literally, suffering via; such an encounter!
Can I ask why you like using commas and semicolons so much?
I'm reading everything like William Shatner.
OMG I just read it in a Captain Kirk voice ROFLMAO.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 389 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 919 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions