Well this is a wake up call

7ypftdg59ki1.png

That's my yoyo history, kind of crazy
«1

Replies

  • goingoffthegrid135
    goingoffthegrid135 Posts: 26 Member
    5'10. I know it's a low goal and I may not make it but I want to be close
  • fallingwave
    fallingwave Posts: 108 Member
    5'10?! I am 5'10 and 135 seems SO LOW. I think 190 is my goal, I definitely have a medium-large frame.
  • goingoffthegrid135
    goingoffthegrid135 Posts: 26 Member
    I have a small frame 5 1/2 wrist. I know how I felt at 135, I felt healthy. And even though 18 seems young to get back to, I was already an adult, done growing. My husband says how are you going to weigh as much as a high schooler??? I dont know, I guess I'll have to readjust as I go.
  • goingoffthegrid135
    goingoffthegrid135 Posts: 26 Member
    edited March 2017
    jemhh wrote: »
    Well, no, most women's bodies aren't totally finished maturing at 18 but whatever. The point is to get started. Don't worry too much about the end point since it's years away.

    Well, I was done growing, meaning height. And I don't plan on it taking years, only 18 months.
  • Maxematics
    Maxematics Posts: 2,287 Member
    It really depends on the person. I weigh less now than I have since I was in 8th grade. Then again, I've never had children and never will. Just make sure the weight goal itself is feasible or make goals in increments.
  • goingoffthegrid135
    goingoffthegrid135 Posts: 26 Member
    Maxematics wrote: »
    It really depends on the person. I weigh less now than I have since I was in 8th grade. Then again, I've never had children and never will. Just make sure the weight goal itself is feasible or make goals in increments.
    Thank you. I have 3 goals. 208 will be "obese" BMI. 173 would be healthy BMI and then my final goal. And in a perfect situation, whatever low weight I get to, then I want to start lifting heavy, and if I gain because of muscle, that's fine

  • crooked_left_hook
    crooked_left_hook Posts: 364 Member
    annacole94 wrote: »
    How tall are you? Aiming for being 18 again may or may not be realistic. ;)

    Good luck!

    Not necessarily, I'm about 40 lbs lighter at age 39 than I was at age 18. 18 was when I was my heaviest. However at 5' 10" that might be a bit extreme...140-145 would probably be more realistic and quite thin for that height. I'm 5'6" with a a 5.5" wrist and 135" is pretty thin for me.
  • annacole94
    annacole94 Posts: 994 Member
    "May or may not" LITERALLY says it might be ok and it might not.

    I doubt she'll want to get that low once she gets to a healthy BMI, but that is a far future problem.
  • goingoffthegrid135
    goingoffthegrid135 Posts: 26 Member
    annacole94 wrote: »
    "May or may not" LITERALLY says it might be ok and it might not.

    I doubt she'll want to get that low once she gets to a healthy BMI, but that is a far future problem.
    I'm not saying it might or might not be ok. I'm saying I may not reach my goal. And I DO want to get that low. I was there before. Can I ask why it seems everyone is nitpicking? Sorry to sound mean but I did not ask for advice. Everyone is different. Only I know my body. And it is not a "far future problem". It's my problem now and it will not take me more than 18 months.
  • msdemeanor70
    msdemeanor70 Posts: 66 Member
    I am exactly the same weight today as I was when I joined the Air Force 27 years ago -- 138. But oh, what a ride it's been in between. :s I am 5'3.5 and very happy at the tippy top of my "normal" BMI range (24.1).
  • cmtigger
    cmtigger Posts: 1,450 Member
    I'm 5'10" and aiming for 140-145, I think I'd look worn out if I was back down to 130 like in my 20's.

    But the good news is that as you lose you can decide where you are comfortable once you are back in a healthy BMI- which is under 170 for our height.
  • thegoat1987
    thegoat1987 Posts: 36 Member
    edited March 2017
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    OK, since most people are weighing in on one side here:

    My lowest weight at full adult height was 113 at 5'6". That was a bit too low. I'd been sick (stomach bug), dropped from 118-ish. I was 18 or 19, don't remember - early college.

    My lowest weight on this round of weight loss was 116, now at more like 5'5". I headed back up to goal, which was 120. I was 60 years old.

    At first, I had a little bit of saggy skin on my face, and (as far as I can tell & confirmed by remarks people have made to me) it has shrunk back in the year I've been on maintenance (as some other areas where I had loose skin have also largely done). People who didn't know me before weight loss are surprised to learn that I used to be obese - it's not obvious.

    I don't have more facial wrinkles than I did before losing weight. I don't believe I look worse than I did before I lost weight (different, yes - and overall, better: I look more muscular, even though I'm not). I will never have "womanly curves" - under the fat rolls I was, and am, built like a 14-year-old boy: No hips, no booty, not much waist indent, broad shoulders, no breasts (used to be small ones, but now bilateral mastectomies).

    I'm not a vain or looks-focused person at all, not very interested in my appearance, so I doubt I'm deluding myself. My weight loss was about some very specific health goals.

    OP is not going to lose all that weight overnight. She will have plenty of time to see and evaluate various intermediate weights, and - if appropriate - decide to stay at a higher weight if she feels & looks good there, or if that calorie level is simply more sustainable for her. Moreover, if she decides she's at too low a weight she can . . . shock! . . . gain some back.

    When I started, I thought I'd be better off weighing a bit more than I had in my youth (people always say that! ;) ), so my initial weight loss goal was higher - 130. But I always planned to re-evaluate when I got within 10 pounds or so of that, and maybe stop sooner, or go on further. It was pretty obvious to me that I should go on a bit further.

    OP, just be you. Keep your eyes open, be honest with yourself, take photos periodically & look at them, etc. Our body composition changes over the years. You may be fine at your youthful weight, or you may find that you feel best a little higher. If you're paying attention, and are honest with yourself, and consider your health as well as your appearance, you'll reach the right conclusion.

    P.S. I'm another vote for starting to lift weights now. Without some muscle stimulus, we're virtually certain to lose more than the minimum of muscle in a calorie deficit. It's hard, slow work for women to build muscle (without performance enhancing drugs), and it gets harder & slower the older we get. It makes excellent sense to hang onto as much as we can while losing weight, and avoid the effort of regaining it later.

    My mother had breast cancer twice, and is one of the least vain people I've ever known - she has no idea how beautiful she is, before or after cancer - she is just happy to be alive. Thank you for your honesty and advice. You, your achievements and outlook are inspiring :)
  • kommodevaran
    kommodevaran Posts: 17,890 Member
    I'm at my "junior high" weight at 46 years old, but I wasn't skinny then so it's a good weight for me now :D
  • Lounmoun
    Lounmoun Posts: 8,423 Member
    See how you feel as you go and don't get stuck on a particular number. You may find your loss slows as you get closer to a healthy weight and that you don't need to be exactly at 135 lbs to feel good. You can lift heavy while you lose weight.

    For me, I was about 100 lbs at 18 years. I was my ideal weight of 125 at 25 years. I got up to 180 lbs. I'd like to go back to 125 lbs but I haven't weighed that for 17 years though. My goal is to be between 125-145 lbs. I feel that anywhere in that range will probably be comfortable and healthy for me.

  • size102b
    size102b Posts: 1,370 Member
    Go by clothes size bmi and scales are really out dated
  • crooked_left_hook
    crooked_left_hook Posts: 364 Member
    Maybe not focus on a number? Just focus on losing and when you get to a spot that feels good to you then stop losing. That's what I did about 6 years back. I actually got to my goal but decided to lose a few pounds more. 5 less than goal felt right even though I could have lost an additional 10 and still be healthy. It's not always about a number on the scale and the weight that feels good in your 30's may or may not be the same as what felt good in your teens. How much you exercise and how much muscle you have/but LS can also play a part in what that end weight ends up being. A fit, toned 150 might wear the same size less toned 135. It's always good to have a plan when starting a weight loss journey, but more often than not I've found that the end goal will evolve along the way and being flexible helps me get the results I want.
  • jemhh
    jemhh Posts: 14,261 Member
    annacole94 wrote: »
    "May or may not" LITERALLY says it might be ok and it might not.

    I doubt she'll want to get that low once she gets to a healthy BMI, but that is a far future problem.
    I'm not saying it might or might not be ok. I'm saying I may not reach my goal. And I DO want to get that low. I was there before. Can I ask why it seems everyone is nitpicking? Sorry to sound mean but I did not ask for advice. Everyone is different. Only I know my body. And it is not a "far future problem". It's my problem now and it will not take me more than 18 months.

    125 lbs in 18 months would be pretty speedy. It's important to be aware that weight loss slows significantly as you get lighter. It's not uncommon to lose just a couple of pounds a month for the last 10 or so pounds, for example. I'd plan on 2.5-3 years, including maintenance breaks. Regardless, best of luck to you.
  • tapwaters
    tapwaters Posts: 428 Member
    Good luck! I went from 250 to 130 in about a year and a half, it's doable.
  • savithny
    savithny Posts: 1,200 Member
    Yeah, at 18, many women aren't fully mature, and the last phase of late puberty often involves a growth spurt with hips widening and more body fat being tucked away in breasts and hips. All part of the "ready to reproduce now!" thing.

    Yes, it's not accurate to say you "can't" get to your high school weight. If you were an overweight adolescent, you probably can get to it and below it. But 135 at 5'10" is low end of normal, and may be aspirational.
  • cbelc2
    cbelc2 Posts: 762 Member
    170 would be a realistic goal, or ask your doctor. I had to get away from the 'diet' mindset. I love my Mediterranean way if eating and I can do it for life, although eventually I won't count calories. Having 'kid food' around is a temptation to eat it with them. The whole family dynamic has to change from quick filling food to quick healthy filling food. Family exercise has to become a fun habit. Water is the best thirst quenched for everyone. Make a plan and include the kids.