Artificial Sweeteners?
Options
Replies
-
I'm not a fan of artificial sweeteners, but only because for the majority of them, I can tell they aren't real sugar and taste different to me. Instead, I slowly dropped the amount of sugar I was adding to my tea/coffee and now it doesn't hurt at all to add my 1 sugar sachet into my black tea/coffee.
You won't know how you feel about artificial sweeteners until you try them.
For example, I don't like diet coke but pepsi max is great, both 0 calories with artificial sweeteners. I don't like the taste of one, love the taste of the other.
You can keep the Pepsi max... Blech! I'll have the diet coke. (but I'll leave the coke zero for someone else... Urgh!)0 -
Helped me a lot. I use them excessively as I drink a lot of warm drinks of all types and drink lots of diet carbonated drinks too.1
-
Come to think of it broccoli and onions do that to me too!
They're foods that ferment in the gut/bowel and can cause irritation and therefore bloating. I was very sad to give up broccoli but my IBS thanked me for it.
I use Canderel for my tea and drink caramel lattes from the Tassimo so they're already sweet enough. Diet Coke and diet Dr Pepper gives me tummy problems but I do okay with Diet Pepsi so I think it's just a case of what works for you.2 -
0
-
There is obviously a profit motive in convincing you all that there are no harmful effects associated with artificial sweeteners
However, I fail to see what motive those who speak out against companies that manufacture these products could possibly have...
Obesity, cancer, heart disease, depression, diabetes, have all been on the rise for decades now. All of your diet cupcakes and zero calories sodas have done nothing to help the matter
In fact you could probably graph the rise in these conditions against the rise in sweeteners and find a direct correlation between the two...
Or you can just think about it a little and ask yourself when did you first start to see light cupcakes and diet sodas on the market and ask yourself, gee when did the health of America really start to decline...2 -
There is obviously a profit motive in convincing you all that there are no harmful effects associated with artificial sweeteners
This is vastly overestimating your own ability to know things without bothering to have a light shone on them and see how they stand up to scrutiny.
There is a profit motive available in convincing anybody of anything diet related.However, I fail to see what motive those who speak out against companies that manufacture these products could possibly have...
It couldn't possibly be that people believe in all sorts of woo and many people find a financial niche in it.
But that you fail to see what profit motive could exist with, when simplified and ignoring the widespread existence of marketing niches, STILL boils down to a vastly larger and more powerful sugar industry VS a much smaller and more niche artificial sweetener industry, well that kind of speaks for itself:
You're starting from the conclusion that artificial sweeteners are bad, certainly not the premise of "following the money" (or the studies with controlled variables) and accepting wherever that leads, or having even the vaguest awareness of how there's all sorts of money to be made from all sorts of angles in just about any industry.
You know the guy you sourced earns millions off book deals, right? I'm not saying he doesn't believe in what he's saying and that this isn't his prime motivation, but you fail to see what profit motive there could possibly be? You realise that failure speaks very badly of myopia of your position, not anything about ours, right?Obesity, cancer, heart disease, depression, diabetes, have all been on the rise for decades now. All of your diet cupcakes and zero calories sodas have done nothing to help the matter
Because people are eating more and exercising lessIn fact you could probably graph the rise in these conditions against the rise in sweeteners and find a direct correlation between the two...
You can do the same with ice cream and murders. Drinking alchohol and coughing up muck the next day. See: Every post in my thread pointing out these absurdly spurious and cherry picked correlations. Also: Graph the rise in the popularity of YOUR author and...Or you can just think about it a little and ask yourself when did you first start to see light cupcakes and diet sodas on the market and ask yourself, gee when did the health of America really start to decline...
Clearly it was the diet sodas, and not the dietary conditions of a vast increase in hyper palatable foods and sedentary lifestyle that created a niche for diet sodas.12 -
JstTheWayIam wrote: »
A YT video is NOT a reputable thoroughly researched scientific source. That's like getting medical info from tumblr...
Your follow up post spouts so much fearmongering and woo it hurts. None of what you claimed has been backed by scientific studies. @comeonnow142857 has the patience of Saints.8 -
My brother used to get a bad rash every time he ate chocolate, that doesn't mean chocolate is "terrible for you".
If they make you feel bad, avoid them. Otherwise, it isn't a worry.4 -
JstTheWayIam wrote: »In fact you could probably graph the rise in these conditions against the rise in sweeteners and find a direct correlation between the two...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuekQC1RXRE10 -
If we accept that all artificial sweeteners have been tested extensively and found to be safe to consume, it seems to me the only thing left to ask with regards to anecdotes is which one people like best. I like splenda/sucralose. It tastes best to me and Aldi sells a generic brand of it for about 1/4 of the brand-name cost. Saccharine (SweetnLow) and stevia (Truvia) both have a bad aftertaste to me. (I'm always surprised that no one else seems to find stevia terribly bitter, but whatever.) I'll use aspartame/Equal if that's all that's around. Its in the middle taste-wise.
"Science" is still learning all sorts of things, so if someone swears they have tummy trouble every time they eat something, I wouldn't necessarily pooh-pooh them. There could be a rare condition that makes people sensitive to a certain substance that we don't know about yet. But I wouldn't take it as meaningful for myself either, unless I had the same experience. If they claimed it caused cancer or serious damage, I'd take that with a very large grain of salt, cuz that's the sort of thing that gets studied. Which basically means that in the end. go ahead and try one in your coffee and see if you like it. Its not going to hurt you. But as somebody else kind of implied, take it for what its worth - it will save you enough calories to have an apple instead, but you probably don't want to build your diet around it.4 -
nicolepburgess91 wrote: »I like sugar in my coffee. I can barely stomach it plain. But it adds more calories than I'd like to see. I'm looking into artificial sweeteners and I'm finding very conflicting information about its benefits/harmful effects.
I'm not looking for scientific data - but, rather personal experience stories.
Have artificial sweeteners helped you, or hurt you?
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
3 -
sheermomentum wrote: »If we accept that all artificial sweeteners have been tested extensively and found to be safe to consume, it seems to me the only thing left to ask with regards to anecdotes is which one people like best. I like splenda/sucralose. It tastes best to me and Aldi sells a generic brand of it for about 1/4 of the brand-name cost. Saccharine (SweetnLow) and stevia (Truvia) both have a bad aftertaste to me. (I'm always surprised that no one else seems to find stevia terribly bitter, but whatever.) I'll use aspartame/Equal if that's all that's around. Its in the middle taste-wise.
"Science" is still learning all sorts of things, so if someone swears they have tummy trouble every time they eat something, I wouldn't necessarily pooh-pooh them. There could be a rare condition that makes people sensitive to a certain substance that we don't know about yet. But I wouldn't take it as meaningful for myself either, unless I had the same experience. If they claimed it caused cancer or serious damage, I'd take that with a very large grain of salt, cuz that's the sort of thing that gets studied. Which basically means that in the end. go ahead and try one in your coffee and see if you like it. Its not going to hurt you. But as somebody else kind of implied, take it for what its worth - it will save you enough calories to have an apple instead, but you probably don't want to build your diet around it.
This is a good post.
Issues are often attributed to one ingredient, when the consumer is missing out consideration of other ingredients in what they consumer. IE. Aspartame in Diet Coke causing stomach upset/gas & shakiness... It's filled with carbonation and caffeine!!! You also have a lot of issues attributed to gluten insensitivity which are really about other issues in foods that tend to be high in gluten, etc. But if something doesn't make you feel right, sure, put it down. It just may not be for the reason you think it is, no matter how convincing that latest fad doctor's book is at giving you a framework that seems to make all your problems fit in a "AHA!" puzzle.
Correlation/causation is hard, and if you can't account for the distinction (like JstTheWaylam's argument above) you aren't in a position where you'll be able to figure it out.2 -
Simply saying that everyone's got a financial stake does not suddenly mean that soda manufacturers do not have a financial stake in convincing people that artificial sweeteners are not harmful... In fact to the contrary, in only helps to backup my argument...
Also note that all the money Dr Greger makes from his book went to charity and he makes nothing on his website either...
You say that I refused to put up any sort of factual argument, while I present you with a YouTube video that definitely has factual information...
You then claim the data to be cherry picked (which your going to claim no matter what I present you with) and counter with absolutely nothing... Nothing at all...
1 -
JstTheWayIam wrote: »removed by moderator
Like when the price of gas went up, more vehicles were being sold? Or when the pirate population increased, so did the temperature of the Earth? How about when more than one TV was put in a house, commercials increased?
Correlation doesn't equal causation. It's an old saying and you've been against any processed thing because it's something you couldn't control and got overweight on it. Don't hate because you can't handle.
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
7 -
Perhaps if you linked to peer-reviewed scientific studies proving your point, you would get a better response. One youtube video with one man's opinion is not scientific evidence.
There have been many, many scientific articles that disprove your position.
One of the best sources is here:
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4 -
JstTheWayIam wrote: »quote removed by moderator
Its not a competition. Nobody has won or lost here today. The body of evidence taken as a whole is clear, and will remain clear unless something new is learned. That's why there is no reputable public health organization in the world which condemns artificial sweeteners of any kind. No one study, book, or video will change that, nor will tossing out individual sources on either side.
TLDR: That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.7 -
https://youtu.be/0smauGspMm4
Pay close attention for at least the first few minutes of the video...0 -
Stevia makes me sneeze and tired but its a member of the ragweed family so I figure that's why
Sucralose puts me in a bad mood about 30 minutes after,dunno why
Aspartame I can handle.surprisingly cuz it seems to get the worst press,we're all different in the way things effect us,I can't drink regular soda cuz I makes my stomach burn so I have diet coke as a here and there treat2 -
To the original poster...
Learn to live without the sweeteners, you don't need them. They're just a crutch, soda and refined sugars are terrible for you whether artificial or not...
Do you really think companies like Coca-Cola give a damn about you... No they don't, diet soda is just a scam to take more of your money as cheaply as they can...0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 394 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 939 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions