Where Does All the Misinformation Come From?
Options
Replies
-
Science changes as new research emerges and new facts discovered. Einstein disproved some of Newton's theories. Pluto is no longer a planet. But by and large the worst information comes from companies trying to sell something. We laugh at the old time snake oil sales men going from town to town selling cocaine laced cough syrup but go out and buy the newest "magic" weight loss pill.2
-
99% of misinformation comes from the bodybuilding.com message boards. Then it takes a decade to figure out which ones are real or not. For a long time multiple small meals and fasted state cardio were dogma.2
-
Money. And agendas. Also it seems like people have a tendency to believe that because a certain something worked for them (like eating 6 small meals a day, or cutting out carbs, or whatever) that it is the ONLY thing that works.1
-
Science changes as new research emerges and new facts discovered. Einstein disproved some of Newton's theories. Pluto is no longer a planet. But by and large the worst information comes from companies trying to sell something. We laugh at the old time snake oil sales men going from town to town selling cocaine laced cough syrup but go out and buy the newest "magic" weight loss pill.
I thought it was, again.
https://futurism.com/pluto-reclassified-as-a-major-planet/2 -
Also, many people want a quick fix. It didn't take only a month to gain the weight I'm now trying to lose, and it would be unrealistic of me to believe I can lose that weight in that amount of time. When I began to lose weight, people would ask what/how I did it. I would say by simply counting calories and getting more exercise. Nobody wanted to hear that tho (because as another user mentioned, it's boring and not sexy), and I'd get follow-ups like "Surely you're cutting out bread and pasta, not eating after 5pm, taking raspberry ketones, on diet pills, etc???" Nope, just calories in/calories out, and my progress has been very 'slow and steady'. Their eyes would start to glaze over, lol.3
-
quiksylver296 wrote: »
Pluto is still a "dwarf planet" not one of the eight "major planets."
Check the date of the article:
"Say it with me now, “Yay!” …also, have a happy April Fool’s."
{Not sure if you were joking or being facetious...}
"Pluto is a dwarf planet. A dwarf planet travels around, or orbits, the sun just like other planets. But it is much smaller." -- NASA
See how easy it is to forget about critical thinking and fall for confirmation bias?
Misinformation...1 -
-
Poisonedpawn78 wrote: »
1 -
-
Instant gratification, everyone wants it. Patience, hard work...things I don't see too often in people.
In down 90lbs and I have no secrets. No pills, no fasting, no cleanses, no low carb just simple math and hard work.1 -
5 -
quiksylver296 wrote: »
Pluto is still a "dwarf planet" not one of the eight "major planets."
Check the date of the article:
"Say it with me now, “Yay!” …also, have a happy April Fool’s."
{Not sure if you were joking or being facetious...}
"Pluto is a dwarf planet. A dwarf planet travels around, or orbits, the sun just like other planets. But it is much smaller." -- NASA
See how easy it is to forget about critical thinking and fall for confirmation bias?
Misinformation...
All I heard was "Pluto is a planet." Good enough for me.4 -
quiksylver296 wrote: »All I heard was "Pluto is a planet." Good enough for me.
0 -
14 -
Well, a few months ago the science team of the New Horizons mission did propose a new definition of planet that would include Pluto, but then the Solar System would have hundreds of planets under this definition. The IAU hasn't taken any kind of action on the proposal though, and AFAIK it hasn't even been formally presented to them. I assumed you were thinking of that.1
-
I blame Google. Seriously, how many posts do we see that give some really bad information followed by "just Google it, you'll see it's true"?1
-
From that infographic, I would be wondering why the journal's peer-review group didn't do a better job of vetting the submission.
@rainbowbow I love how the menu very carefully specifies that the lettuce leaves MUST be "small." Because if you put four LARGE lettuce leaves in that dinner salad, you'll just keep gaining weight. XD4 -
MontyMuttland wrote: »No, no, no no no, nonononononono, nooooooooooo !!
There is no such thing as weight by volume.
? Am I missing something? There is such thing as weight per unit volume: it's called density.
Yes, they weren't clear. The objection is that weight-relative terms are used when it's density that's really being compared.
The counter-argument is that 'everybody knows' that when you say X is heavier than Y that you mean equal volumes of X and Y.
Now personally, I'd be ripped a new one if I use heavier and lighter in that way but I came up through a biochemistry and physics track and am still in a branch of science where assumptions and inaccurate terminology are frowned upon.
So would I. But then, I also understand the difference between a casual expression where, in context, the meaning is clear, and technical contexts where absolute clarity is important. I don't know why this should be so difficult for some people, except perhaps they enjoy the opportunity for needless pedantry.6 -
clicketykeys wrote: »From that infographic, I would be wondering why the journal's peer-review group didn't do a better job of vetting the submission.
@rainbowbow I love how the menu very carefully specifies that the lettuce leaves MUST be "small." Because if you put four LARGE lettuce leaves in that dinner salad, you'll just keep gaining weight. XD
Don't forget your DOMINO sugar!3 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »Sabine_Stroehm wrote: »All of the above, and I'll add: some bad "word of mouth" advice. For example, someone looks great, someone else asks *how* they lost the weight. They give an imprecise short hand answer like: "I'm doing atkins. I eat all the fat and protein I want and no carbs". Which, of course, isn't Atkins. And hopefully isn't what they're doing if they think they're doing Atkins.
Or "I lost weight by not eating anything white". WTH?
I just cut my winter weight and I'm trying to get a little lower. A friend of mine asked me what I was doing because I already eat pretty good and exercise regularly. I told them that I just cut back on carbs at dinner on most nights. He said, "that's it...you just don't eat some carbs at night and that's how you lose weight?"
I had to explain to him that there wasn't anything magical about avoiding carbs in the evening but rather, it's just an easy rule for me to follow to put myself in a calorie deficit if everything else remains the same. That and I don't usually drink beer during the week when I'm cutting...but he didn't like that idea very much.
There you go. you were precise with your description! As I knew you would be!1
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392K Introduce Yourself
- 43.6K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 402 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 997 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions