Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Do you think that gluten, lactose, or {insert supposed food intolerance here} is really just a fad?

12345679»

Replies

  • TrinityR05
    TrinityR05 Posts: 77 Member
    it is very real and is not a fad for some people. for others it is a fad. these issues do exist.
  • avadahm
    avadahm Posts: 111 Member
    I work in food. I sell gluten (lots of gluten) products. Also, clean gluten products and products that are for grain free people.

    Yes I think people can be sensitive to things that others aren’t without having a full blown allergy. I’ve experienced it myself (not with gluten). Also, it’s far far easier to just avoid wheat if it messes with you (go gluten free) than to try to find the cause of why you feel like crap when you eat it.

    Is there a bandwagon? Sure. Is everyone on that wagon faking? I don’t think so. But a good portion are likely trying to just feel (and look) good eating food and are willing to try anything to get there.
  • gracie97007
    gracie97007 Posts: 25 Member
    No. I don't. As a parent of a child with Autism, i can tell you that gluten free/casien free foods were a HUGE part in helping him better sense and feel his surroundings. Including helping him to have the sense to feel when he had to urinate and have a BM. HUGE.
  • hannamarie0098
    hannamarie0098 Posts: 85 Member
    Roadie2000 wrote: »
    Do you think it's possible to have a slight reaction to gluten? My wife seems to think her body just can't handle too much of it but it's fine in lower doses.

    More likely it’s the fructans in the wheat that are causing the issue.
  • hannamarie0098
    hannamarie0098 Posts: 85 Member
    edited March 2018
    Steven Gundry, MD, has a book out. I've not read it but according to Gundry, the "70% of the world is allergic to dairy" means they are allergic to a certain type of dairy protein. According to Gundry, US cows are different than European cows. Europe's cows are "A2" protein producing cows exclusively. It's hypothetically thought that this is why the French eat more cheese than anywhere in the world yet have less heart disease (but more cancer because they smoke like chimneys!).

    American Dairy is A1/A2. Our cows have the spots on them. The fact that the cows have the spots is the sign (typically) that they are A1 and A2 both. We react (again according to Gundry) from the A1 proteins. This is why many people that are lactose intolerant have no issues with sheep/goat milk. Sheep/goat milk is A2 proteins exclusively too.

    There is now available (in most grocery stores) A2 milk. It's more expensive but only the A2 variety proteins (from the same types of cows in Europe). There's a yogurt company in OH that is now producing exclusively A2 yogurt from grass fed cows.

    Lactose intolerance is exactly that, an intolerance to the sugar lactose. Cows milk allergy is completely different and relates to proteins. The two are distinct issues and shouldn’t be confused. I am lactose intolerant, I am not allergic to cows milk. Lactose intolerance is often dosage dependant, with different products affecting people in different measures because they contain more or less fat, with lactose being insoluble in fat and therefore present in smaller amounts in higher fat products.
  • HoneyBadger302
    HoneyBadger302 Posts: 2,063 Member
    Lactose intolerance is definitely real. I was BORN lactose intolerant, at the time it took them 3 months to figure out why I was such a sick, cranky baby. Once they figured it out, and was put on a lactose free diet, I was quite a normal baby (from what my mother tells me anyways).

    My mother has a number of food allergies, and is gluten sensitive, but has discovered through trial and error over many years that in very limited quantities, most of the things are okay for her to indulge in (sometimes with bathroom consequences if she over does it). She went through a number of tests many years ago for celiac after a nutritionist (through an elimination diet) determined that gluten was an issue for her. She never did test positive for it, but she definitely felt better eliminating it from her diet at the time.

    That being said, I've seen a LOT of people where it's just a fad with the usual placebo effects.

    Either way, to each their own. As long as someone isn't trying to force their eating choices on me, if they are being relatively healthy, I fail to see why I should expend energy on trying to dissuade them.
  • mph323
    mph323 Posts: 3,565 Member
    nvmomketo wrote: »
    Lean59man wrote: »
    Only 1% of the population is actually gluten sensitive.

    So...yes, it's a fad.

    It's actually just over 1% that is a celiac. Most estimates I see for gluten sensitivity are between 5 and 30%.

    IMO, gluten-free foods for weight loss is a fad. A GF diet to address health problems is not.

    This! My cousin was diagnosed with celiac disease in the mid-70's, and her doctor did months of tests and research trying to figure out what was wrong because gluten issues just weren't a thing. At that time she was the first patient he had ever seen or knew about personally with celiac disease. I'm not sure why it's suddenly became the diet of the decade, except I suppose it's so restrictive and people tend to drift toward that type of thing when they feel out of control around food.
  • nvmomketo
    nvmomketo Posts: 12,019 Member
    mph323 wrote: »
    nvmomketo wrote: »
    Lean59man wrote: »
    Only 1% of the population is actually gluten sensitive.

    So...yes, it's a fad.

    It's actually just over 1% that is a celiac. Most estimates I see for gluten sensitivity are between 5 and 30%.

    IMO, gluten-free foods for weight loss is a fad. A GF diet to address health problems is not.

    This! My cousin was diagnosed with celiac disease in the mid-70's, and her doctor did months of tests and research trying to figure out what was wrong because gluten issues just weren't a thing. At that time she was the first patient he had ever seen or knew about personally with celiac disease. I'm not sure why it's suddenly became the diet of the decade, except I suppose it's so restrictive and people tend to drift toward that type of thing when they feel out of control around food.

    I think it was a perfect storm. There were a couple of celebrity's who were diagnosed about 10 years ago, and then there were a few books that resonated with people - like Wheat Belly.

    I think it caught on because there is a large enough minority that feel better GF so that it became profitable to make GF products... Maybe they were replacing the Low-fat void that was growing?
  • stanmann571
    stanmann571 Posts: 5,727 Member
    Caeliac is often the only "legitimate" illness mentioned but that is a grossly myopic view.

    Many autoimmune diseases, particularly those that involve inflammatory responses are exacerbated by high gluten foods--so yes, there is some merit to claiming gluten sensitivity, and therefore avoiding those foods.

    Many, if not all, of these illnesses affect mobility, mental health, GI stability and thereby indirectly cause weight gain among patients--so yes, you can be gluten sensitive and overweight/obese.

    Again, the myopia surrounding this topic is ridiculous.

    Some varieties of some subsets of autoimmune may be exacerbated by gluten. And some are not.
    Some varieties of some subsets of autoimmune may be exacerbated by meat. And some are not.
    Some varieties of some subsets of autoimmune may be exacerbated by rice. And some are not.

    This is a highly specific and personal subject out of 5 Lupus patients, one may get relief from cutting out gluten, one may get worse, and the other 3 have no noticeable change.

    Making blanket sweeping statements based on other people's experience leads to eating nothing and starving to death.
  • CharisSunny
    CharisSunny Posts: 276 Member
    Caeliac is often the only "legitimate" illness mentioned but that is a grossly myopic view.

    Many autoimmune diseases, particularly those that involve inflammatory responses are exacerbated by high gluten foods--so yes, there is some merit to claiming gluten sensitivity, and therefore avoiding those foods.

    Many, if not all, of these illnesses affect mobility, mental health, GI stability and thereby indirectly cause weight gain among patients--so yes, you can be gluten sensitive and overweight/obese.

    Again, the myopia surrounding this topic is ridiculous.

    Some varieties of some subsets of autoimmune may be exacerbated by gluten. And some are not.
    Some varieties of some subsets of autoimmune may be exacerbated by meat. And some are not.
    Some varieties of some subsets of autoimmune may be exacerbated by rice. And some are not.

    This is a highly specific and personal subject out of 5 Lupus patients, one may get relief from cutting out gluten, one may get worse, and the other 3 have no noticeable change.

    Making blanket sweeping statements based on other people's experience leads to eating nothing and starving to death.

    The word "many" implies "not all" i.e. not sweeping.
    Stating that gluten sensitivity is a farce is sweeping.
    I, as the scientist that I am, have ensured that I have not swept.
  • Lean59man
    Lean59man Posts: 714 Member
    It's not a farce and it is real but it is also a fad for the majority of people who buy gluten free products.

    If just actual gluten sensitive people bought these products the makers wouldn't sell them because they would not have enough consumers to make a profit.

    Similar fads are organic foods, veganism, vegetarianisn, yoga, and anything Gwyneth Paltrow promotes.
  • Carry_That_Weight
    Carry_That_Weight Posts: 27 Member
    Guys ... okay I only read pages 1 and 13, but people know there is a difference between an allergy and an intolerance right?

    Lactose intolerance is not an allergy to lactose, as in your immune system doesn't start attacking you or producing some crazy histamine response because you ate some yogurt. Intolerances generally develop from not producing - or under-producing - the enzymes needed to digest something particular, in this case the 5-carbon sugar lactose (the corresponding enzyme is lactase). It's entirely possible to have these intolerances vary in severity over the course of your life.

    Many people with IBS are told to avoid high FODMAP foods, for instance, which are generally short-chain carbohydrates that aren't digested very well. I'm not well-read enough on the gluten (which is a protein) issue, but it seems entirely plausible that people can have difficulty digesting these things to varying degrees. That doesn't mean these people are faking any sort of allergy, just that their bowels work a little better if they don't eat a whole lot of them.

    Now, gluten really does seem (to me) to be blown out of proportion. Also, I doubt a lot of the religiously gluten-free crowd would recognize this distinction between allergy and intolerance. And as some sort of weight loss aid, it's entirely a fad. Unless you don't replace the bread you would have eaten with something else.
  • stanmann571
    stanmann571 Posts: 5,727 Member
    Caeliac is often the only "legitimate" illness mentioned but that is a grossly myopic view.

    Many autoimmune diseases, particularly those that involve inflammatory responses are exacerbated by high gluten foods--so yes, there is some merit to claiming gluten sensitivity, and therefore avoiding those foods.

    Many, if not all, of these illnesses affect mobility, mental health, GI stability and thereby indirectly cause weight gain among patients--so yes, you can be gluten sensitive and overweight/obese.

    Again, the myopia surrounding this topic is ridiculous.

    Some varieties of some subsets of autoimmune may be exacerbated by gluten. And some are not.
    Some varieties of some subsets of autoimmune may be exacerbated by meat. And some are not.
    Some varieties of some subsets of autoimmune may be exacerbated by rice. And some are not.

    This is a highly specific and personal subject out of 5 Lupus patients, one may get relief from cutting out gluten, one may get worse, and the other 3 have no noticeable change.

    Making blanket sweeping statements based on other people's experience leads to eating nothing and starving to death.

    The word "many" implies "not all" i.e. not sweeping.
    Stating that gluten sensitivity is a farce is sweeping.
    I, as the scientist that I am, have ensured that I have not swept.

    Many is a massive overstatement of the case... and thus... is sweeping. It's nothing like many. At best it's another 2-3% in addition to the 1% that are celiac. Suggesting avoidance with no testing is why we get 15 people a week asking how to stop drinking diet soda. Something else that is not harmful to 95% or more of the population and yet the farcical hype recommend avoiding Just in Case.
  • jenilla1
    jenilla1 Posts: 11,118 Member
    amlelas68 wrote: »
    I have Celiac and over weight. I was thin as a child and can remember my mother telling me stand up suck that gut in you look 6 months pregnant. Well testing was not all available. Not all test are accurate either as it took a test 2 times and it took like years to figure out that there was something going on. Trust me there are days and wake up and want to just run down the street and grab and yummy hamburger from time to time. So for me it certainly is not a FAD- Its how i have to eat or I am severely sick and in so much pain for days. I am glad there are products now that are GF and I feel so much better now.

    I agree, and I think that it's great that GF is a fad. Not sure why so many people are offended about it. Who cares if some people eat GF for silly reasons? It's not harmful if your diet is otherwise balanced. I couldn't care less. Live and let live.

    This fad means more stuff is available for people like me to eat. I only eat processed GF foods occasionally as a convenience or as a treat, but it's nice to have them available. I especially appreciate the new flour blends, since I love to bake and I wasn't able to enjoy that for a long time. Most of the food I eat is naturally GF, though.

    I have to say that there are NEVER days that I am tempted to eat gluten containing foods. The years that I was sick were so miserable that I don't even miss that stuff. (TMI: near-constant nausea with occasional vomiting out both ends.)

    The one thing that is kind of ridiculous for the normal person, though, is going GF as a weight loss strategy. LOL. I guess it could help if you are used to eating a lot of bread, etc., and the GF diet forces you to cut that out (as long as you don't use GF replacement products to fill in. That would defeat the purpose.) So yeah, don't bother.

    P.S. I didn't lose any weight when I went GF, I was already at the low end of my healthy BMI because I was sick all the time, but I did lose a pant size as the chronic bloat went away.
  • This content has been removed.
  • fb47
    fb47 Posts: 1,058 Member
    I find Keto and IF to be a major fad. I find people embark in diets not because they enjoy it, but because "they heard this from <insert_some_doctor's_name>" claim miracle weight loss or heard from people that it works for them instead of doing those diets because they enjoy it. Many of them embark in these fat loss journey with the rejection of the notion of CICO and put too much faith in diets. As for Gluten, I saw the news talk about it and interview people and the answer many were saying in general "We're not gluten intolerant, but we buy these products, because everyone is doing it these days" :roll_eyes: . In general, humans like to mimic other humans, it's nature I guess.
  • nvmomketo
    nvmomketo Posts: 12,019 Member
    fb47 wrote: »
    I find Keto and IF to be a major fad. I find people embark in diets not because they enjoy it, but because "they heard this from <insert_some_doctor's_name>" claim miracle weight loss or heard from people that it works for them instead of doing those diets because they enjoy it. Many of them embark in these fat loss journey with the rejection of the notion of CICO and put too much faith in diets. As for Gluten, I saw the news talk about it and interview people and the answer many were saying in general "We're not gluten intolerant, but we buy these products, because everyone is doing it these days" :roll_eyes: . In general, humans like to mimic other humans, it's nature I guess.

    IF and keto aren't food intolerances, although keto can be used to treat carbohydrate intolerance/insulin resistance. Both are very popular right now though, so I suppose you could call it fad or even a trend.
  • shaumom
    shaumom Posts: 1,003 Member
    edited March 2018
    Now, gluten really does seem (to me) to be blown out of proportion. Also, I doubt a lot of the religiously gluten-free crowd would recognize this distinction between allergy and intolerance.

    As a small defense of gluten free folks not understanding difference between intolerances and allergies - that's in large part because the experts, aka the doctors, by and large have REALLY screwed it up when it comes to celiac disease and gluten intolerance. And if they can't get it right, how is a layperson supposed to, at least without a huge amount of research?

    Because first, you have celiac disease, named during WWII, a time when all the docs knew was that it involved a food and the immune system. So...must be an allergy, right? And that's where the term 'gluten allergy' came from: an incorrect naming of a disease before it was completely understood (There actually IS no such thing as a gluten allergy - gluten is a collective name for more than one protein. So person can be allergic to all the proteins that are included under the gluten umbrella, but it'd be more accurate to say someone had a 'wheat, rye, and barley' allergy).

    The problem is, some doctors STILL call celiac disease a gluten allergy today, when telling their patients what they are diagnosed with, so many people start to think that celiac disease is a gluten allergy, when it's not.

    And many doctors will use the term 'celiac disease' and 'gluten intolerance' interchangeably, when again, they are not the same thing at all.

    And then on top of that, with doctors sometimes calling celiac disease an allergy, and sometimes calling gluten intolerance celiac disease, it's not surprising that it has now become common to hear gluten allergy and gluten intolerance ALSO used interchangeably. Even by some of the doctors.

    It's so bad that during one international meeting a few years back, that was discussing the disease, they were trying to standardize what to call celiac disease so that doctors would stop just tossing out whatever term they felt like. :|

    So while I do find it really frustrating when people mix up intolerance and allergy, when it comes to gluten, I think there is a pretty good excuse for the layperson to be confused about the difference.
  • Carry_That_Weight
    Carry_That_Weight Posts: 27 Member
    shaumom wrote: »
    So while I do find it really frustrating when people mix up intolerance and allergy, when it comes to gluten, I think there is a pretty good excuse for the layperson to be confused about the difference.

    That's certainly true. I live with a bunch of doctors. I know they can't specialize in everything - but they have no, none, zero training in nutrition, metabolism, etc outside of whatever specific disorders like diabetes they might have covered. And from conversations with them, while some medical schools are starting to incorporate it into their curricula, the vast majority don't. So they're stuck listening to whatever deluge of diet and nutrition information comes their way too, although I'm sure they have a better chemistry/biology background than the average person through which to filter that information.

    Ya know, I was going to say more things but I think it basically comes down to science literacy being in a sorry state right now.
  • stanmann571
    stanmann571 Posts: 5,727 Member
    In defense of doctors, From the perspective of a patient. There are clinical and treatment differences between an allergy, an aversion, and an intolerance. Most notably that an epi pen won't help you if you've got a life threatening intolerance or aversion. But when it comes to things that are voluntarily put in your mouth, They are in fact the same. Just don't do it.

    I have an aversion to NSAIDS. That matters to my allergist and to me. It doesn't matter at all when engaging with my GP for pain management. Aspirin-Nope can't take it, Motrin, Naproxen, etc. Nope.
  • anglyn1
    anglyn1 Posts: 1,802 Member
    It's also possible that people know what they have isn't truly an allergy but say allergy to the waiter because when restaurant staff hears allergic they think liability. When they hear intolerance they just think this special snowflake is on a fad diet, she'll never know the difference. I'm not condoning lying about something as serious as a food allergy just saying I know why some people do it.
  • CBD92
    CBD92 Posts: 72 Member
    I can't speak for gluten intolerance. I'm on the fence with that one. But lactose intolerance is a very real thing and a lot more people are lactose intolerant than you'd think. Everyone produced lactase (the enzyme responsible for digesting lactose which is milk sugar) when they're babies and they produce a lot of it to help with digesting breast milk. As you get older, you produce less and less of it as the body no longer solely relies on milk. Some people still produce enough to digest lactose without causing any negative symptoms but others don't so it's very hard to digest anything with dairy. Lactose intolerance is very different than a dairy allergy, but still a very real thing and definitely not a fad.
  • VUA21
    VUA21 Posts: 2,072 Member
    99% of the time: yes

    There are people who have Celiac disease, who are truly lactose intolerant (I'm one of them, it sucks!!!!), and who have other food allergies/intolerances (nuts & shellfish are the most common).