Crossfit for Heavier Beginners?

Is it do able or should I wait until I drop some weight first?
«1

Replies

  • Reaver_P90X
    Reaver_P90X Posts: 7 Member
    It is doable! Most all crossfit can be scaled to accommodate anyones ability level. No better time than the present to get started!
  • rybo
    rybo Posts: 5,424 Member
    It is definitely doable. Talk to and research the places you are thinking about going to and that should make you feel a bit more comfortable about starting. It's scalable for any fitness level
  • MikeinNOLA
    MikeinNOLA Posts: 91 Member
    Do it!!
  • SonyaCele
    SonyaCele Posts: 2,841 Member
    do it
  • DamieBird
    DamieBird Posts: 651 Member
    Totally do-able. I don't CF anymore, but I did it for about three years and my gym had all types of people getting great workouts. You'll see a lot a people who have the typical "cf look", but you'll also see a TON of people who are older, heavier, more out of shape, or all three. Talk to the members of whatever gym you're thinking about and ask the coaches about their scaling. You can get a good workout as you are now, in whatever condition that is :).
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    It's possible to scale it down, but then it's just circuit training, not CF (which is probably a plus). It's up to you to decide if you want to pay a crossfit premium for something that isn't crossfit.
  • rybo
    rybo Posts: 5,424 Member
    Azdak wrote: »
    It's possible to scale it down, but then it's just circuit training, not CF (which is probably a plus). It's up to you to decide if you want to pay a crossfit premium for something that isn't crossfit.

    How does scaling make it "not crossfit"?
  • bobshuckleberry
    bobshuckleberry Posts: 281 Member
    I am 5"2" and 188 and 49 years old. I just started crossfit with my daughter. There are modifications for things you are not able to do yet. The box we go to has very helpful coaches and members. If you want to try it see if they have a free trial. That's what we did.
  • MilesAddie
    MilesAddie Posts: 166 Member
    You should absolutely give it a shot as you are right now!

    Any good coach will be able to take the workout and 'scale' (adapt) it to movements that you can do at your current level of fitness.
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    rybo wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    It's possible to scale it down, but then it's just circuit training, not CF (which is probably a plus). It's up to you to decide if you want to pay a crossfit premium for something that isn't crossfit.

    How does scaling make it "not crossfit"?

    High-intensity is a fundamental part of crossfit. If someone can't do the intensity, then it's really just random circuit training.

    It's like people saying they're doing "tabata planks".

    Certainly if someone's goal is to do crossfit, it would be worthwhile to start there at a low level and work your way up. But if not, I was just pointing out that it's an expensive way to do basic conditioning.
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    rybo wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    It's possible to scale it down, but then it's just circuit training, not CF (which is probably a plus). It's up to you to decide if you want to pay a crossfit premium for something that isn't crossfit.

    How does scaling make it "not crossfit"?

    High-intensity is a fundamental part of crossfit. If someone can't do the intensity, then it's really just random circuit training.

    It's like people saying they're doing "tabata planks".

    Certainly if someone's goal is to do crossfit, it would be worthwhile to start there at a low level and work your way up. But if not, I was just pointing out that it's an expensive way to do basic conditioning.

    Intensity is relative. Scaling allows the individual to perform at the appropriate intensity level for their fitness. It's not random circuit training. And crossfit is a lot more than just conditioning, there is strength work, depending on the individual box programming, it could be fairly significant.

    Resistance and workload may be relative, but intensity is not. 80% intensity is 80% intensity-- for one it might mean lifting 50lbs and another 200lbs, but the effect on each body will still be 80%.

    The only way you can "scale" the workload for someone who is less fit is to decrease the intensity and likely the volume. And once you do that---it's not crossfit. It's circuit training designed to condition someone so that they can do crossfit.

    Crossfit defines itself as focused on "constantly varied, high-intensity, functional movement". Now a facility can expand its services to include other things as accessories to crossfit, but these are not unique to that business.

    Again, I am only making the point that someone starting out who is likely not conditioned to do crossfit does not have to pay a premium to go to a CF facility to go through that conditioning process. (Actually I'm not even doing that anymore--this is just for fun).


  • rybo
    rybo Posts: 5,424 Member
    Crossfit is not defined by a particular intensity level, that's pretty laughable. 79% intensity, nope, not crossfit yet...80.5% yay! Welcome to crossfit!
  • stanmann571
    stanmann571 Posts: 5,727 Member
    edited August 2017
    Azdak wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    It's possible to scale it down, but then it's just circuit training, not CF (which is probably a plus). It's up to you to decide if you want to pay a crossfit premium for something that isn't crossfit.

    How does scaling make it "not crossfit"?

    High-intensity is a fundamental part of crossfit. If someone can't do the intensity, then it's really just random circuit training.

    It's like people saying they're doing "tabata planks".

    Certainly if someone's goal is to do crossfit, it would be worthwhile to start there at a low level and work your way up. But if not, I was just pointing out that it's an expensive way to do basic conditioning.

    Intensity is relative. Scaling allows the individual to perform at the appropriate intensity level for their fitness. It's not random circuit training. And crossfit is a lot more than just conditioning, there is strength work, depending on the individual box programming, it could be fairly significant.

    Resistance and workload may be relative, but intensity is not. 80% intensity is 80% intensity-- for one it might mean lifting 50lbs and another 200lbs, but the effect on each body will still be 80%.

    You're confused
    The only way you can "scale" the workload for someone who is less fit is to decrease the intensity and likely the volume. And once you do that---it's not crossfit. It's circuit training designed to condition someone so that they can do crossfit.

    If 80% intensity for A is walking 100 meters and picking up a broom stick 10 times and 80% intensity for B is sprinting 400 meters and snatching 100 kilos 10 times

    That's called scaling intensity.
  • MilesAddie
    MilesAddie Posts: 166 Member

    [/quote]

    If 80% intensity for A is walking 100 meters and picking up a broom stick 10 times and 80% intensity for B is sprinting 400 meters and snatching 100 kilos 10 times

    That's called scaling intensity.[/quote]

    100% agree with this. We had two brand new people join our group yesterday, and Toes 2 Bar were in the WOD. Both of the newcomers needed to scale, one subbed V-ups and the other hanging knee raises. Just because they could not do the T2B because of the difficulty of the movement did not mean they didn't participate in CrossFit. They were both drenched in sweat and on the floor like the rest of us at the end of it. I sure wouldn't tell them they did it with 'low intensity'.
  • KarenSmith2018
    KarenSmith2018 Posts: 302 Member
    Crossfit is for everyone no matter what your level of physical fitness is at the current time. All the workouts are scaleable to enable you to push yourself to your maximum whatever that may be. Do not be intimidated by those that are deadlifting 100kg when you can't (yet!) Crossfit is about giving your all whatever that may be. and the next time giving your all, and the next time etc etc until you can deadlift 100kg and the newbies are looking up to you. Crossfit is constantly varied functional fitness. its also so much more than that: its community, its family, its having the box cheer you on to finish the WOD, its everyone celebrating your PB and its the social BBQs outside of the box.
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    Azdak wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    It's possible to scale it down, but then it's just circuit training, not CF (which is probably a plus). It's up to you to decide if you want to pay a crossfit premium for something that isn't crossfit.

    How does scaling make it "not crossfit"?

    High-intensity is a fundamental part of crossfit. If someone can't do the intensity, then it's really just random circuit training.

    It's like people saying they're doing "tabata planks".

    Certainly if someone's goal is to do crossfit, it would be worthwhile to start there at a low level and work your way up. But if not, I was just pointing out that it's an expensive way to do basic conditioning.

    Intensity is relative. Scaling allows the individual to perform at the appropriate intensity level for their fitness. It's not random circuit training. And crossfit is a lot more than just conditioning, there is strength work, depending on the individual box programming, it could be fairly significant.

    Resistance and workload may be relative, but intensity is not. 80% intensity is 80% intensity-- for one it might mean lifting 50lbs and another 200lbs, but the effect on each body will still be 80%.

    You're confused
    The only way you can "scale" the workload for someone who is less fit is to decrease the intensity and likely the volume. And once you do that---it's not crossfit. It's circuit training designed to condition someone so that they can do crossfit.

    If 80% intensity for A is walking 100 meters and picking up a broom stick 10 times and 80% intensity for B is sprinting 400 meters and snatching 100 kilos 10 times

    That's called scaling intensity.

    No, that is setting different workloads to achieve the same intensity for persons of different fitness levels.

    Workload and intensity are two different things. The words are not interchangeable.

  • Penthesilea514
    Penthesilea514 Posts: 1,189 Member
    edited August 2017
    Because I was curious about this discussion and wanted to learn more about the distinctions being discussed, I found a few interesting articles.

    http://www.livestrong.com/article/545984-relative-vs-absolute-exercise-intensity/

    http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/training/what-is-training-intensity.html/

    ETA: I think if you want to try Crossfit, then do it, OP. I have never done Crossfit before, however, so I can't offer specific advice about the workouts.
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    rybo wrote: »
    Crossfit is not defined by a particular intensity level, that's pretty laughable. 79% intensity, nope, not crossfit yet...80.5% yay! Welcome to crossfit!


    " Bike, run, swim, row, etc, hard and fast. Five or six days per week mix these elements in as many combinations and patterns as creativity will allow. Routine is the enemy. Keep workouts short and intense. " --Gary Glassman

    Maybe he doesn't know what Crossfit is either.
  • stanmann571
    stanmann571 Posts: 5,727 Member
    edited August 2017
    rybo wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    Crossfit is not defined by a particular intensity level, that's pretty laughable. 79% intensity, nope, not crossfit yet...80.5% yay! Welcome to crossfit!


    " Bike, run, swim, row, etc, hard and fast. Five or six days per week mix these elements in as many combinations and patterns as creativity will allow. Routine is the enemy. Keep workouts short and intense. " --Gary Glassman

    Maybe he doesn't know what Crossfit is either.

    You aren't supporting your case.
    100% intensity for a person of low fitness is still 100% intensity...for them. What particular movements they do or pace at which they are able to perform them, is going to be vastly different from someone who is highly trained. That doesn't mean they aren't trying or working out with intensity. I don't know how to make it any simpler.

    I suspect he's really not even trying.
    Azdak wrote: »
    . (Actually I'm not even doing that anymore--this is just for fun).


  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    rybo wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    Crossfit is not defined by a particular intensity level, that's pretty laughable. 79% intensity, nope, not crossfit yet...80.5% yay! Welcome to crossfit!


    " Bike, run, swim, row, etc, hard and fast. Five or six days per week mix these elements in as many combinations and patterns as creativity will allow. Routine is the enemy. Keep workouts short and intense. " --Gary Glassman

    Maybe he doesn't know what Crossfit is either.

    You aren't supporting your case.
    100% intensity for a person of low fitness is still 100% intensity...for them. What particular movements they do or pace at which they are able to perform them, is going to be vastly different from someone who is highly trained. That doesn't mean they aren't trying or working out with intensity. I don't know how to make it any simpler.


    Let's review:

    Me: "High intensity is a fundamental part of "crossfit'"

    You: "intensity is relative--'scaling' allow the individual to perform at the appropriate intensity level for their fitness"

    Me: That's changing workload, not intensity. "intensity" is working at a certain percentage of maximum. "Workload" is the resistance, weight, speed, etc necessary to achieve an "intensity".

    You: "Crossfit is not defined by a particular intensity level"

    Me: Per the founder of crossfit, "high intensity" is listed several times in his statement defining crossfit.

    You: "100% intensity for a person of low fitness is still 100% for them"

    Me: ??? That is totally irrelevant to the thread of discussion. And it directly contradicts what you said earlier.

    I'm still not sure you understand the difference between "workload" and "intensity".

    Actually, your first answer was the best one for the OP. I'm the one who derailed the discussion.

  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    rybo wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    Crossfit is not defined by a particular intensity level, that's pretty laughable. 79% intensity, nope, not crossfit yet...80.5% yay! Welcome to crossfit!


    " Bike, run, swim, row, etc, hard and fast. Five or six days per week mix these elements in as many combinations and patterns as creativity will allow. Routine is the enemy. Keep workouts short and intense. " --Gary Glassman

    Maybe he doesn't know what Crossfit is either.

    You aren't supporting your case.
    100% intensity for a person of low fitness is still 100% intensity...for them. What particular movements they do or pace at which they are able to perform them, is going to be vastly different from someone who is highly trained. That doesn't mean they aren't trying or working out with intensity. I don't know how to make it any simpler.

    I suspect he's really not even trying.
    Azdak wrote: »
    . (Actually I'm not even doing that anymore--this is just for fun).


    Au contraire mon frere.

    I may not be serious about crossfit (I mean, who can be, really), but I am serious about language and fitness terms (even though this is still just for fun--and by "fun", I mean a friendly argument).
  • rybo
    rybo Posts: 5,424 Member
    Azdak wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    Crossfit is not defined by a particular intensity level, that's pretty laughable. 79% intensity, nope, not crossfit yet...80.5% yay! Welcome to crossfit!


    " Bike, run, swim, row, etc, hard and fast. Five or six days per week mix these elements in as many combinations and patterns as creativity will allow. Routine is the enemy. Keep workouts short and intense. " --Gary Glassman

    Maybe he doesn't know what Crossfit is either.

    You aren't supporting your case.
    100% intensity for a person of low fitness is still 100% intensity...for them. What particular movements they do or pace at which they are able to perform them, is going to be vastly different from someone who is highly trained. That doesn't mean they aren't trying or working out with intensity. I don't know how to make it any simpler.


    You: "intensity is relative--'scaling' allow the individual to perform at the appropriate intensity level for their fitness"

    Me: That's changing workload, not intensity. "intensity" is working at a certain percentage of maximum. "Workload" is the resistance, weight, speed, etc necessary to achieve an "intensity".
    These 2 statements say the same thing.
    I say that scaling is how you adjust the workout to set the intensity.
    You say that adjusting workload is how you set the intensity.

    Are you trying to say that a beginner cannot work to a high enough percentage of their maximum for it to be called "high intensity"?

  • CJ_Holmes
    CJ_Holmes Posts: 759 Member
    Hi OP! If you want to do CrossFit, you absolutely can! Find a good coach who ramps you up with a structured beginner program and helps you scale the workouts. My box has folks of all sizes who started from all places, and everyone gets stronger and faster! One of my favorite things about CF is that there is endless room for growth and so I never get bored. Have fun!
  • Grimmerick
    Grimmerick Posts: 3,342 Member
    edited August 2017
    Working at a spine clinic I see A LOT of crossfitters (well temporarily out of commission) Cross fit is a great work out sure but I would stress the importance of making sure you get with someone who really cares about and understands proper body mechanics when working out and not pushing yourself to the point where you get injured for results. We see that a lot and it's really hard to maintain working out and eating at a deficit when you're sitting at home laid up or in a docs office because you screwed up your back, knees,neck or shoulders. That's really for any training program but we seem to see crossfitters the most.
  • Keladelphia
    Keladelphia Posts: 820 Member
    OP I started crossfit at the very beginning of my fitness journey weighing 200+ pounds and did it the entire time I lost the weight. It's totally doable now; a good CF facility should be able to scale to any fitness level.
  • PWRLFTR1
    PWRLFTR1 Posts: 324 Member
    If you have a trainer that will work with your limitations, then yes do it.
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    rybo wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    Crossfit is not defined by a particular intensity level, that's pretty laughable. 79% intensity, nope, not crossfit yet...80.5% yay! Welcome to crossfit!


    " Bike, run, swim, row, etc, hard and fast. Five or six days per week mix these elements in as many combinations and patterns as creativity will allow. Routine is the enemy. Keep workouts short and intense. " --Gary Glassman

    Maybe he doesn't know what Crossfit is either.

    You aren't supporting your case.
    100% intensity for a person of low fitness is still 100% intensity...for them. What particular movements they do or pace at which they are able to perform them, is going to be vastly different from someone who is highly trained. That doesn't mean they aren't trying or working out with intensity. I don't know how to make it any simpler.


    You: "intensity is relative--'scaling' allow the individual to perform at the appropriate intensity level for their fitness"

    Me: That's changing workload, not intensity. "intensity" is working at a certain percentage of maximum. "Workload" is the resistance, weight, speed, etc necessary to achieve an "intensity".
    These 2 statements say the same thing.
    I say that scaling is how you adjust the workout to set the intensity.
    You say that adjusting workload is how you set the intensity.

    Are you trying to say that a beginner cannot work to a high enough percentage of their maximum for it to be called "high intensity"?

    I think we are just getting bogged down in the semantics of the words "intensity", "workload", and "scaling". By using "intensity" imprecisely, it makes it sound like you are saying two different things.

    You can adjust a workload, to allow 2 people of different fitness levels to work at the same intensity (for them).

    You can change a workload,movement, etc to reduce the intensity of the workout so that a beginner or someone with less fitness/stamina can do a stripped down version of the workout while they improve their fitness and endurance.

    Both could be referred to as "scaling" the workout, but they are completely different things.

    In scenario A, the goal might be to squat at 80% intensity. For Guy 1, that might be 160 pounds; for Bro 1, that might be 280 lbs. Both are working at 80%, it feels roughly the same for both, but they are doing different workloads. You have "scaled" the workload, but not the intensity.

    In scenario B, the goal is to work at 80% effort for the following circuit: box jumps, row, and kettle bell snatch. Bro 1 can do all three at 80% effort. Average Guy doesn't have the ability or endurance to do those, so he does the following: step up, row, push press. Since he is fairly new, we have him work at 60% effort. You have "scaled" both the workload and the intensity, but in a different way than for scenario A. In this case, "scaling" means something different--the workouts are different.

    So when you say "intensity is relative" and then talk about "scaling", to me you are referring to scenario B. And I am referring to scenario A. So when you say our "2 statements say the same thing", I keep going back and rereading your comment to see if I misinterpreted it.

    And I'm still not sure. That's why I like to be consistent with these terms.