Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

American-seniors-are-sicker-than-global-peers story.

GaleHawkins
GaleHawkins Posts: 8,160 Member
https://cbsnews.com/news/american-seniors-are-sicker-than-global-peers/

Is it just due to the way we think, eat and move that makes us sicker than our peers in other industrialized nations?
«1345

Replies

  • Alatariel75
    Alatariel75 Posts: 17,959 Member
    I'd be interested to know the impact on healthcare systems on these stats...
  • Packerjohn
    Packerjohn Posts: 4,855 Member
    bpetrosky wrote: »
    If only those seniors walked a quarter mile a day, and found their one true macro they'd be so much healthier.

    What is "their one true macro"?
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    edited November 2017
    bpetrosky wrote: »
    If only those seniors walked a quarter mile a day, and found their one true macro they'd be so much healthier.

    Yep that would be a game changer for sure.

    That's running about 15 miles per week at a 10 min mile, or 7.5 miles per week at a 20 min mile pace (if that counts as exercise for the purposes of this recommendation). .25 miles per day would be clearly below the recommendation.

    Fruits and veg are mostly carbs. I'd suggest that they are an excellent part of a balanced diet involving all three macros.
  • jgnatca
    jgnatca Posts: 14,464 Member
    Cool data! One of my things.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2240855/How-does-nation-rank-world-map-life-expectancy.html

    Glad I’m Canadian. I’m pretty sure our obesity rates are on par with the US.
  • jgnatca
    jgnatca Posts: 14,464 Member
  • Christine_72
    Christine_72 Posts: 16,049 Member
    bpetrosky wrote: »
    If only those seniors walked a quarter mile a day, and found their one true macro they'd be so much healthier.

    Yep that would be a game changer for sure.

    Whooosh!

    I don't think so. .. :wink:

  • jgnatca
    jgnatca Posts: 14,464 Member
    I think US results get skewed because the country is not homogenous. There are definite haves and have nots.

    The yellow counties in this map are much healthier. Ask yourself what makes them different.

    http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/usa/life-expectancy-by-county
  • tomteboda
    tomteboda Posts: 2,171 Member
    jgnatca wrote: »
    I think US results get skewed because the country is not homogenous. There are definite haves and have nots.

    The yellow counties in this map are much healthier. Ask yourself what makes them different.

    http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/usa/life-expectancy-by-county

    I'll bite. Why is rural Minnesota so very yellow?
  • PAFC84
    PAFC84 Posts: 1,871 Member
    I thought this was a thread about old people being disgusting. I declare myself disappointed and take my leave
  • jesspen91
    jesspen91 Posts: 1,383 Member
    Along the lines of how healthcare fits into this could overdiagnosing and prescribing figure into this too? I'm not from the US but surely the privatised model insentivises doctors to prescribe medication and therefore diagnose people with health problems that in other other countries might just be lumped in with 'getting old'

    This is starting to happen in the UK as more private companies are getting involved with the NHS. Statins are pretty much routinely prescribed to over 70s even though the rationale for this is weak. Many older people take so many pills that they can't remember what is for what ailment. Surely that is a dangerous way to live.
  • jgnatca
    jgnatca Posts: 14,464 Member
    @tomteboda I have to check out Minnesota. Fresh air?