Anyone have an insta-pot? Thoughts?
Replies
-
Any idea why they say,"If you instant release it, it makes the meat quite tough."1
-
I love mine. But I also batch cook and hate spending any time on cooking (it would be less useful for the gourmet cook). I can toss the entire 40 oz package of frozen chicken, large pork loin, etc in there and have it be done in like 30-40 minutes, and ready to be divvied up into baggies or made into BBQ pulled pork, etc. Soup/stew/chili is quick. If using 1 lb or less of beef, it can be seared right in the pot (I find I need the larger surface area of the stove pans if 2 lb of beef).0
-
Any idea why they say,"If you instant release it, it makes the meat quite tough."
That was always my guess too.0 -
Any idea why they say,"If you instant release it, it makes the meat quite tough."
I assume it's like cutting immediately into a steak when you take it off the grill - all the juices run right out, and that's why you're supposed to let meat rest. With the NPR on an Instant Pot, it allows the juices to distribute and the pressure to release normally, not have some of it sucked right out of the meat as it is quick released.
2 -
.. and I can easily add dried beans, lentils into my soups and chili with no added effort.0
-
WinoGelato wrote: »Any idea why they say,"If you instant release it, it makes the meat quite tough."
I assume it's like cutting immediately into a steak when you take it off the grill - all the juices run right out, and that's why you're supposed to let meat rest. With the NPR on an Instant Pot, it allows the juices to distribute and the pressure to release normally, not have some of it sucked right out of the meat as it is quick released.
Yeah, that's what I read. Natural release keeps the juices in the meat.0 -
I made pulled pork on Sunday and I guess it's one of those things where slow cooker is better... It wasn't quite shredding properly, so I had to close it and put it on pressure again for another 5 minutes (plus natural release again).. while on the slow cooker I would just have had to lift the lid to check it.
It's good, but yeah, with meat it's hard to know if it's actually cooked.
When making any kind of "to be shredded" meat in the IP, always set it for more than you think it will need. You cant overcook meat, when you will be shredding it anyways. Also helps to always NR pressure.
I prefer IP over my slow cooker for pulled pork.
Can't really beat 'ready in 90 minutes' lol.0 -
I got an IP for Christmas and I love it! I’be never had luck preparing dried black beans to cook up tender until the IP. That was my test run and they were perfectly cooked and delicious (garlic, thyme & bay leaves in the water) in about 30 minutes. No soaking! Since then, I also made delicious bbq ribs & chicken thighs, which were frozen, and were fall-off-the-bone tender after cooking in the IP. Steel cut oats with golden raisins came out great. I recommend Melissa Clark’s Dinner in an Instant cookbook. I made her Farro pilaf with cauliflower & raisins twice, already.1
-
Oh yes, and Hoppin John for New Year’s. Made with ham hocks-yum! I use my IP more than my stove!0
-
Any idea why they say,"If you instant release it, it makes the meat quite tough."
Correct. It's not the release method that makes anything tough, it's that the cook time is just longer with NPR.0 -
I got an IP for Christmas and I love it! I’be never had luck preparing dried black beans to cook up tender until the IP. That was my test run and they were perfectly cooked and delicious (garlic, thyme & bay leaves in the water) in about 30 minutes. No soaking! Since then, I also made delicious bbq ribs & chicken thighs, which were frozen, and were fall-off-the-bone tender after cooking in the IP. Steel cut oats with golden raisins came out great. I recommend Melissa Clark’s Dinner in an Instant cookbook. I made her Farro pilaf with cauliflower & raisins twice, already.
Man I need to try ribs.
For beans, I thought one of the reasons to presoak them was to avoid the, um, consequences that you can sometimes get in your intestine from eating beans, so that's why I'm not sure that cooking them in the IP would help with that.2 -
MelanieCN77 wrote: »Any idea why they say,"If you instant release it, it makes the meat quite tough."
Correct. It's not the release method that makes anything tough, it's that the cook time is just longer with NPR.
It seems like there's quite a few websites that claim that IR does effect the quality of the meat, though.
https://www.hippressurecooking.com/meat-openings-pcs/0 -
...
It seems like there's quite a few websites that claim that IR does effect the quality of the meat, though.
https://www.hippressurecooking.com/meat-openings-pcs/
Thanks for that link Toxikon. If a piece of meat has been cooking with high pressure in an Intant Pot long enough for the temperature of the meat to rise to the temperature inside the pot, over 240ºF, the water inside the pot and inside the animal's cell walls won't be boiling due to the increased boiling point under pressure. But as soon as the pressure is released that water will immediately boil furiously. That would blow out cell walls and damage the meat pretty severely. And while the water inside the meat wouldn't evaporate if the meat was submerged as the website correctly states, it would cause that immediate furious and destructive boil inside the meat even if it was submerged.
These are issues I hadn't thought about. Thanks again.5 -
I got an IP for Christmas and I love it! I’be never had luck preparing dried black beans to cook up tender until the IP. That was my test run and they were perfectly cooked and delicious (garlic, thyme & bay leaves in the water) in about 30 minutes. No soaking! Since then, I also made delicious bbq ribs & chicken thighs, which were frozen, and were fall-off-the-bone tender after cooking in the IP. Steel cut oats with golden raisins came out great. I recommend Melissa Clark’s Dinner in an Instant cookbook. I made her Farro pilaf with cauliflower & raisins twice, already.
Man I need to try ribs.
For beans, I thought one of the reasons to presoak them was to avoid the, um, consequences that you can sometimes get in your intestine from eating beans, so that's why I'm not sure that cooking them in the IP would help with that.
You rinse the cooking liquid after cooking the beans and I think that takes care of the “musical fruit” quality to them. I’ve made beans twice so far and it must work. No ill effects so far.2 -
I got one this past summer. I didn't use it much at first but I've been trying to intentionally plan more recipes that use it. I love it for last minute meals using frozen chicken (I cook and shred and add BBQ sauce). I made some great soups and stews in it, and several rice-based dishes that turned out really yummy. Oh! And a really delicious homemade applesauce. The problem really is that you can't ever really be sure how long a recipe is going to take because you don't know how long coming to pressure and releasing pressure will take. I don't love that part. But, overall, I've been happy with it.0
-
I got one this past summer. I didn't use it much at first but I've been trying to intentionally plan more recipes that use it. I love it for last minute meals using frozen chicken (I cook and shred and add BBQ sauce). I made some great soups and stews in it, and several rice-based dishes that turned out really yummy. Oh! And a really delicious homemade applesauce. The problem really is that you can't ever really be sure how long a recipe is going to take because you don't know how long coming to pressure and releasing pressure will take. I don't love that part. But, overall, I've been happy with it.
I bought a nice little Instant Pot cookbook (and she uses the exact model I have for all her recipes, DUO 6qt) and she has cooking time tables in the back. So she tells you how long to cook different cuts of meat (and the weight of the cut too). I think it'll be a handy resource as I play with my IP more.0 -
WinoGelato wrote: »My Instant Pot is getting a workout today prepping for New Years Day Chili Buffet. First up Salsa Verde White Chicken Chili
Made salsa verde chicken in IP first:
6 frozen boneless skinless chicken breasts
1/2 cup chicken broth
1 jar salsa verde
Cooked on high pressure 12 min, then NPR, removed chicken and shredded it with forks. Half into freezer for other meals.
White Chicken Chili:
Into the same pot that still had the cooking liquid, add half a can of great northern beans, purée with immersion blender to thicken.
Then add the other half can great northern beans along with another full can (both drained and rinsed)
1 quart chicken broth
1 cup of frozen corn
1 cup frozen diced onion
1 can of diced green chiles
Juice of 1 lime
Cilantro (I used cilantro paste)
Assorted spices (cumin, chili powder, garlic powder, oregano, salt and pepper)
Shredded salsa verde chicken
Seal and cook on soup setting, then QR.
This will go in a crockpot for tomorrow.
Next up - ground venison and bean red chili!
The Salsa Verde White Chicken Chili sounds awesome....I'm putting that on my "to make" list.1 -
-
-
I got my mom one for Christmas! She made ribs in it the other night and they were great! She also made a corn and ham risotto which was incredible. I think I may need to get one for myself!0
-
Son got me one for Christmas I just love it. I did screw up my roast beef last night. It said 35 min. but wasn't done I put it back in and another 35 min. killed it.0
-
Tried making beef and barley stew last night (from the Food Lab cookbook) and it turned out really well! I used a bit too much barley so it soaked up most of my broth and became very thick, but I don't mind a nice thick stew. The chuck roast chunks turned out so tender.0
-
I bought one last year and my favorite recipe is a veggie and bean soup -- was just thinking of making it tonight since were getting intensely cold weather and would be a perfect night for hot soup...0
-
MelanieCN77 wrote: »Any idea why they say,"If you instant release it, it makes the meat quite tough."
Correct. It's not the release method that makes anything tough, it's that the cook time is just longer with NPR.
It seems like there's quite a few websites that claim that IR does effect the quality of the meat, though.
https://www.hippressurecooking.com/meat-openings-pcs/
Huh I'll have to pay more attention. I haven't found that to be the case but also nor am I standing over the pot waiting for stews and the like to finish so I can QR.0 -
canadianlbs wrote: »i have a some-other-brand pressure cooker, not an instant pot. but having given that disclaimer, i do use it a lot; more than i expected i would.
but the really huge revelation for me was stock. i've made stock since idek when, and it's always been perfectly fine in the slow cooker or on the stove. but for some reason i don't understand, the stock that comes out of the pressure cooker isn't just 'fine'. it's incredible.
not even factoring the takes-less-time aspect.
I make stock a lot on the stovetop. Never used a pressure cooker but have a new impulse buy Instant Pot. One of the bones of contention among amateur stock cooks involves temperature. Conventional wisdom is bring to a boil, skim the scum, reduce heat and simmer at about 190°F for x hours. Emphasis is placed on not allowing a prolonged full rolling boil. The reason usually cited is that the final product won't be clear which is really important to high-class chefs with consummés on their mind. Not being a chef, or high class, or interested in stock clarity I've never fretted much about it. "Cloudiness" certainly doesn't detract from the flavor, if anything, quite the opposite.
But logging and monitoring my weight and calorie intake have convinced me there is a more important reason to control the temperature in the stock pot. What is happening at a rolling boil is the fat in the stock gets emulsified in the liquid like oil in mayonnaise. Here is what Shirley O. Corriher says about it in CookWise.Simmer only. It is very important to simmer stocks and not permit them to boil until after all the fat has been removed. If you boil a stock vigorously, the fat will emulsify or combine with the liquid and form a cloudy, fatty stock. Instead, you want the fat to remain separate and float to the top so that you can remove every bit of it. There are many times in cooking when you do want to make stable emulsions and get fat and liquid to stay together. This, however, is not one of those times.
So I have some experience making and using "cloudy" stock and watching my weight increase more than it should, based on the expected caloric content. But I have no experience with pressure cookers in general or an Instant Pot in particular. Is there any way to prevent fat from being emulsified into the stock using an Instant Pot?
Since you seem to appreciate a good stock, you might want to consider not skimming the fat, or if you do, please save it and use it elsewhere, if you are not already. I never boil a stock, but I also don't throw out a scrap of the fat, because for me that is the entire point of the effort. I will store the stock in quart containers in the freezer and when used in a recipe, I just make sure I add in a quarter cup fat or so (I just log it as lard) per quart used, since that is about what floats to the top of the container. Since I make a roux for just about every stock situation, from a blond roux for chicken n' dumplings to a very dark roux for gumbo, any cloudiness is not a particular concern for me.
For those who have been disappointed in their stock results, make sure you are using enough chicken, and I also highly recommend plenty of the magical trio of onions, celery and carrots (mirepoix; you can save scraps and skins and odds and ends in the freezer till you need it), garlic and bay, and a large bundle of thyme and/or summer savory. I use two chickens in a very large stock pot completely filled with water, and after they have simmered for an hour, I pull them out, shred off most of the meat to freeze separately, and then return all the bones and skin and remaining meat to the stock pot to simmer for another 8 hours or so.
I just got an Instant Pot for Christmas, and am now intrigued about making stock in it--it seems like the perfect size for the random rotisserie chicken carcass you don't have room for in the freezer. I am also curious as to whether it could get even more stock out of the scraps left over from my major stock operation. It kills me to throw out all the scraps as I always suspect there is yet more flavor in there, and (perhaps?) it could be extricated with a second round under pressure.0 -
My sister loves hers and uses it multiple times a week, so I bought one. One year later, I passed mine on to her, happy to be rid of it.
Compared to a crockpot, I found it fussy to use. No comparison to an oven because it gives everything a boiled in water or steamed taste. It was surprisingly hard to clean for being non-stick, and lots of piecesparts that all need to go back together just so or the seal won't take. I hated that I had to be very precise on the timing or overshoot the mark because getting up to pressure takes most of the cook time and I didn't want to have to do that more than once per dish. I like the flexibility of being able to add quicker cooking items later in a crockpot, something you cannot do (at least not easily or quickly) in an Instant Pot.
2 -
blueheartrisen wrote: »My sister loves hers and uses it multiple times a week, so I bought one. One year later, I passed mine on to her, happy to be rid of it.
Compared to a crockpot, I found it fussy to use. No comparison to an oven because it gives everything a boiled in water or steamed taste. It was surprisingly hard to clean for being non-stick, and lots of piecesparts that all need to go back together just so or the seal won't take. I hated that I had to be very precise on the timing or overshoot the mark because getting up to pressure takes most of the cook time and I didn't want to have to do that more than once per dish. I like the flexibility of being able to add quicker cooking items later in a crockpot, something you cannot do (at least not easily or quickly) in an Instant Pot.
I grabbed a glass lid for my Instant Pot, so I can make use of the slow-cooking aspect of it and have one less gadget taking up space in my small kitchen!
It does take some fiddling to get the cooking times right with pressure cooking, and not being able to have a peek along the way feels new and weird to me. But I'm still really enjoying playing with it!
Making hard-boiled eggs in it was AWESOME. Only needed a cup of water and I could put in as many eggs as I wanted. Took about 4 minutes to pressure cook, about 10 minutes in total including coming to pressure then using instant release. Best of all, the shells practically fell off the eggs. And they were perfectly done.
I'm looking forward to trying out some yogurt and cheesecake recipes too.
Anyway. I can see how it's not for everyone. I was really skeptical when I got it but I just love it now. Your sister is lucky to have two now!!1 -
Well, I did BBQ ribs in mine, and they were edible, but not great. Maybe if I lived somewhere else I'd be impressed, but here in Memphis I can drive ten minutes and spend twelve bucks to have someone else serve me the best ribs in the world smoked in a smoker with real wood complete with side dishes, and it makes no sense to spend almost as much money, have to mess with cooking and cleaning up after raw meat, and end up with steam boiled ribs. I finished them under the broiler which made them tolerable (as opposed to honestly sort of gross when they first come out of the pot), but it's just not worth the effort for the end product. Sure, they were tender, as advertised, but there's a lot more to quality ribs than just tenderness!
Someone mentioned low carb cheesecake - does anyone have a good low carb cheesecake recipe for the instant pot?1 -
blueheartrisen wrote: »My sister loves hers and uses it multiple times a week, so I bought one. One year later, I passed mine on to her, happy to be rid of it.
Compared to a crockpot, I found it fussy to use. No comparison to an oven because it gives everything a boiled in water or steamed taste. It was surprisingly hard to clean for being non-stick, and lots of piecesparts that all need to go back together just so or the seal won't take. I hated that I had to be very precise on the timing or overshoot the mark because getting up to pressure takes most of the cook time and I didn't want to have to do that more than once per dish. I like the flexibility of being able to add quicker cooking items later in a crockpot, something you cannot do (at least not easily or quickly) in an Instant Pot.
Yes, for my stew I had to add the veggies for an extra 4 minutes after, which meant more getting to pressure etc.rheddmobile wrote: »Well, I did BBQ ribs in mine, and they were edible, but not great. Maybe if I lived somewhere else I'd be impressed, but here in Memphis I can drive ten minutes and spend twelve bucks to have someone else serve me the best ribs in the world smoked in a smoker with real wood complete with side dishes, and it makes no sense to spend almost as much money, have to mess with cooking and cleaning up after raw meat, and end up with steam boiled ribs. I finished them under the broiler which made them tolerable (as opposed to honestly sort of gross when they first come out of the pot), but it's just not worth the effort for the end product. Sure, they were tender, as advertised, but there's a lot more to quality ribs than just tenderness!
Someone mentioned low carb cheesecake - does anyone have a good low carb cheesecake recipe for the instant pot?
That's why I'm not sure about ribs either. Lots of good bbq places in the area and it probably won't compare at all. I made wing once and they tasted like sadness, lol.0 -
rheddmobile wrote: »Well, I did BBQ ribs in mine, and they were edible, but not great. Maybe if I lived somewhere else I'd be impressed, but here in Memphis I can drive ten minutes and spend twelve bucks to have someone else serve me the best ribs in the world smoked in a smoker with real wood complete with side dishes, and it makes no sense to spend almost as much money, have to mess with cooking and cleaning up after raw meat, and end up with steam boiled ribs. I finished them under the broiler which made them tolerable (as opposed to honestly sort of gross when they first come out of the pot), but it's just not worth the effort for the end product. Sure, they were tender, as advertised, but there's a lot more to quality ribs than just tenderness!
Someone mentioned low carb cheesecake - does anyone have a good low carb cheesecake recipe for the instant pot?
I made ribs tonight and I thought they were really good, and I'm from KC and have been to Memphis dozens of times when it was in my sales territory! Maybe not better than some of my favorite places, but honestly I thought they were better than the ones my husband does on the smoker and grill. They were tender but still on the bone with decent "chew" and I also sauced and finished under the broiler.
2
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions