You don't use a food scale?
Options
Replies
-
Post-vacay bump.1
-
I will admit that I have never weighed a tortilla or a piece of bread.
It's funny you should mention this, because when I make PB toast for breakfast, typically I place the toast on the scale, tare, and then add the PB directly to the toast until i reach my preferred grams. I did this for 2 pieces this morning and prior to the tare, I noticed a difference of 3 grams between the two slices of toast. Not to say that changed my entry in any way, I'm not about to start weighing and obsessing over each individual bread slice unless and until my deficit is so small that I have to do so in order to keep losing, but it was an interesting moment.
Also, I do this for salads since it's been mentioned here. I don't think it takes any longer to weigh all of the ingredients in a salad. I put the bowl on the scale, tare, add an item and note it, then tare, add an item and note it, etc until I have accurate information to log. It doesn't seem especially difficult or tedious to me.My thinking is that when the deficit is large and there is a lot of weight to lose, weighing probably isn't AS essential (unless you are one of those folks who fills every measuring utensil beyond full, every time), but it does make a difference *and* helps you with the information/data you are gathering. More importantly, as each of us gets to the end of the losing stage, those small deficits will be hard to maintain consistently without weighing. I have lots of time until I get there but find weighing food is just easier
Well said, and I think it just builds good habits that will serve us well when we do reach that final stretch.1 -
I weigh bread, using rye or multi-grain bread, each slice can be a different size and weight. It isn't drastic but I do it anyway.1
-
DoubleUbea wrote: »I weigh bread, using rye or multi-grain bread, each slice can be a different size and weight. It isn't drastic but I do it anyway.
I do have a question though. What do you all do when the barcode scanned entry gives you Milliliters instead of grams? I've found if I use milliliters the calories are WAY off. (Why a liquid measurement option is available on so many solid foods, I have no idea. ) For now, I just divide my measurement to grams per serving and go that route. But it would be nice to not have to do math all the time. But why is milliliters available so often? Am I missing something?
1 -
Ok so to play devil's advocate here.
I do consistently weigh my food, but until I started to narrow in on macros, I was always over-eating by 200 to 300 calories in my allowance due to incorrect macro addition by marketing (ie. 30 C 10 P 2 F says its 180 calories, off by 18 calories.)
I still lost weight. Even when I didn't weigh my food I STILL lost weight.
This was due to CONSISTENCY in my diet. Eating one tablespoon (3tablespoons) of peanut butter a day even though tracked as only one, still got the same results. Why? Because my body adapted.
The problem comes when your always trying to fit new and different foods into your diet.
So weigh your flat out wraps all you want. If it's 10 calories over every day for me, my body can handle that..11 -
^^ This is why it took me so long to finally break down and buy a scale. I wasn't weighing a thing, and was losing weight. I think you're right it really boils down to consistency. Even measuring cups and spoons should work to a point (leveled, not heaping) as long as you are consistent. That being said, the scale has made certain foods so much easier to enter into the database. It's a life saver for measuring out whole foods like meat and veggies. I for one can't eyeball what 3oz of meat looks like, nor do I really know what a serving of sliced watermelon looks like.
It's also surprisingly more convenient to just plop out 113(1 serving) grams of cottage cheese onto my plate. Instead of looking at it and going "Is that 1/2 a cup? A bit more? Maybe I should measure so I know what it looks like...?" Or the often mentioned peanut butter. Stick the thing on the scale, tare and scoop out your serving. Way easier then guessing or using a tablespoon to make sure you got 1 serving.
Admittedly, I don't weigh everything. I either forget to tare and plop it on my plate, or it's packaged food and I'm at work. Or I'm cooking for a crowd and can't be bothered with it, lol. If I stall out, I know where my pitfalls are, and right now it's not lack of weighing. It's "Crap I forgot to plan dinner. Let's grab something." And over-eating in general. lol. BUT I still think it's really important for people to do. Especially if they aren't very good at eyeballing portion and serving sizes. Or for things you really can't eyeball very well. Our eyes are untrustworthy little buggers anyways...4 -
Plenty of people lose weight without using a food scale, or even logging. Either they are unusually good at eyeballing portions, or they just chose a way of eating that naturally had them in a calorie deficit.
The calorie deficit is what makes weight loss happen. Some people can get into a deficit without using a food scale. It's not magic, just skill or luck.
But if someone is not losing as expected, weighing out your portions is the best way to determine how many calories you are really eating. Because most people who don't are eating more than they think, including possibly losing weight at a higher calorie level than they think. There are myriad women out there who think they needed to eat 1100 cals or some other ridiculously low # to lose weight. They were no doubt actually eating more because they were eyeballing portions. It really doesn't matter, except when these women start telling other women you should eat 1100 cals to lose weight and it's easy to do so.
@Crafty_camper123 Scanning barcodes simply searches existing entries in the database to find a possible match. If you are bringing up an entry that doesn't give you the best measurement options, try manually searching instead. There are some areas in the world where stuff like ice cream is sold with milliliters as the measurement for some crazy reason. There is also just some random crap in the database, maybe entered by folks who weren't paying attention and clicked the wrong thing. Who knows?11 -
@kimny72 Yes, If the scanner brings up something weird, I do a manual search for one that makes more sense. It never occurred to me that the barcode scanned ones are user entered as well. Makes sense. It also explains why some just don't add up. I had it try to tell me my bowl full of cereal was only 40 calories once. (I wish) I had salad mix the other day, that I could not find one at all in grams. It wasn't until I looked at the bag that I saw that 1 serving was actually 100 grams. So that one was easy. It's rare that the serving size on the package is 100 grams though. It's usually something weird & arbitrary like 73 grams. That's when I usually divide my serving size into the recommended serving and get my serving that way. (80/73= 1.10 Servings.)
I agree that a lot of people are really bad at guessing their calories though. I have had quite a few real life examples where someone tells me "Oh yeah I only eat 900 calories a day! I'm down 5 lbs. since last month" or " Well I'm only eating 1200 a day. I should be losing weight!". Meanwhile I'm watching them eat a thing that is either half or equal to their supposed daily calorie intake in one meal.
The scale is a real eye opener. I found myself I was under-estimating certain things, and over-estimating others. I do like the fact I now know exactly what I'm consuming if I weigh it.5 -
Getting a food scale is definitely on the to-do list! Thanks!4
-
moogie_fit wrote: »Eating one tablespoon (3tablespoons) of peanut butter a day even though tracked as only one, still got the same results. Why? Because my body adapted.
The problem comes when your always trying to fit new and different foods into your diet.
What?6 -
moogie_fit wrote: »Eating one tablespoon (3tablespoons) of peanut butter a day even though tracked as only one, still got the same results. Why? Because my body adapted.
The problem comes when your always trying to fit new and different foods into your diet.
What?
My thoughts exactly!2 -
moogie_fit wrote: »Eating one tablespoon (3tablespoons) of peanut butter a day even though tracked as only one, still got the same results. Why? Because my body adapted.
The problem comes when your always trying to fit new and different foods into your diet.
What?
My thoughts exactly!
Seriously - it's rampant today! Are we sure it isn't Friday?
If this is true, I'm converting my entire diet to ice cream and peanut butter. New and different foods be kittened!5 -
moogie_fit wrote: »Eating one tablespoon (3tablespoons) of peanut butter a day even though tracked as only one, still got the same results. Why? Because my body adapted.
The problem comes when your always trying to fit new and different foods into your diet.
What?
My thoughts exactly!
Seriously - it's rampant today! Are we sure it isn't Friday?
If this is true, I'm converting my entire diet to ice cream and peanut butter. New and different foods be kittened!
I'm going to start counting 3TB of pb as 1 TB... wonder how long it will take my body to adapt?5 -
I bought a very good electronic scale (Taylor) and I weight most of the things we eat. I also really watch the portion sizes on packages. The other night, I defrosted some fish and checked out the portion size on the package. There were 3 servings in the package, but the nutritional information said that the portion size was 3 ounces. There were two filets in the package, so the reasonable person would assume that each filet was a portion! Not so. I made hamburgers for lunch today (all the fixings) and was able to correctly measure 3oz. of beef (extra lean). And I use my measuring cups for everything else. One other thing - I find using luncheon plates, which are smaller than dinner plates, helpful for the "filling the plate" and tricking the eye and mind.3
-
moogie_fit wrote: »Eating one tablespoon (3tablespoons) of peanut butter a day even though tracked as only one, still got the same results. Why? Because my body adapted.
The problem comes when your always trying to fit new and different foods into your diet.
What?
I believe their thought was "I was eating 3 tablespoons of PB while eyeballing, and I still lost weight. Therefore, it didn't matter."
But because they were eyeballing everything, it evened out over the long term.2 -
quiksylver296 wrote: »moogie_fit wrote: »Eating one tablespoon (3tablespoons) of peanut butter a day even though tracked as only one, still got the same results. Why? Because my body adapted.
The problem comes when your always trying to fit new and different foods into your diet.
What?
I believe their thought was "I was eating 3 tablespoons of PB while eyeballing, and I still lost weight. Therefore, it didn't matter."
But because they were eyeballing everything, it evened out over the long term.
That was the best I could figure, too, but the "my body adapted" part didn't make any sense.0 -
moogie_fit wrote: »Eating one tablespoon (3tablespoons) of peanut butter a day even though tracked as only one, still got the same results. Why? Because my body adapted.
The problem comes when your always trying to fit new and different foods into your diet.
What?
My thoughts exactly!
Seriously - it's rampant today! Are we sure it isn't Friday?
If this is true, I'm converting my entire diet to ice cream and peanut butter. New and different foods be kittened!
I'm going to start counting 3TB of pb as 1 TB... wonder how long it will take my body to adapt?
My point was that so long as I always counted 3 tbsp as 1 tbsp and was always 200 calories over my goal, I was still in a deficit4 -
Monday morning bump.1
-
quiksylver296 wrote: »We have many new members who have been around for about three weeks now. And there are lots of posts saying "I've been doing this for three weeks and haven't lost any weight!" Many responses to those threads tell the member to use a food scale. This video illustrates why a food scale is such a powerful tool for most people's weight loss. (Although I wish it used peanut butter instead of oatmeal. )
https://youtu.be/XpHykP6e_Uk
If anyone has any other infographics or videos that are pro-food scale, add 'em!
0 -
jsalazar8714 wrote: »quiksylver296 wrote: »We have many new members who have been around for about three weeks now. And there are lots of posts saying "I've been doing this for three weeks and haven't lost any weight!" Many responses to those threads tell the member to use a food scale. This video illustrates why a food scale is such a powerful tool for most people's weight loss. (Although I wish it used peanut butter instead of oatmeal. )
https://youtu.be/XpHykP6e_Uk
If anyone has any other infographics or videos that are pro-food scale, add 'em!
Your macros are just that - YOURS. As long as you're getting sufficient protein and fat, adjust them to fit whatever works best for you. 35% protein is on the high side, IMO.6
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.4K Getting Started
- 259.6K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 387 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.2K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 911 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions