Viewing the message boards in:

BCAAs? has anyone noticed a difference in the speed of recovery and not aching so much after?

24

Replies

  • Posts: 5,575 Member
    edited January 2018
    bbell1985 wrote: »

    What, the BCAAs? They do taste good tho. Little fizzy.

    From what I've seen, BCAA's drinks tend to be a bit lighter on the leucine and use citrus with a lot of sodium and sweetener to hide the taste of the leucine. Try some pure leucine powder and you'll see what I mean, it's nasty bitter stuff.
  • Posts: 4,571 Member

    From what I've seen, BCAA's drinks tend to be a bit lighter on the leucine and use citrus with a lot of sodium and sweetener to hide the taste of the leucine. Try some pure leucine powder and you'll see what I mean, it's nasty bitter stuff.

    Oooh. Probably just as bad as some terrible preworkouts I've tasted
  • Posts: 5,575 Member
    bbell1985 wrote: »

    Oooh. Probably just as bad as some terrible preworkouts I've tasted

    That's probably the leucine you are tasting.
  • Posts: 4,571 Member

    That's probably the leucine you are tasting.

    Ta-da! You so smart.
  • Posts: 7,682 Member
    edited January 2018

    i prefer to see what people actually think to it rather than read studies that may or may not be accurate. there is so much info on the internet that contradicts each other. one study will say one thing and then another will say the opposite.
    i dont think that is the case with my sister as she was saying today that she missed out on her bcaas the other day and she was really sore. she doesnt usually get that sore when taking it and she can feel the difference

    I have been working out for the last 5 years and my DOMS have NOT gotten any better over time. so getting used to working out doesnt always mean less soreness or no soreness. its going to depend on the person. even if I get a lot of protein I still have DOMS the next few days.with or without bcaa's
  • Posts: 5,575 Member
    Okiludy wrote: »
    I love how BCAA threads roll down the same hill over and over.

    1. Someone asks a question on them.
    2. People who have answered it a bunch of times show the scientific studies.
    3. Someone else defends or questions the evidence against.
    4. Many give personal experiences but it’s ignored.
    5. The person who was nice enough to post the data is called mean or white knighted against. Even when they are just attempting to save the OP time and money.
    6. We wait for up to a week and a BCAA question comes up again and we repeat.

    Ground Hog Day is alive and well

    Everyday is Ground Hog Day on MFP. :lol:
  • Posts: 5,575 Member
    Seth1825 wrote: »

    Hi, first, awesome pic, Metallica is my favorite band, second, I'm sure 5 was referring to my response lol. Now there's nothing wrong with posting information, I'm all for that, but the way he made his comments it came off as like "you're an idiot for not preferring these studies, why would you want to listen to people's opinions" that's why I called him out, otherwise it would've been fine, that's all. I find that often when someone asks a question some people come back acting like some expert and try to seem like they're above the person asking the question in a way. So I appreciate when someone helps to post data, but it's how you relay information that I was focused on.

    I thought someone posted the data already.
  • Posts: 133 Member
    edited January 2018
    You need none of that stuff, if you have your programing, nutrition and recovery, sleep figured out. The only thing that can help you a bit is creatine, if you respond to it. Some people don't. BCAA's, whey proteins, even if it gives you some advantage, it's going up to 5%, if... The only thing that can really help you is steroids.
  • Posts: 280 Member

    i prefer to see what people actually think to it rather than read studies that may or may not be accurate. there is so much info on the internet that contradicts each other. one study will say one thing and then another will say the opposite.
    i dont think that is the case with my sister as she was saying today that she missed out on her bcaas the other day and she was really sore. she doesnt usually get that sore when taking it and she can feel the difference

    So instead of relying on actual science (taking into account really reading through even when there are contradictions so you can see where the contradictions or uncertainty lay in each conclusion) you're going to take the word of random people on the internet?
  • Posts: 280 Member
    bbell1985 wrote: »
    Here's my anecdote.

    I'm on an aggressive cut. So aggressive my diary is closed unless you're my friend. I get 140-170g of protein per day easily, while dropping weight, lifting heavy *kitten* *kitten* and do not need BCAAs. And I know from experience they would do nothing but just taste kind of nice during a workout.

    *nod nod* Some of the flavorings are super tasty.
  • Posts: 280 Member
    edited January 2018
    Seth1825 wrote: »

    Hi, first, awesome pic, Metallica is my favorite band, second, I'm sure 5 was referring to my response lol. Now there's nothing wrong with posting information, I'm all for that, but the way he made his comments it came off as like "you're an idiot for not preferring these studies, why would you want to listen to people's opinions" that's why I called him out, otherwise it would've been fine, that's all. I find that often when someone asks a question some people come back acting like some expert and try to seem like they're above the person asking the question in a way. So I appreciate when someone helps to post data, but it's how you relay information that I was focused on.

    If someone chooses to simply and abruptly address a question in a matter-of-fact way because that might be how they are (even though I honestly think that in this case the "tone" received was more your issue than what it really was) - that's their right.

    Why do "you" think that trying to tell someone how to act and talk is your right and some how makes you better for it? If we were really all about manners, you'd have privately messaged the "offending person" and made suggestions that way instead of calling them out in the public forum.

    Just saying.

    To add - in regards to your comment about why the other person didn't just "post links" without comment...

    Personally, I'd be wary of clicking on links posted on this forum with no information at all. In fact, that's the kind of thing that could potentially be flagged as spam (because spammers do this kind of thing) and get you banned.
  • Posts: 8,934 Member
    edited January 2018

    If you think that respected medical journals and public health organizations might be dodgy, but strangers on the internet are trustworthy, you're shopping for an answer.

    Try starting here
    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10627921/how-to-cut-through-the-new-years-broscience/p1

    +1 Can't imagine we what would be dodgy about a PubMed link unless you have no clue what PubMed is.
  • Posts: 8,934 Member
    Okiludy wrote: »
    I love how BCAA threads roll down the same hill over and over.

    1. Someone asks a question on them.
    2. People who have answered it a bunch of times show the scientific studies.
    3. Someone else defends or questions the evidence against.
    4. Many give personal experiences but it’s ignored.
    5. The person who was nice enough to post the data is called mean or white knighted against. Even when they are just attempting to save the OP time and money.
    6. We wait for up to a week and a BCAA question comes up again and we repeat.

    Ground Hog Day is alive and well

    Lol! Pretty much sums it up. :D
  • Posts: 1,058 Member
    edited January 2018

    can i just ask, are you saying this from experience and have you actually tried it?
    theres always different information on the internet that contradicts each other so i dont know which is right and which is wrong.
    my sister is currently taking bcaas and she says it helps her alot, but just wanting more opinions from people who have tried it to see how many people it has actually worked for before i decide whether to buy it or not. i am currently taking protein shakes to up my intake, but recovery can still be slow

    Check Alan Aragon's research on it, you're wasting your money. BCAA'S is the biggest scam product in the industry. BCAA'S is the equivalent of buying a house with no roof. It's not like creatine which has been proven to work. Just get protein powder, you get enough bcaa's in them or even better, eat food with protein.
  • Posts: 193 Member
    fb47 wrote: »

    Check Alan Aragon's research on it, you're wasting your money. BCAA'S is the biggest scam product in the industry. BCAA'S is the equivalent of buying a house with no roof. It's not like creatine which has been proven to work. Just get protein powder, you get enough bcaa's in them or even better, eat food with protein.

    Yup. Most companies will post the amino profile on the container somewhere. Compare the label on your protein supplement to a BCAA supplement and you don't even need the peer-review to see that it's not worth it. Leucine is Leucine whether it's in a BCAA suppplement, container of Whey, or a nice juicy steak. It's like a pound of fat and a pound of muscle are both one pound.
  • Posts: 113 Member
    My personal experience is I find they are good for me & my goals. Currently at the moment they really help me as they're the only thing that stops me throwing up 1st thing with my morning sickness. However; I have been using them for a while for my bodybuilding alongside protein powders but at different points in the day. I was also using creatine and coffee as pre-workout but had to stop as not safe to use during pregnancy. :)
  • Posts: 3,192 Member
    I use to never use any type of POST workout. Then i started and my recovery time has improved. I still get soreness from time to time but its not nearly as bad and the DOMS (delayed onset muscle soreness) is NO where near as bad.
This discussion has been closed.