Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

When lifestyle doesn't impact chronic disease

amandaeve
amandaeve Posts: 723 Member
edited November 2024 in Debate Club
There is no end to studies that show how healthy lifestyles improve chronic diseases (high blood pressure, diabetes, cancer, etc.) and how poor lifestyles (smoking, drinking, sedentary, fatty food, etc.) contribute to chronic disease. I keep looking for information on the outliers. Are there studies on those with chronic disease for whom lifestyle makes no difference? We all know that person who didn’t fit the data, but I can’t find data as to percentage of the population who are outliers. Are you one of those people? I am curious how many other people are out there like me. The only influence my doctors can attribute to my hypertension is heredity; lifestyle choices make no difference- but none of them can tell me how common that is.
«1

Replies

  • amandaeve
    amandaeve Posts: 723 Member
    @MeanderingMammal lol, yeah, if I had a dollar for every vegetarian friend who was told by their GP to eat less red meat!

    @kommodevaran Agreed, perspective is important, and I think medicine misses that sometimes.
  • Mouse_Potato
    Mouse_Potato Posts: 1,514 Member
    When I quit smoking my blood pressure shot up. It took me two years to get it back down. I still can't explain that one.
  • COGypsy
    COGypsy Posts: 1,394 Member
    I have no idea how common it is in the general population, but hereditary hypertension is pretty common in my mother's side of the family. My grandfather was diagnosed with high blood pressure when he was 18 and enlisting for WWII. At the time he was a skinny beanpole raised on a working farm, so definitely don't think lifestyle was a factor there! My sister was slightly older when she started meds. She's gone up and down in size over the years, but weight changes haven't ever affected her blood pressure. She's also been a pretty nutrition-conscious vegetarian for at least 25 years, so low salt, low cholesterol, high fiber and all that good stuff is a big part of her lifestyle. She's even weirder though because her BP gets lower when she's stressed.

    My suspicion is that there are a lot more outliers than one might expect.
  • amandaeve
    amandaeve Posts: 723 Member
    @COGypsy thank you for sharing. I also went on medication when I was 18 and a prime example of health. Until your comment, I had never heard of another teenager being diagnosed, so thank you for sharing! :smiley:
  • EatingAndKnitting
    EatingAndKnitting Posts: 531 Member
    Do you count mental illnesses as chronic disease? Everyone crows about how wonderful exercise is for treating depression, but for me personally (bipolar I, mostly depression) exercise does nothing to improve my mood. The only thing that works for my mood is medication.

    I worked for a year and a half in retail, walking constantly for hours a time, never standing in one place for more than a couple minutes. For me, that was exercise, because I'm typically quite sedentary. (This was before my arthritis in my knee got so bad and before I started MFP).

    I had a mixed episode (manic and depressed at the same time, I was sucidial and went into a mental hospital for a week, mixed episodes are very dangerous because the mania gives you the energy to actually go through with suicide) and quit my job.

    I did three months of purposeful exercise after that, still no difference in my moods. I make myself exercise to get more calories to eat and to improve my cardiovascular health, but it doesn't seem to do a thing for my mental health.

    Losing weight has also not made the arthrtis/mechanical problems in my knee better. Before I started losing weight I could stand and walk for a three hour shift at work without too much pain in my knee, mostly in my feet, and some in my knee. Now, 57 pounds lighter, I can hardly walk a mile without my knee starting to hurt.

    I do have mechanical problems as well as arthritis though (I had a tendon moved 15 millimeters, which is QUITE a distance), and it's unknown which is causing the pain. I haven't done any MRIs or other tests to find out.
  • lorrpb
    lorrpb Posts: 11,463 Member
    edited February 2018
    30-50% of hypertension is inherited factors. But lifestyle can make it worse. Any scientific study looks at the outliers but that's not what makes it to the popular press.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21462849
  • amandaeve
    amandaeve Posts: 723 Member
    lorrpb wrote: »
    30-50% of hypertension is inherited factors. But lifestyle can make it worse. Any scientific study looks at the outliers but that's not what makes it to the popular press.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21462849

    @lorrpb Thank you for sharing. I am impressed 30-50% is attributed to inherited factors. This thread aside, I've yet to meet anyone who went on medication who fit any or many of the categories that fit me at diagnosis (young, female, physically fit, a healthy BMI, healthy lifestyle, following a DASH diet). I have a curiosity in finding other people like me. You'd think with numbers like that study presented, I would have met more by now.

    @Zodikosis I'm impressed you lowered your RHR that much! Good job! :smile: I've also been curious about RHR averages. I've seen charts that match RHR to age and fitness level, but I've never been able to find information on how many people actually fall into what category per age group. If you have anything like that handy, please share.
  • comptonelizabeth
    comptonelizabeth Posts: 1,701 Member
    amandaeve wrote: »
    There is no end to studies that show how healthy lifestyles improve chronic diseases (high blood pressure, diabetes, cancer, etc.) and how poor lifestyles (smoking, drinking, sedentary, fatty food, etc.) contribute to chronic disease. I keep looking for information on the outliers. Are there studies on those with chronic disease for whom lifestyle makes no difference? We all know that person who didn’t fit the data, but I can’t find data as to percentage of the population who are outliers. Are you one of those people? I am curious how many other people are out there like me. The only influence my doctors can attribute to my hypertension is heredity; lifestyle choices make no difference- but none of them can tell me how common that is.

    I have severe digestive issues. People say to eat more fiber, fruits, veggies, lean meat, and drink more water. What they fail to understand is in my case, fiber makes it 100x worse as does tough meats. And drinking lots of water makes no difference. The unhealthier I eat, the better I feel and less hospital trips I make. My conditions are Gastroparesis and Colonic Inertia. What's even worse is there have been nutritionists who assume I have an eating disorder because I don't eat much and like being a small size. Um, yeah a slow stomach + paralyzed colon = constantly full. Not my fault. And the smaller I am, the less unnecessary food/stool weight it feels like I'm carrying = the more energy I have to get things done. Some people are pricks, I swear.

    This. I suffer from Ulcerative Colitis and if I were to eat 'healthily' I'd end up in hospital.
    And my lifestyle makes very little difference to my condition. Flare ups occur out of the blue and seem to bear no relation to what I've eaten how much stress I'm under or how much water I've drunk. I am at my best when I eat 'beige' food!
  • amandaeve
    amandaeve Posts: 723 Member
    amandaeve wrote: »
    There is no end to studies that show how healthy lifestyles improve chronic diseases (high blood pressure, diabetes, cancer, etc.) and how poor lifestyles (smoking, drinking, sedentary, fatty food, etc.) contribute to chronic disease. I keep looking for information on the outliers. Are there studies on those with chronic disease for whom lifestyle makes no difference? We all know that person who didn’t fit the data, but I can’t find data as to percentage of the population who are outliers. Are you one of those people? I am curious how many other people are out there like me. The only influence my doctors can attribute to my hypertension is heredity; lifestyle choices make no difference- but none of them can tell me how common that is.

    I have severe digestive issues. People say to eat more fiber, fruits, veggies, lean meat, and drink more water. What they fail to understand is in my case, fiber makes it 100x worse as does tough meats. And drinking lots of water makes no difference. The unhealthier I eat, the better I feel and less hospital trips I make. My conditions are Gastroparesis and Colonic Inertia. What's even worse is there have been nutritionists who assume I have an eating disorder because I don't eat much and like being a small size. Um, yeah a slow stomach + paralyzed colon = constantly full. Not my fault. And the smaller I am, the less unnecessary food/stool weight it feels like I'm carrying = the more energy I have to get things done. Some people are pricks, I swear.

    This. I suffer from Ulcerative Colitis and if I were to eat 'healthily' I'd end up in hospital.
    And my lifestyle makes very little difference to my condition. Flare ups occur out of the blue and seem to bear no relation to what I've eaten how much stress I'm under or how much water I've drunk. I am at my best when I eat 'beige' food!

    Very interesting! However, just to clarify, this thread is about when lifestyle (including eating behaviors) have no effect on chronic conditions. Ending up in the hospital from eating certain foods is definitely an impact.
  • lorrpb
    lorrpb Posts: 11,463 Member
    amandaeve wrote: »
    lorrpb wrote: »
    30-50% of hypertension is inherited factors. But lifestyle can make it worse. Any scientific study looks at the outliers but that's not what makes it to the popular press.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21462849

    @lorrpb Thank you for sharing. I am impressed 30-50% is attributed to inherited factors. This thread aside, I've yet to meet anyone who went on medication who fit any or many of the categories that fit me at diagnosis (young, female, physically fit, a healthy BMI, healthy lifestyle, following a DASH diet). I have a curiosity in finding other people like me. You'd think with numbers like that study presented, I would have met more by now.

    @Zodikosis I'm impressed you lowered your RHR that much! Good job! :smile: I've also been curious about RHR averages. I've seen charts that match RHR to age and fitness level, but I've never been able to find information on how many people actually fall into what category per age group. If you have anything like that handy, please share.

    I was surprised the number was that high. But just because 30-50% of hypertension is familial, it doesn't mean all those people are leading healthy lifestyles. Young healthy fit people could have it and not have any idea because they don't go to the doctor very often. That's why hypertension is called the "silent killer." It has no external symptoms.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    edited February 2018
    amandaeve wrote: »
    lorrpb wrote: »
    30-50% of hypertension is inherited factors. But lifestyle can make it worse. Any scientific study looks at the outliers but that's not what makes it to the popular press.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21462849

    @lorrpb Thank you for sharing. I am impressed 30-50% is attributed to inherited factors. This thread aside, I've yet to meet anyone who went on medication who fit any or many of the categories that fit me at diagnosis (young, female, physically fit, a healthy BMI, healthy lifestyle, following a DASH diet). I have a curiosity in finding other people like me. You'd think with numbers like that study presented, I would have met more by now.

    @Zodikosis I'm impressed you lowered your RHR that much! Good job! :smile: I've also been curious about RHR averages. I've seen charts that match RHR to age and fitness level, but I've never been able to find information on how many people actually fall into what category per age group. If you have anything like that handy, please share.

    Often people find out afterwards that it's hereditary...so they're not leading a necessarily healthy lifestyle, but they start to and then find out it's hereditary.

    I was diagnosed with mild hypertension when I was in my 20s and was 6 pack lean and fit...not bad enough to warrant meds, but was told to monitor it as they would likely be necessary in the future. My dad was diagnosed young and while not the fittest guy in the world, he was pretty lean and played tennis most weekends...and both my grandpa and great grandpa had it and they were both pretty fit and active.

    In my dad's case, he blew up with weight and it exacerbated the issue and he also ended up with Type II diabetes and kidney disease.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 35,063 Member
    edited February 2018
    amandaeve wrote: »
    lorrpb wrote: »
    30-50% of hypertension is inherited factors. But lifestyle can make it worse. Any scientific study looks at the outliers but that's not what makes it to the popular press.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21462849

    @lorrpb Thank you for sharing. I am impressed 30-50% is attributed to inherited factors. This thread aside, I've yet to meet anyone who went on medication who fit any or many of the categories that fit me at diagnosis (young, female, physically fit, a healthy BMI, healthy lifestyle, following a DASH diet). I have a curiosity in finding other people like me. You'd think with numbers like that study presented, I would have met more by now.

    @Zodikosis I'm impressed you lowered your RHR that much! Good job! :smile: I've also been curious about RHR averages. I've seen charts that match RHR to age and fitness level, but I've never been able to find information on how many people actually fall into what category per age group. If you have anything like that handy, please share.

    There's any RHR chart for Canada here:

    http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-626-x/2013001/t004-eng.htm

    It's not numbers of people, but it does have percentiles of people. (I'm not Canadian, but its the first one I found from a solid source, and I'd be surprised if the rest of the first world were wildly different.)

    The post you're replying to is right, though: Individuals can vary in absolute RHR, even at similar fitness levels.
  • lorrpb
    lorrpb Posts: 11,463 Member
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    amandaeve wrote: »
    lorrpb wrote: »
    30-50% of hypertension is inherited factors. But lifestyle can make it worse. Any scientific study looks at the outliers but that's not what makes it to the popular press.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21462849

    @lorrpb Thank you for sharing. I am impressed 30-50% is attributed to inherited factors. This thread aside, I've yet to meet anyone who went on medication who fit any or many of the categories that fit me at diagnosis (young, female, physically fit, a healthy BMI, healthy lifestyle, following a DASH diet). I have a curiosity in finding other people like me. You'd think with numbers like that study presented, I would have met more by now.

    @Zodikosis I'm impressed you lowered your RHR that much! Good job! :smile: I've also been curious about RHR averages. I've seen charts that match RHR to age and fitness level, but I've never been able to find information on how many people actually fall into what category per age group. If you have anything like that handy, please share.

    There's any RHR chart for Canada here:

    http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-626-x/2013001/t004-eng.htm

    It's not numbers of people, but it does have percentiles of people. (I'm not Canadian, but its the first one I found from a solid source, and I'd be surprised if the rest of the first world were wildly different.)

    The post you're replying to is right, though: Individuals can vary in absolute RHR, even at similar fitness levels.

    Thank you for some more data, @AnnPT77. So just to clarify for OP, depending on how familiar you are with statistical tables, the "outliers" would be the 5th-10th percentile, and 90-95th percentile, depending on how tightly you want to define outlier. These numbers would be the tails on a bell curve.
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    lorrpb wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    amandaeve wrote: »
    lorrpb wrote: »
    30-50% of hypertension is inherited factors. But lifestyle can make it worse. Any scientific study looks at the outliers but that's not what makes it to the popular press.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21462849

    @lorrpb Thank you for sharing. I am impressed 30-50% is attributed to inherited factors. This thread aside, I've yet to meet anyone who went on medication who fit any or many of the categories that fit me at diagnosis (young, female, physically fit, a healthy BMI, healthy lifestyle, following a DASH diet). I have a curiosity in finding other people like me. You'd think with numbers like that study presented, I would have met more by now.

    @Zodikosis I'm impressed you lowered your RHR that much! Good job! :smile: I've also been curious about RHR averages. I've seen charts that match RHR to age and fitness level, but I've never been able to find information on how many people actually fall into what category per age group. If you have anything like that handy, please share.

    There's any RHR chart for Canada here:

    http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-626-x/2013001/t004-eng.htm

    It's not numbers of people, but it does have percentiles of people. (I'm not Canadian, but its the first one I found from a solid source, and I'd be surprised if the rest of the first world were wildly different.)

    The post you're replying to is right, though: Individuals can vary in absolute RHR, even at similar fitness levels.

    Thank you for some more data, @AnnPT77. So just to clarify for OP, depending on how familiar you are with statistical tables, the "outliers" would be the 5th-10th percentile, and 90-95th percentile, depending on how tightly you want to define outlier. These numbers would be the tails on a bell curve.

    Blood pressure is a good topic because the causes can vary so much. My BP was high when I was overeight and I was taking medication. When I lost the weight I became extremely hypotensive to the point of almost passing out with small changes in physical position. Stopped the meds, BP became normal. Yay. After about 3 months, it started drifting up again. No change in weight; workouts if anything more consistent and fitness level higher. After about 6 months it was within 20% of my all-time high. So I just take my meds.

    One phenomenon that I saw regularly when doing stress tests on patients in previous jobs was how for some people, BP during activity could be completely different than BP at rest. People would have elevated BP at rest. As exertion increased on the test, the metabolic demand of the exercise took over and they had a completely normal exercise blood pressure response to exertion (i.e. increased systolic, decreased diastolic, small/modest rise in mean arterial pressure). However during cool down after the test, after 2 min or so, the mechanism would flip back to whatever was driving their BP at rest and they would become hypertensive again—like flipping a switch. Never did get an answer why, but it was interesting to observe.
  • gradchica27
    gradchica27 Posts: 777 Member
    I don’t have chronic disease at this point, but just found out my cholesterol is high (224, HDL is good—95–triglycerides low—43–but LDL is creeping up—115). My GP isn’t concerned bc of the high hDL, but my husband is (also a physician). I asked, “So what can I do to lower it??” And he replied, “Good question...ummm, eat more fish?” I’m 36, 5’4”, 130. I lift 4x/week, do 30-60 min of cardio 5-6 x/week. I don’t eat meat, eat little cheese, eggs maybe 1-2/week, fish maybe 1/wk. I drink a few glasses of red wine a week, eat a good amount of veggies. So...how do I have high cholesterol? My parents, I suppose. I always thought it was mostly down to their weight, but now maybe that’s not the whole picture. Of course bacon and steak eating, never exercising hubs has perfect cholesterol :neutral:

    So my diet is good (could be better, more fish, less sugar, maybe some more fruits and nuts), my exercise is good (numbers were better when I ran, but running irritates my hip bursitis and knee pain, so can’t go back yet), but I’m not immune from high cholesterol. Argh. I always rolled my eyes at the commercials for meds for “when diet and exercise don’t help” that showed overweight people. I always assumed the diet and exercise bit wasn’t really happening. Serves my proud butt right I guess.
  • nvmomketo
    nvmomketo Posts: 12,019 Member
    I don’t have chronic disease at this point, but just found out my cholesterol is high (224, HDL is good—95–triglycerides low—43–but LDL is creeping up—115). My GP isn’t concerned bc of the high hDL, but my husband is (also a physician). I asked, “So what can I do to lower it??” And he replied, “Good question...ummm, eat more fish?” I’m 36, 5’4”, 130. I lift 4x/week, do 30-60 min of cardio 5-6 x/week. I don’t eat meat, eat little cheese, eggs maybe 1-2/week, fish maybe 1/wk. I drink a few glasses of red wine a week, eat a good amount of veggies. So...how do I have high cholesterol? My parents, I suppose. I always thought it was mostly down to their weight, but now maybe that’s not the whole picture. Of course bacon and steak eating, never exercising hubs has perfect cholesterol :neutral:

    So my diet is good (could be better, more fish, less sugar, maybe some more fruits and nuts), my exercise is good (numbers were better when I ran, but running irritates my hip bursitis and knee pain, so can’t go back yet), but I’m not immune from high cholesterol. Argh. I always rolled my eyes at the commercials for meds for “when diet and exercise don’t help” that showed overweight people. I always assumed the diet and exercise bit wasn’t really happening. Serves my proud butt right I guess.

    @gradchica27 There may be a possible strong correlation with cholesterol and what you ate in the previous week and how much. Feldman has done some interesting n=1 experiments, repeated and confirmed by dozens of others, that show that eating high fat, even in excess calories, will lower cholesterol a few days later... People are using it to get better scores on insurance exams. ;)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZu52duIqno

  • amandaeve
    amandaeve Posts: 723 Member
    jesslla wrote: »
    Do you count mental illnesses as chronic disease? Everyone crows about how wonderful exercise is for treating depression, but for me personally (bipolar I, mostly depression) exercise does nothing to improve my mood. The only thing that works for my mood is medication.

    I worked for a year and a half in retail, walking constantly for hours a time, never standing in one place for more than a couple minutes. For me, that was exercise, because I'm typically quite sedentary. (This was before my arthritis in my knee got so bad and before I started MFP).

    I had a mixed episode (manic and depressed at the same time, I was sucidial and went into a mental hospital for a week, mixed episodes are very dangerous because the mania gives you the energy to actually go through with suicide) and quit my job.

    I did three months of purposeful exercise after that, still no difference in my moods. I make myself exercise to get more calories to eat and to improve my cardiovascular health, but it doesn't seem to do a thing for my mental health.

    @jessilla mental illness totally counts. I remember hearing that the mood-boosting effect of exercise is also genetic. One of those mail-in genetic tests advertised that they tested for it. I thought that was silly, as I am clearly boosted by activity, don't need a test to confirm that one. You probably just don't have the gene. A lot of people around me have a mood affect from daylight/vitamin D, of which I have none. I can get as depressed as the best of them, but not from darkness. If there's any chance for exercise to help you, I would check first to make sure it's an activity you find fun in the first place (or found fun when not depressed). I hated working retail, sure I burned lots of calories, but I also came home exhausted and stressed.
  • amandaeve
    amandaeve Posts: 723 Member
    nvmomketo wrote: »
    I don’t have chronic disease at this point, but just found out my cholesterol is high (224, HDL is good—95–triglycerides low—43–but LDL is creeping up—115). My GP isn’t concerned bc of the high hDL, but my husband is (also a physician). I asked, “So what can I do to lower it??” And he replied, “Good question...ummm, eat more fish?” I’m 36, 5’4”, 130. I lift 4x/week, do 30-60 min of cardio 5-6 x/week. I don’t eat meat, eat little cheese, eggs maybe 1-2/week, fish maybe 1/wk. I drink a few glasses of red wine a week, eat a good amount of veggies. So...how do I have high cholesterol? My parents, I suppose. I always thought it was mostly down to their weight, but now maybe that’s not the whole picture. Of course bacon and steak eating, never exercising hubs has perfect cholesterol :neutral:

    So my diet is good (could be better, more fish, less sugar, maybe some more fruits and nuts), my exercise is good (numbers were better when I ran, but running irritates my hip bursitis and knee pain, so can’t go back yet), but I’m not immune from high cholesterol. Argh. I always rolled my eyes at the commercials for meds for “when diet and exercise don’t help” that showed overweight people. I always assumed the diet and exercise bit wasn’t really happening. Serves my proud butt right I guess.

    @gradchica27 There may be a possible strong correlation with cholesterol and what you ate in the previous week and how much. Feldman has done some interesting n=1 experiments, repeated and confirmed by dozens of others, that show that eating high fat, even in excess calories, will lower cholesterol a few days later... People are using it to get better scores on insurance exams. ;)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZu52duIqno

    Agreed. Cholesterol tests were required for work clearance at a job I used to have. So many people would fail. But if they had the option to take the test again 2 weeks later, they almost always passed. I never failed, so I don't know what food they ate for those 2 weeks, but it was a known thing around the work place, and one person would pass the diet advice on to the next.

    Some of my best friends are vegetarians and medicated for cholesterol, so I was really happy when the news that blood cholesterol levels weren't all about eating cholesterol started getting more mainstream.
  • StonesUnturned
    StonesUnturned Posts: 94 Member
    A few people made the points that scientific studies will often look at a large group of people and the main findings and especially press releases will report average findings across the whole population, although if you look into the paper, sometimes it will point out that a subgroup of people seemed to experience a larger effect. Often we don't have the understanding yet to say what makes this subgroup of people different. However, personalized medicine and genetic studies are becoming trendy and easier to do on large groups, so I expect we will see more studies identifying subgroups of populations in the future.

    Aside from the hypertension stuff already mentioned, a couple of years ago there was a controversial paper that came out saying 2/3 of cancer mutations were random (not due to specific environmental or genetic factors). This paper was partly controversial because of methodology (it was done by mathematicians making certain assumptions about mutations rates and types of cells) and partly because of the message people felt it sent about how useful prevention may or may not be. Also, a lot of the press made it sound like 2/3 of cancer cases were due to "bad luck" as they put it, but this isn't what is meant by cancer mutations (you can have a lot of rare mutations that happen by chance, but a common mutation that is due to environmental factors like HPV or something). More information here: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/03/debate-reignites-over-contributions-bad-luck-mutations-cancer

    There is also a group at Birmingham University who have suggested that about 20% of people don't get fitter with exercise. They still burn calories obviously and can use it as a part of weight loss, but they don't gain aerobic capacity and so exercise just doesn't get any easier for them. They have a set of genetic markers that can find these people. It's not necessarily related to chronic disease, but aerobic fitness is thought to be related to health. This BBC piece has enough info if you want to track down the group's original research: http://www.bbc.com/news/health-17177251
  • GaleHawkins
    GaleHawkins Posts: 8,159 Member
    I am down to the only data that is meaningful in my case is my own n=1 research data. When I have an health issue I read up on it and try some things that have worked for others after I decide doing something similar is not likely to make my health worse.

    Cutting out added sugar and all forms of all grains over three years has I think addressed all of my failing health concerns. I under this may not be a universal solution to all physical, mental, spiritual in the world but it is working out very well for my n=1 research.

    I do think most people can find a WOE that works best for them when it comes to quality of life and quantity of life.
  • MeanderingMammal
    MeanderingMammal Posts: 7,866 Member
    I seriously doubt it will kill me even if it is "high".

    Several years ago my GP made the observation that the vast majority of non-trauma related deaths are a result of one of three things; cancer, stroke and heart failure. High BP increases the risk of both stroke and heart failure.



  • comptonelizabeth
    comptonelizabeth Posts: 1,701 Member
    amandaeve wrote: »
    amandaeve wrote: »
    There is no end to studies that show how healthy lifestyles improve chronic diseases (high blood pressure, diabetes, cancer, etc.) and how poor lifestyles (smoking, drinking, sedentary, fatty food, etc.) contribute to chronic disease. I keep looking for information on the outliers. Are there studies on those with chronic disease for whom lifestyle makes no difference? We all know that person who didn’t fit the data, but I can’t find data as to percentage of the population who are outliers. Are you one of those people? I am curious how many other people are out there like me. The only influence my doctors can attribute to my hypertension is heredity; lifestyle choices make no difference- but none of them can tell me how common that is.

    I have severe digestive issues. People say to eat more fiber, fruits, veggies, lean meat, and drink more water. What they fail to understand is in my case, fiber makes it 100x worse as does tough meats. And drinking lots of water makes no difference. The unhealthier I eat, the better I feel and less hospital trips I make. My conditions are Gastroparesis and Colonic Inertia. What's even worse is there have been nutritionists who assume I have an eating disorder because I don't eat much and like being a small size. Um, yeah a slow stomach + paralyzed colon = constantly full. Not my fault. And the smaller I am, the less unnecessary food/stool weight it feels like I'm carrying = the more energy I have to get things done. Some people are pricks, I swear.

    This. I suffer from Ulcerative Colitis and if I were to eat 'healthily' I'd end up in hospital.
    And my lifestyle makes very little difference to my condition. Flare ups occur out of the blue and seem to bear no relation to what I've eaten how much stress I'm under or how much water I've drunk. I am at my best when I eat 'beige' food!

    Very interesting! However, just to clarify, this thread is about when lifestyle (including eating behaviors) have no effect on chronic conditions. Ending up in the hospital from eating certain foods is definitely an impact.

    True! Hasn't thought of it that way. I guess what I'm saying is that eating conventionally 'healthy' food would not make me better and my condition was not caused by diet or lifestyle ( as far as I am aware)
This discussion has been closed.