Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Are 'convenience foods' really convenient?

13

Replies

  • ejbronte
    ejbronte Posts: 867 Member
    I like to use a mix of prepared/convenience food and food cooked from scratch: frozen riced vegetables can be microwaved and combined with various things I've made from scratch. I do make my own bread these days, as I'm really getting to like it, I'm slowly getting better at it, and I can play with flavors. It started as a way to help with my sodium intake, but it's turning into a lot of fun. I do cook for one now, but as I'm batch cooking, and my freezer is turning into a very good friend, I find I can treat myself as well as I can treat a couple or a family: I think that's been important to realize in my weight adventure.
  • TonyB0588
    TonyB0588 Posts: 9,520 Member
    There really are three options, not two.
    1. Cook everything from scratch, which is what we generally do at my home.
    2. Heat up ready-made store bought frozen foods, which we might do occasionally.
    3. Purchase complete meals at restaurants or fast food shops, which appears to be a growing market segment in the food industry.
  • rheddmobile
    rheddmobile Posts: 6,840 Member
    Setting aside that few convenience foods are filling and suitable for my needs as a diabetic, I would say they are definitely more convenient, usually cheaper, but not necessarily quicker to prepare.

    My most often eaten convenience food is Marie Callender lasagna with a side of canned spinach. It's comparatively wholesome, mostly made from foods I recognize, and not too high in carbs. The lasagna takes something like 15 minutes in the microwave and 45 in the oven, not all that fast, and the spinach is a can dumped in a bowl in the microwave for two minutes. Shopping for it involves going to two different sections of the grocery. The lasagna costs three dollars for a meal big enough for two people. No clean up involved.

    My quickest lazy meal made from scratch - what I cook when I want a real, filling meal but am sick or otherwise exhausted - is roasted chicken thighs in a pan with Wicker's BBQ marinade and v8 juice, with a side of canned field peas and canned spinach. This involves walking all the way to every corner of the grocery, picking out chicken thighs that look okay instead of randomly picking up the package in the front, because fresh food is always packaged in a way which is subject to damage, touching raw chicken and then washing my hands and / or putting on gloves and disposing of them, pouring, and an hour of cook time. A package of chicken thighs is about seven dollars. Plus the cost of the other ingredients. It will feed four, but I don't have four people so I have leftovers. Then I have to wash a roasting pan.

    Any other from scratch meal, such as stir fry, involves washing, slicing, getting pots, pans, knives, and cutting boards dirty. A cheap frozen pizza my husband will happily eat is a dollar and takes ten minutes on a pan in the oven. A nice diabetic friendly equivalent takes half an hour or more prep time and easily ten dollars or more.
  • rheddmobile
    rheddmobile Posts: 6,840 Member
    shaumom wrote: »
    I have seen a few people talk about how convenience foods - in this case meaning pre-packaged foods and meals, like mac & cheese, frozen dinners, hamburger helper, etc... - are not really 'convenient.' Basically, not easier to make, not easy to make in less time, etc..

    Mind, I'm not debating whether convenience food is healthier. Convenient, in this case, is solely looking at 'easier.' The ease of getting the food ready and in our bodies, but not about what happens to our bodies once it is there. Possibly the cost, too, as I imagine it's easier in life if you have more money. :-)


    I have a friend who believes that convenience foods are NOT more convenient. My friend's argument (based on his own views plus a few articles done about 5-8 years ago) was that you still had to go to the store, so that's the same amount of time, that cooking time for convenience foods vs. home cooked foods was about the same, and that people spent nearly the same time in food prep for both (in a bit of research by Margaret Beck in 2013, people spent about 10-12 minutes more prepping 'from scratch' meals vs. convenience foods).


    My belief is that convenience foods are quite often very convenient. So I'm hoping a debate on this will help both myself and my friend when we talk about this next. :-)

    I'm going to just put my own thoughts on this in the next post, to keep things tidier for this first post, and I look forward to hearing what folks have to say on the topic.

    Your friend has obviously never made homemade macaroni and cheese from scratch vs making a box of Kraft mac n cheese :p

    I use both regularly-some things like instant potatoes are way easier/faster/more convenient than making mashed potatoes from raw potatoes. Or things like homemade lasagna vs a Stouffers frozen lasagna, which you literally just throw in the oven. Other things are pretty much a wash. It really just depends on specific items/meals.
    cwolfman13 wrote: »
    Of course convenient foods are easier...

    I made lasagna for guests on Saturday night...between prep, simmering my homemade sauce, and cooking, it was about a 3 hour ordeal. I wouldn't ever do it, but I could have just bought a frozen lasagna and popped it in the oven.

    Our kids really like mac 'n cheese...they usually have Annie's from the box and it takes me all of 10 minutes to make it. When I made mac 'n cheese from scratch, it's at least a 2 hour deal.

    I don't generally make a lot of convenience food...I generally find them sub par to my own cooking...but most of my cooking, particularly during the work week takes me about 20-30 minutes to get dinner ready...in that regard, convenience foods are only slightly more convenient time wise.

    It takes longer to get the roux started for Real Mac n Cheese than it takes cradle to grave for boxed mac.

    You're using a light roux for mac and cheese, right? Shouldn't take too long. But I can make a dark chocolate colored roux in 7 minutes - use bisquick instead of flour. It's like a magic trick. Also, you can put roux in an ice tray and freeze it. Frozen roux cubes are a great thing to have on hand.
  • This content has been removed.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 35,148 Member
    There are multiple possible definitions/dimensions of "convenient". One thing that hasn't been mentioned, that - speaking only for myself - is an inconvenience of "convenience" foods that are fully prepared dishes (frozen entrees, for example: You can pretty much only eat the thing you have.

    I'm a whim-oriented person. If I buy frozen lasagna or a burrito bowl, that's what I have to eat. I'd rather buy (and/or prep) some whole and semi-convenience things, like chickpea pasta, canned diced tomatoes, Ezekiel tortillas, corn tortillas, eggs, cheese, onions, salsa, beans, veggies. Only a few of those are very perishable, given a freezer. With a few things on hand, at whim I can have an omelet with veggies and cheese, a wrap sandwich, pasta with veggies and cheese, veggie chili, several types of main-dish salad, enchiladas or tostadas, . . . . etc.

    None of those things take long to make, none require recipes, and - to me - it's convenient to have what sounds good to me at the time, not just one of the small number of specific frozen meals I might've bought. Also, my semi-home-made food tastes better, and makes it easier for me to hit my protein and vegetable goals at reasonable calories (frozen meals tend to be carb heavy, expecially the vegetarian ones that I need), and (compared to frozen meals I actually sort of like) cooking is cheaper.


  • TonyB0588
    TonyB0588 Posts: 9,520 Member
    Lounmoun wrote: »
    ...............

    I think historically when everyone cooked from scratch they often cooked larger amounts that would last several meals and limited menus instead of having something different every day like people expect these days.



    No. Historically, my parents both came from families where they ate specific foods on specific days. They would never have the "Tuesday" meal on a Thursday or Friday. And Sunday was always something more special than the other days. Not sure they had leftovers. Seems like everything was measured to fit the number of persons in the family.
  • shaumom
    shaumom Posts: 1,003 Member
    Lounmoun wrote: »
    ...............

    I think historically when everyone cooked from scratch they often cooked larger amounts that would last several meals and limited menus instead of having something different every day like people expect these days.

    Honestly, I know of few cultures this would apply to. Mostly because to make big batches of something, you have to have ways to store it without it rotting. And historically that wasn’t possible for meals. Although obviously larger volume food prep for certain foods was still a thing, with dried meats, dried fruits, pemmican, smoked or salted meats and fish, etc...

    Most folks I know of who grow up with food culture that is very removed from first world food practices cook every single day, and often go to market every single day.

    Although I would agree that eating staple foods daily was much more common, in older food tradtions. my mother grew up in a different culture where they still churned their own butter, lived on well water, lived mostly off food you grew yourself, that sort of level of modernity. They had pretty much the same food for each meal for a season or two, because that was what you had.

    She still remembers when they did a huge favor for another villager who, as a thank you, gave them some of his rhubarb crop- rare in that village- for years after. It was a huge deal for them to get a piece.
  • BecomingMoreAwesome
    BecomingMoreAwesome Posts: 153 Member
    shaumom wrote: »
    I have seen a few people talk about how convenience foods - in this case meaning pre-packaged foods and meals, like mac & cheese, frozen dinners, hamburger helper, etc... - are not really 'convenient.' Basically, not easier to make, not easy to make in less time, etc..

    Mind, I'm not debating whether convenience food is healthier. Convenient, in this case, is solely looking at 'easier.' The ease of getting the food ready and in our bodies, but not about what happens to our bodies once it is there. Possibly the cost, too, as I imagine it's easier in life if you have more money. :-)


    I have a friend who believes that convenience foods are NOT more convenient. My friend's argument (based on his own views plus a few articles done about 5-8 years ago) was that you still had to go to the store, so that's the same amount of time, that cooking time for convenience foods vs. home cooked foods was about the same, and that people spent nearly the same time in food prep for both (in a bit of research by Margaret Beck in 2013, people spent about 10-12 minutes more prepping 'from scratch' meals vs. convenience foods).


    My belief is that convenience foods are quite often very convenient. So I'm hoping a debate on this will help both myself and my friend when we talk about this next. :-)

    I'm going to just put my own thoughts on this in the next post, to keep things tidier for this first post, and I look forward to hearing what folks have to say on the topic.

    Your friend has obviously never made homemade macaroni and cheese from scratch vs making a box of Kraft mac n cheese :p

    I use both regularly-some things like instant potatoes are way easier/faster/more convenient than making mashed potatoes from raw potatoes. Or things like homemade lasagna vs a Stouffers frozen lasagna, which you literally just throw in the oven. Other things are pretty much a wash. It really just depends on specific items/meals.
    cwolfman13 wrote: »
    Of course convenient foods are easier...

    I made lasagna for guests on Saturday night...between prep, simmering my homemade sauce, and cooking, it was about a 3 hour ordeal. I wouldn't ever do it, but I could have just bought a frozen lasagna and popped it in the oven.

    Our kids really like mac 'n cheese...they usually have Annie's from the box and it takes me all of 10 minutes to make it. When I made mac 'n cheese from scratch, it's at least a 2 hour deal.

    I don't generally make a lot of convenience food...I generally find them sub par to my own cooking...but most of my cooking, particularly during the work week takes me about 20-30 minutes to get dinner ready...in that regard, convenience foods are only slightly more convenient time wise.

    It takes longer to get the roux started for Real Mac n Cheese than it takes cradle to grave for boxed mac.

    America’s Test kitchen has a stovetop Mac & cheese that’s quite good in their 30 minute cookbook . The secret is evaporated milk. Of course nothing in the ATK 30 minute cookbook actually takes 30 minutes start to finish because I don’t yet have a personal prep cook.

    Op, I agree with you that for the most part—convenience foods actually are more convenient. Everyone has their own happy place between convenience and from-scratch cooking. I think that which convenience foods are worthwhile is one of those completely subjective arguments like which foods make good leftovers. Someone who grows up eating really good homemade fried fish is a lot less likely to enjoy frozen fish sticks. Or the opposite-I don’t taste much difference between a good frozen lasagna and a decent homemade lasagna, so the time and effort aren’t worthwhile to me.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    What about "cook mostly from scratch, but use some pre-made ingredients for convenience's sake?" (Examples: canned tomato products, puff pastry/phyllo dough, stir-fry sauces, canned or frozen fruits and vegetables)

    Yup, that's what struck me as obviously missing from the "there are three choices" thing.
  • jjpptt2
    jjpptt2 Posts: 5,650 Member
    woah... now THAT'S a kid I don't want to meet in a dark alley!
  • sytchequeen
    sytchequeen Posts: 526 Member
    jjpptt2 wrote: »
    For me...

    Cooking (not even from scratch, just assembling ingredients and following a recipe)
    - almost never tastes as good as something boxed/prepared.
    - almost always takes longer to "cook".
    - almost always results in more left overs that no one wants and gets thrown away.
    - is usually *slightly* cheaper.

    Prepared/Prepackaged foods
    - almost always taste better
    - are almost always faster to prepare
    - are almost always more macro flexible (maybe that's because I'm more familiar/learned in how to combine/balance them)
    - are almost always more family friendly
    - are usually more expensive

    Wow. Barring the costs, I have almost always found the reverse to be true. I think I just really don't like the taste of ready meals over my own cooking. They seem either to sweet or too salty or something.

    I am not against "convenience" though. I will happy use dried pasta and tinned tomatoes / beans etc. It's just the ready meals I can't do with.

    Plus I enjoy cooking - for me it's relaxation after a long day. Not for everyone though.

  • jjpptt2
    jjpptt2 Posts: 5,650 Member
    jjpptt2 wrote: »
    For me...

    Cooking (not even from scratch, just assembling ingredients and following a recipe)
    - almost never tastes as good as something boxed/prepared.
    - almost always takes longer to "cook".
    - almost always results in more left overs that no one wants and gets thrown away.
    - is usually *slightly* cheaper.

    Prepared/Prepackaged foods
    - almost always taste better
    - are almost always faster to prepare
    - are almost always more macro flexible (maybe that's because I'm more familiar/learned in how to combine/balance them)
    - are almost always more family friendly
    - are usually more expensive

    Wow. Barring the costs, I have almost always found the reverse to be true. I think I just really don't like the taste of ready meals over my own cooking. They seem either to sweet or too salty or something.

    I am not against "convenience" though. I will happy use dried pasta and tinned tomatoes / beans etc. It's just the ready meals I can't do with.

    Plus I enjoy cooking - for me it's relaxation after a long day. Not for everyone though.

    And I think that's the subjective part of this conversation that makes it interesting. What is tasty vs bland or gross or whatever... what is easy vs tedious vs whatever... those things can vary person to person. Heck, even cost can vary a bit based on factors. Perhaps the time required to prepare the meal is the least subjective/varied aspect, but that is only 1 small part of the conversation (or at least has been for most people).
  • mbaker566
    mbaker566 Posts: 11,233 Member
    jjpptt2 wrote: »
    TonyB0588 wrote: »
    Lounmoun wrote: »
    ...............

    I think historically when everyone cooked from scratch they often cooked larger amounts that would last several meals and limited menus instead of having something different every day like people expect these days.



    No. Historically, my parents both came from families where they ate specific foods on specific days. They would never have the "Tuesday" meal on a Thursday or Friday. And Sunday was always something more special than the other days. Not sure they had leftovers. Seems like everything was measured to fit the number of persons in the family.

    And you're certain that your family is an adequate representation of what the majority of families did "historically"?

    are you sure it isn't?

    my family was and is the same. extended and immediate. my friend's family were too. my inlaws too
  • jjpptt2
    jjpptt2 Posts: 5,650 Member
    mbaker566 wrote: »
    jjpptt2 wrote: »
    TonyB0588 wrote: »
    Lounmoun wrote: »
    ...............

    I think historically when everyone cooked from scratch they often cooked larger amounts that would last several meals and limited menus instead of having something different every day like people expect these days.



    No. Historically, my parents both came from families where they ate specific foods on specific days. They would never have the "Tuesday" meal on a Thursday or Friday. And Sunday was always something more special than the other days. Not sure they had leftovers. Seems like everything was measured to fit the number of persons in the family.

    And you're certain that your family is an adequate representation of what the majority of families did "historically"?

    are you sure it isn't?

    my family was and is the same. extended and immediate. my friend's family were too. my inlaws too

    No, I'm not... which is why I didn't post in support or opposition of the claim being made. My point was simply that your n=1 (or in this case, n=50) doesn't disprove the statement. Your experience is what it is... but that' doesn't mean it's necessarily representative of the norm/majority.
  • aokoye
    aokoye Posts: 3,495 Member
    So I read about half of the posts before deciding to respond. In terms of money I can't really get behind the idea that convenience foods are cheaper. Flour, dried beans, canned tomatoes, vegetable oil, various other things that I would consider staples? Those can be bought very inexpensively. If you have enough freezer space then buying meat on sale is also a way to cut down on cost (and if you really have enough space, buying a side of an animal would be even cheaper per pound).

    Time wise it's really going to depend on what you're making. If I'm short on time I can easily whip out a good but not amazing pasta sauce in 20 min using canned tomatoes, fresh garlic, various dried herbs and spices (which are pantry staples for me), and potentially some sort of meat if I have it on hand. That is cheaper than buying canned tomato sauce or some sort of frozen pasta thing. Thai curry is another meal that comes together very quickly if you have good thai curry paste. On the other hand, making tamales from scratch takes a lot of time. It's totally worth it to me but it takes a lot of time. That said, when I make tamales I also freeze most of them and, again, it is cheaper for me to make them than it is to buy frozen or fresh tamales from somewhere/someone else.

    The pizza example is interesting because as long as you're able to make the dough in advance and let it rise overnight (rising time is not active cooking time) it really shouldn't take 20 minutes depending on what you're topping it with. I know for some people are truly short for time frozen food will potentially be quicker in a lot of ways (clean up being a big one), but I have no way of knowing if that's true for the majority of people who buy convenience food.

    I will say though that I actually really like cooking. I do only cook for myself buy I tend to make 2-4 portions and eat the rest for leftovers. I do buy frozen corn, peas, and various types of berries (if I've run out of whatever berries I frozen over the summer). That's partially an issue of cost and also of freshness (something frozen shortly after it's been harvested in season vs something that has been sitting in the store that was grown totally out of season). I also will buy frozen duck because of the cost, though fresh tastes better. Grocery shopping also isn't something that takes a particularly long time for me nor does making a grocery list. That's especially true if I organize the list by section (all of the meats are together, all of the produce is together, all of the canned goods, etc).

    I can't really think of any prepared food that tastes better out of the freezer section than what I can make from scratch. That has more to do with the quality of food in the freezer section than my own cooking skills. Again though, I like cooking and I like making food that tastes good.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    mbaker566 wrote: »
    jjpptt2 wrote: »
    TonyB0588 wrote: »
    Lounmoun wrote: »
    ...............

    I think historically when everyone cooked from scratch they often cooked larger amounts that would last several meals and limited menus instead of having something different every day like people expect these days.



    No. Historically, my parents both came from families where they ate specific foods on specific days. They would never have the "Tuesday" meal on a Thursday or Friday. And Sunday was always something more special than the other days. Not sure they had leftovers. Seems like everything was measured to fit the number of persons in the family.

    And you're certain that your family is an adequate representation of what the majority of families did "historically"?

    are you sure it isn't?

    my family was and is the same. extended and immediate. my friend's family were too. my inlaws too

    As jjpptt2 said, we'd neither something more than everyone's anecdotal experience.

    But all those people had special meals they ate on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, etc., every single week? You couldn't have pot roast on Tuesday if it was the Wednesday meal or pork chops on Monday if it was supposed to be for Thursday? My experience is the opposite (again, why anecdote is not a good basis for making claims about what the majority of families did).
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    edited April 2018
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    mbaker566 wrote: »
    jjpptt2 wrote: »
    TonyB0588 wrote: »
    Lounmoun wrote: »
    ...............

    I think historically when everyone cooked from scratch they often cooked larger amounts that would last several meals and limited menus instead of having something different every day like people expect these days.



    No. Historically, my parents both came from families where they ate specific foods on specific days. They would never have the "Tuesday" meal on a Thursday or Friday. And Sunday was always something more special than the other days. Not sure they had leftovers. Seems like everything was measured to fit the number of persons in the family.

    And you're certain that your family is an adequate representation of what the majority of families did "historically"?

    are you sure it isn't?

    my family was and is the same. extended and immediate. my friend's family were too. my inlaws too

    As jjpptt2 said, we'd neither something more than everyone's anecdotal experience.

    But all those people had special meals they ate on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, etc., every single week? You couldn't have pot roast on Tuesday if it was the Wednesday meal or pork chops on Monday if it was supposed to be for Thursday? My experience is the opposite (again, why anecdote is not a good basis for making claims about what the majority of families did).

    I remember my mom had a rough meal schedule (there were eight of us so she needed all the planning help she could get). So we'd generally have, say, fried rice on Tuesday. But if there was an activity or a sale on something else or she was out of something, she had no problems switching things around. It was a loose guide, nothing more.

    (I know you said we needed more than anecdotes, but couldn't resist chiming in).

    That makes more sense to me. My mom had a rotation, but it wasn't only 6 meals, and wasn't tied to any day of the week, and she'd vary based on what was in season, sales, if my dad went fishing or someone gave us fish (not uncommon), so on.

    Of course, my mom also used some convenience foods and we had leftovers, although probably not as often as I now do, as I plan that in to make it easier for myself.

    My mom worked full-time and hated cooking, although I didn't know that she did until later. She and my dad went hardcore into convenience options once she didn't feel like she shouldn't use them to feed her family (and because there are better options available now), and then when she was sick and less mobile my dad used them a lot since he liked cooking when it was a hobby but not when he essentially had to do it daily.

    By convenience foods I don't mean fully made freezer meals, but basically relying on convenience products mixed with whole foods. She did some of that (canned soups, dried spaghetti, etc.) when I was a kid, but used many more in more recent years.
  • amusedmonkey
    amusedmonkey Posts: 10,330 Member
    edited April 2018
    We've never had a meal schedule. We still cook most of our meals and we still don't have a meal schedule. It must be a cultural thing in some places. Here the person who cooks just looks at what's available and decides what today's meal is then buys what's needed, or if someone asks for something specific we buy things needed for that. Produce stores are at every corner here, so planning is rarely needed. We usually cook a main meal that lasts for 2-3 days.

    I remember when we visited my grandparents for a couple of months every year, they didn't have a meal schedule either. They live in a village and everything is made from scratch, still churn their own butter, harvest their own produce, and slaughter their own animals. We ate what my grandmother chose to prepare - there was no schedule to it. When it was a larger animal, we ate the few dishes prepared from that animal for a while and sold the rest at the market (you could rent stalls). We went to the market once a week and sold whatever was in excess that week, mostly dairy because we had great cows, then bought whatever we didn't have much of and was cheap. Basically just going by what was available and in season.

    It's probably one of the reasons why meal planning didn't feel natural to me as a way to manage my calories and why I didn't take to it like many would. I'm used to cooking/eating based on what I feel like eating and what is available.

    So that's my n=2: no meal schedule in 2 different cultures and two different places (city and village) in my own family.
  • HoneyBadger302
    HoneyBadger302 Posts: 2,111 Member
    As with most things, IMO, it depends.

    Oftentimes, I could prepare something similar and it would cook in about the same time as some pre-packaged meals, but there are many other factors for me.
    #1: Planning and shopping. Sorry, there's a big difference there. It's a hell of a lot easier to grab a jar of pasta sauce than it is to get all the ingredients to make my own. I live with roommates with limited storage, so I can't keep a lot of non-perishables on hand.

    #2: Clean up from prep. Having to cut, measure, scoop, etc means more dirty dishes. This means more work. Perhaps multiple pans when a packaged food would take one. This is actually one of the things I hate the most about cooking!

    #3: Ease. It may not take a LOT of time to think through a meal plan, but there's a lot less thought when grabbing something and just throwing it on. Grabbing one or two things, bam, done, rather than grabbing more things. Plus, most packaged foods are one and done, coming from skratch I'm more likely to need to put things back/into other containers for future use as they are seldom single-meal sizes.

    Yes, it's all "little stuff" but it's little stuff that adds up. When you have a grand total of 2 hours/day for cooking, eating dinner, errands, and any possibility of relaxing, 2 minutes here and 5 minutes there can add up pretty darn quick.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    I'll add to the conversation. Yes, strictly speaking convenience foods probably ARE more convenient than homemade - but I don't think real life is that simple or black and white. For example, I am sometimes amused at frozen microwave dinners that have potato in them. They microwave in 6-7 minutes - the same time it takes to cook a raw potato from the bin.

    I generally agree with your post, but I found this amusing. I also consider potato a really convenient thing to cook, but no way does it take me anything like 6-7 minutes. It takes longer than that to heat up the oven (I tend to chop while that's happening), and then they cook quite a bit longer. If you'd said asparagus or green beans or something, I would have agreed.
    "Instant" rice is another example. From my memory there was maybe a 1-2 minute time saving for the "instant" version. Those are extreme examples though...

    The best "convenience" thing I have is my rice cooker for rice and oats. Takes a while, but totally fool-proof and I can do other things while it cooks.
    Much of the convenience question depends on if they like to cook, how inconvenient shopping may be, and what stage of life they are currently in.

    Yes -- in my 20s I rarely cooked (other than convenience). Cooking would be something like a bagged salad that I might add some chicken I'd cook to, or pasta I'd add a premade sauce plus some veg to, or a packaged rice and beans I'd add some veg and maybe some feta cheese to.

    Those WERE convenient for me, and way less effort than trying to decide what I wanted, figuring out how to make it, getting the ingredients (which would require a shopping trip and getting lots of staples I didn't have and too much of everything), and stuff like that. No wonder my normal rice and beans seemed more convenient (and at least it was a change from ordering delivery).

    When I decided to learn to cook (and not just find and follow a recipe -- something harder when you couldn't just google), it soon became way more convenient to cook and I soon realized I could cook something I enjoyed as much as anything I could buy, even without freaking out about following a recipe perfectly. I started to do a lot of pasta with homemade sauce, and also a variety of easy dinners (roast some chicken and potatoes and have cauliflower and green beans on the side). The more I cooked, the more I had ingredients on hand and started just winging what to do with them to use them up. It became convenient. It's still not ALWAYS convenient -- if you are exhausted and get home at 10 pm, sometimes you just want to be able to reheat something -- but even there habitual cooking can make that easy, as I often have something on hand.
This discussion has been closed.