What are some of your unpopular opinions about food?
Replies
-
It's quite common in my open plan office to have snacks at the desk. We don't have designated break rooms either, the mini fridge is in each open plan setting. The microwaves are downstairs at the entrance. I can honestly say it doesn't bother me in the least if people snack all day at their desk, don't think I even notice.
I hate to think my fruit and go ahead bars that I eat in between meals at my desk would be judged as a nasty habit...but then again, you can't please them all!
Back on topic though, I don't think there's a point where pasta or rice are overcooked...it's all good to me!4 -
GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »I genuinely think subway makes the best subs and people always look at me sideways when I tell them how much I love subway 😂
I was diagnosed with celiac disease 20 years ago and have no dog in this fight but as a native born Philadelphian I just... can't.
I grew up eating Philly hoagies prepared at a deli with fresh crusty rolls and cannot imagine that any chain sandwich would even come anywhere near being anything other than a pale imitation.
Speaking of being a native of Philly here's my unpopular food opinion: cheeze whiz is an abomination on cheese steaks. Again, I have no dog in this fight, but that nonsense being the cheese topping is something new and was never the cheese that was traditionally on cheesesteaks for years and years.
I am shocked that people would even do that - take a cheese whiz on a cheese steak sandwich. I am also dogless in this fight as I don't eat fellow mammals any more, but the few times I eat cheese whiz it's on wheat thins or similar crackers. An unpopular opinion is that on those rare occasions, I do enjoy that.2 -
CarvedTones wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »I genuinely think subway makes the best subs and people always look at me sideways when I tell them how much I love subway 😂
I was diagnosed with celiac disease 20 years ago and have no dog in this fight but as a native born Philadelphian I just... can't.
I grew up eating Philly hoagies prepared at a deli with fresh crusty rolls and cannot imagine that any chain sandwich would even come anywhere near being anything other than a pale imitation.
Speaking of being a native of Philly here's my unpopular food opinion: cheeze whiz is an abomination on cheese steaks. Again, I have no dog in this fight, but that nonsense being the cheese topping is something new and was never the cheese that was traditionally on cheesesteaks for years and years.
I am shocked that people would even do that - take a cheese whiz on a cheese steak sandwich. I am also dogless in this fight as I don't eat fellow mammals any more, but the few times I eat cheese whiz it's on wheat thins or similar crackers. An unpopular opinion is that on those rare occasions, I do enjoy that.
I'm a vegetarian on top of the gluten restrictions, so there's that too!0 -
PaperDoll_ wrote: »FireOpalCO wrote: »jseams1234 wrote: »jseams1234 wrote: »Nutter Butter > Oreo
Nutter Butter=Oreo
I just can't stand that filling in an original Oreo. Reminds me of toothpaste.
I'm so-so on the original Oreo cookies. I would much rather have the lemon, mint, or brownie batter ones.
I can take or leave an original Oreo. Now the Golden Oreos... yum!
I don't like the original ones, but the Golden ones are so good.
I also really love the new pistachio cream thin Oreos.
Original oreos taste bitter to me, not a fan.
Also Hershey's chocolate sucks, all of it.2 -
GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »Roasted Brussels sprouts are the best vegetable.
I'm going to do some for Thanksgiving and the haters can just leave them all for me!
All diced up with some sweet potato and gonna serve with pecans and cranberries because I'm fancy.5 -
I think brussels got their bad reputation from being boiled (probably to well-beyond done-ness) and ruined. Unless people are just so convinced they hate them that they won't try them, I find that my roasted and pan fried brussels tend to be popular (bacon can be added to entice the non-vegetarian reluctant too).
(My mom was convinced she hated them due to bad childhood experiences, and by the time she was older was really stuck in her food ways, so when we started having T-giving at my house she'd pretend to eat them and then try to sneakily give some to my dad (who loves them) or hide them or say they were delicious but she was just so full. I kept telling her that it would not hurt my feelings if she didn't eat everything or like every dish I made.)6 -
I think brussels got their bad reputation from being boiled (probably to well-beyond done-ness) and ruined. Unless people are just so convinced they hate them that they won't try them, I find that my roasted and pan fried brussels tend to be popular (bacon can be added to entice the non-vegetarian reluctant too).
(My mom was convinced she hated them due to bad childhood experiences, and by the time she was older was really stuck in her food ways, so when we started having T-giving at my house she'd pretend to eat them and then try to sneakily give some to my dad (who loves them) or hide them or say they were delicious but she was just so full. I kept telling her that it would not hurt my feelings if she didn't eat everything or like every dish I made.)
I think you might be right. Boiled within an inch of its life is not the ideal way to present any vegetable. Roasted they often have a sweet flavor. I've gotten hold of some bitter frozen ones, but the fresh ones this time of year are very good!5 -
Of office break rooms and desk eating... Our break room has a huge conference table that never gets used unless we have a potluck. If I don't leave for lunch, I eat at my desk while surfing the net. I don't feel like engaging in small talk with other people who wander in for coffee or to heat up their own food. Thankfully most of my officemates feel the same. All hail the introvert
I don't leave stinky food trash in my office wastebasket, and I don't slop food all around. I had no idea eating at one's desk was such a polarizing issue! I also keep a stash of string cheese in the fridge and almonds at my desk for afternoon snacked. One lady who used to work here kept a whole drawer full of crackers, packaged cookies, etc., that eventually attracted a mouse to take up to residence in it. I draw the line at hosting rodents.10 -
Oreos taste like stale, cheap biscuits3
-
I don't like butter on vegetables. I think it ruins the taste of them.9
-
Of office break rooms and desk eating... Our break room has a huge conference table that never gets used unless we have a potluck. If I don't leave for lunch, I eat at my desk while surfing the net. I don't feel like engaging in small talk with other people who wander in for coffee or to heat up their own food. Thankfully most of my officemates feel the same. All hail the introvert
I don't leave stinky food trash in my office wastebasket, and I don't slop food all around. I had no idea eating at one's desk was such a polarizing issue! I also keep a stash of string cheese in the fridge and almonds at my desk for afternoon snacked. One lady who used to work here kept a whole drawer full of crackers, packaged cookies, etc., that eventually attracted a mouse to take up to residence in it. I draw the line at hosting rodents.
I eat at my desk because I can't eat around my coworkers without getting critiqued. I eat salad, I must be on a diet. No I just like salad because it's easy and I don't get drowsy afterwards. I ate soup out of an old Talenti container and got asked why I was eating ice cream for lunch. Hello the container is clear, see the veggies?
The other department on my floor is jealous of our office. We have a mini fridge, toaster, and Keurig, which my office paid for. We buy our own supplies for it and snacks. The sniping gets annoying. But someone in their department got caught eating chicken wings at their desk during work hours. Very awkward.3 -
PaperDoll_ wrote: »I don't like butter on vegetables. I think it ruins the taste of them.
YES! All I taste is butter and not the veggies. I hate when people add butter to veggies and ruin them. I love to be able to taste the actual veggies.
Also so many people in my family add butter to veggies and then think you can still eat "all you want" because they are "veggies", lol. Drives me nuts!1 -
Noreenmarie1234 wrote: »PaperDoll_ wrote: »I don't like butter on vegetables. I think it ruins the taste of them.
YES! All I taste is butter and not the veggies. I hate when people add butter to veggies and ruin them. I love to be able to taste the actual veggies.
Also so many people in my family add butter to veggies and then think you can still eat "all you want" because they are "veggies", lol. Drives me nuts!
I haven't completely lost my taste for butter but after cutting back I found it is something that I really don't care much about. In my family, it was a lot like the bad habit of salting things before even tasting them, which we commonly did. Butter was passed around and you put a little on pretty much anything that would melt it. No one in my immediate family was big; maybe technically a little overweight at most. We were pretty active and didn't over eat except on special occasions. Most nights there was no dessert. But when there was, it was usually pretty rich.1 -
As a South Jersey (right over the bridge-lol) Celiac, I heartily agree with you about the cheese wiz on cheesesteaks! I’ve been gluten free since 2005 but fondly remember the delicious cheesesteaks from Gino’s (real provolone).GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »I genuinely think subway makes the best subs and people always look at me sideways when I tell them how much I love subway 😂
I was diagnosed with celiac disease 20 years ago and have no dog in this fight but as a native born Philadelphian I just... can't.
I grew up eating Philly hoagies prepared at a deli with fresh crusty rolls and cannot imagine that any chain sandwich would even come anywhere near being anything other than a pale imitation.
Speaking of being a native of Philly here's my unpopular food opinion: cheeze whiz is an abomination on cheese steaks. Again, I have no dog in this fight, but that nonsense being the cheese topping is something new and was never the cheese that was traditionally on cheesesteaks for years and years.
1 -
Of office break rooms and desk eating... Our break room has a huge conference table that never gets used unless we have a potluck. If I don't leave for lunch, I eat at my desk while surfing the net. I don't feel like engaging in small talk with other people who wander in for coffee or to heat up their own food. Thankfully most of my officemates feel the same. All hail the introvert
I don't leave stinky food trash in my office wastebasket, and I don't slop food all around. I had no idea eating at one's desk was such a polarizing issue! I also keep a stash of string cheese in the fridge and almonds at my desk for afternoon snacked. One lady who used to work here kept a whole drawer full of crackers, packaged cookies, etc., that eventually attracted a mouse to take up to residence in it. I draw the line at hosting rodents.
I don't count many voices on the "it's a bad thing" side.6 -
CarvedTones wrote: »lynn_glenmont wrote: »CarvedTones wrote: »A substantiated opinion - the case against using GMO products is complete woo. Every major health organization around the world (CDC, WHO, EUPHA, etc) endorses them as safe. Purposefully avoiding GMO products is pretty much anti-science. A lot of common products avoid them because of public perception so we end up avoiding them without trying. There are reasons to hate Monsanto's business practices with respect to GMO crops. It's a real shame; GMO crops have more yield per acre, reducing the amount of farmland that needs to be cleared. They are more tolerant of drought, increasing the food supply in some areas that need it most. They are more bug resistant, decreasing the need for pesticides that often pollute water supplies.CarvedTones wrote: »A substantiated opinion - the case against using GMO products is complete woo. Every major health organization around the world (CDC, WHO, EUPHA, etc) endorses them as safe. Purposefully avoiding GMO products is pretty much anti-science. A lot of common products avoid them because of public perception so we end up avoiding them without trying. There are reasons to hate Monsanto's business practices with respect to GMO crops. It's a real shame; GMO crops have more yield per acre, reducing the amount of farmland that needs to be cleared. They are more tolerant of drought, increasing the food supply in some areas that need it most. They are more bug resistant, decreasing the need for pesticides that often pollute water supplies.
Agreed. I have zero issue with GMOs.
There is no more rational basis for having a blanket opinion about all GMOs than there is for having a blanket opinion about all possible non GMO organisms. Some will be generally safe for all people, with a very low incidence of allergies. Some will be toxic. And there will be foods that fall somewhere between those extremes.
The process of genetically modifying something doesn't make it automatically safe to eat, anymore than the fact that something isn't genetically modified (by humans through gene manipulation) makes it safe to eat.
Please identify an example of a food that wasn't toxic before modification and is afterwards.
The CDC, WHO, EUPHA and all the other major health organizations are making evidence based scientific conclusions. IMO, trusting science is more rational than dismissing it because I don't like blanket conclusions. There is no rational basis for assuming that modification makes something unsafe to eat when there is no evidence to support that. Science rarely if ever claims 100% certainty of anything only because it is logistically impossible to ever be 100% certain. That doesn't put an unproven hypothesis that isn't based on any evidence on equal footing.
EDIT - Also, they don't just create some new GMO variant and start selling it as food without extensive testing. Mostly they are making sure there is a benefit to the modification, but they do test to make sure the food is acceptable (taste, texture and doesn't kill anyone) as well as achieving their objective (better, yield, more nutrition, higher tolerance to adverse conditions, world peace, etc).
Each GMO food is its own individual case, so having "zero issues" with GMOs is like having "zero issues" with all potential foods There is nothing magical about the GMO process that guarantees that all foods will be safe for all people. I'm perfectly happy to eat GMOs if they have been well-vetted AND if I am allowed access to information about what the modification is. I'm about basing judgments on as much information as possible, so don't try to insinuate that I'm anti-science or anti-evidence. If the evidence is there, there shouldn't be any objection to letting consumers have access to it in each case.
What if they've inserted protein-generating sequences from wheat into a tomato, and I have celiac disease?
I forget the details, but there was a GMO fish that was being brought to market, and they had subbed some gene sequences from a fish that reaches adult weight more quickly than the original fish they were modifying. I would not eat that UNTIL I was able to obtain further information about the fish they were getting the fast-growth genes from. It was a fish that was also commonly eaten by humans, so for me, it was not a concern.
Given the number of drugs that have been approved and brought to market with horrific consequences during my lifetime, due to inadequate vetting, I reserve the right to make my own judgment about each instance of something new that has been "extensively tested" (in the case of GMOs, these extensive tests appear to be on the order of a year or two, which is hardly enough to judge long-term effects).6 -
workinonit1956 wrote: »
As a South Jersey (right over the bridge-lol) Celiac, I heartily agree with you about the cheese wiz on cheesesteaks! I’ve been gluten free since 2005 but fondly remember the delicious cheesesteaks from Gino’s (real provolone).GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »I genuinely think subway makes the best subs and people always look at me sideways when I tell them how much I love subway 😂
I was diagnosed with celiac disease 20 years ago and have no dog in this fight but as a native born Philadelphian I just... can't.
I grew up eating Philly hoagies prepared at a deli with fresh crusty rolls and cannot imagine that any chain sandwich would even come anywhere near being anything other than a pale imitation.
Speaking of being a native of Philly here's my unpopular food opinion: cheeze whiz is an abomination on cheese steaks. Again, I have no dog in this fight, but that nonsense being the cheese topping is something new and was never the cheese that was traditionally on cheesesteaks for years and years.
Hi neighbor! I'm also currently in South Jersey. And yes, I agree. Provolone is the only cheese that belongs on a cheesesteak!2 -
CarvedTones wrote: »Noreenmarie1234 wrote: »PaperDoll_ wrote: »I don't like butter on vegetables. I think it ruins the taste of them.
YES! All I taste is butter and not the veggies. I hate when people add butter to veggies and ruin them. I love to be able to taste the actual veggies.
Also so many people in my family add butter to veggies and then think you can still eat "all you want" because they are "veggies", lol. Drives me nuts!
I haven't completely lost my taste for butter but after cutting back I found it is something that I really don't care much about. In my family, it was a lot like the bad habit of salting things before even tasting them, which we commonly did. Butter was passed around and you put a little on pretty much anything that would melt it. No one in my immediate family was big; maybe technically a little overweight at most. We were pretty active and didn't over eat except on special occasions. Most nights there was no dessert. But when there was, it was usually pretty rich.
There are some things a tiny amount of butter enhances the flavor of (like cooking scrambled eggs in a tiny bit of butter), but I've never been a big fan. I actually prefer olive oil.
I think I was traumatized as a child. My mother LOVED butter to a ridiculous degree and ate ridiculous amounts of it. She was never really overweight until she got much older, but anyway... her butter consumption was just gross. And it just looked disgusting. She'd just lay out slabs of it along the top of a piece of bread, tile-like and chow down on it. :::shudder::: Oil slicks of big globs of it melting on her pancakes. Her baked potatoes looked like more butter than potato. Thankfully, she didn't serve the family veggies with the butter already on them, she added it to her own serving in her own ridiculous amounts.0 -
seltzermint555 wrote: »I know this is a very unpopular opinion but not about the taste of food.
I think it's kind of gross/inappropriate to snack/eat throughout the day at your work desk. I know, I know, people have different needs and busy jobs and whatever else. But to me, the grazing while working is kind of nasty even if you have a private office and keep it clean. I just would rather not see peoples' snacks except in a designated breakroom. I'm sure part of this opinion comes from my earliest jobs in retail when even a bottle of water was frowned upon. But I have worked in offices with people (usually dieting) who constantly had food all over their desks and spent a good amount of time preparing and heating food and carrying it around with them, to meetings even, and I just found it nasty.
You would HATE me then. I eat my breakfast (protein shake and fruit usually) and several snacks at my desk pretty much M-F. I will sometimes eat my lunch if I am extra hungry before my actual lunchtime, or if I have errands to run during lunch. I'm not a slob and there aren't crumbs or whatever all over my desk, so I don't see an issue.7 -
The chicken planks at Long John Silver's are criminally underrated. I know, I know... why are you ordering chicken at Long John Silver's? Wait, why are you eating at Long John Silver's?!!! I don't care if they're deep fried in motor oil, they are really tasty.
I ONLY order chicken at LJS! And I dip it in tartar sauce. My husband thinks it's SO gross. I don't care!0 -
Elphaba1313 wrote: »CarvedTones wrote: »seltzermint555 wrote: »I know this is a very unpopular opinion but not about the taste of food.
I think it's kind of gross/inappropriate to snack/eat throughout the day at your work desk. I know, I know, people have different needs and busy jobs and whatever else. But to me, the grazing while working is kind of nasty even if you have a private office and keep it clean. I just would rather not see peoples' snacks except in a designated breakroom. I'm sure part of this opinion comes from my earliest jobs in retail when even a bottle of water was frowned upon. But I have worked in offices with people (usually dieting) who constantly had food all over their desks and spent a good amount of time preparing and heating food and carrying it around with them, to meetings even, and I just found it nasty.
The break room at my office, like many at other employers, has a refrigerator, microwave, coffee machine, water dispenser and no table. So basically your stance would be that no one at my office or many others like it should ever bring their lunch and/or snacks. That is an unpopular opinion. Packing a lunch to be able to plan what you eat is probably one of the most common suggestions made at mfp. On top of that, I am an hourly contract employee. Leaving to find some other place to eat would cost me money and/or time.
I've never seen a break room without tables... Why don't you guys get a folding card table or something?
In our "break room" there's no room for a table, it's a long alcove that runs between 2 corridors - 2 fridges, hot water station, 2 microwaves, 2 sandwich toasters all on a very long bench. if you stand at the bench you can touch the wall behind you with one arm only. It's also a "throughway" between the corridors so if you are making coffee or heating your lunch someone has to squeeze behind you to get to the fridge or to the other corridor. And this is a government department!
Do we work together?!? :laugh:1 -
Carbs are an important building block of life.13
-
AndThenIWoreIt wrote: »Carbs are an important building block of life.
Carbs are an important building block of my happiness
20 -
Elphaba1313 wrote: »In our "break room" there's no room for a table, it's a long alcove that runs between 2 corridors - 2 fridges, hot water station, 2 microwaves, 2 sandwich toasters all on a very long bench. if you stand at the bench you can touch the wall behind you with one arm only. It's also a "throughway" between the corridors so if you are making coffee or heating your lunch someone has to squeeze behind you to get to the fridge or to the other corridor. And this is a government department!
We have a long kitchen counter with the sink, coffee maker, microwave etc. all on the counter on one side of the corridor. Other side of the corridor is the bathrooms. So, yeah squeeze by the person making coffee to take a *kitten*.
2 -
lynn_glenmont wrote: »CarvedTones wrote: »lynn_glenmont wrote: »CarvedTones wrote: »A substantiated opinion - the case against using GMO products is complete woo. Every major health organization around the world (CDC, WHO, EUPHA, etc) endorses them as safe. Purposefully avoiding GMO products is pretty much anti-science. A lot of common products avoid them because of public perception so we end up avoiding them without trying. There are reasons to hate Monsanto's business practices with respect to GMO crops. It's a real shame; GMO crops have more yield per acre, reducing the amount of farmland that needs to be cleared. They are more tolerant of drought, increasing the food supply in some areas that need it most. They are more bug resistant, decreasing the need for pesticides that often pollute water supplies.CarvedTones wrote: »A substantiated opinion - the case against using GMO products is complete woo. Every major health organization around the world (CDC, WHO, EUPHA, etc) endorses them as safe. Purposefully avoiding GMO products is pretty much anti-science. A lot of common products avoid them because of public perception so we end up avoiding them without trying. There are reasons to hate Monsanto's business practices with respect to GMO crops. It's a real shame; GMO crops have more yield per acre, reducing the amount of farmland that needs to be cleared. They are more tolerant of drought, increasing the food supply in some areas that need it most. They are more bug resistant, decreasing the need for pesticides that often pollute water supplies.
Agreed. I have zero issue with GMOs.
There is no more rational basis for having a blanket opinion about all GMOs than there is for having a blanket opinion about all possible non GMO organisms. Some will be generally safe for all people, with a very low incidence of allergies. Some will be toxic. And there will be foods that fall somewhere between those extremes.
The process of genetically modifying something doesn't make it automatically safe to eat, anymore than the fact that something isn't genetically modified (by humans through gene manipulation) makes it safe to eat.
Please identify an example of a food that wasn't toxic before modification and is afterwards.
The CDC, WHO, EUPHA and all the other major health organizations are making evidence based scientific conclusions. IMO, trusting science is more rational than dismissing it because I don't like blanket conclusions. There is no rational basis for assuming that modification makes something unsafe to eat when there is no evidence to support that. Science rarely if ever claims 100% certainty of anything only because it is logistically impossible to ever be 100% certain. That doesn't put an unproven hypothesis that isn't based on any evidence on equal footing.
EDIT - Also, they don't just create some new GMO variant and start selling it as food without extensive testing. Mostly they are making sure there is a benefit to the modification, but they do test to make sure the food is acceptable (taste, texture and doesn't kill anyone) as well as achieving their objective (better, yield, more nutrition, higher tolerance to adverse conditions, world peace, etc).
Each GMO food is its own individual case, so having "zero issues" with GMOs is like having "zero issues" with all potential foods There is nothing magical about the GMO process that guarantees that all foods will be safe for all people. I'm perfectly happy to eat GMOs if they have been well-vetted AND if I am allowed access to information about what the modification is. I'm about basing judgments on as much information as possible, so don't try to insinuate that I'm anti-science or anti-evidence. If the evidence is there, there shouldn't be any objection to letting consumers have access to it in each case.
What if they've inserted protein-generating sequences from wheat into a tomato, and I have celiac disease?
I forget the details, but there was a GMO fish that was being brought to market, and they had subbed some gene sequences from a fish that reaches adult weight more quickly than the original fish they were modifying. I would not eat that UNTIL I was able to obtain further information about the fish they were getting the fast-growth genes from. It was a fish that was also commonly eaten by humans, so for me, it was not a concern.
Given the number of drugs that have been approved and brought to market with horrific consequences during my lifetime, due to inadequate vetting, I reserve the right to make my own judgment about each instance of something new that has been "extensively tested" (in the case of GMOs, these extensive tests appear to be on the order of a year or two, which is hardly enough to judge long-term effects).
Long winded way of saying that no, you can't identify a single instance of the issue that you are worried about. But since I can't prove the sky isn't falling I guess you might as well wear the tin foil hat for protection in case it is.12 -
Most so-called "hyper-palatable" foods are not. Very, very not.
Obviously, many disagree. They may totally eat my share.
P.S. To brussels sprouts subthread: Food truck here makes them fried to brown patches, topped with soft goat cheese and pomegranate seeds. So good!7 -
GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »Roasted Brussels sprouts are the best vegetable.
I thought I hated cauliflower until I tried it roasted with olive oil. My husband is still a bit miffed about all the cauliflower-less years he suffered through our marriage
Roasted cauliflower is truth. That's the gateway. Next try seasoning it with curry powder and a touch of tumeric. So good.3 -
The chicken planks at Long John Silver's are criminally underrated. I know, I know... why are you ordering chicken at Long John Silver's? Wait, why are you eating at Long John Silver's?!!! I don't care if they're deep fried in motor oil, they are really tasty.
I ONLY order chicken at LJS! And I dip it in tartar sauce. My husband thinks it's SO gross. I don't care!
I do the same! It's so good! I use some malt vinegar too.1 -
seltzermint555 wrote: »I know this is a very unpopular opinion but not about the taste of food.
I think it's kind of gross/inappropriate to snack/eat throughout the day at your work desk. I know, I know, people have different needs and busy jobs and whatever else. But to me, the grazing while working is kind of nasty even if you have a private office and keep it clean. I just would rather not see peoples' snacks except in a designated breakroom. I'm sure part of this opinion comes from my earliest jobs in retail when even a bottle of water was frowned upon. But I have worked in offices with people (usually dieting) who constantly had food all over their desks and spent a good amount of time preparing and heating food and carrying it around with them, to meetings even, and I just found it nasty.
You would HATE me then. I eat my breakfast (protein shake and fruit usually) and several snacks at my desk pretty much M-F. I will sometimes eat my lunch if I am extra hungry before my actual lunchtime, or if I have errands to run during lunch. I'm not a slob and there aren't crumbs or whatever all over my desk, so I don't see an issue.
This is me, too. I eat my breakfast, lunch, snacks, and sometimes dinner at my desk. I spend a minimum of ten hours a day at my desk. I see no reason to make that day any longer by taking time out to go elsewhere to eat.4 -
CarvedTones wrote: »seltzermint555 wrote: »I know this is a very unpopular opinion but not about the taste of food.
I think it's kind of gross/inappropriate to snack/eat throughout the day at your work desk. I know, I know, people have different needs and busy jobs and whatever else. But to me, the grazing while working is kind of nasty even if you have a private office and keep it clean. I just would rather not see peoples' snacks except in a designated breakroom. I'm sure part of this opinion comes from my earliest jobs in retail when even a bottle of water was frowned upon. But I have worked in offices with people (usually dieting) who constantly had food all over their desks and spent a good amount of time preparing and heating food and carrying it around with them, to meetings even, and I just found it nasty.
The break room at my office, like many at other employers, has a refrigerator, microwave, coffee machine, water dispenser and no table. So basically your stance would be that no one at my office or many others like it should ever bring their lunch and/or snacks. That is an unpopular opinion. Packing a lunch to be able to plan what you eat is probably one of the most common suggestions made at mfp. On top of that, I am an hourly contract employee. Leaving to find some other place to eat would cost me money and/or time.
I've never seen a break room without tables... Why don't you guys get a folding card table or something?
My previous employee was very strict - no food at our desks. Granted, we had an open showroom with customers wandering around, so we always had to look professional.
But, if you have a private office/cubicle and you're not working in an environment where customers are coming in and out, then I don't see an issue with eating a meal at your desk. However, I think grazing at your desk all day is a bit unprofessional, unless due to medical necessity. You go to work to work. Get your work done and then eat.
Our "kitchen" is a corner of the file room with a microwave, fridge and sink but no tables. As admin staff I am the only one in my workplace without a private office and I I sit right at the door and eat at my desk. I hate it too because clients walk in and hang right over my lunch and I do think it looks unprofessional and it interrupts my lunch - but what can you do? The only other option is to go downstairs and buy my lunch every day and that is too expensive. I think workplaces should provide a lunch area but mine doesnt so 🤷♀️2
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions