Help! Losing inches off boobs not lower belly/thighs despite doing lower body workouts!Any advice?
Replies
-
Lovee_Dove7 wrote: »Lovee_Dove7 wrote: »What is wrong with a 32D?
Do you keep track of your blood sugar?
High insulin levels will take your calories and deposit them as fat on your body, even if you eat low cals and loads of fiber.
Fat distribution is hormonally directed.
Metabolism = hormones
I'm not here to accept an assignment from you, do your own research.
So as it applies to the OP, eating fiber and/or influencing insulin levels will have nothing whatsoever to do with her goals. What she's trying to do can't be accomplished any way other than plastic surgery, despite what the Kardashians may lead people to believe.
https://bayesianbodybuilding.com/energy-balance-myths/
"Energy balance myths: Why you can gain fat in a deficit"
LOL. Did you even read all the way through what you linked to??? Or was that just the first result when you Googled “gain fat in deficit”?
4 -
Lovee_Dove7 wrote: »Runaroundafieldx2 wrote: »Lovee_Dove7 wrote: »Lovee_Dove7 wrote: »What is wrong with a 32D?
Do you keep track of your blood sugar?
High insulin levels will take your calories and deposit them as fat on your body, even if you eat low cals and loads of fiber.
Fat distribution is hormonally directed.
Metabolism = hormones
I'm not here to accept an assignment from you, do your own research.
So as it applies to the OP, eating fiber and/or influencing insulin levels will have nothing whatsoever to do with her goals. What she's trying to do can't be accomplished any way other than plastic surgery, despite what the Kardashians may lead people to believe.
https://bayesianbodybuilding.com/energy-balance-myths/
"Energy balance myths: Why you can gain fat in a deficit"
What do you think you just linked to?
Please show the link to an actual study not just some one typing their own thou
Actually not a terrible article, at the link. Completely unrelated to the point it's supposed to prove IMO, though.
OP wants to retain fat and lose fat at the same time, in a desired pattern that may not be her genetic predisposition. PP argues that fiber will somehow do hormonal magic, and result in loss of central fat with retention of fatty tissue in the breast, because estrogen (I guess; it was hard to follow).
Article headline is clickbait; actual article describes something not exactly matching headline. Neither headline, nor article, supports breast fat/body fat/fiber/estrogen hypothesis.
I'm betting on the plastic surgery hypothesis, myself. Also, I can't imagine why anyone would want to be like a Kardashian in any way, except possibly rich (if one could do it more ethically). But I'm old, so what do I know.
I was answering back to hammerhead or anvilhead or whoever he is.
He said "There is no net fat storage anywhere on your body when you are in a caloric deficit."
So the article is an answer to that.
Except it kind of doesn't. And it's just some guys opinion, not proof of anything. And I'll copy and paste the About the Author:
Menno Henselmans
Formerly a business consultant, I've traded my company car to follow my passion in strength training. I'm now an online physique coach, scientist and international public speaker with the mission to help serious trainees master their physique.4 -
Lovee_Dove7 wrote: »Runaroundafieldx2 wrote: »Lovee_Dove7 wrote: »Lovee_Dove7 wrote: »What is wrong with a 32D?
Do you keep track of your blood sugar?
High insulin levels will take your calories and deposit them as fat on your body, even if you eat low cals and loads of fiber.
Fat distribution is hormonally directed.
Metabolism = hormones
I'm not here to accept an assignment from you, do your own research.
So as it applies to the OP, eating fiber and/or influencing insulin levels will have nothing whatsoever to do with her goals. What she's trying to do can't be accomplished any way other than plastic surgery, despite what the Kardashians may lead people to believe.
https://bayesianbodybuilding.com/energy-balance-myths/
"Energy balance myths: Why you can gain fat in a deficit"
What do you think you just linked to?
Please show the link to an actual study not just some one typing their own thou
Actually not a terrible article, at the link. Completely unrelated to the point it's supposed to prove IMO, though.
OP wants to retain fat and lose fat at the same time, in a desired pattern that may not be her genetic predisposition. PP argues that fiber will somehow do hormonal magic, and result in loss of central fat with retention of fatty tissue in the breast, because estrogen (I guess; it was hard to follow).
Article headline is clickbait; actual article describes something not exactly matching headline. Neither headline, nor article, supports breast fat/body fat/fiber/estrogen hypothesis.
I'm betting on the plastic surgery hypothesis, myself. Also, I can't imagine why anyone would want to be like a Kardashian in any way, except possibly rich (if one could do it more ethically). But I'm old, so what do I know.
I was answering back to hammerhead or anvilhead or whoever he is.
He said "There is no net fat storage anywhere on your body when you are in a caloric deficit."
So the article is an answer to that.
Except it kind of doesn't. And it's just some guys opinion, not proof of anything. And I'll copy and paste the About the Author:
Menno Henselmans
Formerly a business consultant, I've traded my company car to follow my passion in strength training. I'm now an online physique coach, scientist and international public speaker with the mission to help serious trainees master their physique.
FWIW, Menno generally isn't held in very high regard by evidence-based researchers. He's often been at odds with people such as Eric Helms and Lyle McDonald (the latter has pretty strongly worded opinions about Menno - which is unsurprising if you know anything about Lyle).7 -
Lovee_Dove7 wrote: »Runaroundafieldx2 wrote: »Lovee_Dove7 wrote: »Lovee_Dove7 wrote: »What is wrong with a 32D?
Do you keep track of your blood sugar?
High insulin levels will take your calories and deposit them as fat on your body, even if you eat low cals and loads of fiber.
Fat distribution is hormonally directed.
Metabolism = hormones
I'm not here to accept an assignment from you, do your own research.
So as it applies to the OP, eating fiber and/or influencing insulin levels will have nothing whatsoever to do with her goals. What she's trying to do can't be accomplished any way other than plastic surgery, despite what the Kardashians may lead people to believe.
https://bayesianbodybuilding.com/energy-balance-myths/
"Energy balance myths: Why you can gain fat in a deficit"
What do you think you just linked to?
Please show the link to an actual study not just some one typing their own thou
Actually not a terrible article, at the link. Completely unrelated to the point it's supposed to prove IMO, though.
OP wants to retain fat and lose fat at the same time, in a desired pattern that may not be her genetic predisposition. PP argues that fiber will somehow do hormonal magic, and result in loss of central fat with retention of fatty tissue in the breast, because estrogen (I guess; it was hard to follow).
Article headline is clickbait; actual article describes something not exactly matching headline. Neither headline, nor article, supports breast fat/body fat/fiber/estrogen hypothesis.
I'm betting on the plastic surgery hypothesis, myself. Also, I can't imagine why anyone would want to be like a Kardashian in any way, except possibly rich (if one could do it more ethically). But I'm old, so what do I know.
I was answering back to hammerhead or anvilhead or whoever he is.
He said "There is no net fat storage anywhere on your body when you are in a caloric deficit."
So the article is an answer to that.
But it's not. Other than the headline, I mean.
The closest it comes is this:Following the same logic, you can also gain fat in a deficit. If you lose muscle 5.2 times as fast as you get fat, you gain fat while remaining in a deficit. Unless your weight loss program really sucks though, I should hope this only ever occurs if you stop training, you have a serious medical condition or there are drugs involved.
Note the "If" and the dismissive caveat at the end.
The main thrust of the article is that you can gain muscle while losing fat (yay, recomposition works), with some comments up top that weight change happens when water weight changes (which has nothing to do with gain or loss of muscle or fat).
Yeah, there's some questionable reasoning in there (like the slippery stuff about weight vs. fat), and a touching faith in the precision accuracy of DXA, etc. But it doesn't really matter. The text doesn't back up the clickbait headline.5 -
well I can say when I was 140 lbs my boobs were the same size at 209 lbs. the only thing that changed with gaining weight and losing weight was band size cause I gained back fat when I gained. when I lost I lost the back fat. Im on a higher fiber diet, my boobs are still the same size. so fiber hasnt helped me out in anyway. oh and as for belly fat its one of the last 3 places I lose,so still losing there as well as in my hips and thighs. fiber hasnt helped with those things either.
Fiber has helped bring my cholesterol down along with my low fat,low cholesterol diet and medication. but its taken me 5 years and still going and I still have a little belly fat,thigh fat to go. its coming off but it has nothing to do with the fiber. if you gain weight your boobs will grow IF they are mostly fat tissue. if they are whats called dense breast Like I have they may grow very little if any with weight gain. with weight loss you may lose some but if you are like me you wont lose any size. Im wearing the same size bras I was when I was a teen.2 -
Dear Posters,
I wanted to offer a brief explanation for the locking of this thread.
The forum guidelines include this item:1. Play Nice
I WILL:
• I will be respectful and understand that everyone is different. Some members are new to this, so be kind to the newbies.
• I will remember the human on the other side of the screen.
• I will share my opinions while respecting others' thoughts and feelings as well.
• I will be ready to hear and accept other opinions that I might not always agree with.
• I will ignore users.
I WON’T:
• I won’t be a jerk.
• I will not attack, mock, or otherwise insult others. I can respectfully disagree with the message or topic, but I cannot attack the messenger. This includes attacks against the member’s spelling or command of written English, belittling a member for posting a duplicate discussion, or attacking a member for posting in an older discussion. (ie. It’s lose not loose, strong first post, didn’t you already post this today, etc.) Not every member has the same level of education, so I’ll refrain from criticizing a member for not framing their content in a manner befitting a university-level science paper.
• I won’t pick apart how something is said; I will focus on the meaning/message.
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/welcome/guidelines
At our discretion, this locked thread may be deleted entirely in the near future.
With respect,
kgeyser
MyFitnessPal Moderator
4
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions