Worth hiring someone to get macros and calorie intake numbers?

raven56706
raven56706 Posts: 918 Member
edited July 2019 in Health and Weight Loss
please bear with me. i know i have asked this before but looking for guidance.

i hired someone for my macro and calorie intake but i feel as if i didnt get anywhere with them and it was almost a waste of money. I am obviously overthinking this but just trying to find the right rhythm and not waste my time.

i want to burn fat while working out at least an hour a day for 5 days a week. Is there a good macro or calorie building website that will give me that info and also factoring in my workout intensity?

any comments would be appreciated.

Replies

  • raven56706
    raven56706 Posts: 918 Member
    mmapags wrote: »
    raven56706 wrote: »
    please bear with me. i know i have asked this before but looking for guidance.

    i hired someone for my macro and calorie intake but i feel as if i didnt get anywhere with them and it was almost a waste of money. I am obviously overthinking this but just trying to find the right rhythm and not waste my time.

    i want to burn fat while working out at least an hour a day for 5 days a week. Is there a good macro or calorie building website that will give me that info and also factoring in my workout intensity?

    any comments would be appreciated.

    You seem to just keep going around in circles looking for a magic answer. There isn't one. Hit your calories. Hit somewhere around .6 to .8 grams of body weight in protein and .35 grams of fat per body weight. Eat whatever you want for the rest and work out. It isnt anymore complicated than that. I'll PM you with how to pay me since you feel that is important.

    who said that paying is important. just looking for guidance because i am obviously overthinking it. No need for the backhand comment
  • raven56706
    raven56706 Posts: 918 Member
    mmapags wrote: »
    Well if you know you are overthinking it, why keep doing that and posting about it? I think it was Einstein who said the definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result.

    i didnt say i was continuing to do it. Hence why i am asking here. for guidance and some advice. Isn't this what a forum is for?

    you dont have to be rude about it sir.
  • mmapags
    mmapags Posts: 8,934 Member
    edited July 2019
    raven56706 wrote: »
    mmapags wrote: »
    Well if you know you are overthinking it, why keep doing that and posting about it? I think it was Einstein who said the definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result.

    i didnt say i was continuing to do it. Hence why i am asking here. for guidance and some advice. Isn't this what a forum is for?

    you dont have to be rude about it sir.

    It's hard to read tone over the internet. Not trying to be rude. By you own admission you are overthinking and going around the same circle you've gone around before. The question I would ask, is that productive?

    It seems that you already know the answer...
  • raven56706
    raven56706 Posts: 918 Member
    without a doubt. thats why i am such in a cross roads. I get that i have been on MFP for years but i have hit some bad road blocks so looking to see new ways of getting back on track. Havent been good at getting back so thats why i ask for advice.
  • staticsplit
    staticsplit Posts: 538 Member
    I don't see the need to hire someone when there's so much information out there for free. I also have enough data to know that my macro split tends to be a bit higher on fat than MFP recommends. I wondered if that meant I should cut down on it but I don't see the need as I'm hitting my goal of maintenance or the slowest of slow cuts.

    Have you actually been following what MFP recommends?
  • puffbrat
    puffbrat Posts: 2,806 Member
    raven56706 wrote: »
    without a doubt. thats why i am such in a cross roads. I get that i have been on MFP for years but i have hit some bad road blocks so looking to see new ways of getting back on track. Havent been good at getting back so thats why i ask for advice.

    It might help if you gave us all more information to work with.

    What is your height, current weight, goal weight? How many calories/day are you actually eating? How many calories has MFP set you and what were the parameters for that (weekly loss rate and activity level)? What did the person you hired give you? How long have you stuck with any single plan of consistent eating and exercising and what was the result? What about MFP hasn't worked for you that makes you think using the guided setup won't help you reach your goal?
  • StatChicBayes
    StatChicBayes Posts: 362 Member
    "Worth hiring someone to get macros and calorie intake numbers?"

    I will say in my case it was worth it - but I am 4'11'' and had some health issues. Being short, MFP thought I should be at 1200 calories; I had BMR tested (was higher than calculator used by MFP). Being pre-diabetes my Dr wanted me on a slightly reduced carb (37%), higher protein/fat than what MFP suggested as well. Working with Dr and dietician we set calories at 1400, with 110 grams of protein and then worked out the other macros. I am curious why you felt that working with the

    "i want to burn fat while working out at least an hour a day for 5 days a week. "

    If you have a deficit through either reduced calories or in your case increased exercise or both, you will lose fat, but also water and muscle. Adding strength training in can help reduce the amount of muscle loss. There is lots of info on the forums here.

    The info at https://www.aworkoutroutine.com/1200-calorie-diet/ and links to other sections may be useful if you are working on your own to set targets as an alternative to MFP; it helps with getting overall calorie goals, then sets protein (with strength training), then fat; carbs are what is left that you can program into MFP. It actually is pretty close to what Dr/dietician came up with for me. But is it critical to follow? Probably not.

    Now I rarely nail my macros; some days I gain, some I have bigger drops than expected as weight loss is not always a linear function of "reported calories" and "exercise calories" (lots of measurement error there!) Water weight fluctuates a lot for me. The important part is developing a way of eating that is sustainable - some days I have pasta or pizza and go over "recommended" carbs. I am happy with my long term trend and enjoy what I eat!
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    If you go this route, I'd go for nothing less than a Registered Dietitian. Though outside of medical conditions requiring certain dietary restrictions and the like, I wouldn't personally see the need.
  • Redordeadhead
    Redordeadhead Posts: 1,188 Member
    kimny72 wrote: »
    raven56706 wrote: »
    without a doubt. thats why i am such in a cross roads. I get that i have been on MFP for years but i have hit some bad road blocks so looking to see new ways of getting back on track. Havent been good at getting back so thats why i ask for advice.

    So are you saying that used MFPs goals and it didn't work?

    What do you consider roadblocks? It's normal to have times where the weight loss just doesn't follow. It's normal to have weeks where you just feel a little weaker than you usually do when you work out. It's normal to have days where you just can't stick to your calorie goal, so you have to allow yourself maintenance calories.

    Have you been consistent for months at a time? Is it possible that you keep changing your plan every few weeks because you are impatient?

    These are very good questions. It's also good if you can tell us why you feel MFP's calories and macros were not working for you (no weight loss, lack of energy, constabt headaches, etc.) and over what time period. That way maybe we can make better suggestions for you.
  • PAV8888
    PAV8888 Posts: 14,242 Member
    edited July 2019
    There exists no magic mix and unless you're either at peak performance already, or coasting along and playing with optimization in your spare time that final micro managed 5%-10% boost is not where 95% to 90% of your results will come from.

    If you want to be strong nail your appropriate for your level exercise/strength training routine

    Support that by nailing the appropriate caloric balance for your goals be they hypertrophy, recomposition, or appropriate moderate weight loss.

    Reverse the order of the above two points if weight loss is your primary goal.

    Support your caloric balance and your health by making more healthy choices, ensuring adequate consumption of protein, fiber, and fat, and then eating the rest of your macros in the way that is most satisfying and satiating for you and gives you the best chance to be able to continue to comply with your plan.

    MFP default macro values for protein, fat, and fibre meet or exceed the minimums you should hit.

    You don't have to be precise and exact to get the first 90% of your results.

    Now, of you're already 12% body fat and prepping for a competition, that last but may be necessary!
  • raven56706
    raven56706 Posts: 918 Member
    mmapags wrote: »
    You are hitting roadblock and I understand that is frustrating. When I look at your stated objective of burning fat and working out 5 days per week, I think a couple of things.

    The first is, I find it helpful to separate exercise and fat loss in my mind. Fat loss comes from diet. Pure and simple. If someone has issues with fat loss, they are eating too many calories and not creating a deficit (or enough of a deficit) to meet their expectations. Macros are only significant to meet exercise goals and for satiety. Calorie deficit. Adequate protein and fat. Then whatever you prefer. It is simple really.

    If someone is not meeting their expectations, it is usually for one of 2 reasons. Inaccurate measurement and logging (not logging everything or not using a food scale) or non-compliance (not staying consistent on their plan). You start using estimates but after a time, if there has been accuracy and consistency, there should be results. If the results don't meet expectations, you now have your own real world data to make adjustments and no longer have to rely on estimates. This means staying consistent and on plan for a good period of time. 2 to 3 months before making adjustments or else you just cloud the data with too many short term adjustments.

    Exercise is for fitness and quality of life. Decide your fitness goal. Pick a program that is proven for that goal. stick with it for at least 3 months and measure progress. This will give you a few more calories to eat but exercise does not "burn fat" unless the diet is in order.

    While it is not always easy, it is really that simple. Set a good plan, put your head down and execute it for 3 months. Evaluate and adjust if necessary.


    thanks for this. i will need to man up and just do something for 3 months. thanks
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    Momjogger wrote: »
    Aside from completely missing my point, if you hadn’t been so eager to jump on my comment, you would have noticed that I deleted it. It was meant for a different thread and while some of your knowledge is very useful, I noticed that you like to try to disagree, debunk, or just debate people and I’m not into that. I’d prefer to respect other people’s input and just give my own. I’d appreciate it if you’d do the same when it comes to my comments. Thank you.

    You might find the tone you're looking for in https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/categories/motivation-and-support

    You can also put posters who don't interact with you the way you'd like them to on Ignore.