Do you need a multi vitamin?
Replies
-
Theoldguy1 wrote: »lynn_glenmont wrote: »Multi vitamins have been extensively studied and there is no evidence they improve overall health outcomes like getting vitamins naturally from your food does. As far as "vitamin fortified food", I am not sure that has been studied enough as to whether or not they provide any benefit.
I think if you are trying to focus on health, I would skip the multivitamin, only used fortified foods as a last resort, and try as much as you can to get them from foods where they occur naturally.
In the U.S. you would have to pretty much skip any commercial baked goods, breakfast cereals, standard milk, and I don't know what else to avoid "vitamin fortified food."
I am not saying you need to avoid them. What I mean is that I wouldn't necessarily rely on them as a source of vitamin and minerals, vs getting them from foods where they are naturally occurring.
Unfortunately in US only 1 of 10 adults get the recommended servings of fruits and veggies (which are a significant source of vitamins). A daily supplement might not be bad for most people.
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p1116-fruit-vegetable-consumption.html
Or they could just eat more veg and fruit.2 -
Theoldguy1 wrote: »lynn_glenmont wrote: »Multi vitamins have been extensively studied and there is no evidence they improve overall health outcomes like getting vitamins naturally from your food does. As far as "vitamin fortified food", I am not sure that has been studied enough as to whether or not they provide any benefit.
I think if you are trying to focus on health, I would skip the multivitamin, only used fortified foods as a last resort, and try as much as you can to get them from foods where they occur naturally.
In the U.S. you would have to pretty much skip any commercial baked goods, breakfast cereals, standard milk, and I don't know what else to avoid "vitamin fortified food."
I am not saying you need to avoid them. What I mean is that I wouldn't necessarily rely on them as a source of vitamin and minerals, vs getting them from foods where they are naturally occurring.
Unfortunately in US only 1 of 10 adults get the recommended servings of fruits and veggies (which are a significant source of vitamins). A daily supplement might not be bad for most people.
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p1116-fruit-vegetable-consumption.html
Or they could just eat more veg and fruit.
Very true but do you see it happening in the short term?0 -
Theoldguy1 wrote: »lynn_glenmont wrote: »Multi vitamins have been extensively studied and there is no evidence they improve overall health outcomes like getting vitamins naturally from your food does. As far as "vitamin fortified food", I am not sure that has been studied enough as to whether or not they provide any benefit.
I think if you are trying to focus on health, I would skip the multivitamin, only used fortified foods as a last resort, and try as much as you can to get them from foods where they occur naturally.
In the U.S. you would have to pretty much skip any commercial baked goods, breakfast cereals, standard milk, and I don't know what else to avoid "vitamin fortified food."
I am not saying you need to avoid them. What I mean is that I wouldn't necessarily rely on them as a source of vitamin and minerals, vs getting them from foods where they are naturally occurring.
Unfortunately in US only 1 of 10 adults get the recommended servings of fruits and veggies (which are a significant source of vitamins). A daily supplement might not be bad for most people.
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p1116-fruit-vegetable-consumption.html
Or they could just eat more veg and fruit.
Bonus: One probably gets a bunch of "undiscovered" nutrients that aren't in the mutivitamins yet.
(Quite a few new essential nutrients have been discovered/institutionalized over the course of my life, and I doubt we're done with discoveries yet. I also have the sense - with no way to prove it - that the known valuable nutrients in veg/fruit don't account for all of the benefits we see in people who eat plenty of them.)Theoldguy1 wrote: »Theoldguy1 wrote: »lynn_glenmont wrote: »Multi vitamins have been extensively studied and there is no evidence they improve overall health outcomes like getting vitamins naturally from your food does. As far as "vitamin fortified food", I am not sure that has been studied enough as to whether or not they provide any benefit.
I think if you are trying to focus on health, I would skip the multivitamin, only used fortified foods as a last resort, and try as much as you can to get them from foods where they occur naturally.
In the U.S. you would have to pretty much skip any commercial baked goods, breakfast cereals, standard milk, and I don't know what else to avoid "vitamin fortified food."
I am not saying you need to avoid them. What I mean is that I wouldn't necessarily rely on them as a source of vitamin and minerals, vs getting them from foods where they are naturally occurring.
Unfortunately in US only 1 of 10 adults get the recommended servings of fruits and veggies (which are a significant source of vitamins). A daily supplement might not be bad for most people.
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p1116-fruit-vegetable-consumption.html
Or they could just eat more veg and fruit.
Very true but do you see it happening in the short term?
It's remarkably easy. But no, I don't see it happening, because people probably won't.6 -
Theoldguy1 wrote: »lynn_glenmont wrote: »Multi vitamins have been extensively studied and there is no evidence they improve overall health outcomes like getting vitamins naturally from your food does. As far as "vitamin fortified food", I am not sure that has been studied enough as to whether or not they provide any benefit.
I think if you are trying to focus on health, I would skip the multivitamin, only used fortified foods as a last resort, and try as much as you can to get them from foods where they occur naturally.
In the U.S. you would have to pretty much skip any commercial baked goods, breakfast cereals, standard milk, and I don't know what else to avoid "vitamin fortified food."
I am not saying you need to avoid them. What I mean is that I wouldn't necessarily rely on them as a source of vitamin and minerals, vs getting them from foods where they are naturally occurring.
Unfortunately in US only 1 of 10 adults get the recommended servings of fruits and veggies (which are a significant source of vitamins). A daily supplement might not be bad for most people.
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p1116-fruit-vegetable-consumption.html
Failing to get the recommended servings of fruits and vegetables does not immediately mean someone is deficient or that they need a multi.1 -
Theoldguy1 wrote: »lynn_glenmont wrote: »Multi vitamins have been extensively studied and there is no evidence they improve overall health outcomes like getting vitamins naturally from your food does. As far as "vitamin fortified food", I am not sure that has been studied enough as to whether or not they provide any benefit.
I think if you are trying to focus on health, I would skip the multivitamin, only used fortified foods as a last resort, and try as much as you can to get them from foods where they occur naturally.
In the U.S. you would have to pretty much skip any commercial baked goods, breakfast cereals, standard milk, and I don't know what else to avoid "vitamin fortified food."
I am not saying you need to avoid them. What I mean is that I wouldn't necessarily rely on them as a source of vitamin and minerals, vs getting them from foods where they are naturally occurring.
Unfortunately in US only 1 of 10 adults get the recommended servings of fruits and veggies (which are a significant source of vitamins). A daily supplement might not be bad for most people.
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p1116-fruit-vegetable-consumption.html
Failing to get the recommended servings of fruits and vegetables does not immediately mean someone is deficient or that they need a multi.
Doubtless those rabble-rousing extremist radicals over at the USDA/CDC just recommend them for no reason.
3 -
Theoldguy1 wrote: »Theoldguy1 wrote: »lynn_glenmont wrote: »Multi vitamins have been extensively studied and there is no evidence they improve overall health outcomes like getting vitamins naturally from your food does. As far as "vitamin fortified food", I am not sure that has been studied enough as to whether or not they provide any benefit.
I think if you are trying to focus on health, I would skip the multivitamin, only used fortified foods as a last resort, and try as much as you can to get them from foods where they occur naturally.
In the U.S. you would have to pretty much skip any commercial baked goods, breakfast cereals, standard milk, and I don't know what else to avoid "vitamin fortified food."
I am not saying you need to avoid them. What I mean is that I wouldn't necessarily rely on them as a source of vitamin and minerals, vs getting them from foods where they are naturally occurring.
Unfortunately in US only 1 of 10 adults get the recommended servings of fruits and veggies (which are a significant source of vitamins). A daily supplement might not be bad for most people.
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p1116-fruit-vegetable-consumption.html
Or they could just eat more veg and fruit.
Very true but do you see it happening in the short term?
For some. It's easy enough, especially if one is contemplating adding a supplement.
IMO, veg and fruit is a better choice and easy, but whatever.2 -
I think taking a multivitamin is uneccesary for most people.
Uneccesary but harmless - so if you want to, no harm in doing so - they are relatively cheap and if you feel your diet has room for improvement, they may help fill any gaps.
But nature leaves wide margins so anyone eating a half decent diet will usually not have a vitamin deficiency.
However If I had a specific need, I would take that specific supplement.
In my case iron ,because I tend to border line anemia.
People at risk of osteoporosis might be recomended to take Calcium/Vitamin D, women trying to concieve are recomended to take folic acid etc. (in Australia breads and cereals are fortified with it too)
But they are specific supplements for specific reasons.
1 -
Usually you hear it’s to fill in a gap since our soil is depleted. But what about cereals and bars breads and drinks that already have added vitamins? The story is we don’t eat enough fresh veggies and so on and so forth but of our processed food has the added vitamins in them then wouldn’t taking an extra pill be too much?
I have an autoimmune disease so I have to take a multi-vitamin daily. I usually show up with a deficiency in my blood work, so this just helps ensure I get my daily vitamins in that I can't get on my own.2 -
paperpudding wrote: »I think taking a multivitamin is uneccesary for most people.
Uneccesary but harmless - so if you want to, no harm in doing so - they are relatively cheap and if you feel your diet has room for improvement, they may help fill any gaps.
Pretty much my take. Im well aware a lot of the vitamin dose is lost via urin, and well aware that it may well be unnecessary anyway, but I always think of it as a no harm/no foul kind of thing.
My diet, in terms of fruit and veg, is sometimes brilliant, sometimes really por.
If taking a multivitamin daily helps fill some gaps then I figure its worth it. And am yet to really see a downside, even if the upside is likely negligible.1 -
Theoldguy1 wrote: »Theoldguy1 wrote: »lynn_glenmont wrote: »Multi vitamins have been extensively studied and there is no evidence they improve overall health outcomes like getting vitamins naturally from your food does. As far as "vitamin fortified food", I am not sure that has been studied enough as to whether or not they provide any benefit.
I think if you are trying to focus on health, I would skip the multivitamin, only used fortified foods as a last resort, and try as much as you can to get them from foods where they occur naturally.
In the U.S. you would have to pretty much skip any commercial baked goods, breakfast cereals, standard milk, and I don't know what else to avoid "vitamin fortified food."
I am not saying you need to avoid them. What I mean is that I wouldn't necessarily rely on them as a source of vitamin and minerals, vs getting them from foods where they are naturally occurring.
Unfortunately in US only 1 of 10 adults get the recommended servings of fruits and veggies (which are a significant source of vitamins). A daily supplement might not be bad for most people.
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p1116-fruit-vegetable-consumption.html
Or they could just eat more veg and fruit.
Very true but do you see it happening in the short term?
For some. It's easy enough, especially if one is contemplating adding a supplement.
IMO, veg and fruit is a better choice and easy, but whatever.
If only 1 in 10 are eating enough of these items it's a huge paradigm shift for the population as a whole. Getting a mutli in the 90% is probably a more realistic short term fix, even though not ideal.2 -
weatherwoman94 wrote: »They're expensive. I've just started taking one for immune system and lung health.
You must be taking some specialized item. Basic multivitamins are less than $0.05 a day.5 -
Theoldguy1 wrote: »Theoldguy1 wrote: »Theoldguy1 wrote: »lynn_glenmont wrote: »Multi vitamins have been extensively studied and there is no evidence they improve overall health outcomes like getting vitamins naturally from your food does. As far as "vitamin fortified food", I am not sure that has been studied enough as to whether or not they provide any benefit.
I think if you are trying to focus on health, I would skip the multivitamin, only used fortified foods as a last resort, and try as much as you can to get them from foods where they occur naturally.
In the U.S. you would have to pretty much skip any commercial baked goods, breakfast cereals, standard milk, and I don't know what else to avoid "vitamin fortified food."
I am not saying you need to avoid them. What I mean is that I wouldn't necessarily rely on them as a source of vitamin and minerals, vs getting them from foods where they are naturally occurring.
Unfortunately in US only 1 of 10 adults get the recommended servings of fruits and veggies (which are a significant source of vitamins). A daily supplement might not be bad for most people.
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p1116-fruit-vegetable-consumption.html
Or they could just eat more veg and fruit.
Very true but do you see it happening in the short term?
For some. It's easy enough, especially if one is contemplating adding a supplement.
IMO, veg and fruit is a better choice and easy, but whatever.
If only 1 in 10 are eating enough of these items it's a huge paradigm shift for the population as a whole. Getting a mutli in the 90% is probably a more realistic short term fix, even though not ideal.
Well. lucky for me I don't find eating veg and fruit difficult. I'm not really sure how helpful it is to look at the American population on average when considering whether to consume a multi.1 -
Theoldguy1 wrote: »lynn_glenmont wrote: »Multi vitamins have been extensively studied and there is no evidence they improve overall health outcomes like getting vitamins naturally from your food does. As far as "vitamin fortified food", I am not sure that has been studied enough as to whether or not they provide any benefit.
I think if you are trying to focus on health, I would skip the multivitamin, only used fortified foods as a last resort, and try as much as you can to get them from foods where they occur naturally.
In the U.S. you would have to pretty much skip any commercial baked goods, breakfast cereals, standard milk, and I don't know what else to avoid "vitamin fortified food."
I am not saying you need to avoid them. What I mean is that I wouldn't necessarily rely on them as a source of vitamin and minerals, vs getting them from foods where they are naturally occurring.
Unfortunately in US only 1 of 10 adults get the recommended servings of fruits and veggies (which are a significant source of vitamins). A daily supplement might not be bad for most people.
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p1116-fruit-vegetable-consumption.html
Failing to get the recommended servings of fruits and vegetables does not immediately mean someone is deficient or that they need a multi.
Doubtless those rabble-rousing extremist radicals over at the USDA/CDC just recommend them for no reason.
Fiber and filling yourself with typically lower calorie items for weight management would be really good reasons.
I would suspect that there is a way to eat the recommended servings and still fall short just like there is a way to eat less and be fine.
I like vegetables and I eat well more than some people but I believe there is a point that I hit pretty quickly that afterwards I am only eating them for fiber and satiety.
If you are not under the care of a doctor for prolonged periods of time I would probably recommend all the servings while adding the word variety and it probably would not hurt to take the multi as well.
2 -
It was through a blood test that I found out I was vitamin D deficient. From what I have heard from other doctors, the only vitamin and mineral you should supplement is vitamin D and zinc. All other vitamin and minerals you can through food. They you get rid most of the vitamins and minerals if you are already eating healthy or you intestines are clogged.0
-
dmcmillan74 wrote: »It was through a blood test that I found out I was vitamin D deficient. From what I have heard from other doctors, the only vitamin and mineral you should supplement is vitamin D and zinc. All other vitamin and minerals you can through food. They you get rid most of the vitamins and minerals if you are already eating healthy or you intestines are clogged.
Lots of people have deficiencies in other vitamins and minerals that cannot be addressed through diet, due to malabsorption issues, among other things. And you won't just "get rid" of excess amounts of fat soluble vitamins. (Yes, you will lose excess amounts of water-soluble vitamins in your urine.)3 -
Usually you hear it’s to fill in a gap since our soil is depleted. But what about cereals and bars breads and drinks that already have added vitamins? The story is we don’t eat enough fresh veggies and so on and so forth but of our processed food has the added vitamins in them then wouldn’t taking an extra pill be too much?
re: the soil depletion and low mineral content - I haven't seen this aspect addressed yet by anyone, but from what I've read, it's less an issue of soil depletion (mineral content seems relatively stable in soils, I've read?) BUT crop varieties grown for higher yield, especially with higher carb content, do seem to have fewer minerals (due to a dilution effect). Some minerals are more affected than others. There's a good article on the issue here. It's not a huge issue, as I understand it, honestly (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157516302113https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157516302113 ).
re: fortification - not all vitamins are fortified, so eating food with vitamins and then having fortified food on top of it would only impact certain vitamins. However, for the vitamins fortified? Yeah, you can get too much, in certain cases. It doesn't seem to typically hit toxic levels, from what I've read, but can be problematic (this article talks about how this is being seen more, recently, for iron specifically, called 'iron overload.' - https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/13/a-host-of-ills-when-irons-out-of-balance/[url="http://"]https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/13/a-host-of-ills-when-irons-out-of-balance/[/url] ).
re: taking vitamins. IMHO, it really depends on your health and diet, whether you might need vitamins or not. Many people with auto-immune diseases are known to have low vitamin D, even sometimes when taking supplements, so vitamin D might be helpful for that group. But a bunch of white people at the equator who work outside all day would likely not need that at all.
People with certain food allergies or certain gut issues might have trouble getting nutrients due to diet limitations, so certain vitamins could be helpful there.
But for most people I know who 'need' vitamins, they don't take a multi-vitamin, they take specific, targeted individual vitamins, you know? A multi-vitamin might help overall, but honestly, it's hard to find any today that aren't a bit crazy - with things like 1000% of vitamin X and 333% of mineral Y. Finding one with just 100% of the vitamins in question is rare, now (at least in the vitamins I've been able to find in my area!).
0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Usually you hear it’s to fill in a gap since our soil is depleted. But what about cereals and bars breads and drinks that already have added vitamins? The story is we don’t eat enough fresh veggies and so on and so forth but of our processed food has the added vitamins in them then wouldn’t taking an extra pill be too much?
re: the soil depletion and low mineral content - I haven't seen this aspect addressed yet by anyone, but from what I've read, it's less an issue of soil depletion (mineral content seems relatively stable in soils, I've read?) BUT crop varieties grown for higher yield, especially with higher carb content, do seem to have fewer minerals (due to a dilution effect). Some minerals are more affected than others. There's a good article on the issue here. It's not a huge issue, as I understand it, honestly (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157516302113https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157516302113 ).
re: fortification - not all vitamins are fortified, so eating food with vitamins and then having fortified food on top of it would only impact certain vitamins. However, for the vitamins fortified? Yeah, you can get too much, in certain cases. It doesn't seem to typically hit toxic levels, from what I've read, but can be problematic (this article talks about how this is being seen more, recently, for iron specifically, called 'iron overload.' - https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/13/a-host-of-ills-when-irons-out-of-balance/[url="http://"]https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/13/a-host-of-ills-when-irons-out-of-balance/[/url] ).
re: taking vitamins. IMHO, it really depends on your health and diet, whether you might need vitamins or not. Many people with auto-immune diseases are known to have low vitamin D, even sometimes when taking supplements, so vitamin D might be helpful for that group. But a bunch of white people at the equator who work outside all day would likely not need that at all.
People with certain food allergies or certain gut issues might have trouble getting nutrients due to diet limitations, so certain vitamins could be helpful there.
But for most people I know who 'need' vitamins, they don't take a multi-vitamin, they take specific, targeted individual vitamins, you know? A multi-vitamin might help overall, but honestly, it's hard to find any today that aren't a bit crazy - with things like 1000% of vitamin X and 333% of mineral Y. Finding one with just 100% of the vitamins in question is rare, now (at least in the vitamins I've been able to find in my area!).
There's a good deal of opportunism and fear marketing at play here. The supplement industry has been using the line of "depleted soil" for decades with little evidence to support.
Yes soil is depleted after a season, but this is mitigated by a chemical implant or through a patch of nutrient rich cover crops. These are not harvested, but tilled/ back into the ground to replenish the ground. These draw up nitrogen and other chemicals from deeper into the ground into topsoil - making for a heartier yield.2 -
-
My biochemistry professor called vitamins "expensive pee" 😂😂😂. I don't know what to believe anymore.... they may work, or they work solely by the placebo effect. There are way too many opposing views on vitamins. Personally I like to do my research on foods and see what foods are nutrient dense and prefer to get my nutrients that way, but to each their own👩⚖0
-
I follow a very specific way of eating and supplement specifically for that. So for me I supplement with pink salt daily and magnesium 3-4 times a week. I don't take a multivitamin as it wouldn't benefit me.0
-
maybe it is all in my head, but since starting a multi last week, I feel more alert and have more energy. Whatever the case, it can't hurt to fill the gaps in nutrition and they are cheap.6
-
I can't speak to any experience but my own; I've been taking a multivitamin ever since I contracted mono in college, and my doctor recommended it as a way to help boost my overall immunity and health. I'm vegetarian now, and if I don't take a multivitamin my iron is very low. I struggle to get enough variety in my foods when I'm dieting (calorie restrictions and budget restrictions make it difficult) so for me the multi is a must. If you can afford lots of fresh, out-of-season vegetables and fruits, and expensive meats and fish, maybe you're doing OK. I wasn't.3
-
I'm not sure about a generic multivitamin. They probably in general aren't nessecary. But I was diagnosed with Hashimoto's about a year back. Since my thyroid levels weren't bad enough to warrant thyroid meds, I was told to start taking selenium. I notice a marked difference when I take my selenium vs when I'm not. I've also added magnesium and b12 with folate to the mix. My energy levels and overall sense of well being are greatly improved. I have started and stopped the selenium enough that I'm pretty confident what I'm feeling is not placebo. Actually, thinking about it blood test results also showed an improvement in my numbers too. Just my N=1 to add. I suppose I could just eat a couple of brazil nuts every day... But I don't like them enough to eat them on the daily. And I am apparently not getting enough with all the other foods high in selenium such as eggs. Even though I eat them on the reg?3
-
I'm a bariatric patient so I have a strict vitamin regimen and so far I'm not deficient in anything as evidenced by my blood work so the they must have some benefit4
-
I recently had this very same discussion with my doctor. She said, taking a daily multi-vitamin is fine. Most people get all the vitamins and minerals they need through normal food intake. The multi-vitamin will compensate for any shortages. However, she also advised against "wasting money" on individual vitmain and mineral supplements unless a person is diagnosed with a specific deficiency due to illness, disease, or the result of injury.2
-
Analog_Kid wrote: »I recently had this very same discussion with my doctor. She said, taking a daily multi-vitamin is fine. Most people get all the vitamins and minerals they need through normal food intake. The multi-vitamin will compensate for any shortages. However, she also advised against "wasting money" on individual vitmain and mineral supplements unless a person is diagnosed with a specific deficiency due to illness, disease, or the result of injury.
This. Several vitamins and minerals become toxic when taken excessively, especially over long periods of time (iron, potassium, & vitamin A are the first to enter my mind on this subject). While a daily multi is rarely dangerous to the general public, excessive intake of individual nutrients should be avoided except when deemed necessary by your doctor. Opting for dietary improvement reduces the risk of od’ing and toxicity, but it also helps maintain the lesser known/sought after nutrients that support the big ones and are not found in multis.
2 -
Good on you if you are able to eat enough fresh fruit and veg to get all your nutrients. But how do you know for sure that you are?
Are you going into your garden and picking stuff fresh, just before you eat them? If you buy them from supermarkets how do you know how long they've been there, how they've been stored, and what they've been sprayed or coated with to keep them fresh. I grow some of my own, but nowhere near enough to keep me going through the winter.1 -
Good on you if you are able to eat enough fresh fruit and veg to get all your nutrients. But how do you know for sure that you are?
Are you going into your garden and picking stuff fresh, just before you eat them? If you buy them from supermarkets how do you know how long they've been there, how they've been stored, and what they've been sprayed or coated with to keep them fresh. I grow some of my own, but nowhere near enough to keep me going through the winter.
Nature leaves wide margins - most people eating a half decent diet will not have deficiencies and will not need a multivitamin.
No need to agonise over whether your fruit is super fresh or what supermarkets do.
Take a specific supplement for a specific issue - eg folic acid in pregnancy.
But this ' you think your diet is ok but you can't be sure' just seems a selling gimmick to get people to buy something they don't need.
5 -
dmcmillan74 wrote: »It was through a blood test that I found out I was vitamin D deficient. From what I have heard from other doctors, the only vitamin and mineral you should supplement is vitamin D and zinc. All other vitamin and minerals you can through food. They you get rid most of the vitamins and minerals if you are already eating healthy or you intestines are clogged.
Or if you have all of your intestines. People who have had intestinal resections are usually prescribed something to aid the vitamin deficiency because of loss of partial GI tract.2
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions