Message Boards › Debate: Health and Fitness
raven56706
Posts: 896Member, Premium Member
Posts: 896Member, Premium Member
Too much cardio is unnecessary for losing weight while lifting
raven56706
Posts: 896Member, Premium Member
Posts: 896Member, Premium Member
I have seen this countless times. So just curious.
say your goal is the lose weight and you are on a calorie deficit.
If you are doing a 45 minute weight session, would another 30 minute Peloton ride be too much? Means now you are working out for 75 minutes.
why is it too much cardio hurts your results or is it not that serious?
say your goal is the lose weight and you are on a calorie deficit.
If you are doing a 45 minute weight session, would another 30 minute Peloton ride be too much? Means now you are working out for 75 minutes.
why is it too much cardio hurts your results or is it not that serious?
Replies
All that is necessary for weight loss is to eat less than you burn. That can be done through diet alone without exercise of any kind.
Many people like the extra calorie burn from cardio. Many people like the strength and muscle preservation from strength training.
Starting a new exercise regime, cardio or strength or a combination, or increasing exercise will lead to water retention. The water retention will mask fat loss.
Overdoing exercise, again cardio or strength or in combination, has the potential to lead to injury.
Also, increasing exercise may lead to increased hunger that can set people back on their weight loss goals because they are eating in a smaller deficit than previously.
Cardio and lifting do different things, but other than an overall need for energy, they shouldn't conflict.
Maybe biking on leg day would be a challenge, but as long as your weights are the same or increasing and your recovery time is the same, it isn't going to result in overtraining for most people.
scholarworks.csun.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.3/198593/Helms-ER-Recommendation-2015.pdf?sequence=1
Personally, as a former (reformed?) runner, I like doing some cardio. So I do a couple of hours of HIIT a week and some vigorous walking for 30 minutes or so a couple of days a week. And right now I'm in a calorie deficit with some refeeds on the weekend (that's what I'm calling my weekend cheating when it comes to food, a refeed lol). I have been in a calorie deficit for a couple of months and my resistance training hasn't suffered much. Of course I started out about 23% bf so I had some extra fluffiness to fuel my body.
I have never heard anything like this...
I review much of the data from the military physical readiness courses and it isn't so much that cardio or lifting hurts results, but what do you prioritize?
So if your goal is to develop muscle you should prioritize those activities - progressive lifting, hypertrophy, surplus, etc.
I don't believe 30 mins of aerobic activity is going to hurt results.
one person i read on it says "Say you want to undertake a fat loss diet. At a point you are going to turn to cardio to help you create a caloric deficit along with calorie drops. If you are already doing 60 minutes of cardio 5x per week, you’re going to have to ADD to this. Now you’re doing 75minutes of cardio 6x per week or something similar. That’s a lot of cardio. Especially if you don’t really have the time to add 75 minutes of cardio on top of a 60-90 minute lifting session every day. "
so i ask for a person like say myself who's primary goal is to just lose weight and maintain muscle that i have(full body weight lifting 4 days a week), how much cardio is acceptable? i ask as i like riding my Peloton bike but just don't want it affecting my main goal.
Aside from all that, why not do the 30 minutes on the Peloton on a non lifting day? That would really be optimal. On the lifting day, warm up, lift with focus and intensity. On the next day put in a good Peloton ride.
Is that calorie deficit reasonable in the first place for amount to lose to healthy weight?
Is that same reasonable deficit kept in place when doing all the exercise which adds to your daily burn?
Meaning when you do more you eat more.
Or was the deficit just increased to unreasonable amount because you didn't take the exercise into account?
Unreasonable can easily mean poor recovery.
Is there recovery from one to allow the other, is there waiting for one to allow the recovery to the other.
Meaning you do a good lifting workout - which means recovery for rebuilding can take 24-48 hrs.
Idea is to rebuild stronger say, not just to spin your wheels lifting weight.
Do you do a serious intense or long cardio session within the repair/recovery period - diminishing what your body could have gotten from the lifting workout?
The mis-named Fat Burning HR zone used to be known as the Active Recovery HR zone - for a reason - gentle enough to aid recovery, get the blood flowing - provide benefit (of course not for hours and hours).
And it shouldn't knock the muscles out so badly you can't do another good lifting workout the next day - which would now be about 48 hrs away from prior lifting workout.
As you can imagine - you throw a bad big deficit in on some badly times workouts - you can get some negative results to mainly the lifting - cardio may not suffer at all.
You don't need cardio to lose weight. It can make things easier, but it's not necessary. If I was already doing 60 minutes of cardio 5x per week and I needed to lose weight, I'd cut those calories from my diet, not add more cardio.
You're overthinking this. You do as much cardio as you like or don't like, provided for adequate recovery. When I was regularly doing cycling endurance events, I was lifting full body 3x per week and riding 100+ miles per week...it didn't keep me from losing weight.
No cardio or other exercise in necessary to lose weight. Just a calorie deficit. Do whatever cardio you choose. Do your weight training program and eat at an appropriate and reasonable deficit. You will lose weight.
And maybe stop reading these silly articles?
There is an "interference" effect between running and lifting. It isn't huge, and we don't know exactly why it happens. The best guess is the concentric muscle contractions in running. This is specific to running, but a lot of bros generalize to all cardio, probably because lifting culture isn't so hot on cardio.
Also, you're losing calories on your peleton, you'll have to eat them back if muscle gain is your goal.
But that brings us to the point. You're probably not going to build a ton of muscle in a calorie deficit anyway. Your goal at this point should be to maintain what you have (if you can build some that's a bonus) until you get to goal weight, and then recomp. If you look at it that way, you can forget all the bro-science.
Ok so in my case
Is there a reason you have decided not to just input your stats and goal into this app, and let it do the math for you based on your setup and using your diary every day?
It’s important to point out that “interferes” does not mean “prevents”. It is quite possible to do high volumes of cardio and still increase strength and mass. You just can’t maximize your gainz.
For the average person who will never come close to maximizing their genetic potential, it makes almost no difference.
I’m eating just alittle under the Fat Loss amount. That is based on 4 days of working out.
I did but from I read here that you can either do what MFP offers or what IIFYM puts as a goal. Is there an advantage just going through MFPs calculations?
I would agree. Better for the average person to get the cardio in along with the resistance work.
This article suggest that a modest bit of long low intensity cardio can improve recovery and therefore improve the results of your higher intensity efforts.
http://robertsontrainingsystems.com/blog/long-duration-low-intensity-cardio/
Not necessarily. Just understand which method you are using and follow it accordingly. The amount of cardio you are doing is fine. How much weight have you lost in the last 60 to 90 days.