Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Is it really all that bad to be slighly underweight?
Replies
-
I understand from your posts here that you went through medical education a few decades back. I'm thinking you may not have IT experience?
As for screening tools, they are ways to deal with populations, not individuals. It is the type of thing that is used, for example, to determine whether or not people potentially qualify for drug trials. If they don't pass the screening, they are not considered. If they do, they are interviewed and if they pass that stage, they are invited for a medical examination. Only after that, are they possibly included.
Screening is a way to make an expensive and/or difficult process simpler. Nothing more.
For the rest, unfortunately, it *is* necessary to repeat certain things ad nauseam. One of my favourite examples of that is homœopathy. Even though it was debunked almost as soon as it was created, in the late 1700s, We *still* have to instruct people on why this is nonsensical quackery and there are *still* people dying because they believe in it anyway.
Something similar is the case with BMI. It was created by a 19th century Belgian statistician. Yet, so many people, especially in the English-speaking world, are still applying it in the wrong way. That is what lack of science education does to people.
1 -
cmriverside wrote: »BartBVanBockstaele wrote: »cmriverside wrote: »<snip>
MFP may have cut out its calculator, who knows why - but BMI calculations certainly havent been cut from websites such as Heart Foundation nor has it stopped being used in places like GP surgeries.
https://www.myfitnesspal.com/tools/bmi-calculator
(It's under "Apps" - along with other useful tools. )
Oh, for Pete sake.
I linked to the STILL WORKING TOOL.
No need to come here and correct me. I don't use the (still available) tool, I just use the NIH one. Your post is written in quite the condescending tone and was not necessary - but thanks for playing.
In that case, we both seem to have interinterpreted each other's intentions. I apologise for that. Condescension was not the intention.0 -
perhaps look at tone of your posts then - as I thought same about condescending on posts to me.
You seem to think you are the expert on everything - or at least that is how your posts come across.
I know how to use BMI and do so frequently in my job - I didnt need and I doubt anyone else does and it hijacks OP's thread, a detailed step by step of how to calculate BMI.
Back to OP's topic please.11
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions