Anyone else not believe in "starvation mode?"
Replies
-
America is fat because of the poor food quality. Poor kinds of carb people eat and food that are loaded with different kinds of sugar. In America, everything has to be "sweet"(aka loaded with sugar)
This is a very good lecture.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpllomiDMX0
Hmmm so it has nothing to do with calories then? Thats a relief
From what I can deduce from his lecture, it has to do with the kind of carb/calorie people consume.
Basically boils down to food. To get your calories, will you want to get it from white rice or white sugar?
< gets calories from black rice and black sugar...
LOVE black rice... so good for you!
Haven't tried black sugar. I've got to look into it0 -
America is fat because of the poor food quality. Poor kinds of carb people eat and food that are loaded with different kinds of sugar. In America, everything has to be "sweet"(aka loaded with sugar). Chickens, Cows, Hogs fed with antibiotics, GMO crops (usually to be resistant to pesticides)...
This is a very good lecture.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpllomiDMX0
carb people?
Yes. Carb people.
0 -
Makes me wonder, do Koreans and Japanese "count" their calories and fat intake obsessively or do they just have better portioned diet? They also walk more than most North Americans, which eliminates the "need" to go to the gym weekly.
Both countries have less than 5% obesity rates.
North Koreans or South Koreans?0 -
Makes me wonder, do Koreans and Japanese "count" their calories and fat intake obsessively or do they just have better portioned diet? They also walk more than most North Americans, which eliminates the "need" to go to the gym weekly.
Both countries have less than 5% obesity rates.
North Koreans or South Koreans?
But wouldn't that question bring us potentially back to the question at hand about starvation mode?0 -
America is fat because of the poor food quality. Poor kinds of carb people eat and food that are loaded with different kinds of sugar. In America, everything has to be "sweet"(aka loaded with sugar)
This is a very good lecture.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpllomiDMX0
Hmmm so it has nothing to do with calories then? Thats a relief
From what I can deduce from his lecture, it has to do with the kind of carb/calorie people consume.
Basically boils down to food. To get your calories, will you want to get it from white rice or white sugar?
< gets calories from black rice and black sugar...
LOVE black rice... so good for you!
Haven't tried black sugar. I've got to look into it
well you know that old saying..once you go black, you don't go back...0 -
America is fat because of the poor food quality. Poor kinds of carb people eat and food that are loaded with different kinds of sugar. In America, everything has to be "sweet"(aka loaded with sugar)
This is a very good lecture.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpllomiDMX0
Hmmm so it has nothing to do with calories then? Thats a relief
From what I can deduce from his lecture, it has to do with the kind of carb/calorie people consume.
Basically boils down to food. To get your calories, will you want to get it from white rice or white sugar?
< gets calories from black rice and black sugar...
LOVE black rice... so good for you!
Haven't tried black sugar. I've got to look into it
well you know that old saying..once you go black, you don't go back...
Shame on you!
Y'all are riceists!0 -
America is fat because of the poor food quality. Poor kinds of carb people eat and food that are loaded with different kinds of sugar. In America, everything has to be "sweet"(aka loaded with sugar)
This is a very good lecture.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpllomiDMX0
Hmmm so it has nothing to do with calories then? Thats a relief
From what I can deduce from his lecture, it has to do with the kind of carb/calorie people consume.
Basically boils down to food. To get your calories, will you want to get it from white rice or white sugar?
< gets calories from black rice and black sugar...
LOVE black rice... so good for you!
Haven't tried black sugar. I've got to look into it
well you know that old saying..once you go black, you don't go back...
Shame on you!
Y'all are riceists!
LMAO!0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Your argument is much like the starvation mode argument. By and large inappropriately misused by most people. Yes the type of calorie matters. However as most people don't get the basic in and out concept getting into the nuance of what type of calorie in and type of calorie out is really overkill for the average individual trying to lose weight. 3000 "healthy" calories in and 2000 out will still result in weight increase. Just like 2000 "bad" caloreis in and 3000 out will still result in weight loss. None of which relates to starvation mode which is the topic of this thread.
There is no way an individual would take in 3000 "healthy" calories unless he is 8 foot tall. If you are full, your brains will hardly crave for food, therefore, you will not have the urge to eat.
And 2000 "bad calories" are likely to result to diabetes and other complications.
Again, will you rather take your calories from white sugar from from white rice (or wheat)? Hunger pangs relate to the brains and hunger pangs relate to calorie intake. Would you rather not eat in you are hungry when you've reached your calorie goal or would you rather eat food that make you feel full at the amount of your goal?
If there's nothing in your stomach, your brain will think it is hungry despite meeting his/her calorie goals0 -
Shame on you!
Y'all are riceists!
That had me truly giggling. Which is the real world equivalent of LMFFAO !
0 -
:blushing:0
-
In for more Peachygirl14 logic.
0 -
In for more Peachygirl14 logic.
Yeah...that was kind of entertaining in a WTF are you talking about kind of way....0 -
My fault for trying to reason w the unreasonable... Lol0
-
My fault for trying to reason w the unreasonable... Lol
Lol its also called common sense and alot of ppl lack it so there for think that they can try to talk about anything with out any common sense behind it0 -
My fault for trying to reason w the unreasonable... Lol
Lol its also called common sense and alot of ppl lack it so there for think that they can try to talk about anything with out any common sense behind it
At least I think I do. If I am deciphering your post correctly. Not sure.0 -
My fault for trying to reason w the unreasonable... Lol
Lol its also called common sense and alot of ppl lack it so there for think that they can try to talk about anything with out any common sense behind it
At least I think I do. If I am deciphering your post correctly. Not sure.
Lol I hope you do....Well Im just saying usually ppl who lack common sense talk nonsense even when they try to appear to be talking about something smart0 -
My fault for trying to reason w the unreasonable... Lol
Lol its also called common sense and alot of ppl lack it so there for think that they can try to talk about anything with out any common sense behind it
At least I think I do. If I am deciphering your post correctly. Not sure.
Love that image! I totally want to put it in my office! I was just saying the other day that some people just LOVE to pet and love on their neurosis/diagnosis.0 -
My fault for trying to reason w the unreasonable... Lol
Lol its also called common sense and alot of ppl lack it so there for think that they can try to talk about anything with out any common sense behind it
At least I think I do. If I am deciphering your post correctly. Not sure.
Love that image! I totally want to put it in my office! I was just saying the other day that some people just LOVE to pet and love on their neurosis/diagnosis.
Yes, well...um...my little neurosis may be clearer once you see the source of the image :laugh:
http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/04/alot-is-better-than-you-at-everything.html?m=10 -
My fault for trying to reason w the unreasonable... Lol
Lol its also called common sense and alot of ppl lack it so there for think that they can try to talk about anything with out any common sense behind it
[/quote]
At least I think I do. If I am deciphering your post correctly. Not sure.
[/quote]
Love that image! I totally want to put it in my office! I was just saying the other day that some people just LOVE to pet and love on their neurosis/diagnosis.
[/quote]
Yes, well...um...my little neurosis may be clearer once you see the source of the image :laugh:
http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/04/alot-is-better-than-you-at-everything.html?m=1
[/quote]
I get what you mean now0 -
Lol I hope you do....Well Im just saying usually ppl who lack common sense talk nonsense even when they try to appear to be talking about something smart
ha. Jennagan, I haz a gif for that too.
0 -
AMAZING!0
-
AMAZING!
It's against The Guidelines to be grammar Nazis...but I love it a lot.0 -
Lol I hope you do....Well Im just saying usually ppl who lack common sense talk nonsense even when they try to appear to be talking about something smart
ha. Jennagan, I haz a gif for that too.
Haz are you making fun of my ppl now lol okay people better lol good attitude though. One thing I learned years ago with the "internet" cant always take everything so serious0 -
Totally made my day y'all... Too funny!0
-
Terminology should be changed from "starvation mode" to "extreme calorie deficit".
Yeah, I feel ya, but if you do that people are going to connect the dots between "extreme calorie deficit" leads to "extreme weight loss".0 -
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2012/07/24/3549931.htm
^ An obese man went 1 year and 17 days without food. He lost 125 kilograms of weight and only regained 7 after going back on food. He was constantly monitored , given multivitamins, and did experience some low potassium in the middle which they resolved by giving him supplements.
http://pmj.bmj.com/content/49/569/203.short
^ The actual medical report0 -
"Starvation Mode" is real, but many people that use the term don't really understand what it really is.
The body is always in a state of flux, but if your deficit is too large that your body cannot break down fat stores fast enough, then your body will begin to use muscle as fuel, as well as reducing non-life sustaining functions. This will effect hair, nails, skin, alertness, energy, etc. The result is a slightly lower BMR, meaning the deficit that you thought was 1000 cals/day, may really only be 800 or so, due to your body reacting to the large deficit to "preserve" itself. So the downside is a slower than expected weight loss.
There is also the issue of malnutrition, Many on VLCD do not get the required micro nutrients and over time can have negative health side effects.
this!!0 -
Are you entertained?0
-
Are you entertained?0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions