2000 reasons why GMO foods are safe

tproctor

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonentine/2013/10/14/2000-reasons-why-gmos-are-safe-to-eat-and-environmentally-sustainable/

Confuzzled4ever

hahahaha..


So in..

Achrya

Tagging because...well you all know why.

_TastySnoBalls_

in for cancer

randomtai

In so in.

SunofaBeach14

In for science and tinfoil

ThickMcRunFast

I don't want to...but i'm in.

Confuzzled4ever

I do wish GMO food were labeled better. I'd prefer not to eat them.

fxg20

GM foods are safe and predictable. The alternative breeding method is to wait for random mutations to improve food, and then you have no idea what you are getting. With GM you know exactly what you have added and what, if any, safety concerns might be present.

Dnarules

I don't want to...but i'm in.

:laugh:

Confuzzled4ever

GM foods are safe and predictable. The alternative breeding method is to wait for random mutations to improve food, and then you have no idea what you are getting. With GM you know exactly what you have added and what, if any, safety concerns might be present.

So you're saying science trumps mother nature..

Charlottesometimes23

Good luck convincing the antiGMO crowd OP. I've been down that path and it always ends in tears. :laugh:

Charlottesometimes23

GM foods are safe and predictable. The alternative breeding method is to wait for random mutations to improve food, and then you have no idea what you are getting. With GM you know exactly what you have added and what, if any, safety concerns might be present.

So you're saying science trumps mother nature..

By the term Mother Nature I assume that you're referring to process of random mutation and natural selection? Otherwise, what is Mother Nature?

magerum

GM foods are safe and predictable. The alternative breeding method is to wait for random mutations to improve food, and then you have no idea what you are getting. With GM you know exactly what you have added and what, if any, safety concerns might be present.

So you're saying science trumps mother nature..

Yes. Thank you deodorant.

_SABOTEUR_

GM foods are safe and predictable. The alternative breeding method is to wait for random mutations to improve food, and then you have no idea what you are getting. With GM you know exactly what you have added and what, if any, safety concerns might be present.

So you're saying science trumps mother nature..

Do you have a pet? Bred by humans to be domesticated. Defying Mother Nature.

Organic food? Bred by humans to be as plump and tasty as possible. Defying Mother Nature.

This argument is centuries old. I don't know why people think it's something new...

_SABOTEUR_

I read the article.

No evidence was found that DNA absorbed through the GI tract could be integrated into human cells—a popular anti-GMO criticism.

People geniunely believe that genetic material from GM foods can get into a human's blood stream and fuse with our dna?

:laugh:

:noway:

Kenazwa

GM foods are safe and predictable. The alternative breeding method is to wait for random mutations to improve food, and then you have no idea what you are getting. With GM you know exactly what you have added and what, if any, safety concerns might be present.

So you're saying science trumps mother nature..

Do you have a pet? Bred by humans to be domesticated. Defying Mother Nature.

Organic food? Bred by humans to be as plump and tasty as possible. Defying Mother Nature.

This argument is centuries old. I don't know why people think it's something new...

A lot different than splicing something like fish dna into food to deter pests.

Achrya

GM foods are safe and predictable. The alternative breeding method is to wait for random mutations to improve food, and then you have no idea what you are getting. With GM you know exactly what you have added and what, if any, safety concerns might be present.

So you're saying science trumps mother nature..

Do you have a pet? Bred by humans to be domesticated. Defying Mother Nature.

Organic food? Bred by humans to be as plump and tasty as possible. Defying Mother Nature.

This argument is centuries old. I don't know why people think it's something new...

A lot different than splicing something like fish dna into food to deter pests.

And yet still very much the same.

Also I like fish. As far as I know eating fish doesn't hurt me any. Why do I care if my produce is part fish?

_SABOTEUR_

GM foods are safe and predictable. The alternative breeding method is to wait for random mutations to improve food, and then you have no idea what you are getting. With GM you know exactly what you have added and what, if any, safety concerns might be present.

So you're saying science trumps mother nature..

Do you have a pet? Bred by humans to be domesticated. Defying Mother Nature.

Organic food? Bred by humans to be as plump and tasty as possible. Defying Mother Nature.

This argument is centuries old. I don't know why people think it's something new...

A lot different than splicing something like fish dna into food to deter pests.

Why? It's changing the genetic makeup of something either way.

Also, have you ever been vaccinated?

tproctor

Well, I was not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am simply posting an article i felt would be of interest.

Dnarules

GM foods are safe and predictable. The alternative breeding method is to wait for random mutations to improve food, and then you have no idea what you are getting. With GM you know exactly what you have added and what, if any, safety concerns might be present.

So you're saying science trumps mother nature..

Do you have a pet? Bred by humans to be domesticated. Defying Mother Nature.

Organic food? Bred by humans to be as plump and tasty as possible. Defying Mother Nature.

This argument is centuries old. I don't know why people think it's something new...

A lot different than splicing something like fish dna into food to deter pests.

Why? It's changing the genetic makeup of something either way.

Also, have you ever been vaccinated?

What does vaccination have to do with this.

BattleTaxi

I don't want to...but i'm in.

Me too!

MinMin97

You go ahead and eat them then. I don't want to eat them!

MinMin97

Well, I was not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am simply posting an article i felt would be of interest.

"Interest" or you just wanted some "lively" forum action.

ndj1979

in…because everyone else I know is in ….I am such a follower...

Achrya

You go ahead and eat them then. I don't want to eat them!

Don't worry, I do.

Lleldiranne

Tagging to come back later. These debates are always interesting [read: amusing]

prattiger65

A little late, but in.

Unknown

This content has been removed.

MinMin97

I'm sorry but you can't talk about GMO foods here.

Achrya

GM foods are safe and predictable. The alternative breeding method is to wait for random mutations to improve food, and then you have no idea what you are getting. With GM you know exactly what you have added and what, if any, safety concerns might be present.

So you're saying science trumps mother nature..

Do you have a pet? Bred by humans to be domesticated. Defying Mother Nature.

Organic food? Bred by humans to be as plump and tasty as possible. Defying Mother Nature.

This argument is centuries old. I don't know why people think it's something new...

A lot different than splicing something like fish dna into food to deter pests.

And yet still very much the same.

Also I like fish. As far as I know eating fish doesn't hurt me any. Why do I care if my produce is part fish?

Mmmmm Fishmato

IN for fishmato

Hmm.

I'd try it. I mean I like to put fish, tomatoes, sugar snap peas, and a little butter in the oven and let them get all.. Tasty and flavorful together. And then eat over rice.

This would cut down on 1/4 of the work!